Kev Jackson wrote:
I didnt thought that as well, but that´s not our playground. You
could open a RFE on BugZilla itself :-)
done
so...
>>>
What|Removed |Added
S
I didnt thought that as well, but that´s not our playground.
You could open a RFE on BugZilla itself :-)
done
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh - background could be that no bug should be lost.
Jan
I can see that, but perhaps a 'feature' to archive off components with
100% closed bugs? It seems remarkable that this hasn't been thought of
before (it probably has, but no-one wants to hack the code).
Oh - background could be that no bug should be lost.
Jan
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. Juni 2005 08:54
>An: dev@ant.apache.org
>Betreff: AW: AW: suggestion - remove antidote from components
&g
>You can only delete a component in BugZilla if you re-assign
>all the bugs to something else? Seems to be a bit drastic (oh
>well) Kev
I didnt thought that as well, but that´s not our playground. You could open a
RFE on BugZilla itself :-)
Jan
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that, too - but there would be lot of work without win [1].
You can only delete a component in BugZilla if you re-assign all the
bugs to something else? Seems to be a bit drastic (oh well)
Kev
--
Ant Developers List
>Betreff: suggestion - remove antidote from components list on BugZilla
>
>seems like a waste to have it still listed since it's deprecated
>
>Kev
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
seems like a waste to have it still listed since it's deprecated
Kev
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I just see that Antidote is just a valid Component in BugZilla. 9
> > Bug entries, all marked as fixed, invalid or wont (and wont any more
> > after dropping the whole subproject ;)
> >
> > Should we delete that component?
>
> You can only delete a &quo
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just see that Antidote is just a valid Component in BugZilla. 9
> Bug entries, all marked as fixed, invalid or wont (and wont any more
> after dropping the whole subproject ;)
>
> Should we delete that com
I just see that Antidote is just a valid Component in BugZilla.
9 Bug entries, all marked as fixed, invalid or wont (and wont any more after
dropping the
whole subproject ;)
Should we delete that component?
Jan
-
To
ONTFIX
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-05 10:26 ---
The Antidote project is no longer supported.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug,
Hi,
I've removed write access from the ant-antidote module just to be sure
I really pick up the latest version.
Could you please have a look at
<http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/antidote/> and comment on it (and
maybe check my signature 8-)? This is what I envision to b
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, I was merely indicating that I didn't really have an
> opinion on something I had never or even looked at.
Which is perfectly OK.
> I didn't realize I was hindering the process, nor that 2/3
> majority was required, and fi
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and a +0 by Dominique Devienne. 13 of the 18 people currently listed
> as non-emeritus PMC members or committers have voted and 12 of them
> voted in favor of the proposal so we narrowly matched the 2/3
> requirement.
Hmm, I was merely indicating
Easter weekend.
Unless anybody objects I'll ask infrastructure to take the antidote
module offline and perform all the other steps mentioned in the
original vote email myself by the end of this week.
Stefan
-
To unsubscri
people currently listed
as non-emeritus PMC members or committers have voted and 12 of them
voted in favor of the proposal so we narrowly matched the 2/3
requirement.
We may want to allow some extra time because of the Easter weekend.
Unless anybody objects I'll ask infrastructure to take the ant
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right now it looks as if the vote thread I started is going to fail
> because we don't reach our required 2/3 of all committers bar,
No, I was wrong (and I happy about that), I dodn't see Jesse's vote
prior to writing this mail. 12
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Nowadays most of the IDEs (all?) have an editor for Ant buildfiles.
>> Antidote was touched 17 months ago (as I can see), for Jack Woehr´s
>> I18N-patch.
>
> I had wa
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
[...] I hereby propose to retire the Antidote subproject. [...]
+1
-J.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] x22801 netbeans.org ant.apache.org
if I had known it was harmless I would have killed it myself
-
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Nowadays most of the IDEs (all?) have an editor for Ant buildfiles.
> Antidote was touched 17 months ago (as I can see), for Jack Woehr´s
> I18N-patch.
I had wanted to do more. But it was hard to co-ordinate with the maintainer.
> But I dont think that i
+1.
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Since Antidote's development has been stalled for a long time now -
and there doesn't seem to be a big need for an Ant GUI given the great
IDE support we have - I hereby propose to retire the Antidote
> IDE integration is so good these days, our work is done.
No - but we have to work on another area :-)
Jan
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
This again is a vote that needs two-third of all active committers, oh
my.
Since Antidote's development has been stalled for a long time now -
and there doesn't seem to be a big need for an Ant GUI given the great
IDE support we have - I hereby propose to retire th
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
This again is a vote that needs two-third of all active committers, oh
my.
+1
Conor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Jan
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet am: Montag, 21. März 2005 17:02
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: [VOTE] Retire Antidote
>
> This again is a vote that needs two-third of all active committers, oh
> m
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hereby propose to retire the Antidote subproject.
+ 1
Antoine
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comma
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 March 2005 16:03
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Retire Antidote
>
>
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
e have - I hereby propose to retire the Antidote
subproject.
Actions to be taken:
* announce that development has been stopped, both on Ant's website
and the user list.
* remove the Antidote pages from the website.
* zip up the ant-antidote CVS module and offer it via
archive.apache.org to int
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hereby propose to retire the Antidote subproject.
+1 Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hereby propose to retire the Antidote subproject.
+1
+1
Peter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comma
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hereby propose to retire the Antidote subproject.
+1
-Matt
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I hereby propose to retire the Antidote subproject.
> +1
+0. --DD
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hereby propose to retire the Antidote subproject.
+1
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This again is a vote that needs two-third of all active committers, oh
my.
Since Antidote's development has been stalled for a long time now -
and there doesn't seem to be a big need for an Ant GUI given the great
IDE support we have - I hereby propose to retire the Antidote
subproject
Nowadays most of the IDEs (all?) have an editor for Ant buildfiles.
Antidote was touched 17 months ago (as I can see), for Jack Woehr´s
I18N-patch.
But I dont think that its much used and supported. So it would be a corpse
in the
repository.
Same would be the Ant2-stuff. We have decided to work
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Is there one?
I'm leaning towards retiring antidote instead of moving it over to
subversion. What are your thoughts?
It's dead Jim.
Conor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additiona
Is there one?
I'm leaning towards retiring antidote instead of moving it over to
subversion. What are your thoughts?
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To whom it may satisfy...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project ant-antidote *no longer* has an issue.
The current state of this project is
compile on JDK 1.5
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +8 -8
ant-antidote/src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/acs/ACSDtdDefinedElement.java
Index: ACSDtdDefinedElement.java
===
RCS file:
/home/cvs/ant-antidote/src/java
To whom it may satisfy...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project ant-antidote *no longer* has an issue.
Project State : 'Success'
Full d
To whom it may satisfy...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project ant-antidote *no longer* has an issue.
Project State : 'Prerequisite F
Christoph Wilhelms wrote:
> Hmm... The current Antidote Forms are pretty generic and not really
> "composable".
I was composing new forms.
> Additionally I am not shure how complex a form within Antidoe could
> become, so that I see the value of using a visual gui designer
Hi Jack
> > Oh-o... Let's see the generated GUI code, then. I never liked the
> > GUI-code NetBeans created.
>
> It's got its quirks but I am used to it. It allows really quick redesign
> of forms.
Hmm... The current Antidote Forms are pretty generic and not real
Christoph Wilhelms wrote:
> Hi Jack!
>
> > 1. Check in minimal setting properties for Ant runs
> > from inside Antidote.
> >o May not really be useable but will preserve
> > some hard-worked code.
>
> Let's have a look :-)
Okay,
Hi Jack!
> 1. Check in minimal setting properties for Ant runs
> from inside Antidote.
>o May not really be useable but will preserve
> some hard-worked code.
Let's have a look :-)
>o Oops, another issue here: I'm using NetBeans
>
Christoph Wilhelms wrote:
>
> >2. Another user mentioned on the mailing list that he can't set an
> > 'id' attribute in Antidote.
>
> Not shure what that means
See the archived message:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=1078326078291
Hi Jack!
> 1. Set properties when running Ant from Antidote.
Yep! One of the most important things for the usability of Antidote!
> 2. Wizards
>1. project wizard.
>2. scripting wizard
Agreed
> 3. Simple functional features:
>1. Keeping
Let me expand on that list:
1. Set properties when running Ant from Antidote.
2. Wizards
1. project wizard.
2. scripting wizard
3. Simple functional features:
1. Keeping up with Ant.
2. Another user mentioned on the mailing list that he can't set a
Christoph Wilhelms wrote:
> If the Subject starts with
> [Antidote] I'll see it definately. I'll test that definately and a
> committ is very probable.
Okay, as soon as possible I'll dust things off and submit.
> One mission of Antidote is to cover as many of Ant&#x
Hi Jack!
First of all: If I forgot to submit your chnages (or I may have overseen
your posting) do not hesitate to resend. If the Subject starts with
[Antidote] I'll see it definately. I'll test that definately and a
committ is very probable.
And: Yes, I think it's not nice
Christoph Wilhelms wrote:
> Anyone who'd like to contribute Macro-support to integrate in Antidote?
How would you define this?
--
Jack J. Woehr # We have gone from the horse and buggy
Senior Consultant # to the moon rocket in one lifetime, but
Purematrix, Inc. # there has no
Christoph Wilhelms wrote:
> Did I missed anything? I thought, I have submitted everything you've send
> way back when...
I posted a couple of times some months ago asking you about how to handle
intermediate diffs. As I began working on adding properties dialogs to Antidote,
I wa
Hi Dominique
> I propose that Jack be made a committer on Antidote,
I'd welcome him!
> as he's the only one who cares
NO! :-)
> and has time to improve it ;-)
Yes :-)... ATM... unfortunately... ;-)
BTW: I've just celebrated my 4th Ant-Anniversary (since early 2
Hi Jack!
> I'm wondering if the consensus of Ant developers is that Antidote is dead.
> I had been working fitfully
> on some tasks Christoph Wilhelms had suggested but since CW seems to have
> wandered off, will
> there be anyone interested in vetting my diffs if and when I
I propose that Jack be made a committer on Antidote, as he's the only one
who cares and has time to improve it ;-) --DD
> -Original Message-
> From: Jack Woehr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I'm wondering if the consensus of Ant developers is that Antidote is dead
I'm wondering if the consensus of Ant developers is that Antidote is dead. I
had been working fitfully
on some tasks Christoph Wilhelms had suggested but since CW seems to have
wandered off, will
there be anyone interested in vetting my diffs if and when I get them ready for
submi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A problem with Antidote.
>
I think the main problem with Antidote is that the last Antidote committer,
Christoph Wilhelms, doesn't seem to be following the mailing list anymore.
I tried to discuss some proposed diffs with him a month or t
Hi,
A problem with Antidote.
Impossible to set the attribute "id" (it doesn't appear in the combo-box)
for elements which could have it (ex : path) ; even in the build
ant-antidote_20040302171238.tar.gz
Sincerely
Alain Perry
#
Ce courrier et les documents qui y sont joints p
antoine 2004/02/20 00:07:11
Modified:docs license.html
docs/projects/antidote design.html
xdocslicense.xml
xdocs/projects/antidote design.xml
Log:
Set the author of the license to The Apache Software Foundation
Fix the case of
bodewig 2004/02/16 08:42:01
Modified:xdocs/projects/antidote design.xml index.xml module.xml
news.xml
Log:
Correct copyright statement
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +1 -1 ant/xdocs/projects/antidote/design.xml
Index: design.xml
bodewig 2004/02/16 08:40:21
Modified:xdocs/projects index.xml
xdocs/projects/antidote design.xml index.xml module.xml
news.xml
Log:
Second batch
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +15 -0 ant/xdocs/projects/index.xml
Index
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Surely Apache has run into this before, no?
Yup. For example Microsoft has Avalon, and Sony has Cocoon. But our
projects are "Apache Avalon" and "Apache Cocoon".
So it's not *strictly* necessary to change the name, but why risk
when you don't h
gt; Subject: RE: [ANTidote] possibly needs to be renamed!
>
>
> Thanks :-)
>
> Jan
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: alec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:54 PM
> > To: Ant Developers List
> > Subject: Re
Thanks :-)
Jan
> -Original Message-
> From: alec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:54 PM
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Re: [ANTidote] possibly needs to be renamed!
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >>IANAL,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IANAL, but AFAIK no.
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know AFAIK (as far as i know), but what is IANAL?
Jan
From the Jargon Dictionary:
*IANAL* /[Usenet]/ Abbreviation, "I Am Not A Lawyer".
Usually precedes legal advice.
Alec
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IANAL, but AFAIK no.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know AFAIK (as far as i know), but what is IANAL?
I Am Not A Layer :-)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions ge
> IANAL, but AFAIK no.
>
> --
> Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know AFAIK (as far as i know), but what is IANAL?
Jan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Surely Apache has run into this before, no?
Yup. For example Microsoft has Avalon, and Sony has Cocoon. But our
projects are "Apache Avalon" and "Apache Cocoon".
So it's not *strictly* necessary to change the name, but why
risk when
you don't have a brand to protect any
: 17 October 2003 09:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ANTidote] possibly needs to be renamed!
Maybe another animal
AFE - Ant Front End (german Affe - ape) :-)
or should we consult the movie "Forrest Gumb" once again ?
Jan
> -Original Message-
> From: Tetsuya
ers List
> Subject: Re: [ANTidote] possibly needs to be renamed!
>
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:21:45 +0200 (MEST)
> "Christoph Wilhelms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Anyways: If we have to rename it, I propose to use a simple
> and gerei
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:21:45 +0200 (MEST)
"Christoph Wilhelms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyways: If we have to rename it, I propose to use a simple and gereic name
> like "Ant GUI".
ANTiCUI :-)
-- Tetsuya. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
---
> > Surely Apache has run into this before, no?
>
> Yup. For example Microsoft has Avalon, and Sony has Cocoon. But our
> projects are "Apache Avalon" and "Apache Cocoon".
>
> So it's not *strictly* necessary to change the name, but why
> risk when
> you don't have a brand to protect anyhow.
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
You may be right, because "antidote" is a commonly used word, but I am
with Stefan here and I feel playing save can't be bad :-).
What are the chances that the new name isn't a clash with somebody else
somewhere? How far/wide do you search? Do you cha
Not bad, maybe...
-Matt
--- "Jack J. Woehr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Benson wrote:
>
> > Cool idea; unfortunately the word seems to be
> here:
> >
> >
>
http://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=ommatidium
> >
> > Not too friendly.
>
> You're right, "ommatidium" soun
Matt Benson wrote:
> Cool idea; unfortunately the word seems to be here:
>
> http://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=ommatidium
>
> Not too friendly.
You're right, "ommatidium" sounds like something Winnie the Pooh would hum to
himself.
How about "Formiga"? It's the Portuge
idea, because I found
> > (using Google) some virus detection programs
> called "Antidote"...
> >
> > Thoughts!?!
>
> I never liked the name, it sounds like Ant is a
> disease that you need Antidote for :-)
>
> Isn't there a special Latin term for th
Christoph Wilhelms wrote:
> Additionally: Renaming sounds like a "not too bad" idea, because I found
> (using Google) some virus detection programs called "Antidote"...
>
> Thoughts!?!
I never liked the name, it sounds like Ant is a disease that you need Antidote
Wow Steve!
Impressive research :-)! Well done! Nearly nothing to add :-)!
> Perhaps we just make sure that we call it Apache ANTidote on
> all the web
> page & docs tonight, send him a letter saying we have made
> sure that we
> use the full name. If he insists then
leive them. They might well accept a simple cheap workaround like the
"Apache Antidote" name, as it aquiesses to thier trademark in name at
least, and then they don't have to spend money chasing us.
Also, if there is no trademark on file at the USPTO, we could of course
get the t
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
You may be right, because "antidote" is a commonly used word, but I am
with Stefan here and I feel playing save can't be bad :-).
What are the chances that the new name isn't a clash with somebody else
somewhere? How far/wide do you search? Do you cha
> You may be right, because "antidote" is a commonly used word, but I am
> with Stefan here and I feel playing save can't be bad :-).
What are the chances that the new name isn't a clash with somebody else
somewhere? How far/wide do you search? Do you change agai
ng their product with mine... can I?
You may be right, because "antidote" is a commonly used word, but I am
with Stefan here and I feel playing save can't be bad :-).
Greetings,
Christoph
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rks for the
name "Antidote" in relation to computer software products.
The name is "Apache Ant Antidote", so it's not exactly the same thing.
But the fact that it's both about software, and that it's not the most
widespread part of Ant, it might as well be renam
-Gus
Christoph Wilhelms wrote:
Hi all!
I just want to tell you, that the President of the company "Druide"
http://www.druide.com Eric Brunelle infomed me, that his company own the (not
shure
if just French or international) trademarks for the name "Antidote" in
relation to com
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Christoph Wilhelms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I just want to tell you, that the President of the company "Druide"
> http://www.druide.com Eric Brunelle infomed me, that his company own
> the (not shure if just French or international) trademarks for
Hi all!
I just want to tell you, that the President of the company "Druide"
http://www.druide.com Eric Brunelle infomed me, that his company own the (not
shure
if just French or international) trademarks for the name "Antidote" in
relation to computer software products. If I
srcdownload.html license.html
index.html external.html
docs/projects/antidote index.html module.html design.html
xdocs/stylesheets project.xml templates.vm
docs/projects index.html
xdocsbylaws.xml bindownload.xml
empty.gif
Log:
German i18n, i18n completion and fixes.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +3 -1
ant-antidote/src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/resources/antidote.properties
Index: antidote.properties
===
RCS
Why does using Antidote to build Antidote result in this console message?
main:
Duplicated project name in import. Project Antidote defined first in
/usr/local/src/ant/antidote/ant-antidote/build.xml and again in
/usr/local/src/ant/antidote/ant-antidote/build.xml
--
Jack J. Woehr # You
chrisw 2003/10/07 09:39:59
Modified:src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/xml XMLWriter.java
Log:
Cleans up a little more how a comment gets persisted to an XML-File.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +7 -1
ant-antidote/src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/xml
Hi Antoine!
> Reviewed by is to be filled in only if another antidote
> committer (outside
> of you) had reviewed the code.
Hmm...
So I just have to fill in the comment in normal commits, right!?! Has
this been changed lately...? I am using an IDE (eclipse) for the
commits now - pr
antidote committer (outside
of you) had reviewed the code.
Antoine
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. Oktober 2003 21:31
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: cvs commit:
ant-antidote/src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/customizer
lated conformists.
www.purematrix.com # - Abbie Hoffman
Index: org/apache/tools/ant/gui/xml/XMLWriter.java
===
RCS file:
/home/cvspublic/ant-antidote/src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/xml/XMLWriter.java,v
retrieving revision 1.5
di
Christoph Wilhelms wrote:
> > Bug in Antidote that affects the output.
> >
> > I've just noticed that xml.XMLWriter. startDocument () never
> > gets called.
>
> Fixed myself! Thanx!
Thanks, Christoph, that's what we call "fast service" :-)
--
Hi Jack!
> Bug in Antidote that affects the output.
>
> I've just noticed that xml.XMLWriter. startDocument () never
> gets called. In theory it gets called in
> xml.DOMNodeSerializer.writeNodeStart() when passed a Node of
> type DOCUMENT_NODE but apparently it never g
chrisw 2003/10/05 12:43:49
Modified:src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/core ProjectManager.java
Log:
Fixed bug persisting project, but not entire document!
PR: Bug reported by Jack Woehr via mailig list!
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +4 -2
ant-antidote/src
Log:
Formatting XML output propertly, more JavaDoc, remove some import warnings.
Obtained from: Jack Woehr
Submitted by: Christoph Wilhelms
Reviewed by: Christoph Wilhelms
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
ant-antidote/src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/gui/modules
Here's an Antidote diff that cleans up handling of multiline comment blocks
where each line is an individual comment (such as used within Antidote's
own build.xml file). Antidote currently inserts an extra newline between
each complete XML comment. This changes that behavior at the
Bug in Antidote that affects the output.
I've just noticed that xml.XMLWriter. startDocument () never gets called. In
theory it gets called in xml.DOMNodeSerializer.writeNodeStart() when passed
a Node of type DOCUMENT_NODE but apparently it never gets passed that
type of node. The result is
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
