Re: [VOTE] March 2024 PR of the Month

My vote goes to #36755 Great teamwork, given that it wasn't so easy since so many providers were involved. Kudos! Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 5:46 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 on Python 3.12 (#36755) - with the note that it's been a joint effort > of quite a few

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on March 25, 2024

+1 non binding Installed airflow from main with fab rc1 and I was able to create a few test users with various roles, check their rights on the elements, and run a few simple dags. Works fine from my end. Btw, @Elad Kalif there's a typo: *This release is only for FAB provider to be tested

Re: [VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 22:46, Jed Cunningham wrote: > Hello Airflow Community, > > I would like to start a vote on AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history. > > You can find the AIP here: > >

Re: [VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history

+1 binding On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 6:19 PM Mehta, Shubham wrote: > +1 (non-binding). > > Shubham > > On 2024-03-25, 5:10 PM, "Wei Lee" weilee...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you can

Re: [VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history

+1 (non-binding). Shubham On 2024-03-25, 5:10 PM, "Wei Lee" mailto:weilee...@gmail.com>> wrote: CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. AVERTISSEMENT: Ce

Re: [VOTE] March 2024 PR of the Month

+1 on Python 3.12 (#36755) - with the note that it's been a joint effort of quite a few people - Andrey, Bolke, Gopal Dirisao who contributed to it in Airflow, but also a number people who are maintainers of our dependencies: Israel Fruchter and Bret McGuire from Cassandra, Andreas Poehlmann

Re: [VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history

+1 (non-binding), looking forward to it! Best, Wei > On Mar 26, 2024, at 6:17 AM, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 10:51 PM Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T) > wrote: > >> +1 binding >> >> Sent from Outlook for iOS >>

Re: [VOTE] March 2024 PR of the Month

+1 for #36755 Best, Wei > On Mar 26, 2024, at 5:50 AM, Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T) > wrote: > > My vote is +1 for #36755 - mainly because it was really a long - runner and > important we made it! > > Sent from Outlook for iOS > >

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 2.8.4 Released

Dear Airflow community, I'm happy to announce that Airflow 2.8.4 was just released. The released sources and packages can be downloaded via https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/installation/installing-from-sources.html Other installation methods are described in

Re: [VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history

+1 (binding) On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 10:51 PM Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T) wrote: > +1 binding > > Sent from Outlook for iOS > > From: Pierre Jeambrun > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 9:19:36 PM > To: dev@airflow.apache.org > Subject:

Re: [VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history

+1 binding Sent from Outlook for iOS From: Pierre Jeambrun Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 9:19:36 PM To: dev@airflow.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history +1 (binding) On Mon 25 Mar 2024 at 19:32, Igor

Re: [VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history

+1 (binding) On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 20:19, Pierre Jeambrun wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon 25 Mar 2024 at 19:32, Igor Kholopov > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 7:28 PM Tzu-ping Chung > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 binding. > > > > > > This is something we should

Re: [VOTE] March 2024 PR of the Month

My vote is +1 for #36755 - mainly because it was really a long - runner and important we made it! Sent from Outlook for iOS From: Briana Okyere Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 8:53:32 PM To: dev@airflow.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] March 2024

Re: [VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history

+1 (binding) On Mon 25 Mar 2024 at 19:32, Igor Kholopov wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 7:28 PM Tzu-ping Chung > wrote: > > > +1 binding. > > > > This is something we should just do even outside of the DAG versioning > > context (which we also should do, to be clear). > >

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.13.1 Released

Dear Airflow community, I am pleased to announce that we have released Apache Airflow Helm chart 1.13.1   The source release, as well as the "binary" Helm Chart release, are available:  Official Sources:

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.4 from 2.8.4rc1

Hello, Apache Airflow 2.8.4 (based on RC1) has been accepted. 4 "+1" binding votes received: - Jed Cunningham - Jarek Potiuk - Hussein Awala - Andrey Anshin 3 "+1" non-binding votes received: - Rahul Vats - Amogh Desai - Wei Lee Vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.4 from 2.8.4rc1

Hey Andrey, If you reimport from KEYS, I've already updated the expiration date a while back :). But yes, that would be problematic otherwise. Jed On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 10:41 AM Andrey Anshin wrote: > +1 binding > > Checked files, licences, signatures and also my changes. > > One small nit

Re: [VOTE] March 2024 PR of the Month

+1 for #36755 Python3.12 On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 23:54, Briana Okyere wrote: > Hey All, > > It’s once again time to vote for the PR of the Month! > > With the help of the `get_important_pr_candidates` script in dev/stats, > we've identified the following candidates: > > PR #37937: refactor:

[VOTE] March 2024 PR of the Month

Hey All, It’s once again time to vote for the PR of the Month! With the help of the `get_important_pr_candidates` script in dev/stats, we've identified the following candidates: PR #37937: refactor: Refactored __new__ magic method of BaseOperatorMeta to avoid bad mixing classic and decorated

Re: [VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 7:28 PM Tzu-ping Chung wrote: > +1 binding. > > This is something we should just do even outside of the DAG versioning > context (which we also should do, to be clear). > > TP > > > > On Mar 26, 2024, at 02:12, Aritra Basu wrote: > > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history

+1 binding. This is something we should just do even outside of the DAG versioning context (which we also should do, to be clear). TP > On Mar 26, 2024, at 02:12, Aritra Basu wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > This is quite good, I'd thought in passing that it'd be useful to have. > > -- >

Re: [VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history

+1 (non-binding) This is quite good, I'd thought in passing that it'd be useful to have. -- Regards, Aritra Basu On Mon, Mar 25, 2024, 10:46 PM Jed Cunningham wrote: > Hello Airflow Community, > > I would like to start a vote on AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history. > > You can find the AIP

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.13.1 based on 1.13.1rc1

Hello all, The vote to release Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.13.1 based on 1.13.1rc1 is now closed. The vote PASSED with 3 binding "+1", 1 non-binding "+1" and 0 "-1" votes: "+1" Binding votes: - Jed Cunningham - Jarek Potiuk - Hussein Awala "+1" Non-Binding votes: - Amogh

[VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history

Hello Airflow Community, I would like to start a vote on AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history. You can find the AIP here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-64%3A+Keep+TaskInstance+try+history Discussion Thread:

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on March 25, 2024

+1 (binding): checked signatures, checksums, licences, reproducibility. I build latest main `airflow` (that will become b2) as `2.9.0rc1` package and installed it together with apache-airflow-providers-fab `1.0.2rc1` and they work nicely together. I was able to create users, authenticate, login

[VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on March 25, 2024

Hey all, I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on March 28, 2024 13:55 PM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. Consider this my (binding) +1. This release

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.4 from 2.8.4rc1

+1 (non-binding) Ran a few example DAGs and worked fine. Best, Wei > On Mar 25, 2024, at 3:30 PM, Amogh Desai wrote: > > +1 non binding > > Verified my changes, and ran a few example DAGs. I see no regressions. > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 8:11 PM

Re: [DISCUSS] Applying D105 rule for our codebase ("undocumented magic methods") ?

PR to remove it https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38452 On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 10:14 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Ok. Seems we have a consensus :) > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 7:13 AM Wei Lee wrote: > >> +1 for removing this rule. If docstring is needed for some cases, we can >> still do that

Re: [DISCUSS] Applying D105 rule for our codebase ("undocumented magic methods") ?

Ok. Seems we have a consensus :) On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 7:13 AM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 for removing this rule. If docstring is needed for some cases, we can > still do that or add comments to PRs. > > Best, > Wei > > > On Mar 25, 2024, at 1:31 PM, Amogh Desai > wrote: > > > > After reading the

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.4 from 2.8.4rc1

+1 non binding Verified my changes, and ran a few example DAGs. I see no regressions. Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 8:11 PM Andrey Anshin wrote: > +1 binding > > Checked files, licences, signatures and also my changes. > > One small nit that I've found is that the key

Re: [DISCUSS] Applying D105 rule for our codebase ("undocumented magic methods") ?

+1 for removing this rule. If docstring is needed for some cases, we can still do that or add comments to PRs. Best, Wei > On Mar 25, 2024, at 1:31 PM, Amogh Desai wrote: > > After reading the emails in this thread, I too think that this rule is not > generally very useful, but we should have