dy seems to be fine with this change on Ivy web site
> publication policy, I'll make the change now.
>
> Xavier
>
>
> On Dec 18, 2007 2:04 PM, Xavier Hanin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 18, 2007 12:12 PM, < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
Since everybody seems to be fine with this change on Ivy web site
publication policy, I'll make the change now.
Xavier
On Dec 18, 2007 2:04 PM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2007 12:12 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I havent
On Dec 18, 2007 12:12 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I havent spent any time on Ants site repo [2]. But if we think that
> Ivy is
> > > a subproject of Ant, Ivys homepage is a subpage of Ants. So we could
> store
> > > Ivys generated pages in the generated directory [3] of that repo and
> up
> > I havent spent any time on Ants site repo [2]. But if we think that
Ivy is
> > a subproject of Ant, Ivys homepage is a subpage of Ants. So we could
store
> > Ivys generated pages in the generated directory [3] of that repo and
upload
> > it via its buildfile [4].
>
> Or we could put generated
g/repos/asf/ant/site/generated/
> [4] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/site/build.xml
>
>
>
>
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Maarten Coene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Gesendet: Montag, 17. Dezember 2007 23:24
> > An: Ant Developers List
> > Betreff: Re:
t;
>
> Maarten
>
> - Original Message
> From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Ant Developers List
> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 11:40:10 AM
> Subject: Ivy web site
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The problem for the download page is now fixed, but it has ra
Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Maarten Coene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Montag, 17. Dezember 2007 23:24
> An: Ant Developers List
> Betreff: Re: Ivy web site
>
> I'd prefer having the site in SVN too...
> btw, the rights on the /www/ant.apache.org/ivy director
t: Saturday, December 15, 2007 11:40:10 AM
Subject: Ivy web site
Hi,
The problem for the download page is now fixed, but it has raised some
questions about how we manage our web site:
- we are not in sync with what the apache documentation says on how to
manage web sites [1]. We should put gen
On Dec 17, 2007 7:31 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - by uploading the generated web site, we do not support the
> > executable flag which is a problem for download.cgi
>
> Something like
>
> ?
>
Yes :-)
>
>
>
> > - uploading the whole site takes a long time sometimes for
> > small changes
On Dec 17, 2007 12:02 PM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Xavier Hanin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > - we are not in sync with what the apache documentation says on how to
> > manage web sites [1]. We should put generated site in svn to comply
>
> Not a hard rule, but still prefe
"Xavier Hanin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - we are not in sync with what the apache documentation says on how to
> manage web sites [1]. We should put generated site in svn to comply
Not a hard rule, but still preferred (so the site can be put back into
its old state incase of an accident). I
> - by uploading the generated web site, we do not support the
> executable flag which is a problem for download.cgi
Something like
?
> - uploading the whole site takes a long time sometimes for
> small changes only, using svn would rely on diff only which would make
the
> "upload" (would
Hi,
The problem for the download page is now fixed, but it has raised some
questions about how we manage our web site:
- we are not in sync with what the apache documentation says on how to
manage web sites [1]. We should put generated site in svn to comply
- by uploading the generated web site, w
13 matches
Mail list logo
