This policy is not pushed. They are suggesting of adopting that particular
policy in the ASF repositories.
We can discuss and we can choose if applying it or not.
Il giorno sab 28 nov 2020 alle ore 07:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
j...@nanthrax.net> ha scritto:
> Fully agree, and I have to same conc
My .2 cents:
I don't see any problems replacing the terms.
As pointed out, they are usually replaced by terms that are clearer and
usually represent better their intentions (+ 0.5).
I know that I am fairly new and I don't intend to lecture anyone on
community building. However, I think that, may
Fully agree, and I have to same concern in other projects (Karaf, ActiveMQ, …).
1. These are technical terms without any "allusion"
2. I don’t like with "company" policy are pushed to open source project. Of
course, it can be openly discussed.
Regards
JB
> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 19:03, Onder SEZGIN
+1 to Guillaume.
I would not like to act like Camus or Sartre on these kinds of matters, to
me, it is simple, if you think there is barrier, then there is. Overall
meritocracy is covering all these kinds matters and embraceful enough for
anything.
And these are technical terms.
Changing language o
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 10:14 PM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020/11/09 12:49:43, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > Not really. Those are technical terms, and I don't really see any benefits
> > in changing them.
>
> I would encourage you to read the various documents at
> https://github.com/conscious
On 2020/11/09 12:49:43, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Not really. Those are technical terms, and I don't really see any benefits
> in changing them.
I would encourage you to read the various documents at
https://github.com/conscious-lang/conscious-lang-docs regarding the benefits in
changing th
Not really. Those are technical terms, and I don't really see any benefits
in changing them.
Le lun. 9 nov. 2020 à 11:33, Andrea Cosentino a écrit :
> Hello all,
>
> As reported by Rich Bowen, we still have references to problematic language
> in our codebase
>
> A lazy github search shows, of
Hello all,
As reported by Rich Bowen, we still have references to problematic language
in our codebase
A lazy github search shows, of the words that we've been focusing on:
Slave
https://github.com/apache/camel/search?q=slave
30
Master
https://github.com/apache/camel/search?q=master
567
Whitel
