Still affects xorg-lts-trusty (for Precise users)
** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
** Changed in: xorg-lts-trusty (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
It could be fixed in Ubuntu MATE if they had their own fork of Déjà-Dup,
like they have their own fork of Files, Gedit, Eye of GNOME, Evince,
GNOME Terminal, File Roller.
Another Nautilus fork, Nemo, retained the name Files for its icon in the
menus. Didn't MATE did the same?
I can only suggest t
I have recently encountered that message during the verification step of
a backup. This was extremely disconcerting, as the data being backed up
was user data with adequate permissions.
Déjà Dup should not ask for elevated privileges without explaining why
it needs them, and it probably should not
Does it work though? In Caja? Do you get the restore/revert options when
you right-click?
Cause if I understand correctly those are allowed by libdeja-dup.so in
/usr/lib/[x86_64-linux-gnu]/nautilus/extensions-3.0, so perhaps Caja
looks into a different directory (.../caja/extensions-3.0?).
"Files
I'm glad we could help!
All the best
Naël
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to deja-dup in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652410
Title:
Undescriptive duplicity/collection-status error when the backup
directory c
The file and function I examined are those mentioned in the traceback
reported by David for Ubuntu 16.04, deja-dup 34.2-0ubuntu1.1, duplicity
0.7.06-2ubuntu2:
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/collections.py",
line 105, in add_filename
(self.volume_name_dict, filename)
Ass
** Attachment added: "deja-dup.log2"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1652410/+attachment/4804856/+files/deja-dup.log2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to deja-dup in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652410
I have also replicated the bug, on Ubuntu 14.04 deja-dup 30.0 duplicity
0.6.23 (haven't got a more recent version yet but David has), as a
newly-created user with the default Déjà-Dup settings:
1. Perform the first full backup and check that the backup, the file
signatures, and the manifest file h
>> To fix this bug from happening in the future, we could perhaps
>> restrict the file list that is passed from Déjà-Dup to duplicity
>> collection-status? Perhaps to *.{diff,sig}tar.{gz,gpg} and
>> *.manifest files only, or something like that?
> This sounds good to me!
On further investigation,
** Summary changed:
- duja-dup AssertionError: ({1: 'duplicity-full.20161129T015237Z.vol1.difftar'}
+ Undescriptive duplicity/collection-status error when the backup directory
contains two volumes with different file names and same volume number in the
same backup set
** Changed in: deja-dup (U
>> You apparently performed a full backup on 2016-11-29 at 01:52 UTC,
>> did everything work fine during this backup? Was it successful ?
> Don't think so
Don't think so either, because your full backup on that date is only one
volume long and that volume is 120 bytes long:
ls -l /home/david/Dr
Thanks for the information. First of all, as reported by the log file
you sent and the listing of your backup directory, there is an
uncompressed backup volume in your volume directory, and an uncompressed
file of files signatures, created or last modified on Dec 22:
duplicity-full.20161129T0152
Also, from the content of your log-file, I've got the impression that
there isn't a single well-formed backup chain in your backup directory.
Can you check with:
ls -l /home/david/Dropbox/Backups
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subsc
You apparently performed a full backup on 2016-11-29 at 01:52 UTC, did
everything work fine during this backup? Was it successful ?
When did you run first into this problem - on the first incremental
backup ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, whi
The "status" Vej refers to is the bug status, on this web page, to
switch from "incomplete" to "new".
Thanks for the log. Can you please show the content of your cache
directory?
ls -lR ~/.cache/deja-dup
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which
It's because you're using the fish shell instead of the more common bash
shell. If I understand correctly, the fish translation of Vej's command
is:
env DEJA_DUP_DEBUG=1 deja-dup --backup | tail -n 1000 > /tmp/deja-
dup.log
or:
set -x DEJA_DUP_DEBUG 1
deja-dup --backup | tail -n 1000 > /tm
Thanks for this log. It shows that your current backup chain started on
Oct 10, contains the offending incremental backup (Dec 19 to Dec 20),
and has later incremental backups (three more on Dec 20, one on Dec 21,
one on Dec 22, one on Dec 30). You can see for yourself under "primary
backup chain"
Could this be a message from duplicity instead?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to deja-dup in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1600783
Title:
Not translated string
Status in Déjà Dup:
Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu
To create a new full backup, simply backup to a new location, or move
the files in the current location to some other place. Déjà Dup will
detect the absence of previous backups and start a new full backup.
The backup location is the directory that stores the duplicity files
that Déjà Dup produces
@D. Schuurman:
> Perhaps the "on-demand" installation only checks when new backups are
configured?
Yes, I believe so, it matches my experience. Also, see bugs 1606449 and
1641423. If I understand correctly, it's not duplicity and python-gi
we're supposed to install (by hand or through this "on-de
The link you provided (http://askubuntu.com/q/787244/25388) shows you
solved the dependency problem (it's indeed a matter of installing deja-
dup AND deja-dup-backend-gvfs), so I'm closing this bug. See also bugs
1606449 and 1641423 for more about this dependency issue.
The other problem you menti
The preferred source for Flash is now adobe-flashplugin from partner,
not pepperflashplugin-nonfree from multiverse. It has been so for all
supported releases of Ubuntu, including Precise, since 2015-05.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Chromium/Getting-Flash
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flas
** Summary changed:
- Pepper Flash needs backport to 12.04
+ Pepper Flash needs to be backported to 12.04
** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chrom
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to flashplugin-nonfree in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1517387
Title:
Adobe flash player issue
Status
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1544684 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544684
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1544684
package flashplugin-installer 11.2.202.569ubuntu0.14.04.1 failed to
install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should
reins
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1581874 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1581874
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1581874
package flashplugin-installer 11.2.202.621ubuntu0.16.04.1 failed to
install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
--
You received th
** Package changed: deja-dup (Ubuntu) => deja-dup
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to deja-dup in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783730
Title:
Unable to exclude files by extension/filetype
Status in Déjà Dup:
Co
** Summary changed:
- déja dup does not have an option to exclude hidden files (~save.txt or
.config.txt)
+ No option to exclude all hidden files (e.g. save.txt~ or .config.txt)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to deja-dup i
** Summary changed:
- deja-dup backs-up a lot of rubbish
+ Doesn't exclude as many cache directories as it could
** Package changed: deja-dup (Ubuntu) => deja-dup
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to deja-dup in Ubuntu.
https
Ctrl-H, or right-clicking "Show Hidden Files", works in all Nautilus
file selection dialog boxes, it's not something that's specific to Déjà
Dup.
I agree that I, too, discovered that feature per chance.
If you think it should be easier to show hidden files and directories in
file selection dialog
For people like Mathias having a GPG error similar to "block_filter,
read error, pending bytes":
DUPLICITY: ERROR 31 GPGError
DUPLICITY: . GPGError: GPG Failed, see log below:
DUPLICITY: . = Begin GnuPG log =
DUPLICITY: . gpg: CAST5 encrypted data
DUPLICITY: . gpg: encrypted with 1 passphr
** Package changed: deja-dup (Ubuntu) => deja-dup
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to deja-dup in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313034
Title:
Deja-dup reports it couldn't backup ~/.cache and ~/.gvfs even though
There are several other reports of Déjà Dup repeatedly prompting for the
encryption passphrase when encountering a GPG error (although not
necessarily the same as that in Mathias's log) during an incremental
backup, and only successfully completing full backups. See e.g.
# "encrypted message has b
Not a duplicate of #840393/#681002 because the GPG error is different
(not "Bad CA certificate").
However it looks like it's the same as the one reported by Mathias Binke
in #989750.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to deja-d
Also, same signs of full backups succeeding, so probably same bug as
#989750 indeed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/989750
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to deja-dup in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 681002
gpg: problem with the agent: Bad CA certificate
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to deja-dup in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/883742
Title:
Deja Dup keeps aski
Other users have reported that Déjà Dup repeatedly prompts for the
passphrase over a GPG error (although not necessarily the same as yours)
during incremental backups, and only successfully completes full
backups. See the following bug report and add duplicate status if
appropriate.
https://bugs.l
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 792763 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792763
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 792763
SMB Error: "Backup Failed. Success"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to deja-du
The trash can (US)/rubbish bin (UK) is at ~/.local/share/Trash and
doesn't exist if you've never put anything into.
Adding it back through Déjà Dup's GUI requires right-clicking in the
dialog box to select Show Hidden Files and get into .local, otherwise
from the command line you can run
$ gset
** Package changed: deja-dup (Ubuntu) => deja-dup
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to deja-dup in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056147
Title:
Deja Dup should use inotify or Zeitgeist to get the list of changed
I've just updated another computer's HWE stack from Trusty (xserver-
xorg) to Vivid (xserver-xorg-lts-vivid) and can confirm again that this
bug has been fixed, starting from when you update to Vivid HWE stack.
The /etc/X11/X symlink is still deleted when one purges the remnants of
the previous st
** Changed in: xorg-lts-vivid (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132736
Title:
Xorg fails to start after installing the Har
Timo: sorry, I misread your comment, my bad. The symlink is gone, but
indeed, as you mention, the system continues to work: X starts normally
on the next boot. I wonder how.
Anyway, bug fixed, starting from when you update to -vivid HWE stack
(xserver-xorg-lts-vivid). Good thing, thanks to whoever
Removed "on precise" from bug title because it happens on trusty too.
** Tags added: trusty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132736
Title:
Xorg fails to start after insta
Timo: I don't know exactly for the 14.04.3 LTS -utopic to -vivid HWE
upgrade, but I can confirm this bug is still present for the 14.04.3 LTS
-trusty to -vivid HWE upgrade.
I've just done a fresh install of 14.04.x LTS, using a PXE server so I'm
not exactly sure what the x was in the image I used.
Packages nvidia-331-* are now transitional packages for version 340
where this bug has been fixed, so I guess they can be marked as Fix
Released too. Thanks everyone involved esp. Alberto for your work.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is s
This bug has never been fixed and will never be fixed. Unity 2D is not
used anymore.
** Changed in: unity-2d
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to unity-2d in Ubuntu.
Matching subscriptions: dp-uni
** Changed in: unity-2d
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to unity-2d in Ubuntu.
Matching subscriptions: dp-unity2d
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002710
Title:
Dash will not op
This bug has never been fixed and will never be fixed. Unity 2D is not
used anymore.
** Changed in: unity-2d (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to unity-2d in Ubuntu.
Matching subscription
I forgot to mention, but when this problems appears, unplugging and
replugging the scanner (or switching it off and on) does not make the
problem go away, as far as I have noticed. Only rebooting sometimes make
things work.
Updated SANE from 1.0.22 (-7ubuntu1) to 1.0.25 (-git20150516-precise0)
usi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1410932
package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified:
lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: tentative de
remplacement de « /lib/udev/ru
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715
package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified:
lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rule
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715
package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified:
lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rule
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715
package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified:
lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rule
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715
package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified:
lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rule
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715
package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified:
lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rule
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715
package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified:
lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rule
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715
package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified:
lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rule
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715
package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified:
lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rule
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715
package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified:
lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rule
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715
package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified:
lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rule
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1434782
package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified:
lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: tentata
sovrascrittura di "/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules" (condiviso), diverso da
altre istanze del pacchetto libsane:i386
--
Y
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1434782
package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified:
lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: tentata
sovrascrittura di "/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules" (condiviso), diverso da
altre istanze del pacchetto libsane:i386
--
Public bug reported:
OS/Kernel: Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS (GNU/Linux 3.2.0-80-generic x86_64)
Scanner: Epson Stylus Office BX305FW, USB 2.0, id 0x04b8/0x0863
SANE: libsane_1.0.22-7ubuntu1, libsane-common_1.0.22-7ubuntu1,
sane-utils_1.0.22-7ubuntu1 (up-to-date 12.04 LTS)
Epson IScan: iscan_2.30.1-1, isca
I've changed the status of this old bug to Fix Released because I can't
reproduce it in the current version of Firefox (34.0). It was probably
unknowingly fixed at some point during the two years since it was
reported on Firefox 16.0 and 17.0. A lot of code changes in two years.
--
You received t
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081123
Title:
New Tab only displays the thumbnail of the first
This bug is still present in Firefox 17.0.1 [Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu;
Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0]. I have no idea why
it has been marked Invalid. Curtis, could you please elaborate? What can
I do to help troubleshoot this problem?
--
You received this bug notification bec
This bug is still present in Firefox 17.0.1. I have no idea why it has
been marked Invalid in Firefox's Bugzilla. I have also no idea what I
could do to help troubleshoot it.
Could the other person affected by this bug also report it upstream in
Firefox's Bugzilla bug report (link above)? Thanks.
Bug reported upstream in case someone wants to investigate.
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #814996
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=814996
** Also affects: firefox via
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=814996
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Yo
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0
Got Firefox 17 in the updates today. This bug is present.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081123
Public bug reported:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0
Firefox package version: 16.0.2+build1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1
Hi,
I'm using Firefox 16.0.2 on an up-to-date Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS, and my
settings are to clear history/cache when Firefox closes. In these
con
71 matches
Mail list logo
