Hearty Congratulations Demetrius!
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Saturday, June 7, 2014 4:48 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Demetrius Tsitrelis as committer
Folks - this one's a little belated - we went through the invite
Congratulations Demetrius..
~Rajani
On 08-Jun-2014, at 11:09 am, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote:
Great news, congrats Demetrius!
Ahmad
On Jun 6, 2014, at 4:17 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
Folks - this one’s a little belated - we went through the invite
HI,
I need logs for all functioning of ssvm, can somebody send the logs showing
all function which are happening properly.
if somebody can point the code of cloudstack , I want to understand logs
written for process of management and functioning done by ssvm .
Please help me if you can.
Hi Sheng,
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Hi Rohit,
Well, I don't quite understand why gerrit is old. Google has a team
actively working on it and the release of new version seems pretty fast to
me(https://code.google.com/p/gerrit/, latest release at
On Jun 8, 2014, at 5:31 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
To my understanding 4.4-forward is a staging tree for 4.4.1 release
currently, and only issues critical enough would go for 4.4 branch,
I disagree. That makes things messy, 4.4-forward should only exist till 4.4 is
out, really
Agree with Sebastien. 4.4 is cut too early. By cherry picking and missing some
of the critical fixes in to 4.4, isn't it safe to baseline with 4.4-forward
which has majority of the fixes. It is not like new features are added to 4.4
forward. Looks like most of them are fixes to existing
Hi Ilya,
We have plans to support KVM too. We are working on it.
Thanks,
Suresh
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:19 PM, ilya musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Suresh
Hope all is well,
Are there any plans to support KVM or is it just XEN?
Thanks
ilya
On 6/4/14, 9:08 PM, Suresh
Hi Sheng,
Thanks. We are using XenServer 6.2 SP1. After adding debug in the code, I
see that addVif never gets called in my case.
That's why nic deviceId is zero. Code falls thru the case where vif is already
present.If I dump correctVif.getDevice(conn)
it returns zero.
Does this command
Hi,
I’d like to add a design doc to the wiki. Could someone assign me the
appropriate wiki permissions?
My account username is djs55.
Thanks,
Dave
On Jun 8, 2014, at 4:21 PM, Dave Scott dave.sc...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
I’d like to add a design doc to the wiki. Could someone assign me the
appropriate wiki permissions?
My account username is djs55.
should be good now
Thanks,
Dave
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-4.2/304/
Hi,
Following on from the earlier [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor”,
I’ve added a design doc to the wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Allow+hosts+running+the+Xen+hypervisor+to+be+managed+via+libvirt
This design would allow people who want to manage their
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22354/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6850
As I read your comments you actually don't agree with Sebastien,
Sudha. 4.4-forward was cut of at code freeze. Since then fixes are
committed there and cherry-pick are done by the RM. It seems that this
is exactly what Sebastien meant it to be for.
@Sebastien: in Shengs words I read that some of
Ekta,
If we don't have a resource, say hypervisor, storage etc, you can still play
with cloudstack features using simulator. Check the below link on running and
using simulator. This way, you can play yourself and collect logs required.
Yes, there appears to be at least two lines of thought on x.y-forward
branches (specifically using 4.4-forward as an example here).
1) 4.4-forward and 4.4 should eventually be the same. Once the 4.4 release
goes out the door, 4.4-forward should be removed and changes for 4.4.1,
should such a
I agree that we should be using a process tool like Gerrit or Phabricator
with CloudStack.
Do you guys have a feel for how much work is involved if we decide to move
forward with using one of these tools?
I'm curious to see how disruptive it will be to our release schedule (if at
all), should we
On 06/08/2014 06:23 PM, Dave Scott wrote:
Hi,
Following on from the earlier [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor”,
I’ve added a design doc to the wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Allow+hosts+running+the+Xen+hypervisor+to+be+managed+via+libvirt
This design
Logged a bug to track and fix devcloud issue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6860
Santhosh
On Jun 6, 2014, at 3:53 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 6, 2014, at 9:35 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 12:51 AM, sebgoa
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22356/
---
Review request for cloudstack and daan Hoogland.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Hi Wido,
Thanks for your mail!
On 8 Jun 2014, at 19:02, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 06/08/2014 06:23 PM, Dave Scott wrote:
Hi,
Following on from the earlier [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor”,
I’ve added a design doc to the wiki:
Hi Nitin,
Can you please reply back to my previous mail thread.
As well like to update you that I have even tried this feature with
Networks object. Even in this case, I could set the display flag as
'0', it get hided from normal users as well admin user similar to what
I have mentioned above
Congratulations Demetrius!
-sadhu
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 4:18 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Demetrius Tsitrelis as committer
Folks - this one's a little belated - we went through the invite
Congratulations Demetrius!
On 07-Jun-2014, at 4:47 AM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
Folks - this one’s a little belated - we went through the invite process
around the
time of the mail issues, and somehow we didn’t send the announcement to dev@.
I noticed while doing some
Hi everyone
Activities of Japanese CloudStack Community.
## Event
[6/12] JCSUG will hold a Meet-up in Hokkaido
[6/13] Interop Tokyo 2014 : JCSUG will have a session.
http://www.interop.jp/2014/index2.html
[6/14] OSC Hokkaido: JCSUG will have a session and booth.
[6/22] July Tech Festa :
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
I agree that we should be using a process tool like Gerrit or Phabricator
with CloudStack.
Do you guys have a feel for how much work is involved if we decide to move
forward with using one of these
I think it would be nice, as well, if committers could bypass the process
for trivial changes and - as you say - areas they own or have expertise in,
but we should also have a somewhat clear divide between what qualifies to
bypass the process and what doesn't.
Let's see how much debate this
27 matches
Mail list logo
