Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria

2017-05-12 Thread Chamikara Jayalath
Validated same examples Vikas mentioned for Windows. Updated the doc on acceptance criteria. Thanks, Cham On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 4:43 PM Vikas RK wrote: > Just validated wordcount and mobile gaming examples for Python SDK on > Direct and Dataflow runner. Mostly looks good

Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria

2017-05-12 Thread Vikas RK
Just validated wordcount and mobile gaming examples for Python SDK on Direct and Dataflow runner. Mostly looks good to me, with minor changes that could be done to improve user experience, but not a blocker for FSR. (filed BEAM-2286 ) On 12 May

Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria

2017-05-12 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Enjoy Kenn ! Regards JB On 05/12/2017 03:38 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote: I wanted to let this thread & list know that I'll be offline camping starting ~now through the weekend. So if you see any open thread with me on it, please do take it over. Things are looking pretty good, so I might not see

Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria

2017-05-12 Thread Kenneth Knowles
I wanted to let this thread & list know that I'll be offline camping starting ~now through the weekend. So if you see any open thread with me on it, please do take it over. Things are looking pretty good, so I might not see any more action. I have a lot of faith in this community to validate the

Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria

2017-05-11 Thread Jason Kuster
Just validated a decently-sized wordcount on a YARN cluster successfully. On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > I gave the archetype-based quickstart a try on as many runners and > configurations as I could manage today, mostly embedded and YARN. > >

Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria

2017-05-11 Thread Jason Kuster
on Spark, doh On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jason Kuster wrote: > Just validated a decently-sized wordcount on a YARN cluster successfully. > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Kenneth Knowles > wrote: > >> I gave the archetype-based

Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria

2017-05-11 Thread Kenneth Knowles
I gave the archetype-based quickstart a try on as many runners and configurations as I could manage today, mostly embedded and YARN. There are some issues (filed and added to the doc) that may have to do with my setup, but may not. I'd prefer the runner maintainers / system experts try these on

Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria

2017-05-11 Thread Thomas Groh
I'm making sure the direct runner plays nice in a variety of scenarios (primarily the game examples, at the moment. Been a couple of hours and still going strong in streaming) On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Dan Halperin wrote: > I'm focusing on: > > * user

Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria

2017-05-11 Thread Dan Halperin
I'm focusing on: * user reported bugs (Avro, TextIO, MongoDb) * the actual Apache Release criteria (licensing, dependencies, etc.) On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Lukasz Cwik wrote: > I have been trying out various Python scenarios on Windows. > > On Thu, May 11,

Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria

2017-05-11 Thread Lukasz Cwik
I have been trying out various Python scenarios on Windows. On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Jason Kuster < jasonkus...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > I'll try to get wordcount running against a Spark cluster. > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > > > Just

Re: First stable release: Acceptance criteria

2017-05-11 Thread Jason Kuster
I'll try to get wordcount running against a Spark cluster. On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > Just a quick remainder to consider to consider contributing here. > > We are now at 6 criteria -- thanks! > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Aljoscha Krettek

First stable release: Acceptance criteria

2017-05-08 Thread Davor Bonaci
Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded the acceptance criteria document [2]. Please consider contributing to this effort by: * proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or * supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or * validating a criteria. Please note that