.
But can see that / does bring something new to the table.
regarding ; I think it needs more publicity and use.
- Original Message -
From: "peter reilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 07:09
S
- Original Message -
From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 10:02
Subject: RE: 1.6 milestones ?
>
> I know few people may like the JDK1.4 approach ( "put everything in
> rt.jar"), bu
Costin Manolache wrote, On 14/03/2003 19.02:
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
Thanks Costin.
I also understand some of the philosophical arguments (not to become
scripting), but when you see how confusing a buildfile looks and how many
extra properties you need to add to the build just to avoid using
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
{ http://trelony.cjb.net/ } Alexey N. Solofnenko
Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 usually)
-Original Message-
From: Parimah MehrRostami [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 10:18 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: 1.6 milestones ?
I have
that?
- Original Message -
From: "Alexey Solofnenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Ant Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 10:05 AM
Subject: RE: 1.6 milestones ?
> Is it possible to add expressions in target'
Is it possible to add expressions in target's if and unless attributes? It
would reduce the necessity of statements.
- Alexey.
--
{ http://trelony.cjb.net/ } Alexey N. Solofnenko
Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 usually)
ing in
rt.jar"), but I think it would be better to have more flexibility.
Costin
>
> Jose Alberto
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 14 March 2003 15:47
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: R
made of the other tasks.
Jose Alberto
> -Original Message-
> From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 March 2003 15:47
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 1.6 milestones ?
>
>
> peter reilly wrote:
>
> > The if, foreach, try, and sw
gt;
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Which would add the or the or both depending on the
>> property settings.
>>
>> I can see all kinds of ways to simplify builds by having something like
>> that.
&g
> Jose Alberto
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 14 March 2003 11:32
> > To: Ant Developers List
> > Subject: Re: 1.6 milestones ?
> >
> >
> > new features I would like in 1.6.
> >
all kinds of ways to simplify builds by having something like that.
Jose Alberto
> -Original Message-
> From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 March 2003 11:32
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Re: 1.6 milestones ?
>
>
> new features I would like i
new features I would like in 1.6.
1) import task to import in-line
at the moment, it imports at the end of the build file, thus
messing up order for top level defines.
2) ability to have custom conditions - see bugzilla 17199 :-)
3) add if and unless attributes for some tasks
e.g. in
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 06:29 pm, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> What about releasing an ant 1.5.4 before 1.6 with the current head revision
> in it, plus as many bugs from bugzilla as possible ?
A rose by any other name. If we release the HEAD revision, we'll call it 1.6
> This would help a number of
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:02 pm, Costin Manolache wrote:
> Steve Loughran wrote:
> > That's the task that doesnt have any documentation, right?
> >
> :-)
>
> It'll have documentation after it is reviewed by more people and we
> know it's going to be stable.
>
I think more people will be able to try
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:50 am, Costin Manolache wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do we have any plan or idea on when we'll start distributing 1.6 milestone
> builds ?
>
I'm not really sure what a milestone build means and, more importantly, what
expectations it creates for stability of feature set.
For 1.6 I th
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do we have any plan or idea on when we'll start distributing 1.6
> milestone builds ?
Ant has never released any milestone builds so far, so no, there is no
plan yet AFAIK. If there was, you'd know it for sure 8-)
Before we rele
Steve Loughran wrote, On 13/03/2003 0.39:
...
That's the task that doesnt have any documentation, right?
Jikes, you're right. How do I submit it, as the usual HTML page or the
@tags... I'm a bit behind the Ant documentation efforts, sorry.
Maybe the thing to do is look at what major changes stil
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It'll have documentation after it is reviewed by more people and we
> know it's going to be stable.
I don't like this approach at all. How are you expecting user
feedback on an undocumented feature?
Stefan
What about releasing an ant 1.5.4 before 1.6 with the current head revision
in it, plus as many bugs from bugzilla as possible ?
This would help a number of people and be encouraging for all the ant users
who have reported bugs or suggested patches in bugzilla.
Plus this would bring the task to a
Steve Loughran wrote:
> That's the task that doesnt have any documentation, right?
:-)
It'll have documentation after it is reviewed by more people and we
know it's going to be stable.
> Maybe the thing to do is look at what major changes still need to go in to
> ant. Now that we have explo
- Original Message -
From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 14:50
Subject: 1.6 milestones ?
> Hi,
>
> Do we have any plan or idea on when we'll start distributing 1.6 milestone
> buil
Hi,
Do we have any plan or idea on when we'll start distributing 1.6 milestone
builds ?
Tomcat5 is getting stable, and the next milestone will probably include an
"embeded" profile that will be controlled by ant and jmx tasks. It would
really help to have a matching ant1.6M1 instead of requiring
22 matches
Mail list logo
