Re: Review Request 12205: message(s) made more identifying for the error location

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 06:30:57PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Is this request of yours still valid? happy to do a review or a half. Yes please, still some stuff not in Submitted state. Thanks for your help > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 01

Review Request 12227: NPE wile deployVM in kvm due to capacityIops

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12227/ --- Review request for cloudstack, edison su, Ram Ganesh, and Sateesh Chodapuneedi.

Re: Review Request 11953: Remove code that does nothing but allocate a bunch of objects

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11953/#review22649 --- Ship it! 625a9a1 -> master @Prachi - don't forget to apply it when

Review Request 12224: Cloudstack-3313 Ipv6 - Not able to deploy a new VM in IPV6 network

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12224/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek. Bugs: Cloudstack-3313 R

Re: Review Request 12207: Cloudstack-3299 incorrect arguments sent to the script createIpalias in case of vmware, Cloudstack-3240 corrected a mistake in the script name.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12207/#review22647 --- Also for two bug fixes submit different reviews or if they are dupli

Re: Review Request 12207: Cloudstack-3299 incorrect arguments sent to the script createIpalias in case of vmware, Cloudstack-3240 corrected a mistake in the script name.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12207/#review22646 --- Has this been tested ? - Abhinandan Prateek On July 1, 2013, 12:5

Re: Review Request 12209: Cloudstack-3302 VM deployement failed due to dnsmasq configuration issue in case of multiple subnets in a vlan

> On July 2, 2013, 6:08 a.m., Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > > Ship It! Please, test your code in future, these errors could easily be caught if you tested your code. - Abhinandan --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, v

Re: Review Request 12209: Cloudstack-3302 VM deployement failed due to dnsmasq configuration issue in case of multiple subnets in a vlan

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12209/#review22644 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Abhinandan Prateek On July 1, 2013, 1 p.m.,

Re: In-Development Release Naming

John, If I understand you, we will call master x.(y+1) with x.y being the latest unpatched release unless we decide that it is not going to be x-compatible anymore. We will publish x.(y+1) as some symbolic name, possibly reflecting a running gag from the latest collab, until it is decided whether

Re: Bug in 4.1-4.2 template upgrade process

Hari, The hypervisor comparison should be case insensitive. I think the types comes from a enum, can you also check the case there and try not to hardcode the hypervisor string. Another thing is that we are repeating the code for each HypervisorŠ this can be made more compact. -abhi On 02/07/1

Review Request 12222: CLOUDSTACK-2510: Getting NPE while executing listStoragePools API command.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/1/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh, edison su, and Nitin Mehta. Bugs:

Re: Review Request 11992: CLOUDSTACK-2571 ZWPS issues with Enabling/Clearing the Maintenance State of the Storage

> On July 1, 2013, 5:18 p.m., edison su wrote: > > Ship It! Thanks Edison for the review and pushing to repo. - Rajesh --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11992/#review22613 -

Re: Query String Request Authentication(QSRA) support by S3 providers

Yes thanks Jessica. I re-opened the bug again. I know its not a gui problem per-say in that the template is not ready to show the download link. However, it never becomes ready is the actual problem. What sets the "isready" property to true? As far as I can see, the objects in the S3 stores (AWS or

Review Request 12220: Cloudstack-3313 Ipv6 - Not able to deploy a new VM in IPV6 network.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12220/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek. Bugs: Cloudstack-3313 R

Re: Review Request 12220: Cloudstack-3313 Ipv6 - Not able to deploy a new VM in IPV6 network.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12220/ --- (Updated July 2, 2013, 2:07 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan

DevCloud2 problem

I’m having some problems deploying DevCloud2 and wonder if you could help please. I would like to build the Cloudstack source in DevCloud2 and run everything from within the DevCloud2 VM. So far I have done the following, any idea what can be causing the PermGen error at the end:** 1. Downl

RE: Secondary Storage/TinyLinux

When you see it under Templates, what is the property of 'Ready' attribute of the template? Regards, Devdeep > -Original Message- > From: Soheil Eizadi [mailto:seiz...@infoblox.com] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 4:06 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Secondary Storage/TinyLin

Secondary Storage/TinyLinux

A few days ago I built the latest 4.2 and it came up and secondary storage loaded TinyLinux Image that I was able to deploy it adding instances. Today I rebuilt my system, initialized the database and this time using the same NFS secondary storage. I don't have Tiny Linux Image, when I go to add

Re: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master

I recently had an urgent family matter to take care and thanks for Alex to help me out on this matter. I think at this moment, without a previous 100% rate of BVT past rate, it will be hard to tell a direct link between a particular change with a BVT failure. It is a good idea to resolve this measu

RE: Unresolved compilation problem?

Hi Hugo, Looks like it was just due to some stale files - probably mvn clean has some issue where it isn't cleaning them up - I nuked and recreated my workspace and the cluster addition went through. Thanks for the prompt response! Cheers! Regards, Vijay -Original Message- From: Hugo T

Re: Review Request 11670: CLOUDSTACK-2288: NPE while creating volume from snapshot when the primary storage is in maintenance state.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11670/#review22625 --- Commit ffd5f1a777ac9af5b65b1fcd357684d7dafcce87 in branch refs/heads

Re: In-Development Release Naming

Chip, On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:28:37PM -0400, John Burwell wrote: > > All, > > > > Since we have adopted Semantic Versioning [1], it seems odd that we > designate a release version before the final set of enhancements/fixes has > been iden

Re: In-Development Release Naming

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:40:38PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > That doesn't invalidate John's point about the message to the users. We can > publish it by a code name and still code it with numbers according to our > expectations of the level of bump it will take. Ah... I guess I was thinking t

Re: In-Development Release Naming

That doesn't invalidate John's point about the message to the users. We can publish it by a code name and still code it with numbers according to our expectations of the level of bump it will take. On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:28:37PM -0400,

Re: Unresolved compilation problem?

Heya, I've made some changes to this function to support multiple types of broadcast domain types. So I had to add a dependency to the Pom to get the BroadcastDomainType enum. This probably was not properly updated until you did a full recompile. Cheers, Hugo Sent from my iPhone On 1 jul.

Re: Console Access: /ajax 404 not found

Not too sure about devCloud, it seems that there will be port-forwarding rules set on your local host to make sure console access can go pass the NAT to reach console proxy VM. >From the error log, I think it has reached to a wrong HTTP server Kelven On 6/28/13 4:05 PM, "Tobias Brunner" wrote:

Unresolved compilation problem?

I'm running into this exception when trying to add a vmware cluster on top of latest master: INFO [cloud.configuration.ConfigurationManagerImpl] (829088401@qtp-729217986-4:) adding a new subnet to the network 200 INFO [hypervisor.vmware.VmwareServerDiscoverer] (1175658854@qtp-729217986-5:) D

Re: In-Development Release Naming

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:28:37PM -0400, John Burwell wrote: > All, > > Since we have adopted Semantic Versioning [1], it seems odd that we designate > a release version before the final set of enhancements/fixes has been > identified. For example, the release proceeding 4.2 may contain no bac

Re: Review Request 12156: CLOUDSTACK-3189: Primary storage usage is not getting decremented after deleting the DATA volumes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12156/#review22623 --- Commit af4eb22a6539b9c25f6b9df2aa110bf099283cbb in branch refs/heads

Re: London CloudStack Meetup on July 4th

Just figured I'd follow up on this. If anyone's planning on attending this CloudStack Meetup in London, I'll see you there! On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am planning on heading to London to speak at a CloudStack Meetu

Re: In-Development Release Naming

Definitely a +1 Matt On 7/1/13 2:28 PM, "John Burwell" wrote: >All, > >Since we have adopted Semantic Versioning [1], it seems odd that we >designate a release version before the final set of enhancements/fixes >has been identified. For example, the release proceeding 4.2 may contain >no bac

Bug in 4.1-4.2 template upgrade process

Ran sanity check for the 4.1-4.2 upgrade. Went fine with one exception - I haven't pre-installed the 4.2 system templates, and the update didn't fail. Hari, can you please fix it as you were the one who implemented system template upgrade. Steps to reproduce: 1) Istall 4.1.0 2) Add 1 xen cluster

Re: Review Request 12156: CLOUDSTACK-3189: Primary storage usage is not getting decremented after deleting the DATA volumes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12156/#review22618 --- Commit 737a9c397755f979bd42a1504bd0b298b4f74825 in branch refs/head

Re: In-Development Release Naming

Exactly (+1) and 'gammarays' or '#gammarays' have my preference. On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:28 PM, John Burwell wrote: > All, > > Since we have adopted Semantic Versioning [1], it seems odd that we > designate a release version before the final set of enhancements/fixes has > been identified. F

RE: Query String Request Authentication(QSRA) support by S3 providers

Thomas, I checked the data you provided. The reason that the 2 templates("MyTiny", "AnotherTiny") have no download button is because they are not ready (i.e. their "isready" property is false). Download button is only available when "isready" property is true. Jessica -Original Message--

Re: Master build problem

Hey Paul, That out-of-memory error in the ConfigurationServerImpl might be the root-cause. This would prevent cloudstack from completely initialising and one of the last initialisation steps is to enable the admin user. If you fix that you are a step closer. Cheers, Hugo On Jul 1, 2013, at

In-Development Release Naming

All, Since we have adopted Semantic Versioning [1], it seems odd that we designate a release version before the final set of enhancements/fixes has been identified. For example, the release proceeding 4.2 may contain no backwards compatible API changes to be 4.3. Conversely, we may decide dur

RE: Master build problem

I see the admin user getting added: 2013-07-01 19:14:04,739 TRACE [db.Transaction.Statement] (Timer-1:null) Preparing: INSERT INTO `cloud`.`user` (id, uuid, username, password, account_id, firstname, lastname, created, state, user.default) VALUES (2, UUID(), 'admin', RAND(), 2, 'admin','cloud',

Re: Review Request 12156: CLOUDSTACK-3189: Primary storage usage is not getting decremented after deleting the DATA volumes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12156/#review22616 --- Commit 301c91c099957b77dd1127484446f9fe69b53e39 in branch refs/heads

RE: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

Hi Prasanna, For the following two test failures: - integration.smoke.test_affinity_groups.TestDeployVmWithAffinityGroup.test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup It looks to be some issue with the test itself. The test is failing to find the affinity group created duri

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

Hi Prasanna, Can you add the following logging configuration in your log4j configuration in your automation run: I am trying to look into create_template test case failure, but the ms log does not show much information for me to get some clue where it happens wrong.

Re: Review Request 11953: Remove code that does nothing but allocate a bunch of objects

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11953/#review22615 --- Ship it! This change looks good, we can remove this part for now.

RE: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master

Ilya, Thanks! The current problem on this branch is we're trying to distinguish what's actually broken on master and what's broken by introducing this change. At this point, the branch is basically frozen and only applying bug fixes once BVT found problems. --Alex > -Original Message---

Re: Review Request 11992: CLOUDSTACK-2571 ZWPS issues with Enabling/Clearing the Maintenance State of the Storage

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11992/#review22613 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On June 28, 2013, 9:18 a.m., Rajes

Re: Review Request 11992: CLOUDSTACK-2571 ZWPS issues with Enabling/Clearing the Maintenance State of the Storage

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11992/#review22612 --- Commit 160b493285f6c72e1e93509dfd470c4bd7da7945 in branch refs/heads

RE: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master

Alex, I completely understand. Please keep us in the loop on the progress. If its functional to some extent - i.e. at least build succeeds without errors and major functionality is there, I can merge the code into CloudSand CS distro - to test it out and share it with whoever wants to try it.

Test email #3

This is test email #3 sent from Jenkins

Test email #1

This is test email #1 sent from Jenkins

RE: [ACS42] Branch created

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:02 AM > To: > Subject: Re: [ACS42] Branch created > > On Jun 30, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 04:29:31PM +, Animesh Chaturve

RE: [ACS42] Branch created

> -Original Message- > From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] > Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 12:00 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [ACS42] Branch created > > Just want to confirm if upgrades are all enabled for 4.2?? [Animesh>] Upgrades should work

RE: Review Request 12189: Apach CloudStack 4.1 Quick Install Guide (en-US)

Last week I had someone in Tech Marketing bring up a 4.1 using the distribution and following the installation guide. They were not able to connect the XenServer to CloudStack due to the /usr/bin/vhd-util /opt/xenserver/bin/vhd-util not being present. I patched the system so it was operational

Re: Review Request 12205: message(s) made more identifying for the error location

Is this request of yours still valid? happy to do a review or a half. On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 04:49:53PM +0200, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Hah, > > > > you beat me to it by seconds prassana ;-) > > Hehe. Need help with some others thoug

Re: Jenkins and IRC

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:07:47PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:05:44PM -0400, John Burwell wrote: > > Prasanna, > > > > I don't think a small namespace will deliver much value. We are > > responsible for maintaining the code base -- even the older code > > that will e

Re: Jenkins and IRC

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:51:55PM +0200, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Heya, > > I "fixed" it manually for now. I've connected our cloud to the > jenkins sytem. So there will be a few slaves popping up with names > like 'cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-xxx'. These are automagically > created by jenkins.

Re: Jenkins and IRC

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:05:44PM -0400, John Burwell wrote: > Prasanna, > > I don't think a small namespace will deliver much value. We are responsible > for maintaining the code base -- even the older code that will eventually be > replaced. I would prefer to start with a smaller set of rul

Re: Jenkins and IRC

Prasanna, I don't think a small namespace will deliver much value. We are responsible for maintaining the code base -- even the older code that will eventually be replaced. I would prefer to start with a smaller set of rules focused on high priority issues (e.g. lack of proper equals, hashCod

Re: Review Request 12109: HAProxy maxconn is not configurable

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12109/ --- (Updated July 1, 2013, 3:55 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pra

Re: Jenkins and IRC

Heya, I "fixed" it manually for now. I've connected our cloud to the jenkins sytem. So there will be a few slaves popping up with names like 'cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-xxx'. These are automagically created by jenkins. I've setup the cloudstack-master build to use these slaves in addition to

Re: Review Request 12106: Removed Dead Code from Management Server Hyper-V 2012 Support

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12106/#review22605 --- commit 4361418e415b81567423367c0bd3aff263cc15c8 Author: Donal Laffer

Error while Porting xenserver-6.2.0 in CS 4.1

Hi I tried to complied CS 4.1 to port xenserver-6.2.0 support. Can someone help me what went wrong in this. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-engine-storage-snapshot --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: /root/cloudstack-4.1/dist/rpmbuild/BUILD/cloudstack

Re: Master build problem

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 08:44:28AM +, Paul Angus wrote: > This was a completely fresh build from the 4.2 branch (oss). > > I don't use dev cloud as it's not representative of a real environment. I ran: > Should fail on devcloud too ideally. > yum install -y cloud-client # run aga

Re: On git 4.1 (4.1.1-SNAPSHOT), jetty:run fails because of database version errors

I don't understand why this is a problem. >From a systems perspective there is only one (correct) timezone. Actually using timezones, especially in a geographically distributed cloud is problematic. --David On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Ryan Lei wrote: > Great. Both the OSS and non-OSS buil

Re: Review Request 12191: removed EnumerationImpl

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12191/#review22600 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Hugo Trippaers On June 29, 2013, 5:05 p.m.,

Re: Review Request 12190: removed CleanupDelegate

> On July 1, 2013, 3:11 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Ship It! master: 16b7509a234158b536155be9278cfee33b93a5c7 4.2: 00e99a08169b60b0449d67dfc891053cf4469bf7 - Hugo --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http

Re: Review Request 12191: removed EnumerationImpl

> On July 1, 2013, 3:07 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Ship It! > > Hugo Trippaers wrote: > master: 16b7509a234158b536155be9278cfee33b93a5c7 > 4.2: 00e99a08169b60b0449d67dfc891053cf4469bf7 This was the wrong patch, this is the removed CleanupDelegate patch. Can you submit the right p

Re: Review Request 12190: removed CleanupDelegate

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12190/#review22603 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Hugo Trippaers On June 29, 2013, 5:03 p.m.,

Re: Review Request 12191: removed EnumerationImpl

> On July 1, 2013, 3:07 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Ship It! master: 16b7509a234158b536155be9278cfee33b93a5c7 4.2: 00e99a08169b60b0449d67dfc891053cf4469bf7 - Hugo --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https

Re: Review Request 11942: ProcessUtil cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11942/#review22599 --- utils/test/com/cloud/utils/ProcessUtilTest.java

Re: please review

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 04:26:00PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Can someone look at review request 12205. It only changes strings in > exceptions and a log message. > Done. -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com

Re: Review Request 12205: message(s) made more identifying for the error location

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 04:49:53PM +0200, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Hah, > > you beat me to it by seconds prassana ;-) Hehe. Need help with some others though. Ones by Laszlo and Dave Brosius esp are simpler to review since they touch java issues. Anyone willing to help? https://reviews.apache.org

Re: Review Request 12205: message(s) made more identifying for the error location

Hah, you beat me to it by seconds prassana ;-) Cheers, Hugo On Jul 1, 2013, at 4:48 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12205/#review22598

Re: Review Request 11906: CLOUDSTACK-1047: tracking in logs using job id

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11906/ --- (Updated July 1, 2013, 2:50 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, De

Re: Review Request 11670: CLOUDSTACK-2288: NPE while creating volume from snapshot when the primary storage is in maintenance state.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11670/#review22597 --- Commit 58e69704ea9876b3c5195d085f9a7056b7f65298 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12205: message(s) made more identifying for the error location

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12205/#review22598 --- Ship it! 216e374 -> 4.2 639592f -> master - Prasanna Santhanam O

Re: Review Request 11670: CLOUDSTACK-2288: NPE while creating volume from snapshot when the primary storage is in maintenance state.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11670/#review22595 --- Commit ffd5f1a777ac9af5b65b1fcd357684d7dafcce87 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12205: message(s) made more identifying for the error location

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12205/#review22596 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Hugo Trippaers On July 1, 2013, 10:46 a.m.,

please review

Can someone look at review request 12205. It only changes strings in exceptions and a log message. thanks, Daan

Re: backwards compatibility question

sounds like the intuitive approach, thanks On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:50:08PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > H, > > > > In the network thing I am trying to get you people to accept I want to > add > > a parameter to an api call. What is the

Re: backwards compatibility question

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:50:08PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > In the network thing I am trying to get you people to accept I want to add > a parameter to an api call. What is the policy (does it adhere to common > sense)? It is an extra parameter to the end of an otherwise unchanged call

Re: [GSoC] Encrypted passwords on LDAP.

On 01-Jul-2013, at 2:57 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > On 6/21/13 11:38 AM, Ian Duffy wrote: >> Hi Guys, >> >> I'm using JNDI to connect to LDAP for user authentication. At the >> moment I'm just testing against an OpenLDAP server. >> >> I have my Context.SECURITY_AUTHENTICATION set to simple

Re: database deploy problem

What I did: # git clone https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git # cd cloudstack # mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install # mvn -P developer -pl developer,tools/devcloud -Ddeploydb then error: [INFO] Error stacktraces are turned on. [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] --

Review Request 12209: Cloudstack-3302 VM deployement failed due to dnsmasq configuration issue in case of multiple subnets in a vlan

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12209/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek. Bugs: Cloudstack-3302 R

Review Request 12207: Cloudstack-3299 incorrect arguments sent to the script createIpalias in case of vmware, Cloudstack-3240 corrected a mistake in the script name.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12207/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek. Bugs: Cloudstack-3240 and

backwards compatibility question

H, In the network thing I am trying to get you people to accept I want to add a parameter to an api call. What is the policy (does it adhere to common sense)? It is an extra parameter to the end of an otherwise unchanged call. I am still checking to make sure it is really optional. If it is not ca

Re: database deploy problem

You need to run following command at first mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install 2013/7/1 Thomas Schneider > Hello, > > I try to setup a Cloudstack developpement environement with devcloud > following the instruction on the wiki but I have two problems. > When I execute the following command

database deploy problem

Hello, I try to setup a Cloudstack developpement environement with devcloud following the instruction on the wiki but I have two problems. When I execute the following command I have an error: mvn -P developer -pl developer,tools/devcloud -Ddeploydb [INFO] ---

Review Request 12205: message(s) made more identifying for the error location

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12205/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2162 Repository: cloudstack-g

Re: [GSoC] Encrypted passwords on LDAP.

On 6/21/13 11:38 AM, Ian Duffy wrote: Hi Guys, I'm using JNDI to connect to LDAP for user authentication. At the moment I'm just testing against an OpenLDAP server. I have my Context.SECURITY_AUTHENTICATION set to simple, however when some password encryption are used within LDAP it fails. Any

Re: Review Request 11670: CLOUDSTACK-2288: NPE while creating volume from snapshot when the primary storage is in maintenance state.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11670/ --- (Updated July 1, 2013, 9:18 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pra

Re: Review Request 11670: CLOUDSTACK-2288: NPE while creating volume from snapshot when the primary storage is in maintenance state.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11670/ --- (Updated July 1, 2013, 9:18 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Sin

Re: Review Request 11670: CLOUDSTACK-2288: NPE while creating volume from snapshot when the primary storage is in maintenance state.

> On June 30, 2013, 6:50 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > Applying: CLOUDSTACK-2288: NPE while creating volume from snapshot when the > > primary storage is in maintenance state. > > error: patch failed: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeManagerImpl.java:523 > > error: server/src/com/cloud/s

Re: [DISCUSS] unanswered questions

This sounds like something we want to set up. Does markmail qualify? On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > > > users@ needs more people because I see difficult questions there > > > often. > > > > I have noticed it too, and from my side it seems that the questions have > > b

Re: Suggestion needed for CLOUDSTACK-212

On 7/1/13 8:11 AM, Dharmesh Kakadia wrote: Hi David, I have submitted a patch yesterday. It migrates com.cloud.network o org.apache.network. Please let me know if this is fine so that I can go on for the rest of the packages. Thanks, Dharmesh Can you send me another patch created with git

RE: Master build problem

This was a completely fresh build from the 4.2 branch (oss). I don't use dev cloud as it's not representative of a real environment. I ran: yum install -y cloud-client # run against local 4.2 repo cloudstack-setup-databases cloud:cloud@$MYSQLIP --deploy-as=root:password cloudstack-set

RE: [DISCUSS] unanswered questions

> > users@ needs more people because I see difficult questions there > > often. > > I have noticed it too, and from my side it seems that the questions have > become much more specific. > Questions are certainly not 'boring' but need expert answers. > > Not sure how to deal with this, except that

Re: [DISCUSS] vlan uri format change

The gain is that enums like BroadcastDomainType and IsolationType do not have to check for different formats in the presented uri. It also makes it more intiutive what the parts in the uri mean; vlan:// would inmply that id is a hostname instead of a scheme specific identifier. I think I am reduci

Re: bean exception while running cloudstack on Latest Master.

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:25:22AM +, Rajesh Battala wrote: > Hi All, > > Am on latest master, while launching the jetty server am hitting > with below bean execption server is not getting loaded. > How to resolve this bean issue? > In nonComponent.xml I had modified 'CloudStackImageStoreProvi

Re: [DISCUSS] vlan uri format change

Daan, I'm curious about what is the improvement of changing the vlan String format in URI? I'm -1 on pushing more complexity in URI, because that's abuse of URI class and sounds it's time to get rid of URI. (2013/07/01 16:47), Daan Hoogland wrote: H, I've been trying to get a patch accepted a

RE: bean exception while running cloudstack on Latest Master.

Thanks > -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 1:21 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: bean exception while running cloudstack on Latest Master. > > Looking into it. > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:25:22AM +

Re: bean exception while running cloudstack on Latest Master.

Looking into it. On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:25:22AM +, Rajesh Battala wrote: > Hi All, > > Am on latest master, while launching the jetty server am hitting with below > bean execption server is not getting loaded. > How to resolve this bean issue? > In nonComponent.xml I had modified 'CloudS

  1   2   >