Does not matter IMHO :)
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 10:04 AM Felix Uellendall
wrote:
> Thanks for the link. :)
>
> Okay, and there is also a differentiation between votes of PMC and votes
> of community members for lazy consensus votings? As of my understanding it
> doesn’t matter.
>
> Felix
>
> Sent
Thanks for the link. :)
Okay, and there is also a differentiation between votes of PMC and votes of
community members for lazy consensus votings? As of my understanding it doesn’t
matter.
Felix
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 08:50, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> That was a call f
That was a call for lazy consensus :)
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus
Obviously, it was not silent this time :D
J.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 12:12 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote:
> "unless someone objects" -- so this isn't an official vote, we only care
> if someone objec
"unless someone objects" -- so this isn't an official vote, we only
care if someone objects :D
-a
On Fri, 4 Dec, 2020 at 21:41, Felix Uellendall
wrote:
Makes sense to me. I am actually curious how many people use the imap
provider? If anyone does please let me know - just wondering who else
Makes sense to me. I am actually curious how many people use the imap provider?
If anyone does please let me know - just wondering who else has to process
email attachments. 😅
+1 (if that’s is supposed to be an official voting - don’t see a voting prefix
in the email subject. Isn’t that require
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:15 AM Vikram Koka wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:41 PM James Timmins wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:35 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:22 PM Arthur Wiedmer
>>>
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:41 PM James Timmins wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:35 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:22 PM Arthur Wiedmer
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:35
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:35 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:22 PM Arthur Wiedmer
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:35 AM Jarek Potiuk
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Following the discussion in
>>> https://github.com/apach
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:22 PM Arthur Wiedmer
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:35 AM Jarek Potiuk
> wrote:
>
>> Following the discussion in
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12744
>>
>> I would like to ask for a lazy consensus to get 4 providers
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:35 AM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> Following the discussion in https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12744
>
> I would like to ask for a lazy consensus to get 4 providers installed
> always when you install airflow:
>
> While they are separated out as provid
Following the discussion in https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12744
I would like to ask for a lazy consensus to get 4 providers installed
always when you install airflow:
While they are separated out as providers (and can be downgraded or
upgraded independently, we will make them "required
11 matches
Mail list logo