Review Request 12263: CLOUDSTACK-3354: [automation] scale up VM is failing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12263/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Nitin Mehta. Bugs: CLOUDS

Review Request 12264: CLOUDSTACK-3351: Fix add cluster API to set right hypervisor type

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12264/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3351 R

Re: Review Request 12263: CLOUDSTACK-3354: [automation] scale up VM is failing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12263/#review22754 --- Commit 1e646629fe84fea56371cf75b5f6f05fbdff54a4 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12263: CLOUDSTACK-3354: [automation] scale up VM is failing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12263/#review22755 --- Commit c8ad4e5ced323d27862b7197a05f022f1a6efd4f in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12264: CLOUDSTACK-3351: Fix add cluster API to set right hypervisor type

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12264/#review22756 --- Commit 968c252ca58fe55285004355dd1060fd1ae9aeb4 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12263: CLOUDSTACK-3354: [automation] scale up VM is failing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12263/#review22757 --- setup/db/db/schema-410to420.sql

Review Request 12265: CLOUDSTACK-2571-Zone-Wide-Primary-Storage-blocker-issues-while-Enabling-in-Maintenance-State

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12265/ --- Review request for cloudstack, edison su, Ram Ganesh, and Sateesh Chodapuneedi.

Re: Review Request 12264: CLOUDSTACK-3351: Fix add cluster API to set right hypervisor type

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12264/#review22759 --- Since we have already put it to be case insensitive will this be cau

Re: [Query] dynamic scaling of a virtual machine

I guess there is a need for documentation here. Please open a doc bug as well if you haven't already On 04/07/13 10:50 AM, "Srikanteswararao Talluri" wrote: >I see the same error even after installing xen pv drivers. Filed a bug for >this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3354 > >

Review Request 12267: CLOUDSTACK-3089-[ZWPS]-NPE-while-cancelling-the-Storage-Maintenance

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12267/ --- Review request for cloudstack, edison su, Ram Ganesh, and Sateesh Chodapuneedi.

Re: Review Request 12263: CLOUDSTACK-3354: [automation] scale up VM is failing

> On July 4, 2013, 9:06 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > setup/db/db/schema-410to420.sql, line 1866 > > > > > > only for XS ? Yes. Vmware default template does not have VMWare tools in it. On July 4, 2013, 9:06 a.m.,

Re: Review Request 12264: CLOUDSTACK-3351: Fix add cluster API to set right hypervisor type

> On July 4, 2013, 9:10 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > Since we have already put it to be case insensitive will this be causing > > issues for upgrade or anywhere else we are comparing. This is concerning As long as we get hypervisor type from clusterVO there is no problem since VO converts it t

Verifying Load Balancer logic

Hello, Some of the BVT test cases verify if load balancing rule set to round robin is working or not. It is seen that often LBing is not perfect round robin. If first request goes to one vm the next does not always go to second, when there are just two vms added to LB rule. I vaguely recall di

Re: Verifying Load Balancer logic

why would we remove these cases and not find the root cause, if there is an issue, and fixing that. On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Girish Shilamkar wrote: > Hello, > > Some of the BVT test cases verify if load balancing rule set to round > robin is working or not. > It is seen that often LBing

RE: Verifying Load Balancer logic

This could happen if there is a stickiness policy configured on the LB rule. > -Original Message- > From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] > Sent: 04 July 2013 15:39 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Verifying Load Balancer logic > > why would we remove these cases a

Review Request 12271: CLOUDSTACK-2884: Resolved type conversion issue in test_service_offerings.py:test_04_change_offering_small

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12271/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Repository: cloudstack-gi

Re: Review Request 12271: CLOUDSTACK-2884: Resolved type conversion issue in test_service_offerings.py:test_04_change_offering_small

so hounslow is actually busier? Sent from my iPhone On 4 Jul 2013, at 11:33, Gaurav Aradhye wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12271/ > -

router vm dns

H, I am looking into CLOUDSTACK-3357, which I just filed. I've been looking at the router vm's created and it seems that a script adjusting /etc/dsnmasq.conf should be called after creation of the routervm to set the network domain. cloud-ear

Re: Virtual Router: DHCP and 2-second DNS outages

Hi, The dhcp_release is sending release request on lo (loop back) interface updated it to eth0. It is suppose to send release request on the interface on which dhcp server is listening. Thanks, Jayapal On 03-Jul-2013, at 5:22 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com>> wrot

Re: Review Request 11627: CLOUDSTACK-1012:Encrypt system.vm.password for 4.0 to 4.1 upgrades

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11627/#review22763 --- Commit 3128a4ccee0b8e9d990601bcf72399390e9239ba in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 11627: CLOUDSTACK-1012:Encrypt system.vm.password for 4.0 to 4.1 upgrades

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11627/#review22764 --- Ship it! commit 3128a4ccee0b8e9d990601bcf72399390e9239ba - Kishan

Re: Verifying Load Balancer logic

On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:21:55AM +, Ram Ganesh wrote: > This could happen if there is a stickiness policy configured on the LB rule. This is the basic round-robin on a VR, we don't use any stickiness policy on this. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@

[Discuss][CLOUDSTACK-212] Namespace change for ASF

Hi, Since the cloudstack project has moved to ASF, the suggestion is to move from com.cloud packages to org.apache java packages .( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-212) As you might be realize, this is pretty big change. And merging this changes with a continuously updating maste

Re: Review Request 12227: NPE while deploying any instances in kvm/vmware using ZWPS due to capacityIops

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12227/ --- (Updated July 4, 2013, 12:32 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su, Ra

[INFRA] XenServer runs down

The xenserver runs are hurt at the moment. Hosts are not booting correctly because the cobbler profile is corrupt. This happened while I was trying to include xenserver 6.2 into the test infra. I am working on fixing this. Thanks, -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com

RE: Verifying Load Balancer logic

+1 - let us not remove them. If they are not suitable for BVT, include them in regression suite. -Original Message- From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2013 3:09 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Verifying Load Balancer logic why would w

Re: Review Request 12241: CLOUDSTACK-3339: Add Vlan as true in network offering.

> On July 3, 2013, 11:14 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_network_offering.py, line 61 > > > > > > There is a different issue here. > > > > specifyVlan=false is the default be

RE: router vm dns

I found a call to private void configDnsMasq(...) but this is, as it seems only called for routervm's in guest networks, not for vpc-routervm's. Is this by design? Or an omission? Any guru out there? Thanks, Daan Hoogland -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gma

Re: Review Request 12200: Fixed issues while adding DC to zone in VM ware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12200/#review22767 --- Edison fixed this here commit 810c64e38772719cba1c7e5cb4578c9e8c6a8d

Re: Review Request 12271: CLOUDSTACK-2884: Resolved type conversion issue in test_service_offerings.py:test_04_change_offering_small

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12271/#review22770 --- Commit 05173a68892d28ae6c0854c981c6248a79ac8e0b in branch refs/head

Re: Review Request 12271: CLOUDSTACK-2884: Resolved type conversion issue in test_service_offerings.py:test_04_change_offering_small

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12271/#review22768 --- Commit ee9e7230222e9f63c617a2a7be1f39232f37562e in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12271: CLOUDSTACK-2884: Resolved type conversion issue in test_service_offerings.py:test_04_change_offering_small

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12271/#review22769 --- Commit 048cf5aae84786d2d3515a3199271e87c0c7bafb in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12271: CLOUDSTACK-2884: Resolved type conversion issue in test_service_offerings.py:test_04_change_offering_small

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12271/#review22771 --- Ship it! - Prasanna Santhanam On July 4, 2013, 10:33 a.m., Gaurav

Re: [INFRA] XenServer runs down

On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 07:22:31PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > The xenserver runs are hurt at the moment. Hosts are not booting > correctly because the cobbler profile is corrupt. This happened while > I was trying to include xenserver 6.2 into the test infra. I am > working on fixing this.

Re: Review Request 12263: CLOUDSTACK-3354: [automation] scale up VM is failing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12263/#review22772 --- Ship it! Hari is correct. The new install base schema will have the

Re: Review Request 12263: CLOUDSTACK-3354: [automation] scale up VM is failing

> On July 4, 2013, 2:52 p.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > Hari is correct. The new install base schema will have the flag set to > > false while the upgrade on server startup will set it to true. Hari - this patch does not apply on master/4.2. It applies on master-6-17 stable only. Can you r

Re: Review Request 12263: CLOUDSTACK-3354: [automation] scale up VM is failing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12263/#review22775 --- Commit e404d82ad5903016bba28214332c641998bf4aac in branch refs/head

Re: Review Request 12263: CLOUDSTACK-3354: [automation] scale up VM is failing

> On July 4, 2013, 2:52 p.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > Hari is correct. The new install base schema will have the flag set to > > false while the upgrade on server startup will set it to true. > > Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Hari - this patch does not apply on master/4.2. It applies on

Re: router vm dns

On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 02:33:31PM +, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I found a call to private void configDnsMasq(...) but this is, as it > seems only called for routervm's in guest networks, not for > vpc-routervm's. Is this by design? Or an omission? > > Any guru out there? Not me. But if you see t

Re: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some questions. =)

Andrew - Firstly, apologize for the delayed response. You caught me at a bad time when I was attempting to fix the simulator which was broken when you sent this email. It took longer than expected to fix and get it back in shape. My comments are inline. On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:08:20AM -0700, A

RE: Verifying Load Balancer logic

> -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:prasanna.santha...@citrix.com] > Sent: 04 July 2013 17:10 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: aemne...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: Verifying Load Balancer logic > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:21:55AM +, Ram Ganesh wrote: > > This c

Re: [Discuss][CLOUDSTACK-212] Namespace change for ASF

Hi, On 07/04/2013 01:53 PM, Dharmesh Kakadia wrote: Hi, Since the cloudstack project has moved to ASF, the suggestion is to move from com.cloud packages to org.apache java packages .( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-212) As you might be realize, this is pretty big change. And

Re: Review Request 11942: ProcessUtil cleanup

> On July 1, 2013, 3:04 p.m., John Burwell wrote: > > utils/test/com/cloud/utils/ProcessUtilTest.java, line 34 > > > > > > Is there no system state on which to assert? What would cause this > > test to fail? This tes

Re: Review Request 11942: ProcessUtil cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11942/ --- (Updated July 4, 2013, 9:34 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes

any feedback of upgrading cloudstack from 3.0.2 to 4.1 with xenserver 6.0.2 hosts

Hi, We have a plan to upgrade cloudstack 3.0.2 to 4.1, we use xenserver 6.0.2 as host servers. Did anyone have run the same upgrade path? Any issues or comments will be great appreciated. For xenserver 6.0.2(with XS602E001 and XS602E002 updates), can we keep this version or it's better upgra

Re: [Discuss][CLOUDSTACK-212] Namespace change for ASF

Hi, the corresponding CLOUDSTACK-212 is marked as "Improvement," and planned to be fixed in 4.2.0. But since we have passed the feature freeze date, will the namespace change be deferred to 4.3.0? --- Yu-Heng

Review Request 12273: Cloudstack-2150 DB table entries of phisical network is not proper.Shows Duplicate entries Cloudstack-2980 Adding a VLAN range that overlaps with two existing ranges results inco

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12273/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek. Bugs: Cloudstack-2150 and