are Technology
> W 614-249-6672
> shan...@nationwide.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 9:48 AM
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.0 release (take
> #2)
&
Just to be clear: just remove this from your activemq.xml:
You can see the change here:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/commit/472dcf84979f063a375e5413d794e56117e52a9f
Regards
JB
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 3:58 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> You are us
If we distinguish the simple jira where the title is enough (I'm
thinking about the dependency updates where the title is enough, but
these Jiras are good for the tracking), I generally agree.
+1 to have some guidelines in the contributor guide (in source repo
and/or website) and also in PR templa
+1 (binding)
I did few simple tests on this release:
- build and run artemis
- check hash and signatures
- check LICENSE and NOTICE files
- simple run on Karaf
Thanks
Regards
JB
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:32 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.21.0
pos/asf/activemq-website.git
> >
> >
> > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
> > new fc6da54 Use "new" dlcdn download URLs
> > fc6da54 is described below
> >
> > commit fc6da54d8ff0f5972364a249803aa521a5ff410
gt; >
> > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
> > new fc6da54 Use "new" dlcdn download URLs
> > fc6da54 is described below
> >
> > commit fc6da54d8ff0f5972364a249803aa521a5ff4105
> > Author: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>
from the announcement threads then
> where they said the opposite more than once.
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 06:41, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I talked with asfinfra last need to double check:
> >
> > 1. They confirm that dlcdn is th
gt; https://lists.apache.org/list?us...@infra.apache.org:lte=6M:DLCDN
> Humbedooh 11:14 PM
> it is, yes
> Hans Van Akelyen 11:14 PM
> ack
> Humbedooh 11:15 PM
> I think JB's question was about the templating of it all
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 09:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
FYI, I just asked the question straight (between dlcdn or closer.cgi
preferred use) on #asfinfra. I will update the projects website
accordingly.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 11:19 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Why other Apache projects are using dlcdn directl
> likely just break. Another benefit to using the script is that when
> using the CDN link directly it means the links break when the release
> shuffles off the CDN when a new one arrives, whereas using the script
> the link now keeps working as the script directs to the archive
> ins
Hi Bruce,
I added the ActiveMQ "Classic" section.
Regards
JB
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 9:05 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> Once again, it's time to contribute to the report for the ASF Board. Please
> take just a few minutes to offer up any activity you feel is worthy of
> inclusion by adding it to t
Hi guys,
I would like to prepare ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release this week, probably to
submit it to vote during the weekend or next week.
One of the main reasons is to update to Spring 5.3.18 which includes
CVE fixes
(https://spring.io/blog/2022/03/31/spring-framework-rce-early-announcement).
I also ha
+1 to remove it in 5.18.x for me.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 3:56 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
> Hi all-
>
> Is anyone aware of a use case or compelling reason to maintain the
> activemq-itests-spring31?
>
> If not, I’ll plan to remove in 5.18.x.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt Pavlovich
att Pavlovich
>
> > On Mar 31, 2022, at 7:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I would like to prepare ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release this week, probably to
> > submit it to vote during the weekend or next week.
> >
> > One of the m
t; > >
> > > ref: https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/28260 <
> > https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/28260>
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Matt Pavlovich
> > >
> > >> On Mar 31, 2022, at 9:
Hi guys,
Quick update about ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release.
We have the last update PRs to merge and a couple of fixes to do. I'm
working on it this week. I will submit 5.17.1 to vote by the end of
the week.
Regards
JB
On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 6:11 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi Bruc
I agree. Let me create a PR to remove it ;)
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 10:50 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
>
> Why wait? Seems really quite odd to have a current release stream with
> one of its noted features having been an upgrade to Spring 5, and a
> coming 5.17.1 release updating
Done:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/830
Regards
JB
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 11:04 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> I agree. Let me create a PR to remove it ;)
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 10:50 AM Robbie Gemmell
> wrote:
>
Hi guys
We are finally almost ready for 5.17.1 release. Only two Jira with PRs are
under review.
I will work on these ones today.
I plan to submit 5.17.1 to vote tomorrow.
Thanks
Regards
JB
Le lun. 11 avr. 2022 à 07:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a
écrit :
> Hi guys,
>
> Quick upd
Hi guys,
I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release to your vote.
This release is an important release on the 5.17.x series, bringing
major changes:
- upgrade to Spring 5.3.19, fixing Spring4shell vulnerability (even if
ActiveMQ is not directly impacted)
- XBean 4.21 (supporting Spring 5.x) and ASM 9.3
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 6:24 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.22.0 release.
>
>
> There are no new features on this release, however there are many
> improvements and bug fixes.
>
> In particular there's a default change o
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 4:21 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release to your vote.
>
> This release is an important release on the 5.17.x series, bringing
> major changes:
> - upgrade to Spring 5.3
(Jira, website, reporter, etc). I will
do the announcement once all is done.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 4:21 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release to your vote.
>
> This release is an important relea
Hi guys,
I submit the ActiveMQ 5.16.5 release to your vote.
This release is a maintenance release on the 5.16.x series including:
- fix on configuration when wrapper is used
- fix memory lead on temp store
- avoid potential NPE when starting ActiveMQ
- add missing Jetty continuation artifact and
does list. However one of the files (the bin tar.gz) is still
> > > 404'ing for me on some occasions on 1 network and always on another.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 at 13:16, Robbie Gemmell
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have a
The Apache ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release.
This release is a maintenance release on the 5.17.x series, including:
- upgrade to Spring 5.3.19
- upgrade to XBean 4.21
- upgrade to Jackson 2.13.2/2.13.2.2
- upgrade to Jolokia 1.7.1
- upgrade to ASM 9.3 for better
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:01 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.16.5 release to your vote.
>
> This release is a maintenance release on the 5.16.x series including:
> - fix on configuration when wrapper is used
&
o the announcement.
Thanks all for your vote !
Regards
JB
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:01 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.16.5 release to your vote.
>
> This release is a maintenance release on the 5.16.x series including:
> - fix on con
The Apache ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.5 release.
This release is a maintenance release on the 5.16.x series, including:
- fix on configuration when wrapper is used
- fix memory leak on temp store
- avoid potential NPE when starting ActiveMQ with pending STOMP message
ements.
>
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 at 05:19, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yes, it's OK for me too, dlcdn is up to date.
> >
> > I'm moving forward on website and announcement.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Regards
> >
-1 for leader/follower, it doesn't apply for current master/slave
mechanism, it's not the same semantic as in Kafka for instance
-1 for primary/backup, technically, this one could work, but it sounds
"confusing" to me
+1 for active/passive is probably the most accurate and describe the
behavior (we
Hi
Unfortunately, the image is not displayed on the mailing list.
Can you please send the test case and image to me (jbono...@apache.org) ?
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 3:22 PM Chandan Singh
wrote:
> Hi All ,
>
>
>
> I recently did an Active MQ upgrade for Spring4Shell remediation
Hi
Thanks for the details. Indeed it's related to the quotes in the name (in
order to able to display destinations with spaces etc in the console).
Lucas created a PR, I will review and merge. Then I will move forward on a
release soon.
Regards
JB
Le ven. 6 mai 2022 à 19:25, Chandan Singh
a éc
The purpose is not really a formal vote (as for a release for instance).
It's more to get consensus.
I think we have a consensus.
+1 to proceed now :)
Regards
JB
Le dim. 8 mai 2022 à 05:14, Tetreault, Lucas
a écrit :
> Here is the summary of all the votes:
> [+1,1,-1,-1000,-1,-1] Leader/Follo
ctive Passive.
>
> --
> Étienne
> he/him/his
>
> On Sat, 7 May 2022, at 10:13 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > The purpose is not really a formal vote (as for a release for instance).
> > It's more to get consensus.
> >
> > I think we have a consensus.
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 10:35 PM Havret wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have put together a release of activemq-nms-api, please check it
> and vote accordingly.
>
> This release contains a single bugfix[1] by Iuliia Fatkullina! Thank you!
>
> Besides that I cherry-picked notice a
Hi Sergio,
Yes, I think you are right. I will fix that.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 2:06 AM Mendez, Sergio
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> While browsing through the documentation, I went to the following URL:
>
> https://activemq.apache.org/version-5-getting-started
>
> If I scroll down to
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 9:05 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0 release.
>
> As part of this release I would like to highlight the addition of
> Jakarta 10 to the supported APIs.
>
>
>
> The release notes can be found he
Hi
Agree to close this vote and prepare a New one soon.
Regards
JB
Le ven. 10 juin 2022 à 23:14, Clebert Suconic a
écrit :
> Before I close the result, I would like to highlight ARTEMIS-3856
> which is a regression I caused.
>
>
> When I fixed the ThreadLocal non static usages, I reverted some
Hi
Thanks for the update. I will take a new look (I worked a bit with Etienne
about that).
Regards
JB
Le sam. 11 juin 2022 à 02:15, Nikita Shupletsov
a écrit :
> Greetings.
>
> My name is Nikita Shupletsov. I am a software development engineer at
> Amazon MQ.
>
> I have been working on an Asyn
Hi guys,
I've started to prepare ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release.
This release will include several dependency updates, and fixes
detected on 5.17.0/5.17.1.
I will keep you posted soon with more details, but roughly, I plan to
submit the release to vote by the end of next week.
Regards
JB
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 10:58 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.1 release
>
> This is a small release following up where I added a fix for the following
> bug:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3856 - Fa
Hi Benjamin
are you sure it's really an issue ? If the framework exports the
java.* packages, artemis bundle should work fine.
Can you elaborate your issue ?
Regards
JB
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 6:43 PM Benjamin Graf wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> OSGi bundles are not playing well because of update to
> mav
m 19. Juni 2022 19:05:37 MESZ schrieb "Jean-Baptiste Onofré"
> :
> >Hi Benjamin
> >
> >are you sure it's really an issue ? If the framework exports the
> >java.* packages, artemis bundle should work fine.
> >
> >Can you elaborate your issue
Hi Art,
I disagree: as said on Slack, it works fine with JMS 1.1 with you
provide the right bundle (thanks to dependency flag). So, it's
possible to still use JMS 1.1 bundle (geronimo) if you provide before
installing the activemq-client feature.
If you don't provide jms 1.1 bundle, by default, th
By the way, you can see in activemq-client:
javax.jms;version="[1.1,3)",
So:
1. if your application uses the same range, it works
2. if your application use [1.1,2), than, simple add javax.jms
(geronimo) 1.1 bundle
Regards
JB
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 7:45 PM Arthur Naseef wrote:
>
> I creat
<= 5.16.2 before?
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 09:24, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > By the way, you can see in activemq-client:
> >
> > javax.jms;version="[1.1,3)",
> >
> > So:
> > 1. if your application uses the same
was directly from the
> Import-Package manifest entry of the 5.16.3 and 5.16.5 activemq-client
> jars on maven central. On checking 5.17.1 it lists the same.
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 09:56, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > activemq-client 5.16.3 does use the righ
?
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 1:53 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> I tested at runtime on activemq-osgi bundle used by activemq-client.
>
> The feature verify would not work with this range.
>
> Let me take a look but I doubt it's the case.
>
> On Tu
ease notes as a breaking change so users can know about the issue before
> they upgrade.
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 8:09 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > OK, now I understand the confusion:
> >
> > Karaf activemq-client feature uses activemq-
sing 2 if already supplied, falling back to using its provided 1.1 if
> they dont?
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 14:01, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> >
> > OK, now I understand the confusion:
> >
> > Karaf activemq-client feature uses activemq-osgi bundle,
<=5.16.2 as well, and reasonably wouldnt
> expect to hit a breakage for this any more than they should on 5.16.x,
> since it also does not implement JMS 2 either.
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 15:36, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Agree: I should not have changed on 5.16.x,
7:50 AM Robbie Gemmell
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I would fix it on 5.17.x as well unless theres some reason not to that
> >> im missing, it really seems no different than it is for 5.16.x. People
> >> can upgrade to 5.17.x from <=5.16.2 as well, and reasonably wouldnt
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 10:47 AM Havret wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have put together a release of activemq-nms-openwire, please check it
> and vote accordingly. Huge kudos to Bruce Dodson for his help with
> resolving issues signaled in rc1.
>
> This release contains the fol
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:49 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an ActiveMQ Artemis Native 2.0.0 release
>
>
> For those who are not familiar, this is the Native Layer in Artemis
> responsible for the integration on Linux and Libaio.
>
>
> I have been w
t; for both cases (JMS 1.1 and JMS 2.0 applications).
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Art
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:50 AM Robbie Gemmell <
> robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> &g
tions).
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Art
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:50 AM Robbie Gemmell <
> robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I would fix it on 5.17.x as
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:30 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.24.0 release
>
> There are two features added as part of this release:
>
> - Paging does not use soft cache any longer. As a matter of fact we
> don't have any
Hi,
We already removed the activemq-camel component from ActiveMQ distribution.
However, we still have references to Camel in ActiveMQ distribution
(in the conf example, in the shipped libraries, ...).
For ActiveMQ 5.18.x, I propose to completely remove any reference to Camel.
No objection ?
R
Hi,
We have a consensus. So I will process creating a Jira and preparing a PR.
Thanks all for your feedback.
Regards
JB
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 9:01 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We already removed the activemq-camel component from ActiveMQ distribution.
>
> Howe
Hi,
I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release to your vote.
This release includes 50 fixes and improvements, especially:
- Spring 5.3.22 update
- Jackson 2.13.13 update
- Shiro 1.9.1 update
- Log4j 2.18.0 update
- and much more
Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
https://issues.apach
://github.com/melloware/jasypt
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 10:10 PM
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of AeroViron
there is anything I can do to help getting that in, please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Kind regards,
> Endre
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release to your vote.
> >
> &
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes 50 fixes and improvements, especially:
> - Spring 5.3.22 update
> - Jackson 2.13.13 updat
work here govern what happens, since
> >> it does still run on 17.
> >>
> >> I checked things out as follows:
> >> - Verified the signature and checksum files.
> >> - Checked for LICENCE + NOTICE files present in the archives.
> >> - Checked heade
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes 50 fixes and improvements, especially:
> - Spring 5.3.22 update
> - Jackson 2.13.13 updat
o the announcement.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes 50 fixes and improvements, especially:
> - Spring 5.3.22 update
> - Jac
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
Le mer. 31 août 2022 à 18:28, Clebert Suconic a
écrit :
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.25.0 release.
>
> This JIRA improved flow control from paging preventing Out Of Memory
> issues when there's a bad consumer without flow control (ARTEMIS-3943
>
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release:
https://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5017002-release
This release includes updates, fixes and improvements, especially:
- update to Spring 5.3.22
- update to Shiro 1.9.1
- update to log4j 2.18.0
- and much more!
Enjoy!
Re
at 07:10, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release:
> >
> > https://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5017002-release
> >
> > This release includes updates, fixes and improvements, especially:
> >
o grab it was the ActiveMQ 5.17.2
> announcement. Many did also have release notes or release page style
> link in addition, but they all linked to a general download area.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Tue, 6 Sept 2022 at 07:51, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Noted,
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 10:23 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.26.0 release.
>
>
> We removed ActiveMQ Artemis Rest, (which was already non functional)
> as part of this release.
> And other improvements and bug fixes.
>
>
Hi Clebert,
I'm +1 about this for the two reasons:
1. I don't think lot of people read the Javadoc on website (personally
I'm reading directly in the IDE)
2. We can still have the javadoc jar published on Maven (not need to
update website)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 6:12 PM Clebert Suco
Hi Endre,
I will take a look later today or during the weekend.
Regards
JB
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 9:42 PM Endre Stølsvik wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Would it be possible to get a review of AMQ-8617?
> Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8617
> PR: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/843
Hi Bruce,
Yes, I saw the notification.
I think we can bootstrap the report on wiki, starting from the last
one. Then, we can contribute on it, with deadline on Tuesday evening.
Regards
JB
On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 6:19 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> It seems we have a board report due this Wednesday,
file
> in GitHub and have folks contribute there?
>
> Bruce
>
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 11:02 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > Yes, I saw the notification.
> >
> > I think we can bootstrap the report on wiki, starting from th
the wiki, we said we would use a combination of Github and the website
> > to assemble the report. Has there been any progress on a method for
> > assembling and displaying the reports? Perhaps we should just create a file
> > in GitHub and have folks contribute there?
> >
have been. In
> >> lieu
> >> > of the wiki, we said we would use a combination of Github and the
> >> website
> >> > to assemble the report. Has there been any progress on a method for
> >> > assembling and displaying the reports? Perhaps we shoul
Hi Jon
Thanks for the update and the PR !
I gonna take a look.
Regards
JB
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 12:23 PM Jonathan Gallimore
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I ran into an issue with building ActiveMQ on Windows with the CXF XJC
> plugin:
>
> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> [INFO]
>
Hi,
It's already on track, with Jira and PR:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9130
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/925
I plan to submit 5.17.3 release to vote next week.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:48 AM Peter Raymond
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I see the latest version of A
And back to your question, jackson (including jackson-databind) is
used only in webconsole (and partition but that's rare ;)).
So basically, if you don't use/expose ActiveMQ WebConsole, you don't
have any risk. Furthermore, jackson databind is used in webconsole to
marshall/unmarshall console obje
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
Le mer. 9 nov. 2022 à 03:33, Justin Bertram a écrit :
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.27.0 release.
>
> New and noteworthy items in 2.27.0:
>
> - Fix for CVE-2022-42889 (Apache Commons Text vulnerability)
> - Logging implementation moved to Apach
Hi guys
We just have one pending Jira for 5.17.3 release.
I gonna fix that today (windows platform specific issue).
I plan to submit 5.17.3 release to vote tonight my time.
Regards
JB
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:54 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.27.1 release
>
>
> This is a bug fix release,
>
> I would like to highlight these 3 bug fixes:
>
> - AMQP Large Message over Bridges were broken
> - Rollback o
Hi all,
I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.3 release to your vote.
This release includes 32 fixes and improvements, especially:
- Fix ActiveMQ Console on Karaf 4.4.x
- Fix Jolokia startup on Windows platform
- Upgrade to Spring 5.3.23
- Upgrade to Jackson 2.14.0
- and much more!
Please take a look on th
+1 (binding)
Casting my own vote ;)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 4:31 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.3 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes 32 fixes and improvements, especially:
> - Fix ActiveMQ Console on Karaf
will send the announcement.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 4:31 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.3 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes 32 fixes and improvements, especially:
> - Fix Activ
The Apache ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce the ActiveMQ 5.17.3 release.
This release includes several updates, fixes and improvements, especially:
- upgrade to Spring 5.3.23
- upgrade to Jetty 9.4.49.v20220914
- upgrade to log4j 2.19.0
- fix jolokia access configuration file loading on W
Hi
- Yes, the clients (5.16.x) are compatible with 5.17.x broker
- Java 11 is required broker side, client using Java8 (with previous
AMQ 5.16.x version) for instance can use 5.17.x broker without problem
- No concrete matrix as it's backward compatible in term of protocol.
We plan a compatibility
> Thanks
> Kshitij
>
>
>
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Date: Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 3:39 PM
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Cc: users-h...@activemq.apache.org ,
> dev-h...@activemq.apache.org , Kulkarni, Vinay
> , Kumawat, Tapan
> Subject: [EXTERNA
Hi guys,
I started to work on ActiveMQ 5.18.x major release preparation.
Basically, I propose to include (as major changes, in addition of all
others more "minor" changes :)):
- JMS 2.x support (mostly client and first part broker)
- Spring 6 update
- Jakarta namespace support
I should have the
DK 11 minimum, JMS 2.0, javax.jms, Spring 5)
> v5.19.x (JDK 11 minimum, JMS 2.0, jakarta.jms, Spring 6)
>
> -Matt Pavlovich
>
> > On Jan 8, 2023, at 1:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I started to work on ActiveMQ 5.18.x major releas
) at this stage, I'm doing that elsewhere, though there
> > are certainly also tradeoffs to it vs alternatives. You were proposing
> > something different here, can you flesh out your original idea for
> > comparison? Had you implemented something?
> >
> > On Sun, 8
PI but wants the latest
> version.
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 7:44 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Those are valid points:
> > 1. For Jakarta, I plan to change the dep and rename on dedicated
> > branch (5.19.x). The intention is to
Hi Bruce,
I think replying to a "call for report" email is OK.
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 5:27 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> I just realized that we were notified about our board report too late to
> even submit the report as the meeting is scheduled to take place tomorrow.
> So, let's pla
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 4:18 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0 release.
>
> I would like to highlight the following changes in this release:
>
> - Page counting improved. We no longer store counters in the journal
> si
Hi guys,
We receive several requests to provide a new (final) ActiveMQ 5.16.6
release, including few security fixes/improvements.
So, I submit ActiveMQ 5.16.6 release to your vote. This one should be
the last version on the 5.16.x series, inviting our users to upgrade
to at least 5.17.x (or 5.18.
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 4:56 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> We receive several requests to provide a new (final) ActiveMQ 5.16.6
> release, including few security fixes/improvements.
>
> So, I submit ActiveMQ 5.16.6 release to your
Gentle reminder: we would need an additional binding vote to get 5.16.6 pass.
Thanks
Regards
JB
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 4:56 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> We receive several requests to provide a new (final) ActiveMQ 5.16.6
> release, including few security fix
l and dist.apache.org, then
I will update Jira and website, and I will do the announcement.
Thanks all for your vote!
FYI, ActiveMQ 5.17.4 vote will start soon (before the end of the week)!
Regards
JB
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 4:56 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> W
201 - 300 of 569 matches
Mail list logo
