That's a good point. I know the system VMs are auto created if the system is
aware of their state being either 'Destroyed', 'Expunged'. If the state is
'Starting', or 'Started'/'Running' then no actions are taken.
In your scenario, the system VM would still be 'Started' in the database even
this parameter. It's just seems like a useless setting that might have
been added because there is something else in the system that isn't working
right.
Darren
On Oct 31, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Kelcey Jamison Damage
kel...@backbonetechnology.com wrote:
That's a good point. I know the system VMs
I can tell you it uses 'Storage-Heartbeat method for HA, unless that's
changed. That means the heartbeat ring is via the primary storage.
- Original Message -
From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013
, at different sites, that would probably work,
regardless of whether they're tied together as regions. If regions is
LDAP compatible that might alleviate the manual account replication
issue.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Kelcey Jamison Damage
kel...@backbonetechnology.com wrote:
you would
Hi,
I have gotten so close to have Ceph work in my cloud but I have reached a
roadblock. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I know this is not actually a
CloudStack issue at this point, but I also know several ACS users have tried
Ceph.
I receive the following error when trying to get
+1 again for KVM in Python!
- Original Message -
From: Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:54:26 PM
Subject: Re: Cloudstack collab Hackathons
+1 for kvm in python. I'd like to take it a step further. I'd
That is the old template and won't work with 4.2
You can follow one of the methods in
http://cloud.kelceydamage.com/cloudfire/blog/2013/10/08/conquering-the-cloudstack-4-2-dragon-kvm/
if you wish to recover your cloud, or you can simply use the updated template
link posted and start over
.infoblox.com%3E
From: Kelcey Jamison Damage [kel...@backbonetechnology.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 12:19 PM
To: Cloud Dev
Subject: [ACS 4.2][Upgrade Issue] System VM template caching
Hi,
Several of us in the community have found
Goasguen run...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 4:44:46 PM
Subject: Re: System VM template caching
On Oct 10, 2013, at 2:19 PM, Kelcey Jamison Damage
kel...@backbonetechnology.com wrote:
I just went back through the release guide an nowhere could I
Congrats!
- Original Message -
From: Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 8:58:53 AM
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Daan Hoogland
Congrats Daan :)
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers
We should make a CSS skinning bin/repo so people can easily share their skins.
This could even just be a Wiki section. I have been playing with a dark(Greys)
themed flatter skin that is designed for comfortable 1920 x 1080 usage.
I think us having a fairly easily skin-able UI will attract a
I agree this needs to be approached. I find it quite frustrating to have a VM
with 4-5 volumes and not be able to backup all 5 volumes as a set. Plus the
restore operation gets messy when you have to restore 5 volumes and re-attach
them to the VM.
The user and domain sets you discuss below I
You just made my day, these look great. Most importantly it has a look that
will sell to IT managers, etc.
I wish you the best of luck with this and hope for rapid progress :)
Again, it looks awesome!
- Original Message -
From: Brian Federle brian.fede...@citrix.com
To:
on the left navigation menu or is this a draft?
Thanks
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Kelcey Jamison Damage [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 6:28 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] UI: New look and feel
You just made my
Congratulations!
- Original Message -
From: Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:46:43 AM
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala
Congrats, Rajesh.
-min
On 9/24/13 9:40 AM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi
I do believe we had reached a consensus on a market place needing to be
external to the project, but If someone wanted to make connectors/plug-ins for
integration with an existing service, that would be ok.
I'm pretty certain it had to do with legalities/logistics of the project being
attached
Question for you guys,
I updated the schema on my 4.1.1 cloud. For the most part it works, but some
hosts that I've updated now fail to deploy VMs do to the following error:
-- Instead of creating a guest bridge called 'brbondg-1200' it tries to create
'br-1200' as if it can not detect my
Congrats!
- Original Message -
From: Ilya Musayev imusa...@webmd.net
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, aemne...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2013 1:42:43 PM
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Ilya Musayev
Thank you all..
-Original Message-
From: Ahmad Emneina
Assuming you don't care about pool sanity, then add an alias script to the
guest [ifcfg-eth0:0]
- Original Message -
From: Maurice Lawler maurice.law...@me.com
To: Cloud Dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 11:35:41 AM
Subject: Easiest Way...
Greetings,
What is
attached to Cloud Stack, completely
different subnets.
- Maurice
On Aug 16, 2013, at 2:42 PM, Kelcey Jamison Damage
kel...@backbonetechnology.com wrote:
Assuming you don't care about pool sanity, then add an alias script to the
guest [ifcfg-eth0:0]
- Original Message -
From
Ok so this would make it very difficult to achieve. With Advanced zones you
have the flexibility to make some of this stuff work. Basic was not intended
for this purpose. Advanced zone with SG enabled would give you the tools needed
to accomplish your goal.
Also if the secondary subnet is NOT
, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Kelcey Jamison Damage
kel...@backbonetechnology.com wrote:
Ok so this would make it very difficult to achieve. With Advanced zones you
have the flexibility to make some of this stuff work. Basic was not intended
for this purpose. Advanced zone with SG enabled would give you
, by adding / removing a rule from the ebtables,
so my method of thinking isn't to complex, I was hoping someone on the list
could point me in the right direction.
On Aug 16, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Kelcey Jamison Damage
kel...@backbonetechnology.com wrote:
Ok so this would make it very difficult to achieve
I'm just going to chime in on this. What we need to put together is a primer.
Our docs work fairly well and are CloudStack centric, which I see as most
peoples issue. On the topic of networking, building a cloud requires a very
strong understanding of core Linux networking, which is technically
One last note. As far as stability is concerned... 4.1.x is the recommended
build, and many of us(myself included) are running our production on 4.0.2
which is rock solid for all standard features.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Kelcey Jamison Damage kel...@bbits.ca
To: dev
You can always send them over to IRC where I am. Usually it's easier to handle
support in real-time.
- Original Message -
From: Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 10:15:08 AM
Subject: RE: we like dev better then users :(
Daan,
I went through some of the code and I like much of what I see, but I don't have
a system right now that I can deploy and test this on. Does anyone have a demo
build?
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, Shiva Teja
Congratulations John!
- Original Message -
From: John Burwell jburw...@basho.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:04:28 PM
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New CloudStack PMC Member: John Burwell
All,
I just wanted to thank the community for being so welcoming. Since
Hey David, not sure if I mentioned this, but there are some guys at NetApp in
Calgary that are interested in CloudStack development as well
- Original Message -
From: Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:56:51 AM
Subject:
reach out to
them internally. If not I'll have to go on a witch hunt :-)
David La Motta
Technical Marketing Engineer
Citrix Solutions
NetApp
919.476.5042
dlamo...@netapp.commailto:dlamo...@netapp.com
On Jun 13, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Kelcey Jamison Damage
kel...@bbits.camailto:kel...@bbits.ca
in cloudstack the domain or subdomain would require 1 or more 'private zones'
to restrict user access
If you make a zone under root(called a public zone) then everyone can access
and is restricted by quotas.
hope that helps.
- Original Message -
From: Jessica Wang
} []t2-sub-domain| --- private
zone
- Original Message -
From: Kelcey Jamison Damage kel...@bbits.ca
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 3:35:30 PM
Subject: Re: if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone
in cloudstack the domain
As a non-committer follow these steps:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/develop/non-committer.html
hope that helps.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Sebastien Goasguen sebastien.goasg...@citrix.com
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013
Is there any plan on supporting KVM in the patch cycle post 4.2?
- Original Message -
From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2013 10:12:32 AM
Subject: Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER
I agree on merging Wei's feature
I agree with Chip, lets keep all discussion open, and we can create a [DISCUSS]
thread if need be.
I am currently working on a Flask based UI/API for cloud platforms
management(The layer above CloudStack).
- Original Message -
From: Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
To:
Hi,
Do we have anyone working on storage integration with NetApp? I just got out of
a non-nda meeting with them where they told me they are integrating both Swift
and PNFS. Considering they are the primary curators of the NFS kernel, I'm
hoping we might have at least 1 dev interested in maybe
36 matches
Mail list logo
