Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release

2022-04-25 Thread Daniel Kulp
emq-5.17.1 > > Please vote to approve this release: > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> Talend - https://talend.com <https://talend.com/>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)

2021-04-20 Thread Daniel Kulp
t; > Git tag: > activemq-5.15.15 > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks ! > Regards >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #2)

2021-04-15 Thread Daniel Kulp
] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> - http://dankulp.com/blog <http://dankulp.com/blog> Talend - http://talend.com <http://coders.talend.com/>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.1 release

2021-01-15 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> - http://dankulp.com/blog <http://dankulp.com/blog> Talend - http://talend.com <http://coders.talend.com/>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

2020-12-04 Thread Daniel Kulp
5.15.14/ > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/> > > Git tag: > activemq-5.15.14 > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

2020-11-24 Thread Daniel Kulp
5.14/> > > Git tag: > activemq-5.15.14 > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks ! > Regar

Re: [DISCUSS] Draft proposal for terminology change

2020-07-27 Thread Daniel Kulp
Huge +1 from me. Major thanks for putting a concrete proposal together. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> - http://dankulp.com/blog <http://dankulp.com/blog> Talend - http://talend.com <http://talend.com/> > On Jul 25, 2020, at 11:39 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-06-29 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1, simple building and running basic tests looks OK -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> - http://dankulp.com/blog <http://dankulp.com/blog> Talend - http://talend.com <http://talend.com/> > On Jun 25, 2020, at 10:23 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wr

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.12 release (take #2)

2020-03-16 Thread Daniel Kulp
te to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> - http://dankulp.com/blog <http://dankulp.com/blog> Talend Community Coder - http://talend.com <http://coders.talend.com/>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.12 release

2020-03-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> - http://dankulp.com/blog <http://dankulp.com/blog> Talend Community Coder - http://talend.com <http://coders.talend.com/>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release (take #2)

2019-11-21 Thread Daniel Kulp
5.11 > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > -- > Jean-Baptiste

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to gitbox.apache.org

2018-12-10 Thread Daniel Kulp
'd echo your comment about being fine with it any time so long as >> noone is planning an imminent release. >> >> Robbie >> >> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 17:14, Daniel Kulp > <mailto:dk...@apache.org>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Y

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to gitbox.apache.org

2018-12-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
eer to start a vote, and if OK, I will deal with the infra. > > Thoughts ? > > Regards > JB > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org&

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.7

2018-10-24 Thread Daniel Kulp
/git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=commit;h=795a2533b1cd4883ca1b17e7cb86d9bbc20994c5 > > Please vote to approve this release. The vote will remain open for 72 > hours. > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.7 > [ ] -1 (provide specific comments)

Re: Webconsole deprecation

2018-04-26 Thread Daniel Kulp
That’s something that is easily fixed by the PMC if someone steps up to work on the console: vote them into the PMC. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: Thoughts on refactoring the ActiveMQ website

2017-12-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
I hacked the Confluence exporter a bit to grab the page content in different formats so we can see if one is easier to migrate or similar. I just pushed 3 new branches to this repo: body.only - this is basically the same HTML, but with all the “wrapper” stuff removed. Just the HTML of the

Re: Thoughts on refactoring the ActiveMQ website

2017-12-13 Thread Daniel Kulp
t;>>> On 12 Dec 2017, at 17:04, Clebert Suconic < >> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Exporting to MD and creating a gitbook seems like a big task, I >>>>> suspect >>>>>> any >>>>>>>> tool we use will cause a bunch of styling/content issues. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At least initially, how about we just create a nice landing page >>> that >>>>>>>> brings the ActiveMQ site and Artemis site together, and >>> refresh/align >>>>>> the >>>>>>>> existing content with some CSS? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was just looking for the minimal effort task. I thought that >>>>>>> converting these pages into a doc would be easier than converting >>> them >>>>>>> to another .css... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> if the conversion needed to be done anyways... I thought .md would >>> be >>>>>>> easier and having a better final presentation. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9& >>>> 5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E>>> >>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ >>>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/> >>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> perl -e 'print >>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E>> >>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ >>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/> >>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder >>> >> > > > > -- > perl -e 'print > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: Thoughts on refactoring the ActiveMQ website

2017-12-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
st we would need to convert the raw HTML files to >> Mardown >>> to >>>> put in git. I have experimented with some tools to convert HTML to >>> Markdown >>>> and they are less than ideal. Does anyone have any experience with >> this? >>>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Move PR discussions to another list...

2017-12-06 Thread Daniel Kulp
er places. (JIRA, private list.. >>> etc.. etc) >>> >>> >>> That seems a reasonable thing to me. It would help us to be more >>> active on the dev list.. which is what we need now. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 5:20 PM, j

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis becomes ActiveMQ 6

2017-12-06 Thread Daniel Kulp
iveMQ > 6. > > [+1] - agree > [-1] . - disagree and provide some reason > [0] - neutral but go ahead > > This vote will be open until Thursday, Dec 07 by the end of the day. > > Here is my +1 (PMC) vote. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Move PR discussions to another list...

2017-12-06 Thread Daniel Kulp
tyle and decrease noise. > > > > > > And.. do I need a VOTE for that? or just consensus here? -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: Time for another ASF board report

2017-10-19 Thread Daniel Kulp
mmunity driving the final usability and appearance. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: Time for another ASF board report

2017-10-18 Thread Daniel Kulp
;>>> >>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ >>>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/> >>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> perl -e 'print unpack("u30&

Re: [DISCUSS] release process improvements

2017-09-18 Thread Daniel Kulp
gt;>>> On 13 September 2017 at 17:52, Clebert Suconic >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I actually see how to make the copy into dev... let me play with it >>>>> >>>>> a >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> little bit >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Clebert Suconic >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> what about this: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Currently mvn release and mvn upload will always send the release >>>>> >>>>> to >>>>>>> >>>>>>> nexus, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So what about: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> - we provide an script to artemis to download the correct bits of >>>>> >>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> release, the release manager would use that script to perform such >>>>>>>>>>> download. >>>>>>>>>>> - The release manager would place it on the dev repository Robbie >>>>> >>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> mentioning... (that means.. we wouldn't really have an extra step). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On thing I'm not sure how to do is... how to upload it to the dev >>>>> >>>>> dist >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> and how we would make the final move? just a regular copy? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Robbie Gemmell >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 13 September 2017 at 14:35, Clebert Suconic >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:21 AM Robbie Gemmell < >>>>>>> >>>>>>> robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This was less about time, though there is some benefit in that >>>>>>> >>>>>>> regard, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with how much depending on how particular people actually verify >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> checksums I guess. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually this is kind of moot. nexus does that check for you. >>>>> >>>>> You >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cannot >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> upload a release with a checksum broken. It won't let you close. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Like. Last week I had to restart the release once because MVN >>>>>>> >>>>>>> upload broke >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the checksum somewhere. >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Whether the files in Nexus are ok isn't sufficient. The archives >>>>> >>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> checksum files in the dist repo are the mirrorer official release >>>>>>>>>>>> artifacts (and strictly only the source ones at that), and Nexus >>>>> >>>>> cant >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> check those. There could be a problem deploying those bits for a >>>>>>>>>>>> variety of reasons, so we check they are ok. Users downloading the >>>>>>>>>>>> release archives also tend to grab the checksums from the dist >>>>> >>>>> repo >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> because that is their official source, in order to verify >>>>> >>>>> downloads >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Tim Bish >>> twitter: @tabish121 >>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ >>> > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS] release process improvements

2017-09-12 Thread Daniel Kulp
eeds to. > > # Provide SHA512 checksum files in the dist repo > > The release distribution policy has suggested using SHA512 for some > time now, I think it would be good to make the switch for the files > provided in the dist repo. > http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution.html#sigs-and-sums > > Robbie -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSSS] Web Management Console for Artemis.

2017-07-27 Thread Daniel Kulp
review comments >>> there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1385 < >>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1385> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also there has been a small discussion on how to release this, so >>> that we can start to get end user feedback, as users tend to want a built >>> usable distribution, like wise there is concern of bundling this into the >>> next release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We propose: >>>>>>> We will release the upcoming next version of Apache ActiveMQ >> Artemis, >>> WITHOUT the new web console. This is due to occur in the coming week. >>>>>>> We will then subsequently look to merge and release another version >>> of Apache ActiveMQ Artemis WITH the console, so it is in a clean release >>> with only the addition of the web console. This should occur almost >>> immediately after. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I should thank Clebert and Martyn in offering to run the extra >>> release this would require, but de-risk some community concerns. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This solution is based off a hawtio framework, i would like to >>> iterate i am not a RedHat employee, nor anything to do with Hawtio >> project. >>> I work for a company that uses the project like other end users, and >> simply >>> see it as a framework to enable us in activemq to deliver a usable web >>> management console for artemis with as little cost, effort and >> maintenance >>> as possible, to provide an immediate need in the user community. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Many thanks >>>>>>> Mike >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Tim Bish >>>>> twitter: @tabish121 >>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Clebert Suconic >>> >> -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #1385: ARTEMIS-1270 Management Console - Hawtio Solut...

2017-07-06 Thread Daniel Kulp
uff that is missing can be done by extending what’s there in a way that makes sense. That said, for the first release, if we kind of release note the console as a “technology preview, subject to change” or similar, I’d be less concerned. Dan > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 6

Re: [GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #1385: ARTEMIS-1270 Management Console - Hawtio Solut...

2017-07-06 Thread Daniel Kulp
much more than a “3-4 day delay”. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the Web Console

2017-07-05 Thread Daniel Kulp
gs that belong in there that aren’t, but at least the json.org part is now fixed on master. Dan > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 5 Jul 2017, at 18:45, Clebert Suconic wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >>> Started d

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the Web Console

2017-07-05 Thread Daniel Kulp
>>>> comunity >>>>>> - i.e. “Artemis Management console is powered by hawtio: hawt.io < >>>>>> http://hawt.io/>” etc - as there is no powered by logo. >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 3 Jul 2017, at 23:52, Michael André P

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the Web Console

2017-06-29 Thread Daniel Kulp
any kind of management >>>>> console. With continued questions and calls from users especially as it's >>>>> picking up traction and deployment. >>>>> >>>>> As such could I propose, that as lack of movement on any other solution >>>>> a

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.14.4

2017-02-27 Thread Daniel Kulp
71e2c1c8f179a6cd2e458de5f > > Please vote to approve this release. The vote will remain open for 72 > hours. > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.14.4 > [ ] -1 (provide specific comments) > > Here's my +1 -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Apache.NMS project to Git

2017-02-22 Thread Daniel Kulp
635. If I build again, it would produce Apache.NMS > 1.7.0.18635. Automatically. This way there is no confusion as to what > exact revisions went into creating that assembly, and I have a reproducible > build. And the has accomplishes the same thing if the goal is a reproducible build. -- D

Re: What is the current status and plans for the web-console?

2017-02-17 Thread Daniel Kulp
ctivemq plugin or whatever they have and use it as is. (Unless they want to donate it to this community) -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.14.3

2016-12-20 Thread Daniel Kulp
Source tag: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=commit;h=58dddb9181912bee60fec480d90e05be4ca3a044 > > Please vote to approve this release. The vote will remain open for 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.14.3 > [ ] -1 (provide speci

[RESULT] [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.13.5

2016-12-20 Thread Daniel Kulp
There are 7 +1 votes and not other votes. This vote passes. Dan > On Dec 16, 2016, at 2:23 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release Apache ActiveMQ 5.13.5, a new patch release that > includes a couple high importance fixes. > > Release notes: > http

[VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.13.5

2016-12-16 Thread Daniel Kulp
r at least 72 hours. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Back porting to 5.13.x

2016-12-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
I’m going to back port the web-console fix and a couple others to 5.13.x and hopefully do a 5.13.5 release later this week. If there are other fixes that could/should be pulled back, please let me know. Thanks! -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community

CachedLDAPAuthorizationMap in blueprint....

2016-12-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
subclass version which has the annotations on it. Not sure how to do this though. Anyway, thoughts? -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the Web Console

2016-10-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
>>>> >>>>> The website branding says otherwise (take a look at the top right >>>> >>>> corner). >>>> >>>> >>>> That symbol on the top is just a link to the following: >>>> >>>> "Like hawtio? It’s part of a community of Red Hat projects. Learn more >>>> about Red Hat and our open source communities:" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> No other implications from what I see. >>>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the Web Console

2016-09-30 Thread Daniel Kulp
cerns are resolved. I do know that templating it was certainly one of >> the offered solutions. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-tp4717136p4717302.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> - http://dankulp.com/blog <http://dankulp.com/blog> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com <http://coders.talend.com/>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.14.0

2016-08-03 Thread Daniel Kulp
main open for 72 > hours. > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.14.0 > [ ] -1 (provide specific comments) > > Here's my +1 (non-binding) -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> - http://dankulp.com/blog <http://dankulp.com/blog> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com <http://coders.talend.com/>

[RESULT][VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.11.4/5.12.3

2016-02-08 Thread Daniel Kulp
We have 6 +1 votes. I’ll get the artifacts released. Thanks! Dan > On Feb 3, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Several high importance fixes were back ported from the 5.13.1 release that > we should get into patch releases. > > > Staging Repositori

[VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.11.4/5.12.3

2016-02-03 Thread Daniel Kulp
-- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.13.1

2016-02-03 Thread Daniel Kulp
> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.13.1 > [ ] -1 (provide specific comments) > > Here's my +1 -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache Artemis 1.2.0

2015-12-23 Thread Daniel Kulp
step to >> enable in broker}" but if it is installed, just prompt/given flag. >> >> John >> >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 5:07 PM Daniel Kulp > > wrote: >> >>> >>>> On Dec 23, 2015, at 4:55 PM, Andy Taylor > > wrote: >>&g

Re: [VOTE] Apache Artemis 1.2.0

2015-12-23 Thread Daniel Kulp
ot; so I would have a hard time considering as a part of the platform. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache Artemis 1.2.0

2015-12-23 Thread Daniel Kulp
past must have caused it to install.(likely mysql) > We could change the cli to prompt for a choice at create time. That would certainly work. Dan > On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 21:41 Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> >>> On Dec 23, 2015, at 4:07 PM, John D. Ament >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Artemis 1.2.0

2015-12-23 Thread Daniel Kulp
that are not enabled by default.” Dan > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 4:05 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> >> Question: If I grab Artemis 1.1.0 tarbal/zip and start up the broker “out >> of the box”, does it use libaio or not? If I specifically have to >> confi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Artemis 1.2.0

2015-12-23 Thread Daniel Kulp
uestions about it. We were ok >> as I remember. Maybe someone else (Martyn?) will have it on their >> inboxes. For that reason I don't want to go over the same issue we had >> asked before. >> >> The use of libaio is optional anyways and the system works a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Artemis 1.2.0

2015-12-21 Thread Daniel Kulp
e that is in the form most likely to be edited by recipients for the sake of modifying the product, and in some specific cases the generated (and open) source code of build scripts." http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201203.mbox/%3CC3656B87-A6DC-4D3D

Re: [VOTE] Apache Artemis 1.2.0

2015-12-21 Thread Daniel Kulp
library to work.Thus, it must be optional and the user must take explicit actions to enable it during build and runtime. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache Artemis 1.2.0

2015-12-21 Thread Daniel Kulp
our implementation is > apache licensed. …linked to libraries that are LGPL and only LGPL, which is not allowed per ASF policy. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache Artemis 1.2.0

2015-12-21 Thread Daniel Kulp
t build - in our case, we’d need a maven profile to build it and that profile would need to not be activeByDefault. Thus, I think this release cannot be released as is. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.13.0 Released

2015-12-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
gt;>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> See: http://activemq.apache.org/new-features.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Christopher Shannon < >>>>>>>> christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Apache ActiveMQ 5.13.0 has now been released. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This release contains a number of resolved issues and new features >>>>> since >>>>>>>>> the 5.12.1 release. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A list of issues resolved in this release is available here: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12329848 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Wiki page for the release is here: >>>>>>>>> http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5130-release.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> API documentation for 5.12.1 is located here: >>>>>>>>> http://activemq.apache.org/maven/5.13.0/apidocs/index.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Tim Bish >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Claus Ibsen >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus >>>>>>> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Claus Ibsen >>>>> - >>>>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus >>>>> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Claus Ibsen >> - >> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus >> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > - > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS] OSGi support for Artemis

2015-11-13 Thread Daniel Kulp
s from a jar to another one, >> keeping the same package name, or by renaming one of the split package so >> that there's no duplicate package names across jars. >> >> Thoughts ? >> Guillaume Nodet > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

[RESULT][VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.11.3

2015-11-02 Thread Daniel Kulp
Update subject for future searches…. Dan > On Nov 2, 2015, at 12:33 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > We have 8 +1 votes and no other votes. This vote passes. I’ll promote the > release. > > Thanks! > Dan > > > >> On Oct 29, 2015, at 12:22 PM, Daniel Kulp

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.11.3

2015-11-02 Thread Daniel Kulp
We have 8 +1 votes and no other votes. This vote passes. I’ll promote the release. Thanks! Dan > On Oct 29, 2015, at 12:22 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > This is a vote to release Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.3 > > Staging area: > https://repository.apache.org

[VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.11.3

2015-10-29 Thread Daniel Kulp
/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12333254 This vote will be open till Monday. Here is my +1 -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: Release ActiveMQ 5.11.3....

2015-10-28 Thread Daniel Kulp
any objections or additional concerns or things that are needed, I’ll do the build tomorrow. Dan > On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:23 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > I’d like to build a 5.11.3 release later this week to fix the problems with > ActiveMQ in Karaf, particularly the web console. I’l

Release ActiveMQ 5.11.3....

2015-10-26 Thread Daniel Kulp
know ASAP. Thanks! -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.1

2015-10-13 Thread Daniel Kulp
ce tag: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=commit;h=21c8b4695f771065192ed7a24c92367ed9f6e564 > > Please vote to approve this release. The vote will remain open for 72 > hours. > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.1 > [ ] -1 (provide specific

Re: Please contribute to the board report for October 2015

2015-10-06 Thread Daniel Kulp
; > > > -- > perl -e 'print > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [HEADSUP] ActiveMQ 5.12.1 Release Preparation

2015-09-22 Thread Daniel Kulp
t test. The log points at a fuse JIRA that is obviously completely unrelated. Thus, I have no idea why that change was even put in. I’m tempted to back it out. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: Jetty 9.2 OSGi upgrade

2015-08-19 Thread Daniel Kulp
e was anyone > with more OSGi experience who might volunteer to take a look at this > piece? I was thinking about creating a new Jira subtask for the OSGi piece. > > Thanks, > Chris -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Jetty 9.2 dependency licensing issues

2015-08-18 Thread Daniel Kulp
ies >> below are both GPL and CDDL. Can we still use the dependencies since they >> are also under CDDL or is that not allowed? >> >> >> javax.servlet >> javax.servlet-api >> 3.1 >> >> >> javax.servlet.jsp >> javax.servlet.jsp-api >&

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.0

2015-08-12 Thread Daniel Kulp
or 72 > hours. > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.0 > [ ] -1 (provide specific comments) > > Here's my +1 > > -- > Tim Bish > -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.11.2

2015-08-10 Thread Daniel Kulp
b pull request from the 5.11.x branch. Dan > > Thanks, > Paul > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> We have 3 binding +1 votes, 3 non-binding +1 votes, 1 +0 vote, and no >> other votes. This vote passes. >> >> D

[RESULT] [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.11.2

2015-08-10 Thread Daniel Kulp
We have 3 binding +1 votes, 3 non-binding +1 votes, 1 +0 vote, and no other votes. This vote passes. Dan > On Aug 6, 2015, at 10:57 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.2 > > Staging area: > https://repository.apache.org/co

[VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.11.2

2015-08-06 Thread Daniel Kulp
/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12329669 This vote will be open till Monday. Here is my +1 -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: 5.11.2....

2015-08-05 Thread Daniel Kulp
> On Aug 5, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote: > > Can you add https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5754 to the list? Yep. Done. Thanks! Dan > > Regards > -- > Dejan Bosanac > about.me/dejanb > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Daniel Kulp wro

Re: 5.11.2....

2015-08-05 Thread Daniel Kulp
26ba3337ef20d016 > AMQ-5813: ea03bb1f8cb2bce97fabdaa8fa287f4c9f977a3a > AMQ-5814 : e4af2eb63501251befc33a415abfad2b72d53321 > > > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> >>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Christopher Shannon < >> chris

Re: [DISCUSS] Artemis Coding Style

2015-08-04 Thread Daniel Kulp
ut this potential change? >>> >> +1 >> >> I think following the javaguide style would make the code much more >> approachable. >> >> -- >> Tim Bish >> Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc. >> tim.b...@redhat.com | www.redhat.com >> twitter: @tabish121 >> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ >> > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Artemis Coding Style

2015-08-04 Thread Daniel Kulp
elopers are used to working with if we want to get more >> of the community involved. >> >> I was wondering if anyone would have an issue with changing the style or >> what people's thoughts are about this potential change? > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Artemis Coding Style

2015-08-04 Thread Daniel Kulp
al it would be a good idea to match up to a style > that most Java developers are used to working with if we want to get more > of the community involved. > > I was wondering if anyone would have an issue with changing the style or > what people's thoughts are about this potential

Re: 5.11.2....

2015-08-03 Thread Daniel Kulp
rk at release > time if some of the commits can be merged ahead of time. In any case, I do plan on doing the build on Wednesday or Thursday. If anyone would like something pulled back, please let me know. Thanks! Dan > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >

Re: constant updating of the "Unix Shell Script" website page

2015-08-03 Thread Daniel Kulp
ewed on the website >>> versus the original on confluence >>> (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Unix+Shell+Script). >>> >>> Anyone know how to fix this? Should we remove the TOC, perhaps replace >>> it with links to some static anchors in the page? >>> >>> Robbie >> >> -- >> GPG encryption available: 0x670DCBEC/pool.sks-keyservers.net >> (https://www.256bit.org/keys/mschoechlin.pub.asc) >> >> -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: 5.11.2....

2015-07-30 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> It’s been a while since 5.11.1 so I’d like to get a 5.11.2 release out >> shortly, probably early/mid next week.There’s not a lot of fixes on the >> branch right now, just stuff mostly necessary for OSGi to support run

5.11.2....

2015-07-30 Thread Daniel Kulp
get in, please get them cherry-picked to the activemq-5.11.x branch or send me the git hashes and I can take a look and get them merged. Thanks! -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: Git workflow for committers

2015-06-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
not encourage > branches on the main repo. The only branch you cannot remove is master. Anything else is just like normal. Dan > > -- Clebert Suconic typing on the iPhone. > >> On Jun 9, 2015, at 20:22, Daniel Kulp wrote: >> >> I guess if it was up to m

Re: Git workflow for committers

2015-06-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
Thread... This > is a meta discussion.. I will talk about the issue itself on another > post I'm about to make -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: Artemis and Eclipse...

2015-06-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
>>> On 8 June 2015 at 22:23, Clebert Suconic wrote: >>>>> The only thing I remember we had to add JDK 1.8 to the equation was >>>>> some option we needed for building javadocs. Perhaps there is a better >>>>> way to solve that. >>

Re: Git workflow for committers

2015-06-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
> On Jun 9, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Clebert Suconic > wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >> >> Just to follow up, I have nothing against others using the github tooling or >> whatever if they feel that makes their job easier/faster/better.

Re: Git workflow for committers

2015-06-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
other "review then commit" workflow. Dan > On Jun 9, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> >> On Jun 9, 2015, at 10:47 AM, Andy Taylor wrote: >> >> Dan, >> >> are you implying you are going to bypass the workflow that everyone e

Re: Git workflow for committers

2015-06-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
been using for the last 10+ years and has been using with the git repo for the last 2 years.So yes, I will be using the workflow that the community has agreed on and been using. Thanks for asking. Dan > > On 09/06/15 15:45, Daniel Kulp wrote: >> >>> On Jun 9, 2015, a

Re: Git workflow for committers

2015-06-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
velopment. >>> >> >> You really need github for that. You would need a github account >> associated with your apache email and send send the PR. >> >> You don't want to use github at all? If you don't want to use github, >> then you certainly w

Re: Git workflow for committers

2015-06-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
e CI, that enhances > your testing. > > If you could wait someone else to merge it do it. If you really don't > want to wait push it yourself but I would appreciate if you could at > least wait the CI build to finish and avoid errors. > > > (notice I'm saying avoid

Re: Artemis - CXF

2015-06-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
ts CXF or RestEasy handling the mapping and unmarshalling and such. Dan > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 5:25 AM Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> >> I’m going to start working on replacing RestEASY with CXF for the Artemis >> REST stuff but wanted to start a quick discussion fi

Artemis - CXF

2015-06-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
opping RestEASY entirely for CXF, but I suppose that is a path to mention just for completeness. Thoughts? -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: Artemis and Eclipse...

2015-06-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
ow. > This is build failure: > https://builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ-Artemis-PR-Build/409/ > > I will have to revert this now as I can't compile on the PR check and > in Linux box I have for my own tests. > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >> I’ve

Re: Git workflow for committers

2015-06-08 Thread Daniel Kulp
oute they are just commenting on the >> way they currently work. This is just a discussion about the pros and cons >> of different approaches as far as I can see and to document what ActiveMQ >> currently does, I'm not sure this is currently documented. >> >

Artemis and Eclipse...

2015-06-08 Thread Daniel Kulp
triggered. I think the ibmjdk profile in there is irrelevant as well? (seems to reference things about differences between 1.5 and 1.6) -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: Git workflow for committers

2015-06-08 Thread Daniel Kulp
thub.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/master/docs/hacking-guide/en/maintainers.md > > > Justin > > - Original Message - > From: "Daniel Kulp" > To: dev@activemq.apache.org > Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 8:41:56 AM > Subject: Re: Git workflow for committers >

Re: Git workflow for committers

2015-06-08 Thread Daniel Kulp
being used on ActiveMQ. So what is the general git workflow > that committers use today? > > Bruce > > -- > perl -e 'print > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [jira] [Created] (AMQNET-500) Using Ssl transport with certificates failure

2015-04-29 Thread Daniel Kulp
list of certificates which is closed after calling > X509Store.Close(). I implemented a workaround in the code you could use if > you consider it useful. > > > > -- > This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA > (v6.3.4#6332) -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ {CodeName} Must-Have Features...

2015-04-15 Thread Daniel Kulp
ations (mostly complete). > > This is obviously not all of what the existing ActiveMQ is all about. > What other features are folks wanting to see in the next generation > ActiveMQ? > > James -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: Legacy support for HornetQ

2015-04-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
> perl -e 'print > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Pick a code name for the HornetQ code donation

2015-04-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
eMQ Artemis > [b] ActiveMQ Luna > [c] ActiveMQ Reactive > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. The option with the most votes will win. > > Regards, > Hiram > > -- > Hiram Chirino > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. > hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com >

Re: [DISCUSS] Fix Sorting of Board Reports

2015-04-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
one, the chair didn’t submit it” really wouldn’t matter at all. Dan > > That's me just trying to understand the reason for the Board Report page's > existence. > > -Jim > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> >> N

Re: [DISCUSS] Fix Sorting of Board Reports

2015-04-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
ent board report (2015/02) in the middle > of the pack, making it difficult to find. Good luck trying to find the > report directly prior to that. > > I will make the changes, unless anyone has other suggestions. > > Best, > Jim -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

  1   2   3   >