Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-09 Thread Jorge Cardoso Leitão
rg > > > was > > > > > allowed to run, that would enable everything needed for Julia CI to > > > run. > > > > > > > > > > -Jacob > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 10:00 PM Sutou Kouhei > > > wrote: > > > &g

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-07 Thread Wes McKinney
i > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > I wasn't following the build queue's state lately, but I think we > > > > > > should consolidate the build configurations. > > > > > > Possible

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-07 Thread Jorge Cardoso Leitão
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 10:00 PM Sutou Kouhei > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > I wasn't following the build queue's state lately, but I think we > > > > > should consolidate the build configurations. > &g

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-07 Thread Wes McKinney
ueue's state lately, but I think we > > > > should consolidate the build configurations. > > > > Possible candidates are the PR* workflows > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9120 > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-06 Thread Jorge Cardoso Leitão
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9120 > > > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > kou > > > > In > > "Github Actions feedback time" on Tue, 5 Jan 2021 13:33:38 +0100, > > Krisztián Szűcs wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > &

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-06 Thread Jacob Quinn
ttps://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9120 > > > Thanks, > -- > kou > > In > "Github Actions feedback time" on Tue, 5 Jan 2021 13:33:38 +0100, > Krisztián Szűcs wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm concerned about the overall feedback time we hav

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-06 Thread Sutou Kouhei
Hi, > I wasn't following the build queue's state lately, but I think we > should consolidate the build configurations. > Possible candidates are the PR* workflows https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9120 Thanks, -- kou In "Github Actions feedback time" on T

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-06 Thread Ying Zhou
Hi, Sorry for not noticing this thread earlier. Looks like in addition to unusually slow feedback time that did not happen last Sunday or earlier there are also weird installation errors such as ‘can not install numpy’ as well. Can these be due to some form of timeout? Here is my C++ PR: https

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-05 Thread Jorge Cardoso Leitão
Hi Wes, I fielded ARROW-11140 with what I would consider a successful POC from Rust implementation's point of view. Let's move the discussion there. I was already able to run Rust's first steps there (using my own mac as a runner), and, so far, l

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-05 Thread Josh Taylor
Random question - could Github be reached out to for the limits to be increased/investigated in the mean time, given this is an opensource project? On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 06:57, Andrew Lamb wrote: > Makes sense -- thank you > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 5:38 PM Wes McKinney wrote: > > > There are a

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-05 Thread Andrew Lamb
Makes sense -- thank you On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 5:38 PM Wes McKinney wrote: > There are a lot of companies now with a business interest in the success of > Apache Arrow. We should do a back of the envelope estimate of the number of > compute hours we use per year and arrive at an annual cost est

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-05 Thread Wes McKinney
There are a lot of companies now with a business interest in the success of Apache Arrow. We should do a back of the envelope estimate of the number of compute hours we use per year and arrive at an annual cost estimate. My guess (and maybe I’m wildly off) is that it’s somewhere around $50,000-100,

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-05 Thread Andrew Lamb
One thing that is not clear to me is who will pay for the dedicated infrastructure costs with something like Build Kite? I don't fully understand how moving to self hosted (and thus also presumably limited) arrow-only infrastructure will reduce build queue times, unless there is a deep pocketed sp

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-05 Thread Wes McKinney
hi Jorge -- as far as I know, all that's necessary to use BK is the pipeline configuration in the repo and to attach workers to Arrow's (free) account (which I'm happy to add you to). We can likely get a lot of free cloud credits from Google, Microsoft, or Amazon if we wanted to go that route to ke

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-05 Thread Jorge Cardoso Leitão
Krisztián, I agree with you that there is an ongoing problem with the queue. Thanks for the tips wrt to WIP. Wes, I would be up for moving Rust workflows to Buildkite. Is the integration in place wrt to reporting to triggers and reporting back to gihtub? I.e. can we just place a `pipeline.yml` on

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-05 Thread Wes McKinney
At the risk of sounding like a broken record -- we are almost certainly going to have to move our builds to dedicated infrastructure that this community has complete agency over sometime between now and 2025. Maybe it will be this year, maybe next year, but to me it is an inevitability. I spent qui

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-05 Thread Krisztián Szűcs
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 4:40 PM Jeroen Ooms wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 1:34 PM Krisztián Szűcs > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm concerned about the overall feedback time we have on pull requests. > > I have a simple PR to make the comment bot working again, but no > > builds are running eve

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-05 Thread Jeroen Ooms
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 1:34 PM Krisztián Szűcs wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm concerned about the overall feedback time we have on pull requests. > I have a simple PR to make the comment bot working again, but no > builds are running even after 30 minutes. FWIW, GitHub seems to queue jobs by pusher, not

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-05 Thread Krisztián Szűcs
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 3:21 PM Jorge Cardoso Leitão wrote: > > Hi Krisztian, > > Could you describe which flows you are referring to? > > Rust builds are taking 4-6m on non-(windows/mac) and 8-15m on windows/mac, > with almost immediate feedback. E.g. I force-pushed recently > https://github.com/a

Re: Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-05 Thread Jorge Cardoso Leitão
Hi Krisztian, Could you describe which flows you are referring to? Rust builds are taking 4-6m on non-(windows/mac) and 8-15m on windows/mac, with almost immediate feedback. E.g. I force-pushed recently https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9089 and the first complete test came 5m later. One hypo

Github Actions feedback time

2021-01-05 Thread Krisztián Szűcs
Hi, I'm concerned about the overall feedback time we have on pull requests. I have a simple PR to make the comment bot working again, but no builds are running even after 30 minutes. I can see 2-4 running builds, which will make our work much harder right before the release. I wasn't following th