Re: Review Request 13841: Missing tests from QA repo to ASF - 3 tests from test_vmware_drs.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13841/ --- (Updated Oct. 30, 2013, 7:01 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilam

OVS integration broken in 4.2 & master

OVS integration for GRE overlay tunnels is currently broken in both master and 4.2. Till 4.1, Network Manager will loop through all the network elements for NIC prepare and release so, OVS network element had chance to participate in the NIC prepare/release operations. This behaviour in network

Re: Review Request 14459: CLOUDSTACK-2243: Add automation tests for VMs base image update faclity

> On Oct. 30, 2013, 6:53 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_base_image_updation.py, line 411 > > > > > > Shall we continue even if line at 407 says its not a list? Shall we > > exit in

Re: Issues deploying with marvin

I am adding Prasanna to the thread as he is the main Marvin developer -sebastien On Oct 29, 2013, at 1:02 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > I believe the issues I am running into stem from the fact that the CS code > is in a shared directory from my Mac to VMware Fusion. Because of this the > 'ln' com

Re: [Cloudmonkey] assignVirtualMachine API causes index out of range error

On Oct 30, 2013, at 2:40 AM, Ryan Lei wrote: > Ticket created: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4998 > Ryan, I fixed it in master and 4.2. Any chance you can compile from source and check again ? thanks > ---

[EVENT] CloudStack Collaboration conference is in 3 weeks !! Register Today !!!

Hi folks, CloudStack collaboration conference Europe is around the corner -three weeks- We have put together a great agenda: http://www.cloudstackcollab.org And thanks to our sponsors the event is going to be terrific. Register today to help us plan things even better. Help us get the word out

Re: Review Request 14549: Rename net.juniper.contrail to org.apache.cloudstack.network.contrail

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14549/#review27762 --- Hey Pedro, Nice work, there is some serious effort in getting this

Re: [Cloudmonkey] assignVirtualMachine API causes index out of range error

I'm only using the RPMs to run my 4.2 environment. :( We need some source code + Cloudmonkey people to verify this. --- Yu-Heng (Ryan) Lei, Associate Researcher Chunghwa Telecom Laboratories / Cloud Computing L

Re: OVS integration broken in 4.2 & master

Hey Murali, This has already been done by Nguyen (tuna), we just need to get his patches from the sdnextension branch into master soon. Cheers, Hugo On 30 okt. 2013, at 08:11, Murali Reddy wrote: > OVS integration for GRE overlay tunnels is currently broken in both master > and 4.2. Till 4

Re: [EVENT] CloudStack Collaboration conference is in 3 weeks !! Register Today !!!

Sorry, missed that :D Cheers, Hugo On 30 okt. 2013, at 09:21, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Hi folks, > > CloudStack collaboration conference Europe is around the corner -three weeks- > > We have put together a great agenda: http://www.cloudstackcollab.org > And thanks to our sponsors the event

Re: OVS integration broken in 4.2 & master

On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:47 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Hey Murali, > > This has already been done by Nguyen (tuna), we just need to get his patches > from the sdnextension branch into master soon. > > Cheers, > Yeah, actually can you start a [merge] thread on this, so it gets in 4.3 soon…. >

Docker?

Hi, Docker[1] seems to be all the rage these days and has breathed new life in LXC. Is there any interest whatsoever from the devs to support for it? I noticed it has already landed in the other stack. Lucian [1] - http://www.docker.io/ -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Re: OVS integration broken in 4.2 & master

We need to rabase it on latest master first. I’ll see if i can do that cleanly. Hugo On 30 okt. 2013, at 09:55, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:47 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > >> Hey Murali, >> >> This has already been done by Nguyen (tuna), we just need to get his patch

Re: OVS integration broken in 4.2 & master

We need to rebase it on latest master first. I’ll see if i can do that cleanly. On 30 okt. 2013, at 09:55, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:47 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > >> Hey Murali, >> >> This has already been done by Nguyen (tuna), we just need to get his patches >>

KVM HA tuning

Hi Guys, I've been testing KVM HA in 4.2.1-SNAPSHOT and it seems to be working great. There seems to be a consistent 5 minute wait between killing a host and CloudStack marking the host and VMs as down and then carrying out HA actions. Is this delay customisable or is it hard coded somewhere?

Re: Docker?

On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:56 AM, Nux! wrote: > Hi, > > Docker[1] seems to be all the rage these days and has breathed new life in > LXC. Is there any interest whatsoever from the devs to support for it? > I noticed it has already landed in the other stack. > The answer is yes :) Nugyen has star

Re: OVS integration broken in 4.2 & master

2013/10/30 Hugo Trippaers > We need to rebase it on latest master first. Rebase already done but haven't submitted because of several pending patches before. Commit today! -- N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U

[ASF4.2.1] call for volunteers to close some tickets

Hey, can anyone in community pick any of the following tickets: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4943 Can't create cluster in CS 4.2 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4939 Failed to create snapshot (KVM, Multiple hosts, Sharedstorage) -abhi

Re: Review Request 15021: Fixed Bug: 4899 : Added Configuration Support to Marvin.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15021/#review27764 --- tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackTestClient.py

Re: Review Request 15021: Fixed Bug: 4899 : Added Configuration Support to Marvin.

I've given some inline comments in the patch. The ConfigManager looks too simple perhaps because it's a WIP? At least the goals as you've written in your docstring seem to talk about more than what's provided in the module. On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 06:00:14PM -, Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > -

Re: Review Request 15021: Fixed Bug: 4899 : Added Configuration Support to Marvin.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15021/ --- (Updated Oct. 30, 2013, 10:12 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shila

Re: Issues deploying with marvin

Never tried this with shared dir on vmware fusion but I expect the failure is outside marvin really as Will mentioned. I'm sure this would fail with vbox shared dirs as well. mvn is simply calling 'python setup.py sdist' when doing the build as the user who runs mvn. If that user has permissions t

RE: Wiki access

Please provide edit access: User name :sadhu Regards sadhu -Original Message- From: Parth Jagirdar [mailto:parth.jagir...@citrix.com] Sent: 16 October 2013 00:28 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Wiki access I need edit access too; Username: parth Thanks, .. Parth -Orig

Re: Review Request 15021: Fixed Bug: 4899 : Added Configuration Support to Marvin.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15021/#review27765 --- tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackTestClient.py

Re: Wiki access

Done, added sadhu Cheers, Hugo On 30 okt. 2013, at 11:21, Suresh Sadhu wrote: > Please provide edit access: > User name :sadhu > > Regards > sadhu > > -Original Message- > From: Parth Jagirdar [mailto:parth.jagir...@citrix.com] > Sent: 16 October 2013 00:28 > To: dev@cloudstack.apa

Re: [MERGE] network-guru-orchestration into master

On 29/10/13 10:12 PM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >Hey guys, > >This is something i had on my wish list for some time. The current way >network gurus are handled is that each guru is asked to design a network >and will decide by itself to either do it or don¹t. Most gurus have sane >checks on which

RE: Review Request 15021: Fixed Bug: 4899 : Added Configuration Support to Marvin.

ConfigManager is as synonymous to any other configuration facility provided for products. Currently, we provide configuration as part of some file say json\cfg and provide the command line option to use that. Now, there are places where the hard coding specific to setup\data is done inside of

Review Request 15080: CLOUDSTACK-4855: Throttle based on the # of outstanding requests to the directly managed HV host (direct agents)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15080/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, Chiradeep Vittal, and Darren Shepherd

Re: Review Request 15021: Fixed Bug: 4899 : Added Configuration Support to Marvin.

> On Oct. 30, 2013, 10:12 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > tools/marvin/marvin/configGenerator.py, line 338 > > > > > > Can we have this driven by a cmd line switch to nose? Yes,the facility is now added, the curre

Re: Review Request 15082: CLOUDSTACK-2237: Automation tests for Security Group Isolation in Advance Zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15082/ --- (Updated Oct. 30, 2013, 11:20 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Srikantes

Review Request 15082: CLOUDSTACK-2237: Automation tests for Security Group Isolation in Advance Zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15082/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Repository: cloudst

RE: Issues deploying with marvin

Based upon the error log below, it seems hard link creation is failing. hard linking CHANGES.txt -> Marvin-0.1.0 > > error: Operation not permitted It seems some body earlier has faced a similar issue when using the similar workflow and were not able to create hard links on

Re: Issues deploying with marvin

Yes. I believe the linking is failing because the host os and the guest os are different. Ws On Wednesday, October 30, 2013, Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > Based upon the error log below, it seems hard link creation is failing. > > > > hard linking CHANGES.txt -> Marvin-0.1.0 > > > > > > >

Re: [MERGE] network-guru-orchestration into master

On 30 okt. 2013, at 02:09, Darren Shepherd wrote: > First, I like the idea of consolidating logic. I could see also > implementing this as just an abstract base class that handles this > common logic. I'm not sure which approach I prefer. Exactly what is > the problem that you are trying to s

Re: Docker?

Hi, I'm starting look into docker's architecture and figure out how it plays with lxc and openstack at that moment. Will try to figure some of key points before the CCC13 start, so we can discuss directly at there. Sent from my GT-N7000 On Oct 30, 2013 4:14 PM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: > > O

RE: Docker?

I'd be interested in looking more into Docker - are you planning to host a talk on the subject? Alexander Hitchins - Personal Email : a...@alexhitchins.com Apache Email : a...@alexhitchins.com Website: http://alexhitchins.com Mobile : 07788 423 969 -

Re: Review Request 14459: CLOUDSTACK-2243: Add automation tests for VMs base image update faclity

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14459/#review27772 --- test/integration/component/test_base_image_updation.py

Re: Review Request 15012: CLOUDSTACK-4984: decrement MAX_VXLAN_VNI to be aligned with Linux kernel

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15012/#review27778 --- Commit 089026f6afb4de1a1f81b71d291a79d6e327a3e1 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 14868: CLOUDSTACK-4932: Bugfix: listNetworks API doesn't return vlan id / VNI ( Virtual Network Identifier in VXLAN )

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14868/#review27780 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Toshiaki Hatano On Oct. 23, 2013, 6:38 a.m.,

Re: Review Request 14868: CLOUDSTACK-4932: Bugfix: listNetworks API doesn't return vlan id / VNI ( Virtual Network Identifier in VXLAN )

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14868/#review27781 --- Commit a6b6fa65facf83444262eb37ca65371a16900a04 in branch refs/heads

S3 Secondary Storage fails with large files

Hello Guys , I am using ACS 4.2.0 with KVM hypervisor. While trying to create templates and snapshots from the existing vms I am getting an error message / exception on the management logs: 2013-10-30 13:29:07,264 DEBUG [storage.snapshot.SnapshotManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-12:job-41 = [ 85659

Review Request 14976: [SSL Termination support] Part2 : Assign certificates to LBs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14976/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Darren Shepherd, Murali Reddy, and Sheng Yang. B

Re: S3 Secondary Storage fails with large files

For 4.2.0, you should be able to register template > 5GB. But we are aware of an issue you mentioned here: backup snapshot > 5GB will fail since that part of code is still using S3 single part upload api. This bug has been fixed in latest 4.2 branch, and will be available in 4.2.1 release. Thanks

Re: Docker?

This would be a great thing to try at the CCC hackathon. Docker poses some interesting challenges and to do a useful integration is going to take some careful design. There's two things to consider. First, docker's #1 feature in my mind is that it is a paradigm shift. You interact with docker i

Re: Issues deploying with marvin

...Workaround included... The issue that I run into by not using the 'developer' profile when I do a 'clean install' is that the 'py' files do not get updated in the tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackAPI/ directory. This is only a problem when there are changes, but that happens often enough to warr

Re: S3 Secondary Storage fails with large files

Min, thanks for your answer. Any idea when 4.2.1 is out to general public? Thanks Andrei - Original Message - From: "Min Chen" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, us...@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 30 October, 2013 4:40:48 PM Subject: Re: S3 Secondary Storage fails with lar

Re: S3 Secondary Storage fails with large files

Here is the timeline about 4.2.1 maintenance release: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+4.2.1+Mai ntenance+Release Thanks -min On 10/30/13 10:02 AM, "Andrei Mikhailovsky" wrote: >Min, thanks for your answer. > >Any idea when 4.2.1 is out to general public? > >Tha

Re: [MERGE] network-guru-orchestration into master

I don't particular like saying that picking a Guru is based solely on that criteria. It should be much looser than that. If the problem you are trying to fix is two Gurus implement the same network then we need to set back a bit. I'd like Alex or Chiradeep to weigh in on this. Currently setupNe

Re: [DISCUSS] Domain/Account/User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

And I'd like to write the design document in the wiki page, but I don't seem to have a permission to create pages. So can anyone give me the permission? My account in the wiki is alex.o...@sungard.com Thanks in advance. Alex Ough On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Alex Ough wrote: > I created a

Re: S3 Secondary Storage fails with large files

Hi, I've just tried creating a template from a 10GB disk image file and it has failed with the same error - EntityTooLarge. So, neither snapshots nor templates over 5GB in size are working for me. Could someone confirm if I am not the only one? Thanks Andrei - Original Message -

RE: [MERGE] network-guru-orchestration into master

I agree with Hugo that the current way of ask NetworkGuru to decide itself is not desirable. It makes absolute sense to change that but I wonder why do it through capabilities. Why not just ask the system admin to choose when they setup the zone? When I originally designed NetworkGuru, I fig

Re: Review Request 15047: Add support for multiple networks in the 'per account' source nat type setting

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15047/#review27795 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sheng Yang On Oct. 29, 2013, 8:24 p.m., Will

Re: Review Request 15050: Add Palo Alto Networks Firewall Integration

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15050/#review27794 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sheng Yang On Oct. 29, 2013, 8:52 p.m., Will

Re: Review Request 15050: Add Palo Alto Networks Firewall Integration

> On Oct. 30, 2013, 5:34 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Ship It! No shipping for now. Sorry, press the wrong one. I meant to ship the other patch. Will, since it's a big change, could you send out a notice to the community about this merge? Thanks! - Sheng --

Re: S3 Secondary Storage fails with large files

So you are doing create template from volume, right? I think that it should go through the same code used in backup snapshot, so will have the same limit. Would you mind paste the stack trace you got when you got that error in this case? Thanks -min On 10/30/13 10:29 AM, "Andrei Mikhailovsky" wr

Re: [MERGE] network-guru-orchestration into master

I definitely don't want the setup to be done at a zone level. Specifically, I'd like to get rid of the notion of basic and advanced zones which would mean that you could be mixing gurus in the same zone. If anything, I'd say the simplest would be to just specify the Guru in the network offering.

Re: Review Request 15021: Fixed Bug: 4899 : Added Configuration Support to Marvin.

> On Oct. 30, 2013, 10:22 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackTestClient.py, line 22 > > > > > > It came from merge, i didnt used them in modules required. This i will change to remove unus

Re: [MERGE] network-guru-orchestration into master

On 30 okt. 2013, at 19:08, Darren Shepherd wrote: > I definitely don't want the setup to be done at a zone level. Pretty strong words, i’m considering this a veto on any further discussion around this topic? > Specifically, I'd like to get rid of the notion of basic and advanced > zones which

Re: Review Request 15050: Add Palo Alto Networks Firewall Integration

> On Oct. 30, 2013, 5:34 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Ship It! > > Sheng Yang wrote: > No shipping for now. > > Sorry, press the wrong one. I meant to ship the other patch. > > Will, since it's a big change, could you send out a notice to the > community about this merge? >

Re: [MERGE] network-guru-orchestration into master

On Oct 30, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > I definitely don't want the setup to be done at a zone level. Why ? That seems to me the most obvious way to do it. There are different networking solutions: e.g. VLANs and overlays such as OpenContrail that assume an L3 switching topolog

Reverting commit 5bcd8280fdd1e9039a6bf6c4c4fd43b8b49f938e

Hey Anthony, I’ve reverted your commit with id 5bcd8280fdd1e9039a6bf6c4c4fd43b8b49f938e. It breaks packaging because the plugins are no longer actually called when you moved them to pluginManagement. I know about the m2eclipse errors, but we need those maven plugins to do their work during the

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

Hi All, I have the patch for adding SSL termination support at https://reviews.apache.org/r/14976/ . It would be great if this can be reviewed. Thanks, -Syed On 13-10-15 03:01 AM, Murali Reddy wrote: On 11/10/13 9:31 PM, "Syed Ahmed" wrote: Thanks for your valuable feedback Murali. Here

RE: ui styling

Hi Frankie, unfortunately that would be hard to do, since they were just incremental changes applied on master. I would have to cherry pick all the commits I did over time, which would take a while :). What you can try is copying the updated CSS files (/css), images (/images) and all scripts und

Re: Review Request 14976: [SSL Termination support] Part2 : Assign certificates to LBs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14976/ --- (Updated Oct. 30, 2013, 8:34 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Darren Shephe

Re: Review Request 15068: Change labels for VLAN to vNet

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15068/ --- (Updated Oct. 30, 2013, 8:46 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Toshiaki H

Re: Review Request 15050: Add Palo Alto Networks Firewall Integration

> On Oct. 30, 2013, 5:34 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Ship It! > > Sheng Yang wrote: > No shipping for now. > > Sorry, press the wrong one. I meant to ship the other patch. > > Will, since it's a big change, could you send out a notice to the > community about this merge? >

Review Request 15106: MacAddress fix for windows ipconfig

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15106/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

[ACS43] Schedule reminder feature freeze on 11/08

Folks We are now just 9 days from feature freeze on 11/08. There are still many open feature and improvement tickets. If your contribution is unlikely to make it to 4.3 feature freeze on 11/8 please move them out of 4.3 release to 'Future'. Do remember that we have a 72 hour notice period to so

Re: ifconfig and MacAddress

Hi, A patch to make MacAddress eat the Windows ipconfig output. https://reviews.apache.org/r/15106/ I have one more question about how MacAddress should work. It seems it is returning the mac address of the first interface of the ipconfig/ifconfig output. Therefore if you configure up a new netwo

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #1648

See Changes: [anthony.xu] CLOUDSTACK-4750 -- [...truncated 4049 lines...] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-plugin-syslog-alerts --- [INFO] [INFO

Review Request 15108: Grab MacAddress in a more deterministic fashion

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15108/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang and Laszlo Hornyak. Repository: cloud

Re: ifconfig and MacAddress

Shoot, I didn't see your patch. I just created a patch that supersedes yours. https://reviews.apache.org/r/15108/ The logic is as follows 1. Look for MAC that matches interface of cluster.node.IP 2. Look for first interface alphabetically that has a non-linklocal address 3. Look for first inter

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-noredist #1649

See

Re: Review Request 14738: Testscript for DeployVM User data enhancement

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14738/ --- (Updated Oct. 31, 2013, 1:11 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, sailaja mada,

Re: Review Request 12228: wip: static resource compression

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/ --- (Updated Oct. 31, 2013, 1:36 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle

Re: [MERGE] network-guru-orchestration into master

Its important to remember that the definition of a Network in CloudStack is quite purposefully very loose. A network in the simplest terms is just a group of VMs. A guru creates and manages that network. A network is not strictly defined as a union of traffictype/isolationtype/networktype/guestt

[ACS 421] Upgrade testing

Hi All, Want to check if anyone is testing upgrades from prior versions to 4.2.1. As Release date is getting close, If there are gaps, would like to cover some scenarios in our lab. Thanks /sudha

Re: [MERGE] network-guru-orchestration into master

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Pedro Roque Marques wrote: > > Why ? That seems to me the most obvious way to do it. > There are different networking solutions: e.g. VLANs and overlays such as > OpenContrail that assume an L3 switching topology. For a deployment one > would tend to choose a s

Re: [MERGE] network-guru-orchestration into master

Here's a scenario... Lets say we currently have a zone deployed with Vlan isolation. There's nothing stopping us from running a vxlan isolation on the same hosts, even on the same physical interface. This is actually done in devcloud-kvm where public and mgmt traffic are selected by traffic label (

Re: Review Request 15021: Fixed Bug: 4899 : Added Configuration Support to Marvin.

> On Oct. 30, 2013, 10:22 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > tools/marvin/marvin/configGenerator.py, line 303 > > > > > > The reason is simple. We already have a module configGenerator and is > > used as configuration

Re: Review Request 14199: Adding missing test cases: Snapshots Improvement

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14199/ --- (Updated Oct. 31, 2013, 10:34 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shila

Re: Review Request 15021: Fixed Bug: 4899 : Added Configuration Support to Marvin.

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:42:48AM +, Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > ConfigManager is as synonymous to any other configuration facility > provided for products. Currently, we provide configuration as part > of some file say json\cfg and provide the command line option to use > that. Now, ther

Re: Review Request 15082: CLOUDSTACK-2237: Automation tests for Security Group Isolation in Advance Zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15082/ --- (Updated Oct. 31, 2013, 5:16 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Srikantesw

Re: Review Request 15082: CLOUDSTACK-2237: Automation tests for Security Group Isolation in Advance Zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15082/ --- (Updated Oct. 31, 2013, 5:17 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Repository:

Re: Review Request 14319: CLOUDSTACK 2238: Automation - Non Contiguous VLAN Ranges

> On Oct. 29, 2013, 11:38 p.m., SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote: > > Committed by Talluri Master - 8a6694b396500897a3d5ce3f292864f2c5c2530f 4.2 - c6ce74fe61ae463a964215ab892c6cb399909801 - Gaurav --- This is an automatically generated e

[ACS4.2.1] CLOUDSTACK-2804

Hi Hugo, There are some commits in CLOUDSTACK-2804, will you know if this is fixed ? -abhi

ACS + Riak-CS, works?

Has anybody gotten CloudStack and Riak-CS to work together. No matter what I try when it goes to download and save the template, after its posted a series of multi part uploads it ends up sending a 403. The access log looks like 127.0.0.1 - - [31/Oct/2013:05:41:11 +] "PUT /buckets/bucket1/ob

RE: ACS + Riak-CS, works?

Hi, Cloudstack with Riak-CS works fine. If we register template more than 5GB we use multipart upload to push the files to Riak. But this does not work for snapshots and volumes. This will be fixed in CS4.2.1 . But for template registration it should work fine. Thanks, Sanjeev -Original M

Re: Review Request 14459: CLOUDSTACK-2243: Add automation tests for VMs base image update faclity

> On Oct. 30, 2013, 1:59 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_base_image_updation.py, line 411 > > > > > > I mean why not we assert at 407? Does self.fail is same as test case > > failure

Re: Review Request 14459: CLOUDSTACK-2243: Add automation tests for VMs base image update faclity

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14459/ --- (Updated Oct. 31, 2013, 6:39 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilam