On Wednesday 14 June 2006 20:16, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On 6/14/06, Calum Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Indeed... I've often thought that larger OSS projects might benefit
> > from a "feedback squad"
>
> That could prove difficult. One of the unfortunate tendencies within
> the open source com
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 17:55, Tim Bray wrote:
> End users didn't
> invent mice, windows, hyperlinks, alt-tab, or "undo".
I'm sure they invented "undo". Multiple times even. :-)
___
Desktop_architects mailing list
Desktop_architects@lists.osdl.org
On 6/12/06, Bryce Harrington <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Chang-Won,Thanks for giving this update on the sub-working group activities. Inthese activities, have you discussed including open source developersin your region that might not otherwise be involved in dtl?
...
So to your question about
On 14 Jun 2006, at 20:31, Gregory Raiz wrote:
> Traditional usability will allow you to collect feedback on
> observable human
> behavior. Usability is typically not as good a tool for collecting
> feedback
> on broader design issues across a project.
>
> "I know I can't use it, but don't ask
Traditional usability will allow you to collect feedback on observable human
behavior. Usability is typically not as good a tool for collecting feedback
on broader design issues across a project.
"I know I can't use it, but don't ask me how to fix it."
Usability will tell you that a specific fun
On 14 Jun 2006, at 19:31, Bryce Harrington wrote:
>
> The approach we've taken is to encourage users with ideas, to make
> sure
> they're recorded in the RFE tracker (i.e., look for a similar idea
> already filed, and add to that, or create a new ticket if its a new
> idea.) This gets the feedb
On 14 Jun 2006, at 19:16, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On 6/14/06, Calum Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Indeed... I've often thought that larger OSS projects might benefit
>> from a "feedback squad"
>
> That could prove difficult. One of the unfortunate tendencies within
> the open source community
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 06:55:13PM +0100, Calum Benson wrote:
>
> On 14 Jun 2006, at 18:23, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> >
> > we also tend to do a crappy job of dealing with the input when we
> > get it.
> > well, some of us anyways. we're painting with broad brush strokes
> > here that
> > don't
On 6/14/06, Calum Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indeed... I've often thought that larger OSS projects might benefit
> from a "feedback squad"
That could prove difficult. One of the unfortunate tendencies within
the open source community - of both users and developers - is to try
and "educate
On Jun 14, 2006, at 1:55 PM, Calum Benson wrote:
> Indeed... I've often thought that larger OSS projects might benefit
> from a "feedback squad" in much the same way that they have bug
> squads... a team of people whose job is to patrol mailing lists, web
> forums, IRC and bug reports, and collate
On 14 Jun 2006, at 18:23, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>
> we also tend to do a crappy job of dealing with the input when we
> get it.
> well, some of us anyways. we're painting with broad brush strokes
> here that
> don't cover everyone equally =)
Indeed... I've often thought that larger OSS projec
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 10:55, Tim Bray wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> >> With
> >> few exceptions, most open source developers are really just users
> >> that
> >> got very passionate and curious. ;-)
>
> I *really* don't think so. Most OSS developers are people who
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Bryce Harrington wrote:
>>
>> With
>> few exceptions, most open source developers are really just users
>> that
>> got very passionate and curious. ;-)
I *really* don't think so. Most OSS developers are people who like
computers and like programming computers and like
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Bryce Harrington wrote:
>
> But the whole idea of open source is that it is open _to users_. With
> few exceptions, most open source developers are really just users that
> got very passionate and curious. ;-)
>
> Thus the OSS development model works when users go beyond
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 08:42:46PM +0900, Chang-Won Ahn (ETRI) wrote:
> On 6/9/06, SAKUMA Junichi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Discussions
> >- Food for thoughts by Jun Iio, Mitsubishi Research Institute
> > - Linux has only 5% share of the client market. Why so poor?
> > - Do we let MS rule for
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 08:42:46PM +0900, Chang-Won Ahn (ETRI) wrote:
> Hi, guys,
>
> I want to add some background informtion of OSS activities in Asia,
> especially, in CJK (China, Japan, Korea).
>
> I hope this debate to be a good chance to find a clue to motivate asian
> developers
> to activ
Hi, guys, I want to add some background informtion of OSS activities in Asia, especially, in CJK (China, Japan, Korea).4 years ago, CJK (China, Japan, and Korea) has made CJK OSS Promotion Forum to promote OSS in our countires. At that time, each country has also made its own
national OSS Promotion
17 matches
Mail list logo
