DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34464.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bodewig 2005/04/15 01:10:39
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Java.java
Log:
Make sure we add a location when java fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.104 +4 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Java.java
Index: Java.java
bodewig 2005/04/15 01:11:09
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH
Java.java
Log:
merge
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.77.2.14 +4 -1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33604.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34458.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: bodewig
Date: Fri Apr 15 05:53:08 2005
New Revision: 161447
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=161447
Log:
Initial directory structure
Added:
ant/antlibs/
ant/core/
ant/sandbox/
ant/sandbox/antlibs/
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34458.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34458.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34458.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
you may have noticed my test commit.
I plan to import the svn, dotnet and antunit things from proposal
somewhere under sandbox/antlibs, I'm not exactly sure when I'll find
time to do that, though.
I've chose antlibs instead of libs (as suggested by DD), but we can
change that easily in SVN by
Author: bodewig
Date: Fri Apr 15 07:32:50 2005
New Revision: 161469
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=161469
Log:
Import sandbox antlibs
Added:
ant/sandbox/antlibs/antunit/
ant/sandbox/antlibs/antunit/branches/
ant/sandbox/antlibs/antunit/tags/
Added: ant/sandbox/antlibs/svn/trunk/build.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/ant/sandbox/antlibs/svn/trunk/build.xml?view=autorev=161469
==
--- ant/sandbox/antlibs/svn/trunk/build.xml (added)
+++
Added:
ant/sandbox/antlibs/dotnet/branches/Ant_1.6.2_compatible/src/etc/testcases/src/fail.cs
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/ant/sandbox/antlibs/dotnet/branches/Ant_1.6.2_compatible/src/etc/testcases/src/fail.cs?view=autorev=161469
Added: ant/sandbox/antlibs/dotnet/trunk/docs/nunit.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/ant/sandbox/antlibs/dotnet/trunk/docs/nunit.html?view=autorev=161469
==
--- ant/sandbox/antlibs/dotnet/trunk/docs/nunit.html
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I plan to import the svn, dotnet and antunit things from proposal
somewhere under sandbox/antlibs, I'm not exactly sure when I'll find
time to do that, though.
Just did, but they won't build until anybody fixes the build files
(they
Added:
ant/sandbox/antlibs/svn/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/svn/SvnChangeLogTask.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/ant/sandbox/antlibs/svn/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/svn/SvnChangeLogTask.java?view=autorev=161469
Author: ddevienne
Date: Fri Apr 15 08:00:09 2005
New Revision: 161477
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=161477
Log:
Proposal for XML doc of Ant, transformed to HTML using XSL.
Added:
ant/sandbox/antlibs/gendoc/
ant/sandbox/antlibs/gendoc/build.xml
--- Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Matt Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ever noticed that every Ant type that supports the
id/refid pattern must include a load of custom
code?
Why? Wouldn't it be possible in UE to check all
DataType subclass elements
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you start to commit to the repo[1], please keep in mind that svn
treats all files as binary, unless you set the svn:eol-style property
to native.
I use the following snippets[2] in my ~/.subversion/config to make SVN
guess the eol-style
--- Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
inspired by the creative use of macrodef and
fail others (mainly
Matt and Steve) have shown in our tests, the idea of
AntUnit we had a
long time ago surfaced in my mind again.
Cool. I'm pretty sure it was some of Steve's tests
that inspired
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, if anyone objects to the XML+XSL doc proposal going to SVN
ant/sandbox/antlibs/gendoc, let me know and I'll remove it.
I'm not sure that antlibs is the correct place or whether a different
category under sandbox was more
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, if anyone objects to the XML+XSL doc proposal going to SVN
ant/sandbox/antlibs/gendoc, let me know and I'll remove it.
I'm not sure that antlibs is the correct place or whether a different
category under sandbox was more appropriate.
Can we keep old [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address for SVN updates? The
commit messages just spam dev build list.
- Alexey.
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
you may have noticed my test commit.
I plan to import the svn, dotnet and antunit things from proposal
somewhere under sandbox/antlibs, I'm not exactly
--- Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Matt Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't. If I'm going to dump this
ResourceCollection stuff into HEAD I'd rather have
this resolved first, and right now only five
committers have shown any interest in this
I wonder if there's any mileage in developing a symbolic debugger for Ant
scripts? While the debug output is often adequate for simple(ish) scripts I've
had a number of cases where I really could do with a symbolic debugger (like
just now!).
Phil :n.
At least some JBuilder 2005 (SE+?) have ANT debugger that allows also
debug custom tasks.
- Alexey.
Phil Weighill-Smith wrote:
I wonder if there's any mileage in developing a symbolic debugger for Ant
scripts? While the debug output is often adequate for simple(ish) scripts I've
had a number
Does it debug at the build script source level or at the java code level for
the tasks? It's the former I'd really want in this case.
Phil :n.
-Original Message-
From: Alexey N. Solofnenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 15/04/2005 17:09
To: Ant Developers List
Cc:
IIRC you can run Ant builds through the Eclipse debugger.
--
Jeffrey E. Care ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
WebSphere Build SWAT Team Lead
WebSphere Build Tooling Lead (Project Mantis)
https://w3.opensource.ibm.com/projects/mantis
Phil Weighill-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
04/15/2005 12:03:08 PM:
There is an Ant debugger for NetBeans 4.x.
I've not really played with it much. I have accidentally hit debug
instead of execute for a given Ant script in the IDE and the results
looked promising...
Jeffrey E Care wrote:
IIRC you can run Ant builds through the Eclipse debugger.
Great, looks good
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Matt,
I have not been able to respond as my work commitments
are extreme at the moment.
I do not like roles (although I did write an implementation)
as it would be like the following in a language:
Integer x = 1;
Complex x = (8, 10);
Complex z = (-1, 9);
Complex y = x + z;
The compiler in this
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33604.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have not been able to respond as my work commitments
are extreme at the moment.
I do not like roles (although I did write an implementation)
as it would be like the following in a language:
Integer x = 1;
Complex x = (8, 10);
Complex z
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Alexey N. Solofnenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Can we keep old [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address for SVN updates?
The commit messages just spam dev build list.
Actually I thought we'd be getting the CVS commit mails there
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) as well.
Does the majority of us
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can we keep old [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address for SVN updates?
The commit messages just spam dev build list.
Actually I thought we'd be getting the CVS commit mails there
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) as well.
Does the majority of us want the
mbenson 2005/04/15 13:25:36
Modified:.WHATSNEW
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types RedirectorElement.java
src/etc/testcases/types redirector.xml
src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/types
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Matt Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't. If I'm going to dump this
ResourceCollection stuff into HEAD I'd rather have
this resolved first, and right now only five
committers have shown any
You are using my preferred syntax. Also available
would be, e.g.:
and xmlns=ant:conditions /
and xmlns=ant:fileselectors /
and xmlns=ant:resourceselectors /
date xmlns=ant:resourceselectors /
date xmlns=ant:resourcecomparators /
-Matt
--- Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Benson
thanks for giving me a probe-mail, Matt. 8-)
OK, CVS commits go to [EMAIL PROTECTED], will send SVN mails there as
well.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mbenson 2005/04/15 13:52:53
Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW
src/etc/testcases/types Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH redirector.xml
src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/types Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH
RedirectorElementTest.java
Well that would be up to the user. Would it mean for us that the code
must be in different libraries, or is it enough if the classes are
defined in separate property files / marked with special values, while
the classes can still be blended in in core ant.
Martijn
Matt Benson wrote:
You are
From: Martijn Kruithof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this te direction we are going with roles:
project name=foo default=bar
xmlns:co=ant:condition
xmlns:set=ant:resourceselector
resourcecollection id=blah
set:and
set:files dir=foo name=**/*.java/
set:date
--- Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well that would be up to the user. Would it mean
for us that the code
must be in different libraries, or is it enough if
the classes are
defined in separate property files / marked with
special values, while
the classes can still be blended
--- Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn, Matt, the example above would be necessary
if and only
if resourcecollection only had a
add(ResourceSelector). In
practice, we'll likely have specialized
addAnd(ResourceSelector) and co
so that if can be written just:
oh, that's
Dominique Devienne wrote:
snip with namespaces
Martijn, Matt, the example above would be necessary if and only
if resourcecollection only had a add(ResourceSelector). In
practice, we'll likely have specialized addAnd(ResourceSelector) and co
so that if can be written just:
snip without
But wouldn't that defeat the whole purpose of the fill in role-type
here I thought the whole point was avoiding having addConcrete in
favour of having add(Role).
What basically is that what Matt just stated.
Apart from the variands A and B further below, would the following also
work?
project
From: Martijn Kruithof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip with namespaces
Martijn, Matt, the example above would be necessary if and only
if resourcecollection only had a add(ResourceSelector). In
practice, we'll likely have specialized addAnd(ResourceSelector) and
co
so that if can be written
--- Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
Apart from the variands A and B further below, would
the following also
work?
project name=foo default=bar
resourcecollection id=blah xmlns=ant:set
and
files dir=foo name=**/*.java/
date select=newer
48 matches
Mail list logo
