Hi, sorry you didn't get a reply sooner, but I just noticed this. All I can
say is that yes, I've run into some issues as well with building on MacOS.
Most of them seem minor and scripting related, like you mention -
dependency on bash arrays was another I ran into, needed to install bash5.
General
gh I'd still expect to see 'npt' in the source VM XML
and on its qemu command unless it's similar but not quite the same issue.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:32 AM Marcus wrote:
> That does sound like some sort of libvirt, then. I don't know why it would
> fail to transfer
12-2021 om 00:52 schreef Marcus:
> > Just for clarity - Wido you mention that you tried using a common CPU
> model
> > across the platforms (which presumably doesn't contain npt) but migration
> > still fails on npt missing. That does seem like a bug of some sort, I
>
Just for clarity - Wido you mention that you tried using a common CPU model
across the platforms (which presumably doesn't contain npt) but migration
still fails on npt missing. That does seem like a bug of some sort, I would
expect that the the following should work:
* Update cloudstack agent con
Great, thanks! I'll take a look.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 5:17 AM Paul Angus wrote:
> Hi Marcus et al,
>
> This is where I had got to, to a create a containerised image of
> simulator, with options to deploy a region created by marvin (either a
> predetermined multi-zone o
might do in an RPM
spec.
I feel like I also ran into an issue with some hard coding for x86_64 in
regards to the RPMs, which a direct build and package into Dockerfile
avoided.
On Wednesday, November 17, 2021, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> Sometimes I use the docker images to build a
maybe deprecating and removing the old unused ones over time.
On Wednesday, November 17, 2021, Sina Kashipazha
wrote:
> Hey Marcus,
>
> We use docker to build cloudstack packages when we want to build
> cloudstack for the different target OS. That is our only use case, which
> ha
know what is up with the Marvin artifact publishing? Did it move
or do we not have a source for that?
On Wednesday, November 17, 2021, Gabriel Bräscher
wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> I have never played with the Dockerfile you've mentioned.
> I need to double-check on it, but I
like
/proc/meminfo and scripts with bash 4 arrays. Maybe some of that could be
fixed but I think building in Docker is a common and reasonable pattern too.
On Wednesday, November 17, 2021, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> I'm not sure about others, I don't use docker so can&
arvin bit is secondary.
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 10:15 AM Marcus wrote:
> Hi all, I've been familiarizing myself with the Docker image tooling in
> CloudStack, and I have a few questions. I've been playing with a
> multi-stage build that shrinks the image from ~4Gi to ~800Mi,
Hi all, I've been familiarizing myself with the Docker image tooling in
CloudStack, and I have a few questions. I've been playing with a
multi-stage build that shrinks the image from ~4Gi to ~800Mi, packages just
the jar, some UI, and a JDK thinking that it might be more usable.
1) Is there anyon
pluggable plugins that
> say are implemented using mysql/db, embedded zookeeper, or hazelcast. We
> had done some poc as part of an internal hackathon in the past (
> https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/tree/locking-service).
> * Maybe a more modern approach would be to look
Cloud-init is always fun to debug :-). It will probably require some
playing with to get a pattern down.
There is perhaps a way to get it to re-check and grow every reboot if you
adjust/override the module frequency, deleting the module semaphore in
/var/lib/cloud/sem or worst case clearing the me
Thanks, Daan, I appreciate the feedback and I hope it is useful. I wish I
could comment more on the other hypervisors and how something similar might
work for them.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 2:49 AM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> thanks Marcus,
>
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 7:32 PM Marcus wrote:
Hi everyone! It's been awhile. I've got a feature I'd love to get some
feedback on and contribute to the community, if it's acceptable. I need to
brush up on the proper process (did read CONTRIBUTING.md). I should have
discussed this *before* implementation, for sure, but since this is
something
Yes, +1 on EV. It is more current, better maintained and I think it is
generally considered the go-to for EL based hypervisors (largely due to the
oVirt use).
On Saturday, April 10, 2021, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Great, thanks for sharing Simon. If we've consensus and there are no
> objections I wo
I just wanted to drop a line to the community - perhaps this has been
addressed already and I'm just disorganized.
I see that in the 4.12 SQL upgrade scripts we use "ALTER VIEW" rather than
the previous pattern of "DROP VIEW IF EXISTS" + "CREATE".
The problem I've seen with ALTER VIEW is that in
aged to recover vCenter and Cloudstack
> > after
> > > reboots of the vCenter machine and the Cloudstack management service.
> > > There's no exact points to recover for now, but restart seems to work.
> > > By graceful failure I mean, cloudstack erroring out the
The issue sounds severe enough that a release note probably won't suffice -
unless there's a documented way to recover we'd never want to leave a
system susceptible to being unrecoverable, even if it's rarely triggered.
What's involved in "failing gracefully"? Is this a small fix, or an
overhaul?
blic artifacts with
Github.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:24 AM Marcus wrote:
> I'll try to find time to see if I can point my plugins archetype generator
> at that. It would be extremely useful and simplify building plugin packages.
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 5:10 AM Rohit Yadav
I'll try to find time to see if I can point my plugins archetype generator
at that. It would be extremely useful and simplify building plugin packages.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 5:10 AM Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> All,
>
> This has come up a few times in the past when someone wants to
> build/extend Clou
more instances based on load
balancer data, but traditionally not much demand for shrinking/growing CPU
and memory, except maybe in the DRS case where it is combined with being
able to shuffle workloads across physical resources.
On Wednesday, September 11, 2019, Marcus wrote:
> Yes, it puts mem
Yes, it puts memory pressure within the VM to evict the memory and then it
is hidden from the OS.
However, I’m not a fan of ballooning, as it depends on a driver in the
guest OS. When I tested it a few years back one simply had to blacklist the
module within the VM to get the full (max) RAM, as th
I think some direction may come out of what we see at the conference.
UX - UI, API, CLI
KVM agent communication model
On Friday, September 6, 2019, Paul Angus wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have a large room for the day on Wednesday for a hackathon. I think it
> might be a good idea if we marshal som
+1 for upgrading after 4.13.
I looked into this recently, and determined that actually for open source
users there's not a lot of benefit going to JDK 11, as OpenJDK 8 would be
supported until 2023, and switching to 11 only gets us to 2024.
https://access.redhat.com/articles/1299013
I realize so
was a timing issue it would seem like we
should already have that problem with the existing cloud-early-config.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:24 PM Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi Marcus, Simon,
>
>
> I explore two of the short term solutions and I've a working (work in
> progress)
Long ago it was a disk. The problem was that these disks had to go
somewhere, a place where they could survive migrations, which didn't work
well for block based primary storage... at least for the code base at the
time. Using virtio socket was seen as a fairly standard way to communicate
temporary
Caused by: java.net.SocketException: Protocol family unavailable
This is a common Java issue when trying to containerize, I believe you can
search for it and find a generic answer. Basically has to do with whether
Java is trying to use IPv4 or IPv6 and what your Docker solution supports.
If I reca
>From your other emails it sounds as though you do not have IPMI configured,
nor host HA enabled, correct? In this case, the correct thing to do is
nothing. If CloudStack cannot guarantee the VM state (as is the case with
an unreachable hypervisor), it should do nothing, for fear of causing a
split
Can we not rely on secondary storage for config drive? I'd much rather see
it generated dynamically into a temp space during VM start, or (less
desirable) even during VM create on primary storage (perhaps in a
configdrive) directory where the root disk resides. It just seems like a
bad idea to rel
We've also seen in the past initiatives like object store and 'secondary
storage free' zones. We may not want to cement the idea that we have
secondary storage as a mountable filesystem that is highly available.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 5:40 PM Marcus wrote:
> Can we not
Fx"dxxxffzxzsd
Em 21 de abr de 2016 07:10, "jayapalu" escreveu:
> Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1255#issuecomment-212842613
>
> @kansal Can you please complete the localisation changes.
>
>
> ---
> If your project is set
A few things to note:
1. I repeated this until I felt bad about harping on it, but we were seeing
new functionality slip into minors all the time. The idea that 4.4.x ->
4.4.y upgrade was safer than 4.4.x -> 4.5.0 (just made up versions as an
example) is unfortunately wrong.
2. I agree that large
Hi Nux,
The thing about ghz is that it is the unit of capacity for CPU, VMs are
allocated to hosts according to the number of "cycles" it has. As a
customer, I agree, core count is more important. As an admin, if you have a
single host in a cluster that is using much more CPU than the others an
I have found managing commands.properties pretty painful, so figuring that
out was a huge relief.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Good point, Marcus - thanks!
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
>
Note you don't have to edit commands.properties if your API command has the
APICommand annotation:
@APICommand(name = "getTimeOfDay",
description = "get time of day",
responseView = ResponseView.Restricted,
responseObject = GetTimeOfDayResponse.class,
:
Tests in error:
testIsMockServerCanUpgradeConnectionToSsl(rdpclient.MockServerTest):
Invalid service principal name: host/cs-devel
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Marcus wrote:
> If you upgrade your java 1.7 you may see this error.
>
> On CentOS 7 I was running version
> "java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.79-2.5
ncipal name arose. I downgraded and the problem went away. I
tried this on two boxes.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Yes, I've seen it. It's not a reliable test, there have been several
> issues arise with it, because it requires the compiling host have a certain
>
Yes, I've seen it. It's not a reliable test, there have been several issues
arise with it, because it requires the compiling host have a certain
configuraiton. It needs to be able to resolve its own hostname, etc.
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Abhinandan Prateek <
abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.
Might as well put the check in, to ensure we don't try to use flags that
aren't available.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Thanks, everyone
>
> Marcus - Do you think I should put in a version check or is that ver
Looks like the VIR_DOMAIN_XML_MIGRATABLE flag was introduced in v1.0.0
(version 100 in how the Libvirt API reports), and VIR_DOMAIN_XML_SECURE
was all the way back in v0.8.0 (version 8000).
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Marcus wrote:
> There are a bunch of things like this in the c
There are a bunch of things like this in the code already, and they're
wrapped in version checks. See
_hypervisorLibvirtVersion in LibvirtComputingResource. We just need to
figure out which versions need to be left out.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I thi
t;
>
> Keep in mind that ONLY when using NFS there will be a heartbeat written
> to the storage.
>
> Currently HA is the safest to use when there is at least one NFS primary
> storage available.
>
> Wido
>
> > HTH
> > Lucian
> >
> > --
> > Sent f
e else pushing back, so I figure I need to get the opinion
out there, even if it's a lone one.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Marcus wrote:
> > Why are we touching 4.5 branch with anything other than known bugfixes?
>
>
I hate to bring this up, as I don't like being a curmudgeon, but
occasionally I see things like this and I wonder why we are doing it.
commit 6e3c6e82990cafdab8453ed56530dc619ba70338
Date: Tue Jun 9 23:57:00 2015 +0200
CLOUDSTACK-8537 refactor registerSSHKeyPair() for legibility and
testab
When I build CloudStack RPMs on 4.5 branch I get mysql ha RPMs. Looking at
the specfile:
%if "%{_ossnoss}" == "noredist"
%package mysql-ha
Summary: Apache CloudStack Balancing Strategy for MySQL
Requires: mysql-connector-java
Requires: %{_tomcatversion}
Group: System Environmnet/Libraries
%d
... and this is the relevant portion of the logs indicating the failure
reason:
"Template
content is unsupported, or mismatch between selected format and template
content. Found : x86 boot sector; partition 1"
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Looks like it is seei
Looks like it is seeing a raw disk, when you specified it was QCOW2. That's
what the 'file' command is doing. We used to just trust the name of the
file, but this was enhanced to inspect the first 1MB of the download and
validate that you are supplying the image format that CS expects.
Because the
I assume the ASF turns their nose up to this? Have we discussed this before?
https://www.mysql.com/about/legal/licensing/foss-exception/
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 3:16 PM, creategui wrote:
> Github user creategui commented on the pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#
Looks like that is LGPL
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:57 PM, creategui wrote:
> Github user creategui commented on the pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-110153681
>
> How about switching to https:
CC'd security@ ...
Yeah, we definitely want to involve as many people as we can from the
original change. Cookies and javascript variables are very different
things, cookies are available across tabs/windows (hence why the change
breaks auto-login via opening a new tab) and persist beyond the life
/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8339
> > Project: CloudStack
> > Issue Type: Bug
> > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> > Components: KVM
> >Affects Versions: 4.5.0
> >Reporter: Mar
Did you guys review the functional spec that has been floating around on
cwiki?
On May 23, 2015 8:27 AM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 05/22/2015 11:05 PM, server24 Cloudstack wrote:
> > Hi Wido,
> >
> > was nice talking to you about this
I'm not sure it is any different. Either you have a giant block of code
that represents a bunch of little commits, or a giant block that is one
commit. We don't want to merge little chunks to master that don't fully
implement the feature.
To the extent that features and goals can be split up, yes,
I
> > always have vlan values - since this is all Guest NICs - they must have
> > vlan ID...
> > NULL values are only present when VM is deleted/stoped in my case...
> >
> > Can you check your VM 664 - what is so specific about it ?
> > all NICs (in my underst
It's possible to do, but there's some work involved. We'd have to modify
the table that stores the rules, then pass that in the ACL commands that
change the iptables rules.
It goes against the idea of tiers, though. A tier is supposed to represent
a given function, your mail server and web server
So, I vaguely remember an issue introduced a little over a year ago where
the broadcast domain value of the nic was changed from a URI to just a vlan
ID, which worked for vlans but broke vxlan and some other things. If I
remember correctly, there would be a small set of installs during this
period
Yes, and follow best practices of running qemu as non-root, and a user that
has no privileges and a restricted shell! Change user and group in
/etc/libvirt/qemu.conf
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Nux! wrote:
> https://access.redhat.com/articles/1444903
>
> People running KVM might want to upd
This could be a good opportunity to get your hands dirty and submit a
patch! These iptables rules are managed by a handful of shell scripts.
There are some specific to VPC if I remember correctly, in /opt/cloud/bin
on the virtual router. You can get a history of what script was run and
with which p
1 PM, Sebastien Goasguen
wrote:
>
>
> > On 13 May 2015, at 23:35, Marcus wrote:
> >
> > Looks like we're still missing some chunks of the website.
>
>
> Which ones ?
>
> >
> > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Sebastien Goasguen
>
Looks like we're still missing some chunks of the website.
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Sebastien Goasguen
wrote:
> Yes i know what that is. I am on it after breakfast
>
> -Sebastien
>
> > On 12 May 2015, at 05:03, Abhinandan Prateek <
> abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> >
> > http
/9190
> >
> > The latter would most likely hurt the less to a broad user base :)
> >
> > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Rafael Fonseca
> > wrote:
> >
> >> There are some handy tools to get the sense of having likely issues with
> >> other services :)
I don't think we are recommending a reverse proxy (are we?), it was just
brought up as a solution if someone wants port 80 to go to cloudstack. At
past jobs we put Apache on 80, and used it solely to host CS api docs for
the version of the API that the management server was running, as well as a
f
Main site looks good, but docs/api is still missing
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Sebastien Goasguen
wrote:
>
> > On May 11, 2015, at 9:42 PM, Marcus wrote:
> >
> > Does this have anything to do with the 404s I'm getting from
> > cloudstack.apache.org?
>
Does this have anything to do with the 404s I'm getting from
cloudstack.apache.org?
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Rafael Fonseca
wrote:
> That is a great change Sebastien :)
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:03 PM, sebgoa wrote:
>
> >
> > On May 11, 2015, at 6:29 PM, Sebastien Goasguen
> wrot
Unfortunately, no. It seems the upgrade from 4.5 to this branch in my dev
environment has left the management server unstartable, presumably due to
systemd changes. I now have a broken link in
/etc/rc5.d/S80cloudstack-management, and systemd complaining:
Process /usr/sbin/cloudstack-management cou
Yes, its a bug. We had added that feature and it was working in 4.1+, but
apparently there is a regression. There's no reason the same VLAN ids can't
be reused on different physical networks
On May 8, 2015 10:29 PM, "Alireza Eskandari"
wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> It seems that we can't create m
Can you confirm that those bridges and bond devices exist prior to
attempting migration, and that the VMs are attached to them and work?
Perhaps a 'brctl show' and 'virsh dumpxml'. Those look like they should be
cloudstack-generated guest network bridges and libvirt is complaining they
don't exist
y S3 style storage :)
>
> Just need some integration guidelines...
>
> Thx
> On May 8, 2015 2:58 AM, "Marcus" wrote:
>
> > Not entirely sure, but is there anything about the other object
> stores(S3)?
> > They should all work the same with NFS staging.
> >
Not entirely sure, but is there anything about the other object stores(S3)?
They should all work the same with NFS staging.
On May 7, 2015 4:00 AM, "Andrija Panic" wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I cant find any docs on this topic, so...posting a question here.
>
> We are going to use Swift as region wide
Does mvn -o fix it? Looks like it is unable to fetch a dependency, if you
have it cached locally then -o should help.
On May 7, 2015 5:24 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having trouble building the latest from 4.5. Am I missing something
> here?
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.
Yeah, I'm really familiar with the standard linux bridge methods, but not
so much on OVS. It seems a bit strange to me that you only have a bridge
'cloudbr' and the traffic labels refer to ports rather than bridges, but
what do I know.
There are lots of ways to configure networking. If you want to
asking if
your labels matched your OVS bridge (usually I only create one).
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Aleksandr wrote:
> Marcus writes:
>
> >
> > What is your default OVS bridge name? Are your traffic labels matching
> the
> > OVS bridge cloudbr0?
> >
&g
till need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security
> Groups build, in for a busy week!
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Geoff Higginbottom
> > CTO / Cloud Architect
> >
> > D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540
> > | M: +447968161581
>
+1 (binding)
On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
> Thanks for running with this Rohit.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH
What is your default OVS bridge name? Are your traffic labels matching the
OVS bridge cloudbr0?
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Aleksandr Ivanov wrote:
> Sure
> [root@node2 /]# cat /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties
> #Storage
> #Mon May 04 23:29:33 MSK 2015
> guest.network.device=cloudbr1
My testing indicates we need to avoid this line from serviceConfig.py when
setting up EL7 hypervisors :
cfo.addEntry("cgroup_controllers", "[\"cpu\"]")
The cgroups are added automatically by systemd-machined, regardless of
whether /etc/libvirt/qemu.conf has this line or not. There's
known
or existing issues.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> sure, hence the -0
>
> Op di 5 mei 2015 om 17:03 schreef Marcus :
>
> > This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can prove
> > that it's a regression. If the f
This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can prove
that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0 and haven't
been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather than trying to fix
all known bugs before shipping.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland
I'm assuming your host agents are configured to use the OVS bridge driver?
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Aleksandr Ivanov wrote:
> Hi !
>
> But what to do if its not created automatically ?
> It's just telling me that : "Cannot get interface MTU on 'OVSTunnel1725':
> No
> such device"
>
> Rega
First thing that comes to mind is to modify your system vm template for
this scenario with virt-what swapped out with a dummy script to say
whatever you want. It's a hack for sure, but the other obvious alternative
involves editing CloudStack code.
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Ian Duffy wrote:
Congrats, well deserved.
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Rafael Fonseca wrote:
> Congrats Remi :)
>
> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
>
> > Congrats Remi!
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Daan Hoogland >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The Project Management Committee (PMC)
eme. You get the idea.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Marcus wrote:
> I agree, this wrapper is a good step forward. It's totally fine to
> continue on that path because it is obviously better and makes it easy to
> switch to autodetection anytime later by simply adding the annotat
at. Also to a lesser extent in the
API server, but it is spread across a bunch of classes.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Wilder Rodrigues <
wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> Thanks for the email… I’m always in for improvements. But why can’t you
>
e KVM agent would be
pluggable like the management server side is.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Wilder Rodrigues
wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> Apologies for taking so much time to reply to your email, but was, and still
> am, quite busy. :)
>
> I would only use reflection if that was
es up properly.
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Marcus wrote:
>
>> Logged into the router?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski
>> wrote:
>> > Well, I seem to be able to reproduce this every time I start up the VR in
>>
Logged into the router?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Well, I seem to be able to reproduce this every time I start up the VR in
> my environment.
>
> I'm not sure, though, if this is only my environment or if other people who
> are making brand new CS clouds with 4.6
Log into the vm and look at the /var/log/cloud.log. It might be that
the agent isn't starting (e.g. you require non-oss build but have oss
build, and agent fails to find PremiumSecondaryStorageResource or
whatever)
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Hey Wilder,
>
> Thanks f
r). We can essentially set a date
and do that any time, with some advance notice that direct commits
will be reverted.
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
>> On Apr 18, 2015, at 8:36 AM, Marcus wrote:
>>
>> Have they diverged that much? Due to cherry-pic
There's already been some work on OpenDaylight, and it has been merged
but I don't think many people are using it. It should be roughly
analogous to the Nuage plugin's functionality, where openvswitch on
the hypervisor talks to a controller that provides all of the traffic
flow rules. It might not
Has anyone had experience with securing the KVM agent, specifically
getting it to run as non-root. I've looked a bit, and I believe it
would require code changes. An initial, simple plan for this (that
involves code fixes) might be to do something like:
1) generate a list of included scripts duri
I'm not sure how they'll take to a response that
they need to upgrade. Overall I think it will approve stability and
focus our efforts, but have we had a vote around this change?
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
>> On Apr 18, 2015, at 8:36 AM, Marcus
Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Marcus wrote:
>> We just have to do it. We just freeze master at some point, do all of
>> the release bugfixes, and when it is solid enough to pass a release
>> vote we branch a release from it, and then only allow merges to master
>> that ha
I tend to handle
the commands when subclassing LibvirtComputingResource. I haven't had
any problems with it, but then again I haven't tried to refactor 5500
lines into that model, either.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> I like the annotation i
Kind of a tangent, but I'd actually like to see some work done to
clean up LibvirtComputing resource. One model I've prototyped that
seems to work is to create an annotation, such as
'KVMCommandExecutor', with a 'handles' property. With this annotation,
you implement a class that handles, e.g. Star
I agree with Wido. The first thing that came to mind is legacy
installs of CentOS that have java6,7 but not java8. I'd prefer to wait
until we can reasonably say that Ubuntu 12.04 and CentOS6.x are
artifacts of the past that people should not be running (maybe 6-12mo
past LTS, or something). Unless
We just have to do it. We just freeze master at some point, do all of
the release bugfixes, and when it is solid enough to pass a release
vote we branch a release from it, and then only allow merges to master
that have been tested in a merge branch, or something along those
lines. Things will slip
This requires has actually bitten us in the past. It needs to change
to 'java-1.7.0', because 'java7' isn't satisfied by anything in EL7,
and 'java >= 1.7.0' actually is satisfied by java 1.6 due to epoch
issues.
That said, EL7 support was considered 'tech preview' even with 4.5,
I'm not sure what
What state was it in when it was merged? Functioning?
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> I’m not sure. I saw that somebody from Inocybe (Mathieu Lemay) was interested
> in supporting the plugin. As to whether it works with the latest release of
> ODL, not sure.
>
> From:
gland wrote:
> We heavily invested in code now on master. Not looking forward to
> backporting that.
>
> mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk)
> Op 17 apr. 2015 21:02 schreef "Marcus" :
>
>> Well, would we just swap the last relea
1 - 100 of 1292 matches
Mail list logo
