Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.1

gt; Test to change service offering of router after addition of one guest > network ... === TestName: > test_04_chg_srv_off_router_after_addition_of_one_guest_network | Status : > SUCCESS === > ok > Test destroy of router after addition of one guest network ... === > TestName: test_05_des

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.1

I am having a problem, When trying to add a vpc from the UI the zone dropdown is empty. when trying to add an isolated network the dropdown does contain the wanted choice. Any body else seeing this? On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi all, >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.1

esent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the > intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based > upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender > if you believe you have received this email in error

Re: Package Repositories

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > My experience has been that the vast majority of users want the noredist > version. If the consensus is that the 'community created' packages should > be/must be OSS (something which I think only harms the project)

marvin updates

​Is anybody in the community still maintaining Marvin? (I mean the framework not the tests)​ -- Daan

Re: Package Repositories

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > As I mentioned in my initial message, the public ShapeBlue repositories > [1] are noredist builds of release baselines with no additional patches or > changes. My understanding is that the project cannot officially

deploy dc with marvin

Santosh, Gaurav, I am looking for functionality to deploy a data center with features that I don't see supported (or am to dumb to see). the things I want are: deploy basic zone with security groups deploy advanced zone with security groups deploy a zone with zone wide primary storage I don't

Re: marvin updates

+91 97011 99011 > <tel:+91%2097011%2099011> > abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com > > > > > > > On 01/12/15, 3:45 PM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >​Is anybody in the community still maintaining Marvin? (I mean the > >frame

Re: deploy dc with marvin

ue". Nothing about zone wide primary storage > though. > > Cheers, > > Patrick > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Santosh, Gaurav, > > > > I am looking for functionality to deploy a dat

Re: Package Repositories

ears ago. We do not endorse them, but we should promote them. > > > > In our docs however, we should not be referencing 3rd party repos, and > any URLs > > should be cloudstack project specific. > > > > Can you please reply with your vote on these 3 catego

Re: Package Repositories

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > Paul, as far as releases I know, package on cloudstack.apt-get.eu > include > > noredis libraries. > > > > The debs don't I think. I never checked the RPMs. ​Any RPMs I uploaded do. Those are mostly the 4.4 ones

Re: Package Repositories

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > So. My understanding is that to make the packages in the repo 'official' > they must be voted on. -- would we make the packages what we vote on, > rather that the source code (bearing in mind you can't separate the >

Re: Package Repositories

riginal Message----- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: 27 November 2015 09:36 > To: dev <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Package Repositories > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> > wrote: > &g

Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for cloudstack

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think we all need to triage this. Not just PR authors. > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Rajani Karuturi < > rajani.karut...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> *98* New defects. >>

Re: Package Repositories

Erik On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Erik Weber wrote: > Would it be too blunt to propose that we set up a team, composed of any > community members interested, to handle packaging and promote that as 'the > community package'? > > Realistically, as a user, it is not

Re: [NOTICE] people.apache.org web space is moving to home.apache.org

You are right, Sebastien. @Rajani, do you have an idea on the volume of work, here? On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:10 PM, sebgoa <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Nov 25, 2015, at 2:07 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > are those refs expecti

Re: Package Repositories

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:52 AM, John Burwell wrote: > All, > ​...​ > In my opinion, favoring one 3rd-party repository over another is > detrimental to the community. ​agree ​ > We should either list all maintained 3rd-party package repositories or > we should

Re: [NOTICE] people.apache.org web space is moving to home.apache.org

are those refs expecting particular content returned? (it will be redirected) On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > We have references to people.apache.org in our testdata. > > ~Rajani > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Daniel Gruno

Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for cloudstack

I think we all need to triage this. Not just PR authors. On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > *98* New defects. > All the latest merged PR authors, can you please go through the list of > new defects? > > ~ Rajani > > > > > > > > > -Original

release managers wanted

People, We now have two release manager who both live in UTC+1. It would be nice to have some one from UTC-11 or there abouts and even better to have two extra people, one from between UTC+5 and +10, and one from UTC-6 to UTC-11. ​I think we can all see why,​ -- Daan

Re: release managers wanted

/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+principles+for+Apache+CloudStack+4.6+and+up On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > Out of curiosity, > What are the responsabilities of a release manager? > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:06

noredist build error

trying to fix the noredist build on master I run into [INFO] Compiling 12 source files to /Users/daan/cloudstack/cloudstack/plugins/network-elements/f5/target/classes [INFO] - [ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : [INFO]

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: PR1102 regression fix; half the annotatio...

Did anybody build 4.6 noredist? I can not get it or master built. On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 6:33 PM, DaanHoogland wrote: > Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1110#issuecomment-159005121 > > The error

Re: Getting re-started

Wolf, I am not sure if access to analysis is default for apache account holders. Ask infra ;) On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Wolf Halton wrote: > I am a little embarrassed, but I cannot log in to the analysis site with my > apache username. > 1. I could have just

Re: 4.6 release

Paul, this is not helpful. please supply changes for what you would like to see instead so we can discuss. On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > Guys, > > > > I’m out and about this morning, but I’ve noticed that the release notes > state that baseurl

Re: 4.6 release

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > Which version (noredist or oss) have the packages on cloudstack.apt-get.eu > been built with? > ​these used to be build noredist. Has anything changed?​ I think we must replace them if it has. -- Daan

Re: Request for CloudStack Dev Slack channel access

yab On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Prashanth Manthena < prashanth.manth...@nuagenetworks.net> wrote: > Hi, > > Can you please grant me access and point me to the CloudStack Dev Slack > channel. > > With regards, > Prashanth > -- Daan

Re: [STABILITY]} Large KVM Infrastructure with ACS

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:31 PM, ilya wrote: > Maybe I need to ping LeaseWeb and ExtremePC folks.. > ​We have many smaller installations, nothing near those limits.​ (we being LeaseWeb) -- Daan

Re: [STABILITY]} Large KVM Infrastructure with ACS

sounds like a bad limit Ilya, i'll keep an eye out. On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:10 PM, ilya wrote: > I'm curious if anyone runs ACS with atleast 250+ KVM hosts. > > We've been noticing weird issues with KVM where occasionally lots of KVM > agents get Nio connection

[DISCUSS][PROPOSE] use of optional instead of null

LS, As a spin off from a discussion in a PR where it is no longer relevant I made another PR to show the principle of the use of Optionals[1] Miguel from Schuberg Philis has been proposing this as replacement of the bad practice of returning null

Re: DevCloud deployment

/devcloud4/README.md > >> [3] > >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/tools/devcloud4/advanced/README.md > >> > >> ~Rajani > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland < > daan.hoogl...@gmail.com&g

Re: Hello 4.6.0, now what?!

Sebastien, On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > > On Nov 17, 2015, at 7:33 AM, Wilder Rodrigues < > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > > And for that, I think we should have 4.7 RMs. > we have three so far (don't know if Rajani continues) Remi,

Re: Hello 4.6.0, now what?!

to bad On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Wilder Rodrigues < wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > I won’t be RM, Daan. Will just continue that work I do in the way I do it. > > Cheers, > Wilder > > > > On 17 Nov 2015, at 09:25, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gm

Re: code quality improvement

covery Solutions > Mobile/Text 678-687-6104 > > -- > Sent from my iPhone. Creative word completion courtesy of Apple, Inc. > > > On Nov 16, 2015, at 3:23 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I know it is not sexy and we all much rath

code quality improvement

I know it is not sexy and we all much rather implement cool new things but there is some technical debt in cloudstack there a view tools running that analyse the code and report on it on the web. See links for those. I try to pick at least one issue a week and address it to hopefully get it

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 (round 2)

+1 (binding) tentative, all my reasons to vote in the previous rc still stand and the improvements on centos7 packaging are fine. I wanted to do extra tests on upgrades hence tentative but it seems I wont make the deadline. On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Rajani Karuturi <

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

thanks all, great. let's improve even further, after we had a great party to celebrate our selves. On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi all, > > After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.6.0 [1] *passes* with 7 PMC + 2 > non-PMC votes. > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 (round 2)

The upgrade test I am planning is not going to happen today. The db is to big so I'll test in the weekend and report the unlikely event of problems after the release to be fixed in 4.6.1: +1 (binding) On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > +1 (binding)

Re: DevCloud deployment

osi...@gmail.com>: > This is fragment of vmops.log file of MS. > > 2015-11-12 0:49 GMT+06:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>: > >> Ilya, Can you share the log of your management server? There must be some >> more info in there. And maybe you can check SRLog on the

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 (round 2)

Lucian, are you testing RC2 or 1? On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Nux! wrote: > -1 > > I'm testing upgrade from 4.4.1 (what we run in production) to 4.6.0 and > have hit 2 issues. > > 1 - minor packaging issue, upgrading to 4.6.0 makes > cloudstack-awsapi-4.4.1 complain about

Re: DevCloud deployment

t > > > > 2015-11-11 19:41 GMT+06:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>: > > > >> what version of ACS? > >> It sounds like a network issue between ms and host? can you ssh from ms > to > >> host on the right port? (i think it was 3922, mi

Re: DevCloud deployment

what version of ACS? It sounds like a network issue between ms and host? can you ssh from ms to host on the right port? (i think it was 3922, might be 3022) On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Илья Толстихин wrote: > Hi all, > Could you please help with the DevCloud deployment.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 (round 2)

Wilder, Borg, I would be fine with this as a known issue but I'll create a PR to remove the 4.5 upgrade code anyway. We can put it in 4.6.1 if nothing else pops up. On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Wilder Rodrigues < wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > Nice to know, Lucian! > > Happy

Re: DevCloud deployment

015-11-11 22:00 GMT+06:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>: > > > this is a xen host, right? > > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Илья Толстихин <inosi...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > On host ssh is up with 22 port only. >

Re: bringing jenkins.bac.o down

done for now. Please let any problems know at this list On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > jenkins restarting again > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> And

bringing jenkins.bac.o down

I am bringing down the ci server imminently to update it with the latest sec patched release. please stop me within minutes or pray. -- Daan

Re: [DISCUSS] upgrade of system templates

s-commons and others)? Does > it need to be password enabled? > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Devs, > > > > This has bitten us in indecent places time after time and after some > >

Re: [DISCUSS] upgrade of system templates

, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > nice thanks. > Do not we have a doc page for that? > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Rafael, check the tools/appliance

Re: bringing jenkins.bac.o down

And we're back. I'm not done fiddling though. On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am bringing down the ci server imminently to update it with the latest > sec patched release. > > please stop me within minutes or pray. > > -- > Daan > -- Daan

Re: bringing jenkins.bac.o down

jenkins restarting again On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > And we're back. I'm not done fiddling though. > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I am bring

[DISCUSS] upgrade of system templates

Devs, This has bitten us in indecent places time after time and after some contemplating the solution seems quite simple. An api call implemented in the TemplateService that lets you MarkTemplateAsSystemVmTemplate(optional uuid, optional name). No other params are needed as the template should

Re: Mirroring CloudStack to internal MVN repository

es and snapshots repo. > * Deployed a built version of 4.5.3-SNAPSHOT to archiva using mvn deploy > * Wipe out local ~/.m2/repository and see what happens. This leads to the > error I described in the first post. > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@

Re: Mirroring CloudStack to internal MVN repository

Jeff, kicking in an open door: did you edit your .m2/settings.xml? On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Jeff Hair wrote: > Also, mirroring is probably not the best term. We are not mirroring the > build artifacts from the official build servers. We are attempting to > deploy

infra ticket

Please every body review https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10703 and vote for it. The builders ubuntu-[2456] are constantly failing with segv in java and make our live harder. -- Daan

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CID-1338387: paranoia null checking

sure On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:47 PM, miguelaferreira wrote: > Github user miguelaferreira commented on the pull request: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1056#issuecomment-155411442 > > That intention opens up an entire category of errors, null >

Re: Automatically trigger a new Jenkins build

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 6:00 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Which Jenkins? > ​preferably builds.a.o but whichever, no? ​ > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Remi Bergsma > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Just had a chat with Miguel. > > He showed me that if we

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Boris Schrijver

now the real work starts, Boris. Go get'em. On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Nice job, Boris! > > On Sunday, November 8, 2015, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

+1 (Binding) I can confirm that Paul has an issue but it is in the centos7 install which is know, not new, and should have been fixed but can be overcome by experienced operators. The spec file is not good and should be fixed more then it had recently. The version installed with this failing

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Paul, By the looks of it it doesn't fail. It just doesn't install the non ssl config from tomcat6. Does your management server install? I think your output does NOT warrant a -1 as is! On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Boris Schrijver wrote: > Same tomcat6 issue? > > -- > >

Re: git tags on cloudstack repo

I don't like the rc1 tag. The date tag is more descriptive. and easier to automate. As for the tag being or not in git doesn't really matter. I used to rename the released branch to GA-4.4.x after the vote and leave the tag on there as well. In the end it is the commit-id that is significnant. On

Re: git tags on cloudstack repo

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Remi Bergsma <rberg...@schubergphilis.com> > wrote: > >> I accidentally pushed the 4.6.0 tag and I shouldn't have done that before >> it is fin

Re: Git with Eclipse

never mind: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/31/files looked in the wrong repo On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ron, can you link us to your PR? there is 118 open at the moment and I > don't see your name with th

Re: Git with Eclipse

Ron, can you link us to your PR? there is 118 open at the moment and I don't see your name with the last bunch. On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote: > Due to Sebastien and Daan's help, I have been able to create a pull > request for a small change

Re: Compiling master - build error

hey some guy, Our jenkins apidoc builders have been failing regularly in such a way coming back after a while. Have a look to see if it is the same issue. and if it is; Try just building anew it might just work. if you find the root cause please submit a PR. regards, On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 4:01

Re: Build error

@wido, is this one due to the temp dir path on windows thing as well? On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:55 AM, B Prakash wrote: > I am new to this and hence might be missing something, please could > someone help me with this build error? I am having the latest build and > getting

Re: [PROPOSAL] remove travis pull request checks from github

ng effort we are not putting into it.​ > > > --David > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Guys and dolls, > > > > > > We have been having travis builds for a while now and they seem to &g

Re: Add Debian 8.0 in OS List for Template

Milamber, there are api's for this: http://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.5/root_admin/addGuestOs.html and http://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.5/root_admin/addGuestOsMapping.html Or am I missing your point? On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Milamber wrote: >

Re: applying fixes, after 4.6 is out

;bo...@pcextreme.nl> wrote: > Good idea! If there aren't any merge conflicts we could even automate it > by means of a script. > > Though, who's responsible if there are conflicts? Extra work, testing > against the other branch? > > On October 30, 2015 at 11:45 AM Daan Hoogla

applying fixes, after 4.6 is out

H, Being kind of an optimist sometimes I want to start talking on how to handle PRs from 4.6.1 onward. If you don't understand what I'm talking about, please feel free to bother me with questions. I had a discussion with Remi last night about refusing PRs or not based on the premiss they are

Re: Automatically trigger a new Jenkins build

So Rajani, you suggest to remove the automatic trigger and leave that to reviewer. Sound fine to me. On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > Thats a good idea. I have seen other open source projects do it this way. > (example: netty project) > On demand

Re: New PMC member: Erik Weber

enloy the ride, Erik. Welcome. On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Congratulations, Erik! > > On Friday, October 30, 2015, Giles Sirett > wrote: > > > All > > The PMC is delighted to announce that we have asked

Re: Git with Eclipse

Ron, in eclipse i avoid doing any work involving multiple remotes. I do those things from the commandline. Other things work fine and the part with remotes might work well as well these days. If you use only your fork from eclipse and fetch and rebase from apache or github from out side eclipse

Re: [PROPOSAL] remove travis pull request checks from github

an what we use now. > I’m guess that the apache build does more stuff like packaging RPMs, but > I’m not sure there. > > \ Miguel Ferreira >mferre...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:mferre...@schubergphilis.com> > > > > > On 29 Oct 2015, at 11:27, Daan Hoogland &l

Re: [PROPOSAL] remove travis pull request checks from github

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Oct 29, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Sebastien, it is not urgent but costing us time > > so just don;t look at

Re: [PROPOSAL] remove travis pull request checks from github

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Oct 29, 2015, at 2:28 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> > >>> On Oct 29

Re: [PROPOSAL] remove travis pull request checks from github

like to see 4.6 released and then we can check what’s happening with > Travis. > > > > On Oct 29, 2015, at 12:59 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > The apache build reports rats, findbugs, pmd, coverage etc. > > > > On Thu, Oct

[PROPOSAL] remove travis pull request checks from github

Guys and dolls, We have been having travis builds for a while now and they seem to generate more work then help. There are a lot of time-outs, (false positive) and when a suite passes it is often because all tests where skipped (false negative). In addition, and this may be just me, I've never

Re: [PROPOSAL] remove travis pull request checks from github

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Miguel Ferreira < mferre...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > However, I would still find it valuable to have travis run a single > command: > mvn clean isntall -P developer,systemvv > > That is because, still many people commenting on PRs don’t even do that. > In

Re: Build failure for plugin ovm3

arch: "i386", family: > "unix" > > The java version is latest provided by ubuntu on 12.04. Should I try > upgrade or downgrade from 1.7.0_79 ? > > Regards, > Sateesh > > From: Daan Hoogland [daan.hoogl...@gmai

[DISCUSS] personal mentoring program (was: Mentor)

people, I have answered David and Prakesh on a personal note to get them started. When I started at cloudstack I had the luck to be in close quarters with a fellow developer. Not everybody is. Is there a wider call for mentoring on a personal level? Several people have proposed to be a google

Re: Mentor

Prakesh, Thanks for the offer to step in. There are lots of improvements and refactorings to be made. Made sure you have a good test bed first. At the moment we are in freeze so getting contributions accepted is hard on the beginner. For starters I would suggest finding the massive blobs (huge

Re: Build failure for plugin ovm3

Sateesh, I've seen many failures in many modules. Can you include the actual error of the testcompile? This doesn't say to much. On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi < sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com> wrote: > Off late, I am seeing following test-compile failure with plugin

Re: Build failure for plugin ovm3

H Sateesh, It looks like you hit a maven bug. you better check if you need to up- or downgrade. Also you may want to look at your java version. Can you share those? On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi < sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com> wrote: > Hi Daan, > There are no errors

Re: Mentor

I think you will find most satisfaction with obliging Erik as it is a real user problem which is always more rewarding when done. The others are merely very good to get acquainted with the system. this is a volunteer job so if you don't have a boss telling you what is more important it is what

Re: Invalid worker VM tag

Octavian, my vmware is not fluent, so you might have gone beyond this already: this is a cloudstack message not a garbage collector message. It retrieves worker tags from a managed object and tries to clean them. My gues is that cloudstack thinks vmware has an object but vmware has already

Re: 4.6 status update after QA Day yesterday

Yesterday was long and tiring but very productive afaict. we should do this *some* times. congratulations on the results every body. On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi all, > > Lots of work has been done yesterday! PRs were reviewed, tested,

Re: [4.6] Issue with removed column in volumes table not being updated

Mik, isn't it more generic then the solidfire plugin? On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > It looks like this is an issue with managed storage. > > I can actually put a fix in the SolidFire plug-in to correct what's going > on. > > I opened a

master build broken?

git reset --hard mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install leads to build failure in BasicRestClientTest.testExecuteRequestWhenClientThrowsIOException Expected exception: com.cloud.utils.rest.CloudstackRESTException ​anybody else seeing this?​ -- Daan

Re: master build broken?

any clues out there? I backtracked master to 4 weeks ago and keep getting this failure!?! On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > git reset --hard > mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install > > lead

Re: master build broken?

HttpConstants.HTTPS; > > private static final StatusLine HTTP_200_REPSONSE = new > BasicStatusLine(new ProtocolVersion(HTTPS, 1, 1), 200, "OK"); > > > 2015-10-22 12:41 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>: > > > any clues out there? I b

Re: Development and building of ui components

mvn -rf :cloud-client-ui ? not sure and I don't think it exists. You'll problably need to edit the project. please contribute back if you find a convenient way. On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:13 PM, cs user wrote: > Hi Folks, > > If you are modifying the code (javascript for

clue needed on marvin sources build

H devs, During a build that works for colleagues on a clean virtual machine I get an error on the marvin generated sources part. The error is clear about what happened but the cause is a mistery. Can anyone point me to the right direction? thanks, [INFO] [INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:exec

Re: clue needed on marvin sources build

that gives me a warm fuzzy feeling ;) On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Boris Schrijver <bo...@pcextreme.nl> wrote: > Hi Dahn, > > I must admit, I ran into it a couple weeks ago. No idea how I fixed it... > > On October 20, 2015 at 10:42 AM Daan Hoogland <daan.hoo

gson upgrade test required

H, PR932 contains a 'working' patch for gson. this touches every command and answer serialization however, so I would ask everybody to include it in their next test run. Both CIs report success in github. please, please, very please, -- Daan

Re: [ACS460] QA days (part one)

great, I will lobby internally and outside for everybody to join On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > I just setup a QA_days channel we can use. It should be easy to add a > hangout as well, should we want. > > > > Regards, > Remi > > > On

Re: CCCEU15: on site discussions around QA and release of 4.6 report

thanks guys, To bad I couldn't stay for this but I'll take some time to send you my nagging on this soon ;) I hope I can afford to spend a lot of time on generic quality issues on Leaseweb's accord. We will be discussing this on Monday. On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion

Re: UI translation for 4.6

sebastien and Dutch users, I have translated some strings. I think we need to review each other on this as sometimes a translation holds the middle ground between ridiculous and over the top when done from english to dutch. I would like to translate everything (185 strings to go). On Sat, Oct

Re: jenkins analysis and rat jobs

> Hi, > > That’s great! I’d asked infra about it because it makes Jenkins more > visible. Great that it’s there now :-) > > Regards, > Remi > > > > > On 05/10/15 11:55, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >H, > > &g

windows support

devs, at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing_comparison cloudstack is reported to not support windows as host os ; https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cloud_computing_comparison=edit=3 I am not familiar enough to do the edit and be confident but don't we? -- Daan

zone creation wizard

Bruno, Nitin, I would like to test PRs 906 and 912 combined, maybe one of you can pull in the other ones changes and make one PR a combined one? We can also create a new one merging in both of yours but this seems useless overhead ​thanks,​ -- Daan

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >