Hello Jarek,
Thanks for sharing this. I would like to join as well, please!
On Sat, 8 Jun 2024, 14:33 Sumit Maheshwari, wrote:
> Same, add me as well. Thanks!!
>
> On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 2:27 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
>
> > Same, would love to join
> >
> > On Sat, 8 Jun 2024 at 09:19, Aritra Basu
+1 (non-binding)
Concurring with Wei!
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 8:55 AM Wei Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Tested my change
. Many of us (myself included) may have assumed
from our university days, indexes are always created for
foreign keys, but that's not always the case. :)
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard
Yes, indeed, all the nominations are excellent.
Since I have only one vote, I give a +1 to #39336.
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 12:18 AM Brent
+1 (binding)
On Thu, 9 May 2024, 08:17 Wei Lee, wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> > On May 9, 2024, at 10:39 AM, Phani Kumar
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 binding, looking forward to add Scarf
> >
> > On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 7:42 AM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Discussion
Okay, thanks for clarifying :)
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 5:05 PM Elad Kalif wrote:
> Yes, sorry.
> copy paste typo
>
> On Mon,
be just a typo in the email
message.
Can we please confirm?
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 1:40 PM Elad Kalif wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Apach
-1 (non-binding) for the Google RC based on comment
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36090#issuecomment-2094972855
risking some PRs included in the Google RC.
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone
+1 (non-binding)
Tested my set of changes.
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 4:25 PM Hussein Awala wrote:
> +1 (binding) checked licen
+1 (non-binding)
Tested the RC client to do some basic functionalities like get DAGs, tasks
for a DAG,
trigger a DAG, get Airflow configuration. Everything went well!
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone
+1 (non-binding) Concurring with Wei.
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 9:01 AM Wei Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I tested my chang
ftware
> >> > > > development approach, since this will be the first time for us, as
> >> > > Airflow
> >> > > > PMC, to add such telemetry. This is of course just my opinion
> >> though :)
> >> > > >
> >>
-1 (non-binding) for the Databricks provider. We would need to also include
PR https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38962 for the included PRs in the
RC to work well.
Also added a
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/38997#issuecomment-2053904837 on
the status issue.
On Sun, 14 Apr 2024,
+1 (non-binding)
Verified my changes and our provider's example DAGs are running fine
on the RCs.
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 3:01 PM Jarek
Many congratulations, Wei 拾
Very well done and well deserved!!
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, 14:19 Ash Berlin-Taylor, wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Airflow has invited Wei
> Lee to become a committer and
> we are pleased to announce that they have accepted.
>
> Wei has
+1 from me to this idea.
Sounds very reasonable to me.
At times, my experience has been better with public runners instead of
self-hosted runners :)
And like already mentioned in the discussion, I think having the ability of
a applying the label "use-self-hosted-runners" to be used for critical
+1 binding. Sounds exciting.
Sorry I missed the discussion earlier. I have some questions but those are
implementation related
and I think the PRs will help me understand those :)
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra
/r06j306hldg03g2my1pd4nyjxg78b3h4),
similarly about the DaskExecutor (
https://lists.apache.org/thread/ptwjf5g87lyl5476krt91bzfrm96pnb1), etc.
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Phone: +91
+1 to what Aritra is saying.
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Phone: +91 9730079985
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:05 PM Aritra Basu
wrote:
> I'm in general not a huge
successful and failure
scenario where tasks should be marked as success/failed correspondingly
and should not be stuck, works as expected.
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Phone: +91
on-sql
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Phone: +91 9730079985
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 3:00 PM Andrey Anshin
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verify signatures, checksums, fil
RC based on the Amazon system
tests.
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Phone: +91 9730079985
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 1:03 PM Elad Kalif wrote:
> *Update:* Providers ama
+1 (binding)
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Phone: +91 9730079985
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 8:05 PM Amogh Desai wrote:
> +1 from me too based on my earlier poi
+1 to keep this
@Bolke de Bruin: I am just thinking more on your point and wondering
that if someone has the intent to hide the conversation, they can anyway
mark it as resolved irrespective of this configuration, no?
+1 (non-binding)
Tested required changes are in. Thank you so much Elad for the release
efforts.
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Phone: +91 9730079985
On Wed, Jan 31
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024, 13:48 rom sharon, wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> בתאריך יום ד׳, 24 בינו׳ 2024 ב-10:17 מאת Rahul Vats <
> rah.sharm...@gmail.com>:
>
> > +1 non-binding
> >
> > Verified below providers with our example DAGS.
> >
> >-
+1 (non-binding)
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Phone: +91 9730079985
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 12:00 PM Ephraim Anierobi
wrote:
> Hi Bolke,
>
> I have included
Many congratulations Andrey (taragolis :) ) Very very well deserved
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Phone: +91 9730079985
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 11:03 PM Mehta
+1 (non-binding)
Concurring with Rahul and Wei!
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024, 18:55 Rahul Vats, wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> In addition to providers mentioned @Lee-W and also verified
> apache-airflow-providers-mysql==5.5.1rc1. LGTM.
>
> Regards,
> Rahul Vats
> 9953794332
>
>
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at
I very much like the concept. We have been using it actively for Astronomer
code repositories for 1+ year already and it has helped us greatly (Thanks
to Felix Uellendall for introducing this back then )
On Sat, 30 Dec 2023, 12:10 Jarek Potiuk, wrote:
> FYI - Just now INFRA rejected the
I like the idea, at least double checking what the comments were is
a good cause. +1 to incorporating this.
On 2023/12/19 13:12:05 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> TL;DR; I have a small proposal/discussion proposal to modify a bit the
> branch protection rules for Airflow. Why don't we
+1 (non-binding)
Installed the RC and was able to trigger a DAG successfully using the
client.
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Phone: +91 9730079985
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023
+1 (non-binding)
On 2023/12/18 10:00:50 Rahul Vats wrote:
> +1 (non-binding). I re-verified tests with rc4.
>
>- Verified that running our example DAGs did not reveal any regressions.
>- Verified the addition of the task context logging feature, enabling
>the forwarding of messages
+1
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Phone: +91 9730079985
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 4:30 PM Ephraim Anierobi
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 10:56, Am
+1 (non-binding)
Concurring with Rahul
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023, 11:01 Rahul Vats, wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
>- Verified that running our example DAGs did not reveal any regressions.
>- Verified the addition of the task context logging feature, enabling
>the forwarding of messages to
+1 (non-binding)
Tested my set of changes.
Best regards,
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 9:57 AM Amogh Desai
wrote:
> +1 non binding for all the other providers other than Google and Docker.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 5:46 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
> > +1
Great news, many congratulations Utkarsh 拾✌
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, 00:53 Pierre Jeambrun, wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> Le lun. 4 déc. 2023 à 20:18, Andrey Anshin a
> écrit :
>
> > Congrats!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 22:45, Amogh Desai
> wrote:
> >
> > > This is fantastic!
+1 (non-binding)
Tested my set of changes, all work fine. Thank you for the release efforts!
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Phone: +91 9730079985
On Sun, Nov 26, 2023
+1
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Phone: +91 9730079985
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 9:55 PM utkarsh sharma
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 9:06 PM, Wei L
completeness of these providers.
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Phone: +91 9730079985
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 5:53 PM Hussein Awala wrote:
> +1 (binding) I chec
Many congratulations, Jens!!
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Phone: +91 9730079985
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 9:07 AM Aritra Basu wrote:
> Congrats J
+1 (binding)
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023, 06:32 Andrey Anshin, wrote:
> +1 binding
>
>
> Best Wishes
> *Andrey Anshin*
>
>
>
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 14:25, Kaxil Naik wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Following the discussion about adding five new providers, I am calling
> for
> > an official
Hi Andrey,
We discussed internally (at Astronomer) regarding your
suggestion on the PRs and we will incorporate the suggestion
in our PRs to remove the callable approach and include
examples in the docs to achieve the same using TaskFlow
and using hook methods in those. Thank you for
the
t; > > Congratulations @Pankaj and @Amogh :)
> > > > Well deserved.
> > > >
> > > > -Rohith Sharma K S
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 19 Sept 2023 at 10:17, Jarek Potiuk
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hell
s of the 3 providers ran
fine.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:05 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 (binding): check
+1 (non-binding)
Our astronomer-providers (async) DBT DAG based on the provider RC2 ran fine.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Wed
manager's decision on it.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 8:02 PM Pankaj Koti
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
cross-provider dependency bumps
during releases? Does it get handled automatically or do we need a
manual minimum version dependency bump here in Google RC to contain
common-sql>=1.7.2?
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian
provider.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 11:28 PM Hussein Awala wrote:
> Since we moved the execut
+1 (non-binding)
Checked that my set of changes are included and they work fine.
Run a few example DAGs and they work fine too.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
I agree with Maciej's rationale here and inclined towards removing it
straight away.
Also, is it the case that users have discovered this flag themselves
without us documenting it anywhere as a feature to use?
*We have a leading underscore for the variable and it hints that it's for
internal
+1 (non-binding)
Tested astronomer-providers with deferrable operators
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, 22:19 Vincent Beck, wrote:
> +1 non binding.
>
> I tested my changes and it works as expected. I also run som testing DAGs
> and everything looks good. I ran AWS system tests against Amazon provider
>
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, 12:59 Hussein Awala, wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> On Mon 28 Aug 2023 at 08:36, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
> > +1 from me
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 8:30 AM Elad Kalif wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to start a vote about Drop MsSQL as a supported backend.
> > >
few DAGs with basic setup/teardown and seems to work well.
Verified the recent fixes for dag_run.conf and it works fine after setting
the needed env var
AIRFLOW__WEBSERVER__SHOW_TRIGGER_FORM_IF_NO_PARAMS to True
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location:
in 2.7.0 (which means
> preparing RC2).
>
> I am writing that in the name of the release-management "concilium":
> Ephraim, Hussein, Elad, Jens, Pankaj Koti, Rahul Vats, myself
>
> We discussed it today at the #release-management channel about the problem
> wit
+1 (non-binding)
Ran the RC with breeze, ran some example DAGs. Tested my change in #32052,
works as expected
We also ran example DAGs for astronomer-providers including deferrable
operators and they work fine.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location
+1 (non-binding)
Concur with Wei & Rahul.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 5:45 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
+1 (non-binding).
I concur with Wei.
Thank you Elad for your efforts with multiple rounds on this provider :)
Also many thanks to Jarek, Hussein and Maciej for their suggestions and
support on the PR while resolving this :)
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering
,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 11:06 PM Elad Kalif wrote:
> Thank you Wei Lee,
>
> Can you please share a rep
+1 (non-binding)
Tested my set of changes. Verified they are included in the RCs, ran tests
and ensured they work as expected.
Thank you for including these.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST
Great work, Wei! !
Congratulations, keep going!!
On Sat, 29 Jul 2023, 03:14 Briana Okyere,
wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> Thanks for your engagement with our PR of the Month Vote for the July
> Newsletter. Lots of great PRs this month!
>
> The results are in at:
>
>
>- *+6 to #31712 by @Lee-W:
[a] (non-binding)
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 11:55 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
>
Many congratulations, Hussein
On Sat, 29 Jul 2023, 23:06 Amogh Desai, wrote:
> Awesome news! Good going, Hussein!
>
> Congratulations
>
> Thanks,
> Amogh Desai
>
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2023, 23:04 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
> > Hello Airflow Community,
> >
> > I have the pleasure to announce
-airflow-providers-google==10.5.0rc1
6. apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure==6.2.2rc1
7. apache-airflow-providers-sftp==4.5.0rc1
8. apache-airflow-providers-snowflake==4.4.0rc1
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian
+1 for #32525.
Seems like a great contribution for AIP-56.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 11:35 PM Michael
I like `db migrate` and would like to vote for it.
It implies to apply all migrations including the initial (init) migrations
similar to how projects like Django do.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time
examples to reduce ambiguities where breaking upgrades are
possible?
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 2:48 PM
dence over
default_deferral.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 4:25 PM Wei Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Avoiding unexpec
help us here which mentions it to install
the provider additionally in case they would like to continue using it.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91
+1 (non-binding)
Verified that remote logging using Elasticsearch works well with the
changes in the RC.
Thank you for the release efforts!
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k
+1 (non-binding)
Concurring with Wei Lee.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 2:10 PM Wei Lee wrote:
> +1 (
+1 (non-binding)
Used this RC to start Airflow with breeze and ran a few example DAGs.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Mon, Jul 10
+1 (non-binding)
Our Amazon example DAGs ran fine with this RC.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 1:08 AM
*Change of vote: +1 (non-binding)*
Since ES RC is being excluded I have no other reservations.
Thank you Elad for all the efforts!
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k
-providers-elasticsearch==4.5.1
Sorry again for the confusion.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 2:16 PM Pankaj
-providers-dbt-cloud
- apache-airflow-providers-google
- apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure
- apache-airflow-providers-snowflake
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k
I am facing trouble with using the ElasticSearch RC.
The remote logging setup that used to work for me previously is no longer
working with this change.
I have reached out for help on the PR with comment
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31920#issuecomment-1623629476
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
Many congratulations Dennis !!
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 10:49 PM Hussein Awala wrote
Yes, +1 also from me for #31123.
Thank you for the poll!
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023, 18:59 Jarek Potiuk, wrote:
> Big +1 for #31123 from me.
>
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 3:02 PM Brent Bovenzi >
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for #31123
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 4:39 PM Elad Kalif wrote:
> >
> > > My vote
Amazing news at the start of the day!
Very well deserved all of them, Vincent, Phani and Maciej!!
Congratulations! Keep helping us and the community :)
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email
+1 (non-binding)
Installed the RC on Docker Desktop's Kubernetes cluster and ran a few
example DAGs successfully, tried to play around with few airflow config
values using values.yaml and it all worked fine.
On Sat, 24 Jun 2023, 00:35 Jarek Potiuk, wrote:
> +1 (binding) -> tested sources (new
+1 (non-binding)
Installed the RC and triggered an example DAG run.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 1:49 AM
flow-providers-cncf-kubernetes==7.1.0rc1*
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:28 AM Wei Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-
+1 (non-binding)
I have a question which I sent in the discussion email :)
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 12
AIP?
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 10:21 PM Jed Cunningham
wrote:
> Sounds good to me. Hopefully we ca
+1 (non-binding)
Tested my set of changes in the RC, ran a few example DAGs and concur with
Phani that our integration DAGs are running fine.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k
:)
Hahah, yes, +1 (non-binding)
He is super helpful and super responsive. Helped us tremendously getting
onboarded with OpenLineage and resolve our queries and doubts very quickly.
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023, 02:25 Jarek Potiuk, wrote:
> Oh God. :)
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 10:54 PM Austin Bennett
+1 (non-binding)
Tested my set of changes and additionally ran a few DAGs.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 1
Many congratulations, Pankaj!! 拾
On Tue, 13 Jun 2023, 05:38 Vikram Koka,
wrote:
> Awesome! Congratulations Pankaj Singh!
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 3:37 PM Oliveira, Niko >
> wrote:
>
> > Woo! Congrats Prankaj!
> >
> >
> > From: Ankit Chaurasia
> > Sent:
+1 to both ideas.
I have a stronger +1 to include the flag with breeze since triggerer
is an Airflow component and breeze commands having support for
it would be nice.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time
Yes, agreeing with all so far, I vote for #27264 too.
On Sat, 27 May 2023, 02:58 Daniel Standish,
wrote:
> you can have any author you like, as long as it is potiuk
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/27264
>
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 2:09 PM Hussein Awala wrote:
>
> > I join Bas and
+1 (non-binding)
Concurring with Wei.
On Wed, 24 May 2023, 21:09 Wei Lee, wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> Test all the providers with example DAGs
>
> > On May 24, 2023, at 3:46 PM, Elad Kalif wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,I have just cut ad hoc wave Airflow Providers packages. This
> > email is calling
+1 (non-binding)
Verified that installing the package from the RC works well, triggered an
example DAG using the client and saw that it worked fine.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email
+1 (non-binding)
Tested my set of changes in the Amazon provider RC2
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/8.1.0rc2/
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k
+1 (non-binding).
Tested my set of changes in the Amazon RC. Thank you!
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:23
+1 (non-binding)
I tested our example DAGs for asynchronous providers kept in
astronomer-providers on this RC3, verified that the version works well and
does not have a regression on our suite.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
+1 non-binding
I tested our example DAGs for asynchronous providers kept in
astronomer-providers on the RC2 too, verified that the version works well
and does not have a regression on our suite.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
+1 non-binding
I tested our example DAGs for asynchronous providers kept in
astronomer-providers, verified that the version works well and does not
have a regression on our suite.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian
+1 non-binding
On Sun, 30 Apr 2023, 02:20 Hussein Awala, wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Sat 29 Apr 2023 at 23:39, Bolke de Bruin wrote:
>
> > I think I found a critical bug in rc5
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Just kidding :-)
> >
> > +1 binding
> > Bolke
> >
> > Sent
+1 (non-binding)
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023, 07:15 Vikram Koka,
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 6:37 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
>
> > +1 binding
> >
> > On Fri, 28 Apr 2023 at 14:54, Jed Cunningham
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Checked signatures, checksums,
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
