Congrats Vijay :)
From: Prasanna Santhanam [t...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2013 10:30 AM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Vijay
Bhamid
/DedicatedResourceDaoImpl.java 6c91ce7
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13495/diff/
Testing
---
list dedicatedzone with zoneid now returns correct dedicated zone.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
/test_explicit_dedication.py bd97551
tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/common.py 4f5acef
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13560/diff/
Testing
---
test runs successfully whenever an empty host is found.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
a single pool in the cluster, the test is skipped.
If multiple suitable hosts are found, the test passes.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
/integration/component/test_explicit_dedication.py bd97551
tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/common.py 4f5acef
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13560/diff/
Testing
---
test runs successfully whenever an empty host is found.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
)
Thanks,
Saksham
-Original Message-
From: Radhika Puthiyetath
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 2:29 PM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Saksham Srivastava;
deepti dohare (deeptidoh...@gmail.com)
Cc: Sudha Ponnaganti; Devdeep Singh; Radhika Nair
Subject: RE
/ManagementServerImpl.java 3341c05
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13911/diff/
Testing
---
UI/API displays the correct host list now.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
> On May 4, 2013, 8:48 p.m., Pranav Saxena wrote:
> > Review comment on the corresponding JIRA ticket to verify if its actually a
> > valid bug . If yes , then we'll definitely proceed with validating the fix
> > . Thanks !
Hi Issac, CLOUDSTACK-2178 is marked closed as invalid.
Do we still ne
Congratulations Ilya.
Regards,
Saksham
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 12:22 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Ilya Musayev
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has as
In 4.2, UI functionality for adding/removing and updating default NIC has been
added.
You may find it in the NIC tab of an instance.
I haven't explicitly tried the APIs on 4.1.1, but the APIs should be present
there also.
Thanks,
Saksham
-Original Message-
From: France [mailto:mailingl
Congrats Dave.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 7, 2013 7:51 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Dave Cahill
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Dave
Cahill t
t itself will fail, it will be good to
skip the test in that case.
test/integration/component/test_ip_reservation.py
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/14079/#comment50860>
Adding an addition check of None will prevent future NPEs
- Saksham Srivastava
On Sept. 11, 2013, 10:09 a.
eImpl.java 4169d42
utils/src/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtils.java 05b485b
utils/test/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtilsTest.java 3cfc98f
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14124/diff/
Testing
---
Added unit test for the utility.
Tested locally.
Build is successful.
Patch applies cleanly.
Thanks
patch.
- Saksham Srivastava
On Sept. 12, 2013, 11:13 a.m., Anshul Gangwar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
Congrats Rajesh.
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:00 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Raje
m/cloud/utils/net/NetUtilsTest.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/14451/#comment51906>
Can you add few negative test cases like (15, "00:00:00:00:00:ff") in each
of these methods.
- Saksham Srivastava
On Oct. 2, 2013
uot;));
Just a few such cases will suffice.
- Saksham Srivastava
On Oct. 2, 2013, 9:19 p.m., Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To rep
Please provide me edit permissions, username: saksham
Regards,
Saksham
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 10:46 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wiki access
Mike, Tuna, Srinivas, Go, done.
On 10/3/1
Thanks Daan.
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 2:52 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Wiki access
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Saksham Srivastava <
saksham.srivast...@citrix.com> wrote:
> saksham
you're in
> On Oct. 4, 2013, 6:43 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
> > utils/test/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtilsTest.java, line 225
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/14451/diff/1/?file=360598#file360598line225>
> >
> > What I am suggesting is that add a method something
://reviews.apache.org/r/14647/diff/
Testing
---
Tested locally :
The status is now as #service cloudstack-management status
cloudstack-management is stopped
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
,
Saksham Srivastava
Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 12:40 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chiradeep Vittal
Cc: Kishan Kavala; Saksham Srivastava; cloudstack
Subject: Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1012:Encrypt system.vm.password for 4.0
t
/20
=> Existing Reservation is not affected.
Added UnitTest testIsSameIpRange()
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
-29c8c91c24d3
Enabled
480-504;910-914;916-918;920-923;925-934;936-940
VLAN
Build passes successfully.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
Congrats Jayapal.
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 9:00 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Jaya
is now enhanced:
1
49e5cdfc-2c14-415a-9dd3-38ac2fdeef54
Physical Network 1
ZONE
0bd17058-2931-479b-98b5-29c8c91c24d3
Enabled
480-504;910-914;916-918;920-923;925-934;936-940
VLAN
Build passes successfully.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
/DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.java 4ef2152
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12028/diff/
Testing
---
Tested dedicating zone, then deploying vms from other accounts, it fails now.
Also if no affinity group is chosen for the same account, vm deployment fails.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
://reviews.apache.org/r/11627/diff/
Testing
---
Tested on local setup.
Build successful.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
---
Tested on local setup.
Build successful.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
://reviews.apache.org/r/12326/diff/
Testing
---
Created a shared network.
Added the NIC to a vm with error state, causing a NIC entry in db but removed
as not null.
Added the same network again without error state, the network gets added.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
://reviews.apache.org/r/12510/diff/
Testing
---
If domain has dedicated resources, cleanup=true will release dedication and
delete the domain.
cleanup=false will not release dedication and will not delete the domain.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
- Saksham
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12510/#review23089
---
On July 12, 2013, 2:01 p.m., Saksham Sr
the domain.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java 9968690
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12720/diff/
Testing
---
Migrated VMs across explicitly dedicated hosts and alerts are generated.
Migrated VMs across implicitly dedicated hosts and alerts are generated.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
The fix should qualify for 4.1.1
Thanks,
Saksham
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 6:41 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alena Prokharchyk; Devdeep Singh
Cc: Saksham Srivastava; cloudstack
Subject: RE: Review Request 12510
implicitly dedicated hosts and alerts are generated.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
ws.apache.org/r/12720/#review23372
---
On July 19, 2013, 11:52 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> h
generated.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
implicitly dedicated hosts and alerts are generated.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
---
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
creating template with virtual size.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
/StorageUsageParser.java 337e8e2
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12852/diff/
Testing
---
Usage event generated for creating template with virtual size.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
Not there in 4.2?
-Original Message-
From: Isaac Chiang [mailto:isaacchi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 3:12 PM
To: Pranav Saxena
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Git Push Summary
Hi all,
I've been working on re-factoring the dedication UI code in these d
/schema-410to420.sql f9417a0
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12811/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
|
++-++-+-+-+---+-+-+--+---+---+--+
Build passed.
Patch applies cleanly.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
://reviews.apache.org/r/12993/diff/
Testing
---
Build is successful.
Patch applies cleanly.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
---------
On July 26, 2013, 12:42 p.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/12968/
>
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/12968/#comment47832>
Min, I have created a new patch addressing all the concerns, also removed
extra checks.
- Saksham Srivastava
On July 27, 2013, 6:58 p.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
>
> ---
|
++-++-+-+-+---+-+-+--+---+---+--+
Build passed.
Patch applies cleanly.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
type: XenServer
processed: 0
virtual_size: NULL
Build passed.
Patch applies cleanly.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
Isaac, I tried some of your changes. Looks good.
Regards,
Saksham
-Original Message-
From: Isaac Chiang [mailto:isaacchi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 3:12 PM
To: Pranav Saxena
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Git Push Summary
Hi all,
I've been working
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12968/#review24049
---
On July 27, 2013, 6:58 p.m., Saksham Srivastava w
, you should just generate usage event for this
> > zone.
>
> Saksham Srivastava wrote:
> The reason I do it is because, this part of code will be executed only
> once even when template is cross zone.
> If I do not generate all the events here, only the first template that
&
server/test/com/cloud/vm/DeploymentPlanningManagerImplTest.java 10e23d7
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13266/diff/
Testing
---
Root admin is now able to deploy vms on a zone dedicated to a sub domain.
Build is successful.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
; Saksham Srivastava
Subject: RE: Reverting 17267794adb2bab923fb20515a7b943780d61921
+1. Provided git allows to make a specific file as read-only.
> -Original Message-
> From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 12:01 PM
> To: dev@cloudstac
to account/domain and do not use affinity group of type Explicit
Dedication -> VM deployment fails.
Dedicate zone to appropriate account/domain and use affinity group of type
Explicit Dedication -> VM deployment passes.
Build passes.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
CIDR, not the
range.
* Please mention that feature is not supported in shared networks.
Thanks,
Saksham
From: Radhika Puthiyetath
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 5:44 PM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Saksham Srivastava;
Abhinav Roy
Subject: [Doc] IP Address Reservation
If there are no empty hosts present, the test returns without further
dedication or deploying vms.
If there is a single empty host present, the host is dedicated and vm is
deployed.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
py e1991ac
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13377/diff/
Testing
---
If there are no empty hosts present, the test returns without further
dedication or deploying vms.
If there is a single empty host present, the host is dedicated and vm is
deployed.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
CIDR: 10.1.1.0/24 (10.1.1.1-10.1.1.254, Broadcast: 10.1.1.255)
Reserved Range: 10.1.1.64-10.1.1.254
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
becomes 10.1.1.0/26
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
Changing the subject and reposting.
-Original Message-
From: Abhinav Roy [mailto:abhinav@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 10:36 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [IP Reservation] Is VM creation using the reserved IPs on
cloudstack managed hosts supported?
Hi,
Hi,
Using addNicToVirtualMachine API user can add multiple NICs to a VM
I am also able to add multiple NICs to a VM on the same isolated guest network.
Is this a valid scenario??
If yes what could be the use case for the same?
Thanks,
Saksham
not clear :(
> Can you give a detailed step by step procedure of
> "creation of VMs using the reserved IP (after doing IP reservation) on
> cloudstack managed hosts supported?"
>
> On 4/12/13 8:00 AM, "Saksham Srivastava"
> wrote:
>
>> Changing the sub
r NIC).
Should we allow only one of them, as they both tend to serve the same purpose,
or am I missing something?
Thanks,
Saksham
From: Marcus Sorensen [shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 9:03 PM
To: Saksham Srivastava
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subjec
Following the discussion on bug:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-645 , there needs to be some
work done for enhancing VMware support for the feature Add/Remove Network on
VM.
I will be updating the FS soon and will send out for review.
Thanks,
Saksham
FS is available at :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Add+Remove+Networks+to+VMs+%28Enhanced%29
Thanks,
Saksham
On Monday 15 April 2013 11:11 PM, Saksham Srivastava wrote:
> Following the discussion on bug:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-645 ,
fected.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
--
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10005/#review19396
-----------
On April 19, 2013, 9:45 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
>
> ---
/20, guestVmCidr : 10.0.151.0/20
=> Existing Reservation is not affected.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
://reviews.apache.org/r/10005/diff/
Testing
---
CIDR : 10.0.144.0/20, Network CIDR : null, guestVmCidr : 10.0.151.0/20 =>
Reservation is not applied.
CIDR : 10.0.144.0/21, Network CIDR : 10.0.144.0/20, guestVmCidr : 10.0.151.0/20
=> Existing Reservation is not affected.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
Yes creating multiple vlans with different CIDRs is possible.
Thanks,
Saksham
On Tuesday 23 April 2013 05:14 PM, Sean Truman wrote:
> All,
>
> Is it possible for me to define a guest network lets say 10.8.0.x/24 Tagged
> with VLAN of 500 and then another guest network with 10.9.0.x/24 with VLAN
>
10:04 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10078/
> ---
>
> (Upd
roadcast IP (10.1.1.255) for the entire network.
Am I missing something?
Regards,
Saksham
From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 3:55 PM
To: Saksham Srivastava; Murali Reddy
Cc: cloudstack
Subject: RE: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1748: IP Reservation
Hi Mice ,
I just saw your commit for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2277
So I recently picked this bug, marked it as "in progress" as I was
working on it and was about to submit the patch for the same, but then I
saw that you already fixed it :)
A quick comment :
The fix ma
after a
> reboot, can you confirm it in your env?
>
> Regards
> Mice
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Saksham Srivastava [mailto:saksham.srivast...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 4:37 PM
> To: Mice Xia; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Fix for CLOU
Hi,
I did a fresh setup of CloudStack master,
Both the system vms are running fine and the secondary storage is also
shown enabled.
But the built-in template is not getting downloaded.
ISO Registration happens but the ISO download is not initiated.
I keep on getting this message in the logs:
20
elated
to CLOUDSTACK-2064
On 10-May-2013, at 7:20 PM, "Saksham Srivastava"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did a fresh setup of CloudStack master,
> Both the system vms are running fine and the secondary storage is also
> shown enabled.
> But the built-in template is not getting down
Congratulations Devdeep :)
-Original Message-
From: Abhinav Roy [mailto:abhinav@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 8:50 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Devdeep Singh
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Devdeep Singh
Congratulations Devdeep :)
-Original Message-
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11156/diff/
Testing
---
Tested manually.
Rat build passed.
Rebased to latest master.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
Congrats Swamy.
On Friday 24 May 2013 02:51 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Venkata Swamy to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that they have accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute
Congrats Sailaja :)
On Friday 24 May 2013 02:50 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Sailaja Mada to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that they have accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to contrib
plugins/dedicated-resources/test/org/apache/cloudstack/dedicated/DedicatedApiUnitTest.java
Marvin Test: To dedicate host, create affinity group, deploy-vm, check if vm is
deployed on the dedicated host.
Rat Build Successful.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
Successful.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
the dedicated host.
Rat Build Successful.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
iption to be
> > specific not generic ("release the dedication")
Fixed for all resources.
- Saksham
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11379/#review2
f/
Testing
---
Unittest: For the new APIs and Service, added unit tests under :
plugins/dedicated-resources/test/org/apache/cloudstack/dedicated/DedicatedApiUnitTest.java
Marvin Test: To dedicate host, create affinity group, deploy-vm, check if vm is
deployed on the dedicated host.
Rat Build Successful.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
is
deployed on the dedicated host.
Rat Build Successful.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
affinity group, deploy-vm, check if vm is
deployed on the dedicated host.
Rat Build Successful.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
d on the dedicated host.
Rat Build Successful.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
|
| 28 | NETWORK.OFFERING.ASSIGN | 2 | 2013-05-29 12:31:58 | 1 |
3 | 8 | 8 |NULL | 0 | NULL
| 0 |
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
edicated host.
Rat Build Successful.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
/cloudstack/dedicated/DedicatedApiUnitTest.java
Marvin Test: To dedicate host, create affinity group, deploy-vm, check if vm is
deployed on the dedicated host.
Rat Build Successful.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
ver/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java d2e5aaa
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18683/diff/
Testing
---
Adding new guest IP range passes smoothly.
Adding new public IP ranges passes smoothly.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
volume without tags
attaching local volume with different tags
attaching shared volume
Build passes successfully.
Patch applies cleanly.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
Marcus, as a committer can you kindly commit it too.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Marcus
Sorensen
Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 10:09 PM
To: Marcus Sorensen; Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Cc: Saksham Srivastava; cloudstack
Subject: Re
Thanks, I am still not there :)
-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 10:48 AM
To: Saksham Srivastava
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Subject: Re: Review Request 18683: CLOUDSTACK-6194: Failed to increase Shared
attaching local volume with different tags
attaching shared volume
Build passes successfully.
Patch applies cleanly.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
---
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
