+1 (binding)
Also check out black to auto-pep8!
https://github.com/ambv/black
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 5:12 PM Tao Feng wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 4:27 PM Beau Barker
> wrote:
>
> > +1 non binding
> >
> > Pylint is extremely strict so your may want to be selective about the
> >
`end_date` is useful, some DAGs / tasks may be scheduled to expire, say an
A/B test in an A/B testing framework with an experiment duration, a
backfill framework, or a framework/UI that allows users to schedule to run
a task to run for say 30 days. I'd keep this one for sure, not all
pipelines /
+1
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 4:27 PM Beau Barker
wrote:
> +1 non binding
>
> Pylint is extremely strict so your may want to be selective about the
> rules it applies.
>
>
> > On 12 Apr 2019, at 7:15 am, Kamil Breguła
> wrote:
> >
> > +! (non-binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:05 PM
Thanks Ash and contributors.
> On 12 Apr 2019, at 3:38 am, Gabriel Silk wrote:
>
> Nice work!
>
>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:21 AM Sid Anand wrote:
>>
>> Woot! Piling on with the kudos to Ash!
>>
>> -s
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 6:55 AM Jarek Potiuk
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Great work Ash!
+1 non binding
Pylint is extremely strict so your may want to be selective about the rules it
applies.
> On 12 Apr 2019, at 7:15 am, Kamil Breguła wrote:
>
> +! (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:05 PM Driesprong, Fokko
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> For more information
I agree with Max here, we should be careful.
Regarding the yesterday_ds, yesterday_ds_nodash, tomorrow_ds,
tomorrow_ds_nodash. I'm not against having better readable shorthands, but
more about the fact that having a tomorrow_ds doesn't make sense when we
have an hourly (or weekly) job.
I'm
+! (non-binding)
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:05 PM Driesprong, Fokko
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> For more information about AIP-6:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=99844429
>
> Op do 11 apr. 2019 om 23:03 schreef Kaxil Naik :
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Apr
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:51 PM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:50 PM Bas Harenslak <
> basharens...@godatadriven.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello Airflow community,
> >
> > This email calls for a vote to introduce Pylint in the Airflow project.
> >
+1 (non-binding).
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:50 PM Bas Harenslak <
basharens...@godatadriven.com> wrote:
> Hello Airflow community,
>
> This email calls for a vote to introduce Pylint in the Airflow project.
> The vote will last for at least 1 week (April 18th 23:00 CET), and at least
> three +1
Hello Airflow community,
This email calls for a vote to introduce Pylint in the Airflow project. The
vote will last for at least 1 week (April 18th 23:00 CET), and at least three
+1 (binding) votes have been cast.
After feedback on AIP-6 and discussion on
Nice work!
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:21 AM Sid Anand wrote:
> Woot! Piling on with the kudos to Ash!
>
> -s
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 6:55 AM Jarek Potiuk
> wrote:
>
> > Great work Ash!
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:19 AM Sumit Maheshwari <
> sumeet.ma...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
Woot! Piling on with the kudos to Ash!
-s
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 6:55 AM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> Great work Ash!
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:19 AM Sumit Maheshwari
> wrote:
>
> > Kudos to Ash!!
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 12:34 PM Chao-Han Tsai
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Ash!
> > >
>
Hello everyone,
I am relatively new to Airflow and I am not sure if this is the right place to
ask questions.
We set up a simple Kubernetes pod running a Docker image that contains Airflow.
We want the DAGs to be synced from a Git repository. The first idea we had was
to define an extra dag
Great work Ash!
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:19 AM Sumit Maheshwari
wrote:
> Kudos to Ash!!
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 12:34 PM Chao-Han Tsai
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Ash!
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 6:07 PM Jiajie Zhong >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Ash!
> > >
> > > Best wish.
> > > --
Kudos to Ash!!
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 12:34 PM Chao-Han Tsai wrote:
> Thanks Ash!
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 6:07 PM Jiajie Zhong
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Ash!
> >
> > Best wish.
> > -- Jiajie
> >
> > From: Deng Xiaodong
> > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 7:13
Thanks Ash!
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 6:07 PM Jiajie Zhong
wrote:
> Thanks Ash!
>
> Best wish.
> -- Jiajie
>
> From: Deng Xiaodong
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 7:13
> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Airflow 1.10.3 has been released!
>
> Thanks Ash!
Great discussion, let’s stay on track. If I can summarise:
* yesterday_ds, yesterday_ds_nodash, tomorrow_ds, tomorrow_ds_nodash
* Arthur: some users use these for convenience
* Bas/Fokko: these are values that can be easily derived in a one-liner
* tables
* nobody?
Some personal thoughts about the PR processing speed specifically.
I'm trying to benchmark Airflow with other Apache projects (like Spark,
Kafka), in terms of PR reviewing/merging speed: as at this moment, there
are 400+ open PRs in Spark and 500+ open PRs in Kafka. On the other hand,
there are
18 matches
Mail list logo
