Re: Review Request: when a template is deleted and then copied over again , it is still marked as "Removed" in template_zone_ref table.

Bharat - Can you please rebase and resend please ? On 21/03/13 11:10 AM, "Nitin Mehta" wrote: >Nitins-MacBook-Air:incubator-cloudstack nitinmehta$ git apply >CS-14673.patch >CS-14673.patch:19: trailing whitespace. > >CS-14673.patch:22: trailing whitespace. > >error: patch failed: >server/src/com

RE: [master branch issue ]Problem with SystemVMs and Primary Storage in latest Master

+1 . Always a better thing to have exception handling at the API later but this would be applicable only if somebody uses the API's to create the zones , assuming we have those UI checks in place. -Original Message- From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, March

Re: [master branch issue ]Problem with SystemVMs and Primary Storage in latest Master

Besides UI changes suggested below, I also think that we shouldn't allow adding Zone wide storage in XS/Vmware if the capability doesn't exist. There should be an explicit error thrown rather than waiting for system vms not starting. On 29/03/13 12:16 AM, "Edison Su" wrote: > > >> -Original

MASTER NONOSS BUILD FAILURE

[INFO] Apache CloudStack Server .. FAILURE [36.121s] . . [INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 1:39.509s [INFO] Finished at: Thu Mar 28 15:56:08 PDT 2013 [INF

Re: Review Request: BigSwitch networking plugin update

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9789/ --- (Updated March 29, 2013, 6:38 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Murali Reddy

Re: Review Request: Store NetworkServiceProvider connectivity service configuration in database.

> On Jan. 29, 2013, 9:43 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > The change looks good. Could you update the patch to the latest state of > > master? Hiroaki can you update the patch to latetst master. - Animesh --- This is an automatically g

Re: [ACS41] Today's 4.1 blocker and crit list! Go get 'em!

Here's the latest Blockers and criticals (UTC +0530, Mar 29) Blocker: CLOUDSTACK-1746 Cloudstack Usage Server won't start Kishan KavalaFrancois Gaudreault CLOUDSTACK-1836 License header failures for ja-JP .po translation files sebastien goasguen Chandan Purushothama Critical: CLOUDSTAC

Re: Can same Xen Server Host be used for different Management Servers?

On 29 March 2013 11:37, Kausal Malladi wrote: > I tried that, but on my 3GB machine inside DevCloud only SSVM is > getting started and not ConsoleProxy VM because of Insufficient Server > Capacity Exception. Also I am not able to create a new Virtual Machine > as template is not getting downloaded

4.1 Patches on review board

I was reviewing the patches on the review board and following 4.1 patch needs some action from the submitters? Kelven, Kishan, Pradeep please review your action items. Review# Status Who to take Action Action Item 9860Committed

Re: Can same Xen Server Host be used for different Management Servers?

I tried that, but on my 3GB machine inside DevCloud only SSVM is getting started and not ConsoleProxy VM because of Insufficient Server Capacity Exception. Also I am not able to create a new Virtual Machine as template is not getting downloaded. My experiment needs at least 2 VMs to be created in a

Re: [PROPOSAL] EIP across zones

On 26/03/13 8:10 PM, "Adam Grochowski" wrote: >Hi, >So I'm curious - what is the proposed method to move a single IP >across zones (presuming these zones span regions). As Chiradeep >mentioned earlier, /24 is the largest block that will be advertised, >so it would necessitate moving (or advertis

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1156: Limit Primary and Secondary storage for domain/accounts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9541/#review18496 --- Commit 18695276f79a4cf90279f6ff25ebc7c66b6a9c49 in branch refs/heads/

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1638) Network plugins won't be notified VM migration.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9871/#review18495 --- setup/db/create-schema.sql

Re: Can same Xen Server Host be used for different Management Servers?

On 29 March 2013 11:11, Kausal Malladi wrote: > Hi, > As part of development, I have configured a XenServer host with > Management Server built from CloudStack 3.0 source code and have > changed few things (resource allocation algorithm) in CloudStack 4.0 > source code (for my experiment). > Can I

Re: Review Request: Cloudmonkey requester.py change to return clearer errors and implement a logic change for async calls.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10151/ --- (Updated March 29, 2013, 5:49 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yad

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1264: Initialize some configuration variables properly to avoid any possible racing conditions.

> On March 14, 2013, 7:19 p.m., Chip Childers wrote: > > There's no comment about this being a required change in the bug, and the > > bug is resolved as "Can't reproduce". > > > > Is this change already in master? > > > > Thanks! Kelven, The referennced bug is fixed and committed in both m

Can same Xen Server Host be used for different Management Servers?

Hi, As part of development, I have configured a XenServer host with Management Server built from CloudStack 3.0 source code and have changed few things (resource allocation algorithm) in CloudStack 4.0 source code (for my experiment). Can I use the same host for testing my cloud with management ser

Re: Review Request: Fix log4j configuration for KVM agent

> On March 15, 2013, 1:59 p.m., Chip Childers wrote: > > also, what's the bug ID? I updated the BUG ID. Chip looking at JIRA you have already committed it. Kelven can you mark the patch as submitted? - Animesh --- This is an automatica

Re: Review Request: Fix log4j configuration for KVM agent

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9860/ --- (Updated March 29, 2013, 5:39 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Chip Child

Re: [DISCUSS] Palo Alto Integration

On 28/03/13 10:59 PM, "Will Stevens" wrote: >I am trying to implement the non-overlapping cidrs right now and I have >some questions. Does the ExternalGuestNetworkGuru create networks with >non-overlapping cidrs by default? Or do I need to override it's 'design' >and 'implement' methods to impl

RE: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi

Congrats Animesh! > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 1:28 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi > > The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack > has aske

RE: New Committer: Ilya Musayev

Congrats Ilya! > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 12:06 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New Committer: Ilya Musayev > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has > asked Ilya Mus

Re: Review Request: Cloudmonkey requester.py change to return clearer errors and implement a logic change for async calls.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10151/#review18491 --- Thanks for your patch Funs, I did not consider catching and handling

Re: New Committer: Ilya Musayev

Congrats Ilya and Animesh. On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:18 AM, prasanna wrote: > On 29 March 2013 00:06, Chip Childers wrote: > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack > > has asked Ilya Musayev to become a committer and we are pleased to > > announce that they have accepte

Re: [MERGE] bvt branch to master

+1 Awesome work Prasanna! Cheers. On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > I'd like to merge the bvt branch into master. The proposal [1] was to > stabilize master by allowing devs to quickly setup CloudStack using > simulated hypervisors and run some basic tests against it.

[ACS41][QA] Automation Tasks

Hi, Wanted to bring up this topic for discussion. I would like to propose to create Automation tasks for each of the stories and check in automation code for those tasks. I can create the tasks and whoever interested can pick those up for adding regression test cases i.e BVTs are being added by

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]

I've applied this on 4.1 so we can test upgrades - 260f6f7e5d7adae9da0d62c530e5279aeffb6f79 On 29 March 2013 07:37, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > commit d6e11f25ace4696ec39063f86342cd8a94bd96ee > Author: Marcus Sorensen > Date: Thu Mar 28 20:03:28 2013 -0600 > > CLOUDSTACK-1844 - fix typo in

Re: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi

Congratulations Animesh! On 29 March 2013 01:27, Alex Huang wrote: > The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has > asked Animesh Chaturvedi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce > that they have accepted. > > > > Being a committer enables easier cont

Re: New Committer: Ilya Musayev

On 29 March 2013 00:06, Chip Childers wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack > has asked Ilya Musayev to become a committer and we are pleased to > announce that they have accepted. > > Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more > autonomously. For

RE: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi

Congrats Animesh! --Sanjay > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 1:27 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi > > The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack

RE: New committer: Hiroaki Kawai

Congratulations! --Sanjay > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 7:09 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New committer: Hiroaki Kawai > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has > asked Hiroaki K

RE: New Committer: Ilya Musayev

Congrats Ilya! --Sanjay > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 12:06 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New Committer: Ilya Musayev > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has > aske

RE: New Committer: Ilya Musayev

Ilya, hearty Congratulations mate! > On 29/03/13 12:07 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked > >Ilya Musayev to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that > >they have accepted. > > > >Being a committer allows many cont

RE: New committer: Hiroaki Kawai

Hi Kawai san, Congratulations!! -Original Message- From: Noah Slater [mailto:nsla...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 6:08 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: New committer: Hiroaki Kawai Congrats! On 25 March 2013 13:39, David Nalley wrote: > The Project Managemen

RE: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi

Congratz Animesh and Ilya.. -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 8:04 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi Thanks everyone !! > -Original Message- > From: Alex H

Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

Hey guys, I think we're talking about a lot of good stuff here. What do you think about us walking through Edison's Wiki document, updating it, and extending it to include the things we're talking about? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Storage+subsystem+2.0 We could do th

Re: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi

Congrats Animesh On 29/03/13 1:27 AM, "Alex Huang" wrote: >The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has >asked Animesh Chaturvedi to become a committer and we are pleased to >announce that they have accepted. > > > >Being a committer enables easier contribution to th

Re: New Committer: Ilya Musayev

Congrats... On 29/03/13 12:07 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack >has asked Ilya Musayev to become a committer and we are pleased to >announce that they have accepted. > >Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more >autonomo

RE: [MERGE] bvt branch to master

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:00 PM > To: CloudStack Dev > Subject: Re: [MERGE] bvt branch to master > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:36:58PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > I'd like to merge the bvt

RE: New Committer: Ilya Musayev

Congratulations Ilya > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 11:36 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New Committer: Ilya Musayev > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked >

RE: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi

Thanks everyone !! > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:57 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi > > The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack > has

Maven POM file question (related to Eclipse)

Hi, I've been building and running outside of Eclipse for the past few months, but decided to give it a try again today. Everything seems to build now, but I have three Maven issues (looks like m2e doesn't support certain Maven features we're using). What do you suggest I do with the following th

Refactoring questions

Hi, I see some descriptions about next cloudstack refactoring in cwiki (*1, *2). I have questions about: 1. What is the status of the development? 2. The refactoring seems to use distributed transaction managemnt, is this right? 3. Should the plugins also be refactored with the change of interface

[ACS41][Patch Request]

commit d6e11f25ace4696ec39063f86342cd8a94bd96ee Author: Marcus Sorensen Date: Thu Mar 28 20:03:28 2013 -0600 CLOUDSTACK-1844 - fix typo in agent pre-script to allow copy of old configs to new config location Reported-by: Sangeetha Hariharan (JIRA) Signed-off-by: Marcus Sorensen

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1844) Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - KVM host agent.properties is not restored as part of upgrading the binaries from 4.0 to 4.1.

Ah, it works if you're running agent and management server on the same host, but there was a typo in the agent portion that would keep it from working standalone. Pushed a fix to master. On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/bro

RE: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1844) Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - KVM host agent.properties is not restored as part of upgrading the binaries from 4.0 to 4.1.

Marcus , I did the following: Created a repo for all the new RPM from the build from 4.1 Then did yum update cloud-* After update , I see that the rpm packages have been upgraded successfully. [root@Rack3Host18 agent]# rpm -qa | grep cloud cloudstack-agent-4.1.0-SNAPSHOT.el6.x86_64 cloudstack-c

Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

Hey guys, I'm thinking through what Vladimir wrote below. My comments are inline. Thanks! On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Vladimir Popovski < vladi...@zadarastorage.com> wrote: > If I read what Edison mentioned properly, the idea was to provide as much > freedom for the plugin as possible. >

Re: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1844) Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - KVM host agent.properties is not restored as part of upgrading the binaries from 4.0 to 4.1.

Hmm, when you say binaries are you talking about RPMs? Is this centos? I've tested 4.1 rpms and we copy the old agent.properties, everything started up fine. I'll take a look. More info on your test setup is appreciated. On Mar 28, 2013 7:43 PM, "Sangeetha Hariharan (JIRA)" wrote: > Sangeetha Har

RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

I tried upgrade from 4.0 -> 4.1 using Rhel6.3 binaries for Management server and KVM hosts in Advanced zone set up. I had an issue with KVM agent upgrade. After upgrading the binaries on KVM host , cloudstack-agent fails to start. This was because agent.properties is not restored as part of upgr

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1638) Network plugins won't be notified VM migration.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9871/ --- (Updated March 29, 2013, 1:49 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Hugo Trippaer

Re: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi

Congrats Animesh ! On 29/03/13 3:37 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: >Well done Animesh, > >On Mar 28, 2013, at 4:04 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote: > >> Congrats Animesh! >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 3:57 PM

Re: Review Request: MidoNet Networking Plugin [2/2]

Hi all, I think all review comments have been addressed on this, but review progress seems to have stalled - anything I should be doing to keep things moving? Thanks, Dave. On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Dave Cahill wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > h

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

If I read what Edison mentioned properly, the idea was to provide as much freedom for the plugin as possible. The generic code of datastore creation and manipulations will be available, but will be optional. The plugin may decide to use it or perform something else. We can consider two main sce

Question pertaining to ASF 40 to 41 Upgrade: Global Configuration Parameters that have Path Information

There is a global configuration parameter by the name "mount.parent" in CloudStack Setup where it defines "The mount point on the Management Server for Secondary Storage.". In ASF 4.0 fresh Installation, it points to "/var/lib/cloud/mnt" by default and in ASF 4.1's fresh installation, it points

Re: [ACS41] Today's 4.1 blocker and crit list! Go get 'em!

On Mar 28, 2013, at 6:44 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Mar 28, 2013, at 5:05 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Here's the list as of right now (and we are still pending a clear >> statement from Sudha / others that upgrade testing has been completed). >> >> Shout if you wan

[ACS41][PATCH request]CLOUDSTACK-1827: Fix redundant router update mechanism

commit e3f67d126d66c31e027c96b5524667884084053b Author: Sheng Yang Date: Thu Mar 28 15:02:45 2013 -0700 CLOUDSTACK-1827: Fix redundant router update mechanism There is a bug that if the smaller number ID RvR stop running, that pair of RvR's status won't be updated. This patch fixed

Re: [ACS41] Today's 4.1 blocker and crit list! Go get 'em!

On Mar 28, 2013, at 5:05 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > Here's the list as of right now (and we are still pending a clear > statement from Sudha / others that upgrade testing has been completed). > > Shout if you want help, or if there is a pending patch that I missed! > > Blocker: >

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

>> >so looking at this it all seems to be vitual box based, is that correct ?? >id be curious if it was possible to convert the vbox image to xen, and >create >say an Devcloud/XEN QuickCLoud since i see virtual box as overhead since >im >already running XEN under my desktop > Absolutely. You don

Re: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi

Well done Animesh, On Mar 28, 2013, at 4:04 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote: > Congrats Animesh! > >> -Original Message- >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 3:57 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi

Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

Hi Edison, I think I'm seeing a bit more where you're coming from. I guess I was under the impression that when a plug-in was invoked to create storage that the idea was always for that storage to be for a single VM or a single data disk. It sounds like the plug-in architecture, however, is bein

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:26 PM To: Edison Su Cc: Vladimir Popovski; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs Hi Edison, Can you clarify what you mean here? [Edison] If there are HV-dependent stor

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:51 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:34 PM > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Cc

RE: [QA] Test plan for Password Encryption - Make SHA1 Salted as default authenticator and encoder.

Great!! Thanks. Thanks, .. Parth -Original Message- From: Vijayendra Bhamidipati Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:40 PM To: Parth Jagirdar; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [QA] Test plan for Password Encryption - Make SHA1 Salted as default authenticator and encoder.

Re: [QA] Test plan for Password Encryption - Make SHA1 Salted as default authenticator and encoder.

Hi Parth, The test plan looks good. You can also add a test to remove an authenticator that was used for a particular user (say MD5) after creating that user, rebuild/restart the mgmt server and see that that user authentication fails. All other tests look good. Regards, Vijay On 3/25/13 12:38 P

Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

Let me draw a diagram and send it to you guys. The gist is that all storage plug-ins that make use of iSCSI will need certain support (like communicating with the hypervisor of the cluster the storage is for and hooking up said storage). The storage plug-ins themselves should not know anything ab

Re: Review Request: Make SHA256Salt the default password encoding and authentication mechanism for cloudstack

Hugo/Kelven, Please review the changes and let me know, Thanks, Regards, Vijay From: Vijayendra Bhamidipati mailto:vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com>> Reply-To: Vijayendra Bhamidipati mailto:vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com>> Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 10:03 PM To: Kelven Yang mailto:kelve

Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

Hi Edison, Can you clarify what you mean here? [Edison] If there are HV-dependent storage code there(I assume it should have some code can be shared between different storage provider at hypervisor side), we can generalize them and expose them. I think Vladimir and I are proposing that the stora

Re: Create VMware Datastore

Hi, Thanks for taking a look at the code and commenting. I'm including the CloudStack distribution list in replies so others can chime in, if they'd like. I sent the first e-mail directly to you guys because it included an attachment and those get taken out by the CloudStack mail system. I put

KVM | Loading Additional Volume | Windows

Hello,I have obtained drivers for this to work via KVM, however; uncertain how to complete this. The links I have reviewed:http://sourceforge.net/projects/kvm/files/kvm-guest-drivers-windows/2/http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/WindowsGuestDrivers/Download_Drivershttps://launchpad.net/kvm-guest-drivers-

[ACS41] Today's 4.1 blocker and crit list! Go get 'em!

Hi all, Here's the list as of right now (and we are still pending a clear statement from Sudha / others that upgrade testing has been completed). Shout if you want help, or if there is a pending patch that I missed! Blocker: CLOUDSTACK-1836 License header failures for ja-JP .po translation file

Re: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi

congrats to both sateesh, alex, and animesh... dont want anyone feeling left out. On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013, at 02:57 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > > Please join me in congratulating Animesh! > > Congrats, keep up the good work! > > Best, > > jzb >

Re: [MERGE] bvt branch to master

+1 On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > +1 > > On 3/28/13 12:00 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > >On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:36:58PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > >> I'd like to merge the bvt branch into master. The proposal [1] was to > >

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:34 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Cc: Phong Nguyen >> Subject: Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than

RE: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

> -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:34 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Phong Nguyen > Subject: Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute > > > > On 3/28/13 1:04 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal"

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > >> >>Wow this is awesome. Will you consider writing a blog post about this? > > Yes, sure. > > One thing that is not 'ready' is the operational / packaging side of > things. > Copying systemvm.zip around and starting daemons without some k

Re: Review Request: Make SHA256Salt the default password encoding and authentication mechanism for cloudstack

On 3/20/13 10:09 PM, "prasanna" wrote: >> > >Thanks Vijay, I'm just wondering how does someone not dealing with the >UI know the auth mechanism to use? When login happens, when account >creation happens, or when api signing happens (unaffected?)? Is there >an API call that lists the authenticato

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

On 3/28/13 1:04 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: > >> >>Wow this is awesome. Will you consider writing a blog post about this? > >Yes, sure. > >One thing that is not 'ready' is the operational / packaging side of >things. >Copying systemvm.zip around and starting daemons without some kind of init

RE: [ACS4.2] master blockers

I just resolved all of my bugs: >CLOUDSTACK-1730Jessica Wang >CLOUDSTACK-1728Jessica Wang >CLOUDSTACK-1616Jessica Wang >CLOUDSTACK-1731Jessica Wang -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 2

Re: Review Request: Make SHA256Salt the default password encoding and authentication mechanism for cloudstack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10039/ --- (Updated March 28, 2013, 8:26 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Hugo Trippae

Re: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013, at 02:57 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > Please join me in congratulating Animesh! Congrats, keep up the good work! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

RE: [DISCUSS]VMware Open Source APIs

I guess a small world for you Chip :) For those who would like to learn more or just curious, the README file has some interesting things we should consider. -- WHAT IS VI JAVA API? VI Java API is a set of Java libraries that aim to ease the usage of VI SDK Web Services interfaces. It's now

RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

Create a doc bug for documenting these steps - CLOUDSTACK-1837 - Additonal Steps ( Restart of all system Vms , copy vhd-utils) to be included in the upgrade procedure from 4.0 -> 4.1 -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Thurs

Re: [DISCUSS]VMware Open Source APIs

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:14:17PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > The author, Steve Jin wrote this API, he also co-wrote and designed the > original non open source VmWare APIs. (I even have one of his books). > > This project is now supported by community and Steve. > > I'd say the chance of it

RE: [DISCUSS]VMware Open Source APIs

The author, Steve Jin wrote this API, he also co-wrote and designed the original non open source VmWare APIs. (I even have one of his books). This project is now supported by community and Steve. I'd say the chance of it being very much similar to non opensource version - is very high, but I wi

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

Comments embedded in below. From: Vladimir Popovski [mailto:vladi...@zadarastorage.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 12:22 PM To: Mike Tutkowski; Edison Su Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs Hi All, I was away for couple of days, so sorry fo

Re: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi

Grats! On 28 March 2013 19:57, Alex Huang wrote: > The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has > asked Animesh Chaturvedi to become a committer and we are pleased to > announce that they have accepted. > > > > Being a committer enables easier contribution to the pr

RE: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi

Send your congrats to Animesh. Sateesh should always be congratulated but he is already a committer. :P --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:57 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New Committer: Anim

Re: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi

Congrats Animesh! On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:57:24PM -0700, Alex Huang wrote: > The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has > asked Animesh Chaturvedi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce > that they have accepted. > > > > Being a committer enable

Re: [MERGE] bvt branch to master

+1 On 3/28/13 12:00 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:36:58PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: >> I'd like to merge the bvt branch into master. The proposal [1] was to >> stabilize master by allowing devs to quickly setup CloudStack using >> simulated hypervisors and run som

RE: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi

Congrats Animesh! > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 3:57 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi > > The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack > has a

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

> >Wow this is awesome. Will you consider writing a blog post about this? Yes, sure. One thing that is not 'ready' is the operational / packaging side of things. Copying systemvm.zip around and starting daemons without some kind of init script isn't ideal. Also the UI still shows "0" system vm

RE: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi

Congrats Animesh !:) . -Original Message- From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 1:27 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animes

New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi

The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission p

Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

Hi, A bunch of us were talking about hypervisor limitations on the number of iSCSI connections the other day. Hopefully this is accurate, but the thinking was we'd run out of VLANs first. I sent you and Edison a little VMware code to create a datastore earlier today. Hopefully we can complete i

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

Hi Mike, Say hi to John from me. He is an amazing guy and most likely I will meet him during the OS summit. We don’t have any hypervisor-specific code for manipulating with storage objects. There was no such a need for the OpenStack drives. Inside of our systems, we usually provide a direct a

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:28:33AM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote: > Then we can go with the option of reboot (start and stop) of all the system > Vms (SSVM,CPVM and routers) as part of Upgrade procedure ? Sounds like it. Care to add a note to the release notes wiki page to this effect? > >

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

For optional dependencies, JSR330 injection requires using setter injection. You should write @Inject void setGslbProvider(GslbProvider provider) { this._gslbProvider = provider; } On 3/27/13 8:36 PM, "Murali Reddy" wrote: >On 28/03/13 9:00 AM, "Rajesh Battala" wrote: > >>Jetty is failing

Re: [MERGE] bvt branch to master

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:36:58PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > I'd like to merge the bvt branch into master. The proposal [1] was to > stabilize master by allowing devs to quickly setup CloudStack using > simulated hypervisors and run some basic tests against it. > > The bvt branch integrat

RE: [master branch issue ]Problem with SystemVMs and Primary Storage in latest Master

> -Original Message- > From: Srikanteswararao Talluri [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 5:02 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [master branch issue ]Problem with SystemVMs and Primary > Storage in latest Master > > > > > -

RE: New Committer: Ilya Musayev

It's about time :) Congrats! -kd >-Original Message- >From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 11:36 AM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject: New Committer: Ilya Musayev > >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has

  1   2   >