I might be behind on the discussions here, but I will veto an RC that does not
have list of bugs fixed and proper upgrade path documented (minimum of a fix
from 4.2.0 upgrade docs). Separate repo of the docs or not.
Right now I see that the bugs fix list points to a jira filter. This is not
H all,
One last call fro all coming to CCC Europe: have a quick look at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CCC+Europe and
see what you want to work on on Wednesday. If it is not there feel
free to submit more ideas.
regards,
Daan
I have reverted the same in 4.3 as well
commit f84b729eb01ffc7cae1e210b58f80ff2033ad785
Author: Koushik Das kous...@apache.org
Date: Fri Nov 15 12:59:48 2013 +0530
Revert CLOUDSTACK-5176:
This reverts commit f29c7188ba03f1997238d50f8a11857e94fe4b55.
On 15-Nov-2013, at 10:35 AM,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15507/#review28951
---
Commit 52de0dc2cae33831cebb23ed4bb81d8368ed33de in branch
So the -1 is because of the lack of rn and upgrade path docs, right, I
think I proposed earlier this thread to release after the doc
hackathon privided that. I wasn't really explicit about it I think as
no one commented on this strategy. Would that be acceptable to you all
(especially David and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15452/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15570/#review28952
---
Commit a95bea08e4c41e359c137068245d04bae4d1dff4 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15570/#review28953
---
Commit 08208cf427f9957514e3bcc624272c6781a1189a in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15570/#review28954
---
Ship it!
COmmitted to 4.2, 4.3 and master
- Girish Shilamkar
On
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15570/#review28955
---
Commit c141e418e927dadc90a87ad4e1a939091cfbe54e in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15452/#review28957
---
Commit cfe3aabdc79a0702f5f12ca6b11266acf054cd6e in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15452/#review28956
---
Commit a6c2c6a261af4871b0a8872f43068f15cc1da3cd in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15452/#review28958
---
Ship it!
Committed to 4.2, 4.3 and master
- Girish Shilamkar
On
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15452/#review28959
---
Commit 057a65e9a9df80592e1360dce8dfffaddacebd02 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15569/#review28960
---
Commit 5b2de676732ad8f8180782348cde656821728696 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15569/#review28961
---
Commit e8629283000fbf7874309903da647e341854a7c6 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15569/#review28962
---
Commit 8a1918dbe1c5fbbb60c21fa89d880a99e7b33bd6 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15569/#review28963
---
Ship it!
COmmitted to 4.2, 4.3 and master
- Girish Shilamkar
On
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15571/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and Rayees Namathponnan.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15571/#review28964
---
Commit 09c0370d70721e07ff02cd907a2cab2cabc9ae5b in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15571/#review28965
---
Commit 729bf51070812db93611a732d2956207584fc3d2 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15571/#review28966
---
Commit ac9c4b0233070748e2a489df5005e65c8f890356 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15572/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Ian Duffy.
Bugs:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:14:48AM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
I also would like to see the results of the test matrix for 4.2.1
running within jenkins.buildacloud.org. This
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/ runs against
master and has been failing for a while.
Bit
See
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist/21/changes
Changes:
[w.zhou] remove duplicated scheduled tasks from
VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl
[jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-999: hyper-V: UI Add Primary Storage when
hypervisor type of selected cluster is
To address the concern of RN we will not conclude the vote on RC (i.e. Not
make a release)
till the RN in general and upgrade instructions in particular are also of
acceptable quality.
As for other inconsistencies will work towards ironing those out.
-abhi
On 15/11/13 3:30 pm, Sebastien
For listing down the fixed issues, since there are ~175 of these. I will
list down some important fixes.
Followed by the query to give a exhaustive list, is that acceptable ?
For known issues will look at the 4.3/4.2 open tickets list down the
important ones.
This will go in the CHANGES in
Forward as the mail to the list is not setup yet.
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: scan-ad...@coverity.com
Date: 15 november 2013 13:47:59 CET
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for cloudstack
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s)
Abihnandan,
Why not include the output of the query instead of the query? I think
this is what Sebastien means. A list of the important ones can still
be prepended in more readable form afaic.
Daan
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Abhinandan Prateek
abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com wrote:
For
On Nov 15, 2013, at 7:32 AM, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com
wrote:
For listing down the fixed issues, since there are ~175 of these. I will
list down some important fixes.
Followed by the query to give a exhaustive list, is that acceptable ?
I know jira has an api, so
Ok I will go that way till someone says that listing 175 tickets in
CHANGES file will needlessly clutter it.
Can we focus the list to blockers and criticals at least ?
-abhi
On 15/11/13 6:34 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Abihnandan,
Why not include the output of the query
Hi,
Looking to add hackathon entry over here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CCC+Europe#
But unable to do so as it seems the wiki edit access permissions are not there.
Can you somebody give edit access to cwiki for user 'sateeshc' ?
Regards,
Sateesh
Ok, will make a exhaustive listing and see if it can be automated for
future releases.
On 15/11/13 6:41 pm, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 15, 2013, at 7:32 AM, Abhinandan Prateek
abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com wrote:
For listing down the fixed issues, since there are ~175
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15578/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4738
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15489/#review28968
---
Syed I dont think you added 'protocol' to createLoadBalancerRule.
Hi, this is a bit of a brain dump:
I tend to see different types of buckets:
1-Processes
Involves getting better as a community in terms of release, bug fixing,
committing code, documentation and user support. Some of these have already
been discussed partially but we need to come to consensus
On Nov 15, 2013, at 8:19 AM, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com
wrote:
Ok I will go that way till someone says that listing 175 tickets in
CHANGES file will needlessly clutter it.
Can we focus the list to blockers and criticals at least ?
How was it done for 4.1.1 ?
all bugs
IMO, we should kill the CHAGES file and just get the release notes
document under control. I'm fine if Changes is in bad shape for
this release personally, as long as the release notes are accurate.
Another thought to remind folks about in this thread:
Changes to the cloudstack.git repo's 4.2
×2
mobile biligual spell checker used
Op 15 nov. 2013 15:27 schreef Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org:
IMO, we should kill the CHAGES file and just get the release notes
document under control. I'm fine if Changes is in bad shape for
this release personally, as long as the release notes
Yes - it's hard to maintain, and it's yet another place to point
people to. Let's deprecate it in favor of decent RN.
--David
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
IMO, we should kill the CHAGES file and just get the release notes
document under control.
done
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi
sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
Looking to add hackathon entry over here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CCC+Europe#
But unable to do so as it seems the wiki edit access permissions are not
there.
Bump... Still trying to find system vm templates for 4.3. Are they
generated somewhere when I do a clean install and I can manually put them
on secondary storage? If not, is there a publicly accessible URL where I
can get the 4.3 system vm templates for 4.3?
Thanks...
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at
On Nov. 15, 2013, 1:53 p.m., Murali Reddy wrote:
Syed I dont think you added 'protocol' to createLoadBalancerRule. There
should not be 'protocol' in the LoadBalancerContainer?
I actually did add the 'protocol' parameter to createLoadBalancerRule. This
maps to `lb_protocol` field in the
Syed, that sounds correct to me. Container should have the properties
algorithm, protocol, public Ip, etc. While LoadBalancer represents only the
rule itself (the port combination)
-Alena.
From: Syed Ahmed sah...@cloudops.commailto:sah...@cloudops.com
Reply-To: Syed Ahmed
On Nov. 15, 2013, 1:53 p.m., Murali Reddy wrote:
Syed I dont think you added 'protocol' to createLoadBalancerRule. There
should not be 'protocol' in the LoadBalancerContainer?
Syed Ahmed wrote:
I actually did add the 'protocol' parameter to createLoadBalancerRule.
This maps to
I have looked into this briefly. It appears that these commands are not
needed, so I will remove them and only keep the Palo Alto specific commands.
addPaloAltoFirewall=1
deletePaloAltoFirewall=1
configurePaloAltoFirewall=1
listPaloAltoFirewalls=1
listPaloAltoFirewallNetworks=1
Cheers,
Will
Hi folks:
If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
have a great opportunity for you :)
CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and is
also attractive.
A couple examples of powered by logos:
http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 6:28 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes
IMO, we should kill the CHAGES file and just get the release notes document
under control. I'm fine if
May have deleted the thread but wasn¹t this being covered off earlier in
@marketing or is this a new request?
On 11/15/13, 12:56 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Hi folks:
If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
have a great opportunity for you :)
CloudStack
I found
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/master/job/build-systemvm-master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/
Let me know if this is valid. I'll update the wiki
Thanks,
-Syed
On Fri 15 Nov 2013 12:03:16 PM EST, Will Stevens wrote:
Bump... Still trying to find system vm
Thanks Syed. I will test them.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Syed Ahmed sah...@cloudops.com wrote:
I found
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/master/job/build-systemvm-master/
lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/
Let me know if this is valid. I'll update the wiki
This is really a follow on to that request.
Chip commented to me on IRC that he was running out of time to work on
it, so hence my request.
--David
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Kelly Hair kelly.h...@citrix.com wrote:
May have deleted the thread but wasn¹t this being covered off earlier in
Yep - that's the deal... I gave some initial designs, we got some
feedback... would love for someone to take a crack at round 2
options.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:33 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
This is really a follow on to that request.
Chip commented to me on IRC that he was
Hi All,
I was wondering if it was possible to update the nitro packet which is
required for Netscaler API from 10.0 to 10.1. The new 10.1 supports the
bundle parameter which makes it possible to upload certificate and
the trust chain in a single file which makes it very easy for
certificate
Sure, if you don't need these addExternalFirewall etc., you can just remove
them.
Because the name of addExternalFirewall etc. is too generic, so I thought
if you need them as well, you should able to merge your version and SRX
version into one command.
--Sheng
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:47 AM,
+1 especially to CI process improvement.
IMO, we need to improve the patch review process.
Sometimes we encounter that the master branch is broken. Low quality
commit slows down our developing and testing on the master branch.
I think we should change the patch review process to check that a
I've closed one of mine. But the others would need QA to verify.
Thanks.
--Sheng
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti
sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com wrote:
Below are the defects which are fixed in 4.2.1 but not validated. Can you
pl take few min to review fix done and close
Not that I have great graphical skills, but I will give it a try to see if
I can compete with the pros :-)
Are there any deadlines?
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Hi folks:
If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
have a great
Awesome!!! Thanks!
Not really - sooner is generally better than later, but getting it
done is better than not.
--David
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
laszlo.horn...@gmail.com wrote:
Not that I have great graphical skills, but I will give it a try to see if
I can compete with
I will just remove them. It appears the only reason they are there is for
backwards compatibility. I have checked other plugins and they all just
expose the device specific api commands (Other than SRX which exposes both).
The problem with merging them into one command is the PaloAlto plugin is
May be a silly question, but why not just add powered by the existing
logo?
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:06 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Awesome!!! Thanks!
Not really - sooner is generally better than later, but getting it
done is
I hate to sending the same emails over and over again, but I really need to
finalize this feature to be included in the next code freeze because this
feature is very critical in our inside project.
Anyone who can help, please?
Thanks
Alex Ough
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Alex Ough
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15569/#review28986
---
Commit 8a1918dbe1c5fbbb60c21fa89d880a99e7b33bd6 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15571/#review28987
---
Commit 09c0370d70721e07ff02cd907a2cab2cabc9ae5b in branch
See
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist/22/changes
+1(binding)
Tested on my local machine with one KVM host, basic marvin vm test passed.
-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:53 AM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1
+1.
Did some basic testing like creating vms, attaching volume, creating
snapshots etc. and they all worked fine.
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 14/11/13 8:40 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 binding (I had not been clear on this in this thread it seems)
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 6:05
+1(binding)
Tested on my local dev setup with one Xen host and basic zone, marvin vm
test passed.
Thanks
-min
On 11/15/13 3:21 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
+1(binding)
Tested on my local machine with one KVM host, basic marvin vm test passed.
-Original Message-
From:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:42 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1
Ok, that may be my fault as I've got various 4.2.0 systems built
As long as we document the router reboot requirement in the release
notes, yes, I'm +1.
On a side note, we have an upgradeRouterScripts API call (in our
plugin) that just scps the new systemvm tar up to a given router and
extracts it, which allows us to avoid reboots, but we've been leary of
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 4:19 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1
As long as we document the router reboot requirement in the release
For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
(binding) with their vote?
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
+1 (binding) (with the assumption that we won't announce until after
docs are finished)
Verified sigs and hashes,
You want to pass the vlan tags into a VM that is actually a XenServer?
On 11/14/13 3:02 PM, Francois Gaudreault fgaudrea...@cloudops.com
wrote:
Is there a way to assign a trunked interface to a VM running in CS? Like
assign the entire guest interface. We have a use case where we need to run
Alex, Could you just do a git blame on the file and copy the emails of
people who changed that bit of code? They may be able to help if Cc-ed
directly.
Thanks,
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:49:07PM -0600, Alex Ough wrote:
I hate to sending the same emails over and over again, but I really need to
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:36:49PM -0500, Syed Ahmed wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if it was possible to update the nitro packet which
is required for Netscaler API from 10.0 to 10.1. The new 10.1
supports the bundle parameter which makes it possible to upload
certificate and the trust
Yes Prasanna. This is a jar upgrade and yes that is the source code.
This means that we could remove the noredist from netscaler plugin.
Thanks,
-Syed
On Fri 15 Nov 2013 10:26:51 PM EST, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:36:49PM -0500, Syed Ahmed wrote:
Hi All,
I was
that should be ok - i was supposed to have moved the netscaler plugin
from noredist to oss but never got around to it. would you be able to
take that up as part of your change?
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:29:56PM -0500, Syed Ahmed wrote:
Yes Prasanna. This is a jar upgrade and yes that is the
Sure. No problems.
Thanks,
-Syed
On Fri 15 Nov 2013 10:35:04 PM EST, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
that should be ok - i was supposed to have moved the netscaler plugin
from noredist to oss but never got around to it. would you be able to
take that up as part of your change?
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013
awesome. thanks syed!
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:39:18PM -0500, Syed Ahmed wrote:
Sure. No problems.
Thanks,
-Syed
On Fri 15 Nov 2013 10:35:04 PM EST, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
that should be ok - i was supposed to have moved the netscaler plugin
from noredist to oss but never got
@Syed: I just did that for the Palo Alto plugin, so let me know if you have
questions...
Will
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
awesome. thanks syed!
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:39:18PM -0500, Syed Ahmed wrote:
Sure. No problems.
Thanks,
Thanks Will. Will Do.
On Fri 15 Nov 2013 10:52:27 PM EST, Will Stevens wrote:
@Syed: I just did that for the Palo Alto plugin, so let me know if you
have questions...
Will
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org
mailto:t...@apache.org wrote:
awesome. thanks
Yes. We want to be able spin XS within CloudStack. We also need those XS to
consume VLAN tags to do advanced networking (kind of CS inside CS). Lets
say we do have devs with ambitious needs :)
Francois
On 2013-11-15 9:46 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
wrote:
You want to pass
82 matches
Mail list logo
