Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Celix & libuv

, it is not essential for the Celix 3.0.0 release as it does not impact the external API. So updating the Celix event thread can be an optional ticket for a Celix 3.0.0 release. Best regards, Pepijn On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 7:18 AM Peng Zheng wrote: > > On 2024/7/8 02:30, Pepijn Noltes

[DISCUSSION] Apache Celix & libuv

Hi All, In the discussion for pull request #753 ((https://github.com/apache/celix/pull/753)), there was a brief conversation about the potential benefits of integrating libuv into Apache Celix. For those unfamiliar, here's a short introduction to libuv from Wikipedia: """ libuv is a

Re: Personal feedback to your last release vote

ink we should do the next release with RC1, RC2, etc subjects. And if needed we can also add an ad-hoc DISCUSS thread. > > > > Chris > > > > Von: Pepijn Noltes > Datum: Dienstag, 16. Januar 2024 um 13:23 > An: dev@celix.apache.org > Cc: Christofer Dutz > Betreff:

Re: Personal feedback to your last release vote

Hi All, @Chris Thanks for the feedback. On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 4:17 AM Peng Zheng wrote: > > Hi, Chris. > > Thanks for providing feedback. > > On 2024/1/15 01:10, Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > while going through the projects activity over the last quarter in > > preparation of

Remote Service Admin and Apache Celix 3.0.0 API

Hi All, As previously mentioned, Apache Celix is moving towards a new major release, and this comes with some API-breaking changes. One of these changes is the removal of the old C API (all headers/functions without a `celix_` prefix). This means that users will need to adopt the updated API.

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Celix 2.4.0 released

The Apache Celix team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Celix 2.4.0. Apache Celix is an implementation of the OSGi specification adapted to C and C++. It is a framework to develop (dynamic) modular software applications using component and service-oriented programming. This new

Support branch for Apache Celix 2.4.x Patch Releases

Hi All, Apache Celix 2.4.0 has just been released (Hooray!). And as previously discussed, this means the master branch will now be geared towards preparing for the Apache Celix 3.0.0 release. Consequently, should we need to make a patch release for Apache Celix 2.4.0, it's likely we won't be

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Celix version 2.4.0

The vote has passed with the following result: +1 Roy Lenferink (binding) +1 Peng Zheng (binding) +1 Pepijn Noltes (binding) The released artifact will be moved to the release area for mirroring. The 2.4.0 tag will be created on the release branch and the release branch will be merged

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Celix version 2.4.0

On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 11:26 AM Pepijn Noltes wrote: > > Adding my > +1 (binding) > And closing the vote. > > Thanks for voting. > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 7:55 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > > > Just a minor detail which we should probably fix in the next rele

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Celix version 2.4.0

* The SHA512 checksum > > * The GPG signature > > * Whether the package builds (it does) > > * Whether all tests succeed (they do) > > > > Op wo 27 sep 2023 om 19:24 schreef Pepijn Noltes : > > > >> This is the release vote f

[VOTE] Release Apache Celix version 2.4.0

This is the release vote for Apache Celix, version 2.4.0. It includes the following changes: https://github.com/apache/celix/tree/1fbd599c4a4141d147701e18377518f9fec8e338/CHANGES.md Source files: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/celix/celix-2.4.0/ The commit ID to be voted upon:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Celix version 2.4.0

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 7:36 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Op ma 25 sep 2023 om 20:00 schreef Pepijn Noltes : > > > @Roy I think if https://github.com/apache/celix/pull/657 is merged, we > > have fixed all the issues you have found. Correct? > > > > > The iss

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Celix version 2.4.0

ace] [celix_framework] > >>> [celix_framework_stopAndJoinEventQueue:1081] Stop and joining event loop > >>> thread for framework 19a7f4df-1551-47d9-a3b7-340019325097 > >>> [2023-09-23T14:34:27] [ debug] [celix_framework] > >>>

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Celix version 2.4.0

The vote has not passed with the following result: +1 Peng Zeng (binding) +1 xuzhenbao (non binding) -2 Roy Lenfering, Pepijn Noltes (binding) The vote was for commit ID 25745ae13848b0ce7b2b35c1e8553ba03f0529a9. Although this is a unsuccessful vote, it is good to see that we have a active

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Celix version 2.4.0

x framework started with uuid c69f04a6-2404-4431-8edd-b4da67665e66 > > > [2023-09-23T14:34:27] [ trace] [celix_framework] > > > [celix_framework_utils_extractBundlePath:191] Extracting bundle url > > > > > `/home/rlenferink/Downloads/celix-2.4.0/build/libs/framewor

[VOTE] Release Apache Celix version 2.4.0

Hi All, This is the release vote for Apache Celix, version 2.4.0. It includes the following changes: https://github.com/apache/celix/blob/25745ae13848b0ce7b2b35c1e8553ba03f0529a9/CHANGES.md Source files: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/celix/celix-2.4.0/ The commit ID to be voted upon:

2.4.0 release

Hi All, ## 2.4.0 Release Within the next two weeks, I am planning to release Apache Celix 2.4.0. Currently, only two issues remain for the 2.4.0 milestone [1]: one concerning documentation updates (#99) and another regarding changes.md (#632). For #99, I will likely update the subproject

Issues with the good first issue label

Hi All, The Apache Celix issues have been updated and now contain some issues with the "good first issue" label [1]. Hopefully this helps to make it easier to contribute to Apache Celix. Please feel free to add, comment or update "good first issue" issues. [1]:

Re: GitHub notifications format

On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 12:18 PM Peng Zheng wrote: > > On 4/28/23 21:12, Pepijn Noltes wrote: > > Hi Roy, > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 1:51 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Looking at [1] the possibility now exists for projects to tweak the format > of > the GitHub notific

Re: GitHub notifications format

Hi Roy, On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 1:51 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Looking at [1] the possibility now exists for projects to tweak the format > of > the GitHub notifications sent to the project its mailing list. > > I just opened PR #528 [1] as a starting point for this. I copied this from > the >

new PMC member: Peng Zheng

Hi All, The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix has invited Peng Zheng to become a member of the PMC for Apache Celix and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. A PMC member helps manage and guide the direction of the project. Yours, The Apache Celix PMC

new committer: Zhenbao Xu

Hi All, The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix has invited Zhenbao Xu to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Celix version 2.3.0

Correction! The +1 Roy Lenferink (binding) Should be +1 Roy Bulter (binding) The voting result remains the same. On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 5:53 PM Pepijn Noltes wrote: > > The vote has passed with the following result: > > +1 Roy Lenferink (binding) > +1 Peng Zheng (binding) >

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Celix version 2.3.0

The vote has passed with the following result: +1 Roy Lenferink (binding) +1 Peng Zheng (binding) +1 Pepijn Noltes (binding) The released artifact will be moved to the release area for mirroring. The release branch will be merged with master and a 2.3.0 tag will be created. After the mirroring

Re: [VOTE] Release Celix version 2.3.0

Hi All, Adding +1 for me and closing the vote. On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 12:00 PM Peng Zheng wrote: > > On 7/12/22 16:50, Pepijn Noltes wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 8:00 AM Peng Zheng wrote: > >> +1 > >> > >> As I know, Zhenbao Xu will

Re: [VOTE] Release Celix version 2.3.0

mentioned issues are resolved. > > On 7/10/22 22:53, Pepijn Noltes wrote: > > This is the release vote for Apache Celix, version 2.3.0. > > > > It fixes the following issues: > > > > Source files: > > https://dist.apache.org/

[VOTE] Release Celix version 2.3.0

This is the release vote for Apache Celix, version 2.3.0. It fixes the following issues: Source files: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/celix/celix-2.3.0/ The commit ID to be voted upon: a03cd54755a7b3736914296852070ab663ce628f

Re: how can we set the service.exported.configs property of ExportScopes

Hi, Indeed I did not notice this mail, thanks for the ping. On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 5:20 AM Peng Zheng wrote: > On 3/26/22 11:21, xuzhenbao133 wrote: > > Hi, > > In the remote service code, The service.exported.configs > property of exported service(eg:examples/calculator_service) has

Re: new committer: Peng Zheng

Welcome Peng :) On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 10:10 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > Hi All, > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix > has invited Peng Zheng to become a committer and we are pleased > to announce that he has accepted. > > Being a committer enables easier contribution to

Re: ABBA deadlock

On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 12:00 PM Peng Zheng wrote: > On 2/25/22 17:54, Pepijn Noltes wrote: > > Hi Peng, > > > > To start off, I see that some emails are directly mailed to me. I > > think for future mails these discussions can go to the celix dev > > mailing

Re: Help with Building and Installing and 'Creating a simple Bundle'

Hi Marcel, Good to hear that you now have a working Celix environment and thanks for the feedback. I will apply the needed changes in the documentation update branch. Greetings, Pepijn On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:19 PM Marcel Bootsma wrote: > Hello again, > > We also got the Simple Bundle

Re: C++17 headers and next release

ogress, not yet finished and also still in flux you could have a look at the intro documentation I am working on: https://github.com/pnoltes/celix/tree/feature/update_documentation/documents/intro Maybe that helps and works better. Greetings, Pepijn > > > > On 2022/02/08 15:2

Re: Help with Building and Installing and 'Creating a simple Bundle'

Hi Marcel, On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 12:54 PM Marcel Bootsma wrote: > Hello, > > I just started on a project that uses Celix bundles, so I wanted to get > accounted into the system. > > I Followed the Building and Installing guide ( >

C++17 headers and next release

Hi All, It has been a while since the last Celix release and I think it is time to prepare for the next release. One of the recent changes is that Celix now also has C++ support. The C++ support is done by a header-only C++17 implementation that is built on top of the Celix C framework and utils

new committer: Rick Stegeman

Hi All, The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix has invited Rick Stegeman to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This

Re: [VOTE] New committer: Rick Stegeman

21 sep. 2021 om 14:39 heeft Pepijn Noltes het > > volgende geschreven: > > > >  > > > > > > -- Forwarded message - > > From: Pepijn Noltes > > Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 at 15:38 > > Subject: [VOTE] New committer: Ric

Re: Celix Board report

Hi All, I uploaded the board report. Greetings, Pepijn On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 8:41 PM Pepijn Noltes wrote: > > Hi All, > > It is board report time again. > Please let me know if you have any remarks/requests. > > Greetings, > Pepijn > > ## Description: > Dyna

Celix Board report

Hi All, It is board report time again. Please let me know if you have any remarks/requests. Greetings, Pepijn ## Description: Dynamic service framework - OSGi like - for C and C++ ## Issues: There are no issues requiring board attention. ## Membership Data: Apache Celix was founded 2014-07-16

Celix Board report

Hi All, I posted the board report for Celix. See report below. Greetings, Pepijn ## Description: Dynamic service framework - OSGi like - for C and C++ ## Issues: There are no issues requiring board attention. ## Membership Data: Apache Celix was founded 2014-07-16 (6 years ago) There are

Re: Positioning Celix against CppMicroservices, a C++ OSGi implementation

Hi Michael, On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 10:41 PM Michael de Lang wrote: > > It seems we've (or at least I have) missed the already existing > CppMicroservices (https://github.com/CppMicroServices/CppMicroServices) > framework, which aims to implement OSGi for C++14. Given our current >

Re: new committer: Michael De Lang

And on a more personal note: Welcome Michael :) On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 8:49 PM Pepijn Noltes wrote: > > Hi All, > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix > has invited Michael De Lang to become a committer and we are pleased > to announce that he has a

new committer: Michael De Lang

Hi All, The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix has invited Michael De Lang to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This

Re: [VOTE] Release Celix version 2.2.1

Adding +1 from me and closing the vote On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 8:39 PM Alexander Broekhuis wrote: > > Ah yes, of course. I knew that ;). Thanks for the reminder! > > Op do 14 mei 2020 om 20:03 schreef Pepijn Noltes : > > > Vote is on a commit id. After the vote passe

Re: [VOTE] Release Celix version 2.2.1

er Broekhuis < > a.broekh...@gmail.com>: > > > +1 > > > > Don't see anything strange. Archive has correct hash, builds as expected. > > > > Op do 14 mei 2020 om 09:22 schreef Pepijn Noltes : > > > >> Hi Roy, > >> > >> Thanks

Re: Structs to Java

Hi Brian, The $ char is not allowed in a descriptor. I expect you need this because of Java inner classes. I created an issue for this (#223) I also cheated a bit and put your example through our companies code gen, maybe this helps in getting everything to work. Results: //RemoteExample.avdl

Re: [VOTE] Release Celix version 2.2.1

+1 (binding) on the release. > > Roy > > On 2020/05/11 17:40:46, Pepijn Noltes wrote: > > Hi Roy, > > > > Thanks for looking into this. > > I updated the checksums. > > > > Greetings, > > Pepijn > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:44 PM

Re: [VOTE] Release Celix version 2.2.1

tion#sigs-and-sums for the > policy on checksums. > > Short summary: if you remove the md5 checksum and update the .sha checksum to > become .sha512 > then my -1 (binding) will become a +1 (binding). > > - Roy > > (I updated the process on the website already) >

[VOTE] Release Celix version 2.2.1

This is the release vote for Apache Celix, version 2.2.1. It fixes the following issues: - Fixes etcdlib CMake setup to that etcdlib can be build as a separate project Source files: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/celix/celix-2.2.1/ The commit ID to be voted upon:

Re: Questions

Hi Brian, On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 5:02 PM Brian Michael wrote: > > Hello, > > I was curious about some of the capabilities of Celix. In particular the RSA > and PubSub implementations. Could you inform me of the following items: > - Is Celix setup to perform PubSub between Java and C/C++? I

Re: [LAZY] Send GitHub notifications to new notifications@ list (instead of dev@)

Hi Roy, Sounds good, +1. On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 6:58 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Hi all, > > Currently all GitHub activity is sent to our dev@ list. I'd like to propose > to change this to a new > notificati...@celix.apache.org list. > > This way Celix contributors/watchers on our dev list

Re: [LAZY] Use master as development branch

Hi All, +1 for me. On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 6:34 AM Alexander Broekhuis wrote: > > I'm not against this. But would like some more info on how we are going to > work with this. > > What is your proposal wrt feature, bugfix and release branches? > One concern I have is that last one. With a

Re: board report

Hi All, I posted the board report. Greetings, Pepijn On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:01 AM Pepijn Noltes wrote: > > Hi All, > > It is board report time again. If you have any comments/remark feel > free to let us known. > I am a bit late with the board report this time, s

board report

Hi All, It is board report time again. If you have any comments/remark feel free to let us known. I am a bit late with the board report this time, so if there are any comments please today. Greetings, Pepijn # Celix Board Report ### ## Description: Dynamic service

[VOTE][RESULT] Release Celix version 2.2.0

The vote has passed with the following result: +1 Roy Bulter (binding) +1 Erjan Altena (binding) +1 Daan Fischer (binding) +1 Pepijn Noltes (binding) The released artifact will be moved to the release area for mirroring. The release branch will be merged with master and a 2.2.0 tag

Re: [VOTE] Release Celix version 2.2.0

Op 6 jan. 2020 om 21:25 heeft Pepijn Noltes het > >> volgende geschreven: > > This is the release vote for Apache Celix, version 2.2.0. > > > > It adds/fixes the following issues: > > > > ## New features: > > - PubSub TCP (donation) > > - Pu

board report

Hi All, It is board report time again. If you have any comments/remark feel free to let us known. Pepijn == ## Description: Dynamic service framework for C and C++ ## Issues: There are no issues requiring board attention. ## Membership Data: Apache Celix

[VOTE] Release Celix version 2.2.0

This is the release vote for Apache Celix, version 2.2.0. It adds/fixes the following issues: ## New features: - PubSub TCP (donation) - PubSub Avro bin serializer - PubSub Websocket (donation) - HTTP Admin (donation) - Shell Web UI (using HTTP Admin) ## Improvements - CELIX-438: Refactored

Re: Error when stopping resolved bundle

Hi, This should not happen and is a bug. I created an issue for this: https://github.com/apache/celix/issues/129 Greetings, Pepijn On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 10:45 PM Woojoong Kim wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I am trying to use Celix. > > Just I want to know how to fix an unexpected error when stopping

Re: Celix board report

Hi Roy, Looks good to me, thanks for picking this up. Greetings, Pepijn On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 3:56 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Hi all, > > It's board report time again. If you are having any comments / feedback > feel free to address them. > If no comments are made I'll submit the report

Re: new committer: Idzard Hoekstra

Hi Idzard, Welcome to Celix :) Greetings, Pepijn On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:26 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Hi All, > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix > has invited Idzard Hoekstra to become a committer and we are pleased > to announce that he has accepted. > > Being a

Re: Moving Celix issue management to GitHub

com/apache/celix/milestone/1 Thanks for picking this up. I did notice the a slight increase in incoming mails ... ;) > > Op wo 25 sep. 2019 om 19:07 schreef Roy Lenferink : > > > Issue created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19153 > > > > Op zo 22

Re: Protected 'develop' branch for Celix

Hi Roy, On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 11:20 AM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'd like to propose the idea of having the 'develop' branch for Celix > protected. > This means branch-deletion and force-pushes are not allowed anymore. > Because Celix development happens on the develop branch we

Re: new committer: Daan Fischer

Hi Daan, On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 7:29 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Hi All, > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix > has invited Daan Fischer to become a committer and we are pleased > to announce that he has accepted. > > Being a committer enables easier contribution to the >

Re: new committer: Roy Bulter

Hi Roy, On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 7:29 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Hi All, > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix > has invited Roy Bulter to become a committer and we are pleased > to announce that he has accepted. > > Being a committer enables easier contribution to the >

Celix 2.2.0 release

Hi All, It is time - long overdue time - to start preparing for a new Celix release. Although the current develop cycle has been quite long - more than a year - I do think we made quite some progress with Celix considering its small development team. Just to highlight a few of the major

Re: [VOTE] Accept the websocket pubsub admin donation

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 4:16 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Hi all, > > A few days ago we received yet another code donation from Daan [1]. > This donation contains a new pubsub admin which is able to publish > and subscribe over websockets. It is using the HTTP admin service to > open the websocket

Re: [VOTE] Accept the TCP pubsub admin donation

+1 Nice to see an other donation, thanks for bringing this to Celix Roy. On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 22:26, gerritbinnenmars wrote: > HelloRoy what a nice job and what an amount of code. Thanks. Although the > tcp_constants.h is self explaining I think it would be useful to have some >

Re: Board report Celix

Hi All, I posted the board report. Greetings, Pepijn On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 5:47 PM erjan altena wrote: > > Also a +1 from me. > > Op do 11 jul. 2019 22:33 schreef Konstantin Boudnik : > > > +1 > > > > On July 11, 2019 12:36:50 PM PDT, Pepi

Re: Converting site to Hugo

Hi Roy, Interesting, I think we started with Hugo and moved to Jekyll and are now back to Hugo. That being said I think website looks good and also the Hugo input looks understandable, so +1 from me. Thanks for picking this up ;) Greetings, Pepijn On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 8:55 PM Roy Lenferink

[DISCUSS] C++ Celix Framework

Hi All, The last weeks I put some effort in exploring the benefits and downsides of changing the primary language of Celix from C to C++ in an experimental branch. As you probably already know Celix start around 2010 with the focus on a OSGi implementation in C; following the Java OSGi spec

Re: [DISCUSS] Celix site

s, I noticed they are using doxygen as well > [1]. So maybe we can follow their approach. > I'll have a look into this as well shortly. > > - Roy > > [1] http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/apiDocs-3/annotated.html > > Op za 5 jan. 2019 om 12:09 schreef Pepijn Noltes : > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Celix site

Hi Roy, Sorry for the late reply. Great work, I think the website looks great. Clean design :). And thanks for updating the information (i.e. how to apply patches, realising, etc). Do you have any idea if (and if yes, how) we can add API (i.e. doxygen) information to the website? Greetings,

Re: [VOTE] Switch celix.a.o from svn to git

Hi Roy, Also a +1 from me. Good Work!. Greetings, Pepijn On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 2:20 PM erjan altena wrote: > > Hi Roy, > > Nice Work, a +1 from me. > > Regards, > Erjan > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 7:55 AM gerritbinnenmars > wrote: > > > Good work Roy. Can you have a short look at the

Celix board report

Hi All, It is time again for the board report. If there are any question or remarks, please feel free to mention them. ## Description: - Dynamic service framework for C and C++. ## Issues: - there are no issues requiring board attention at this time ## Activity: - Three new PMC members

Welcome new Apache Celix PMC member Roy Lenferink

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix has invited Roy Lenferink to become a PMC member and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Congratulations and welcome, Roy!

Re: Apache current-event banner

Thanks Roy, I say you also added the latest Celix release on the Celix website and added a patch to the Avro community for updating their website to include the event banner.. nice work :) Greetings, Pepijn On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:45 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > Hi

Re: Celix board report

lly needed. Any thoughts? > -- > Regards, > Cos > > On April 11, 2018 9:52:02 PM GMT+03:00, Pepijn Noltes < > pepijnnol...@gmail.com> wrote: > >Hi Roman, > > > >On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:11 PM Roman Shaposhnik > ><ro...@shaposhnik.org> &

Re: Celix board report

Hi Roman, On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:11 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Pepijn Noltes <pepijnnol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > It is time again for the board report. > > If there are

Celix board report

Hi All, It is time again for the board report. If there are any question or remarks, please feel free to mention them. ## Description: - Dynamic service framework for C and C++. ## Issues: - there are no issues requiring board attention at this time ## Activity: - Version 2.1.0 of Celix has

Re: Next Celix release

tion and distributed tracing should be high > > on the prio list. > > The config admin is not well usable and for service invocation tracing no > > facilities are available yet. > > > > I like the idea of positioning Celix as an elaborate microservice chassis &

Modern CMake

Hi All, I merged the feature/CELIX-417-cmake-refactoring to develop. With this merge the Celix project now uses a "Modern Cmake" approach. The available info of how "Modern CMake" should works is scarce, but see [1] and [2] for more info. [1] https://youtu.be/bsXLMQ6WgIk [2]

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Celix version 2.1.0

Hi All, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 Roy Lenferink, Gabriele Ricciardi, Erjan Altena, Bjoern Petri and Pepijn Noltes (binding) +1 Gerrit Binnenmars (not binding) The released artifact will be moved to the release area for mirroring. The release branch will be merged

Re: VOTE] Release Celix version 2.1.0

hem are sufficient serious > > to block the release: > > > > - android docker build seems to be broken due to zlib dependency > > - NOTICE year needs update > > > > Besides, I checked that signature+hashes are correct using > > the keys from https://dist.apache.org/repos/di

VOTE] Release Celix version 2.1.0

Hi All, This is the release vote for Apache Celix, version 2.1.0 This release contains various bug fixes and adds a service-based publish subscribe implementation. For a complete overview see: https://github.com/apache/celix/blob/353ac0d2e0f819f8f59d4cdf8ea1dfd701201d74/CHANGES.md Source

Re: Celix board report

Hi All, I just posted the board report. Greetings, Pepijn On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 11:06 PM Roy Lenferink <lenferink...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Pepijn, > > The board report looks good to me. > > Cheers, > Roy > > 2018-01-09 21:23 GMT+01:00 Pepijn Noltes <pepi

Celix board report

Hi All, It time again for the board report. Last time we were late, so this why this board report is only a month later. If there are any question or remarks, please feel free to mention them. ## Description: - Dynamic service framework for C and C++. ## Issues: - It has been a while since

Re: Celix board report

Hi All, I posted the board report for Celix. Greetings, Pepijn On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:46 PM Pepijn Noltes <pepijnnol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > It is time for the board report. > See my proposal below, please feel free to comment if you are missing > som

Celix board report

Hi All, It is time for the board report. See my proposal below, please feel free to comment if you are missing something. Greetings, Pepijn ## Description: - dynamic service framework for C and C++. ## Issues: - There are no issues requiring board attention at this time ## Activity:

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Celix website svn -> git

needs some work. You should be able to run the build script following the instruction in the README and then browse the update site on locally on your machine. [1] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/celix-site.git Greetings, Pepijn On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:12 PM Pepijn Noltes <pepijn

Re: ASF Board Report for Celix - Repeated Reminder for December 2017

Hi All, Sorry for my late reaction, but I was not sure how to react to this. Concerning the missing board report. I personally have no real good reason for this, except that it just did not have my focus. IMO the Celix project is active enough, at least from a coding point of view. The remarks

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Celix website svn -> git

to jekyll. Saying this, I should mention that I do not have any > experience with jekyll, but I really like hugo for it's simplicity. > > So maybe your student wants to give it a try as well. > > Regards, > Bjoern > > [1] https://gohugo.io/ > > > On 02.10.2017 21:0

Next Celix release

Hi All, In the last weeks we did some considerable work on improving the pubsub functionality, including pluggable serializers. This is one of the feature I wanted in the next release. Also If I am correct we currently have no open issues in coverity. All in all this is IMO a good starting point

board report juli 2017

Hi All, It is report time again. See my proposal for the board report below. Any remarks / additions are welcome. The report should be uploaded tomorrow, so if possible a quick reply will be helpful :) Greetings, Pepijn ## Description: - dynamic service framework for C and C++. ## Issues:

Re: [DISCUSS] Celix Roadmap & Future Celix vs OSGi

ort a really minimalistic operating system, e.g. FreeRTOS, to get > > more embedded system/IoT attention > > - roadmap / release schedule for modules in Celix that are not part of > the > > current releasse (e.g. ConfigAdmin, EventAdmin, Remote services) > >

Re: Is there a Yocto-Recipe for Celix 2.0.0 available?

Hi, On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 7:08 PM eddi1...@gmx.net wrote: > On 16.06.2017 15:30, eddi1...@gmx.net wrote: > > Hallo, > > > > is there a yocto recipe for celix 2.0.0 available? I don't found it at > > http://layers.openembedded.org. > > > After that I tried to build the

[DISCUSS] Celix Roadmap & Future Celix vs OSGi

Hi All, I took the liberty to setup a roadmap [1] for Apache Celix based on the improvement ideas. This is just an initial setup and should considered an input for discussion not a final roadmap. [1] https://github.com/apache/celix/blob/develop/documents/roadmap/roadmap.md In this roadmap I

board report may 2017

Hi All, It is report time again. See my proposal for the board report below. Any remarks / additions are welcome. Greetings, Pepijn ## Description: - OSGi framework implementation in C and C++. ## Issues: - there are no issues requiring board attention at this time ## Activity: - The

Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Publish Subscribe Admin Donation

%40mail.gmail.com%3E Greetings, Pepijn > > > 2017-01-24 21:04 GMT+01:00 Pepijn Noltes <pepijnnol...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > The vote is closed and the results are > > > +1: > > > Roy Lenferink > > > Erjan Altena >

Re: new committer: Erjan Altena

On a more personal note: Erjan welcome to the club :) On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 4:34 PM Pepijn Noltes <pepijnnol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix has invited Erjan > Altena to become a committer and we are pleased to an

new committer: Erjan Altena

Hi All, The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix has invited Erjan Altena to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This

  1   2   >