RE: having datatypes load classes

See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=104870800508326&w=2 And http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17199 I prefer the first link, since I'm the author of it, but the second link addresses the same issue. If your elements do not need any configurations though, it may be overk

having datatypes load classes

Hi all, I'm writing some Ant task that requires the flexibility of having nested data-types that can load their own classes. For sure I will need to have the @classpathref and nested to actually get doing it, but since that pattern is to be seen more around ant iteself,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15449] - Weblogic deploy task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17199] - patch to allow custom conditions (+ filters..)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17199] - patch to allow custom conditions (+ filters..)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14650] - RPM task with -b in command broken on RH8.0

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14650] - RPM task with -b in command broken on RH8.0

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18656] - Rename recursively

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14650] - RPM task with -b in command broken on RH8.0

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14650] - RPM task with -b in command broken on RH8.0

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18826] - rpm task doesn't work with recent versions of rpm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18826] - rpm task doesn't work with recent versions of rpm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18826] - rpm task doesn't work with recent versions of rpm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18826] New: - rpm task doesn't work with recent versions of rpm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18793] - Project.getTargets() returns one too many targets

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release

- Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 06:41 Subject: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release > I am about to build Ant 1.5.3. There are just a few minor changes from the > Beta. > > Please indicate your support for this

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18822] - SQL Task fails to load some packages in Oracle

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18822] New: - SQL Task fails to load some packages in Oracle

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

AW: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release

Hi, > I'm having trouble getting the JSPC test to work - any ideas? Check which version of Jasper you have in your classpath. We could only get JSPC working with the version of Jasper that comes with Tomcat 5. I'd say the test is working well! Cheers, Nick. > > Conor > > > -- > Conor Mac

Re: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release

On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm having trouble getting the JSPC test to work - any ideas? Did they change at all? IIRC jspc is still kind of broken but works a lot better than in 1.5.1. Stefan

Re: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release

On Tue, 8 Apr 2003 11:41 pm, Conor MacNeill wrote: > I am about to build Ant 1.5.3. There are just a few minor changes from the > Beta. > I'm having trouble getting the JSPC test to work - any ideas? Conor -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/

RE: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release

> I am about to build Ant 1.5.3. There are just a few minor > changes from the Beta. > > Please indicate your support for this release > > Here is my +1 +1! We'll need do get this release out of the door really soon :). 1.5.2 didn't please too many people ;). Greetings, Christoph

Re: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release

+1 Cheers, Magesh - Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 9:41 AM Subject: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release > I am about to build Ant 1.5.3. There are just a few minor changes from the > Beta. > > Please indicate y

Re: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release

+1 On Tuesday, April 8, 2003, at 09:41 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: I am about to build Ant 1.5.3. There are just a few minor changes from the Beta. Please indicate your support for this release Here is my +1 Conor - To unsubscrib

Re: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations

Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Ignacio J. Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje > >>> Class.forName will use the system classloader and not the nice >>> little >> >> IMHO This contradicts my experience of CLs, i think some p

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual cover.html credits.html

conor 2003/04/08 07:17:05 Modified:.Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH build.xml docs/manual Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH cover.html credits.html Log: Preparation for 1.5.3 release Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision

Re: Making URIs from locations

On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note the change to resource (from resources) to be consistent with > / . resources has been a typo, thanks. > I assume the url attribute's signature would be setUrl(URL url). Yes. Stefan

RE: Making URIs from locations

I'm +1 for not overloading . I also like Stefan's syntax the best from the different proposals, I'd just drop the set prefix to have simply: http://www.apache.org/"/> Note the change to resource (from resources) to be consistent with / . I assume the url attribute's signature would be se

Re: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release

On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am about to build Ant 1.5.3. Yes, yes, yes. Sigh with relief. 8-) +1 Stefan

[PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release

I am about to build Ant 1.5.3. There are just a few minor changes from the Beta. Please indicate your support for this release Here is my +1 Conor

Re: Using files in classpath in task file=""

On Tue, 08 Apr 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IIUC style="" would accept only files, so using it I'd have to be > sure it's on the FS. Yes. With the additional benefit over > styleuri="" instead can be used both for remote and local files, if > I resolve it to a URL, and

cvs commit: ant/xdocs faq.xml

bodewig 2003/04/08 06:05:06 Modified:docs Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH faq.html xdocsTag: ANT_15_BRANCH faq.xml Log: sync with HEAD Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.30.2.9 +26 -1 ant/docs/

cvs commit: ant/xdocs faq.xml

bodewig 2003/04/08 06:04:24 Modified:docs faq.html xdocsfaq.xml Log: FAQ about the broken zip task in 1.5.2 Revision ChangesPath 1.67 +19 -1 ant/docs/faq.html Index: faq.html ==

AW: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18809] New: - Core task "war" broken

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Dienstag, 8. April 2003 14:54 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18809] New: - Core task "war" broken > > Conor, > > if you can find some spare hours, could we please release 1

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18809] New: - Core task "war" broken

Conor, if you can find some spare hours, could we please release 1.5.3? Pretty, pretty please. Meanwhile I'm going to create an FAQ entry from this, not that it is going to help too much, but at least we can make people feel bad for their duplicate reports 8-) Stefan

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17648] - not working for zip task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18809] - Core task "war" broken

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/xdocs external.xml

bodewig 2003/04/08 05:49:22 Modified:docs Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH external.html xdocsTag: ANT_15_BRANCH external.xml Log: sync with HEAD Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.48.2.36 +58 -0

Re: New external resource found

committed, thanks Stefan

cvs commit: ant/xdocs external.xml

bodewig 2003/04/08 05:42:53 Modified:docs external.html xdocsexternal.xml Log: Add pointer to JMX4Ant. Submitted by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Revision ChangesPath 1.110 +53 -0 ant/docs/external.html Index: external.html

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18809] New: - Core task "war" broken

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18708] - outputproperty attribute of

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

WG: New external resource found

Ok, Brian, sais 1.4 and above :-) Jan Matèrne -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Brian Dueck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet am: Dienstag, 8. April 2003 13:01 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: New external resource found Thanks for the cross post Jan. JMX4Ant should work fine with 1.4

New external resource found

I found a new external resource: JMX4Ant It provides JMX access from Ant. I adapted the JMeta-XDocs for external.xml: JMX4Ant provides tasks for integration with JMX (Java Management Extensions). It provides tasks for getting and setting attributes of MBeans, in

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18708] - outputproperty attribute of

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18708] - outputproperty attribute of

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18708] - outputproperty attribute of

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18807] New: - Pro*C

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Making URIs from locations

Stefan Bodewig wrote, On 08/04/2003 10.33: [was Re: Using files in classpath in task file="", changed subject to attract more comments] On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... about a new attribute to that would set the property to the URI of a file that get's res

Re: Using files in classpath in task file=""

Stefan Bodewig wrote, On 08/04/2003 10.23: On Tue, 08 Apr 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote, On 08/04/2003 9.07: But why stick with the resource protocol? Can't Xalan deal with stylesheets loaded via http? Please excuse me, I'm a PITA, I knew that before thi

Making URIs from locations

[was Re: Using files in classpath in task file="", changed subject to attract more comments] On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... about a new attribute to that would set the property to the URI of a file that get's resolved relative to basedir. > Pick the na

Re: Using files in classpath in task file=""

On Tue, 08 Apr 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote, On 08/04/2003 9.07: > >> But why stick with the resource protocol? Can't Xalan deal with >> stylesheets loaded via http? > > Please excuse me, I'm a PITA, I knew that before this thread ;-) > You mean us

Re: Using files in classpath in task file=""

Stefan Bodewig wrote, On 08/04/2003 9.07: On Mon, 07 Apr 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What should I send a patch for? For now, new attributes would be better IMHO. Yes. Solution to the problem, and extra goodies later. But why stick with the resource protocol? Can't Xal

Re: Using files in classpath in task file=""

Stefan Bodewig wrote, On 08/04/2003 8.49: On Fri, 04 Apr 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * is not as transparent as you say. Tasks could only use the URI if they first check that the object is is our version of File and cast to it. No... that's not how it's supposed to be. Wh

Re: Using files in classpath in task file=""

On Mon, 07 Apr 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What should I send a patch for? For now, new attributes would be better IMHO. But why stick with the resource protocol? Can't Xalan deal with stylesheets loaded via http? Stefan

Re: Using files in classpath in task file=""

On Fri, 04 Apr 2003, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure if IH can deal with overloaded methods In a hacky way, as always. It already does so. If it finds two attribute setters of the same name and one takes a String argument, it will favor the other one. Stefan

Re: Using files in classpath in task file=""

On Fri, 04 Apr 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> * is not as transparent as you say. Tasks could only use the URI >> if they first check that the object is is our version of File and >> cast to it. > > No... that's not how it's supposed to be. What other method do they > nee

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18795] - Pathconvert strange behavior

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18786] - exec cannot execute all command lines...

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18768] - WAR task (or ZIP base ?) generates amazing archives

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations

On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Ignacio J. Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje >> Class.forName will use the system classloader and not the nice >> little > > IMHO This contradicts my experience of CLs, i think some places > inside tomcat used Class

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18768] - WAR task (or ZIP base ?) generates amazing archives

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18795] New: - Pathconvert strange behavior

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18793] - Project.getTargets() returns one too many targets

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18793] New: - Project.getTargets() returns one too many targets

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu