RE: Security Groups

If you are using Xenserver hosts , can you make sure you have the CSP packages installed? -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Michael Phillips [mailto:mphilli7...@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 9:33 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Security Groups I pos

RE: Creating an instance with ssh key pair

To deploy Vm using ssh key pairs you will need to use a template that has SSH Key Gen Scripts in it. Only then you will be able to ssh into the instance using ssh key. -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Gaurav Aradhye [mailto:gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com] Sent: Thursday, Septe

RE: Connection Refused

You can try setting this global parameter- secstorage.allowed.internal.sites to allow for "mirrors.liquidweb.com" . Or , If you register the iso using the Ip address instead of mirrors.liquidweb.com , it should work as well. -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Maurice Lawler [m

RE: Connection Refused

After changing the global variable , can you see if restarting the SSVM helps? -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Maurice Lawler [mailto:maurice.law...@me.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 5:58 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sangeetha Hariharan Subject: Re: Connection

Re: Review Request 14469: CLOUDSTACK-4637: Fix failures in test_egress_fw_rules.py

loyed with egress_policy=True which is the default. create_vm() should be called with egress_policy=False , to match the changes that is done for expected_result. - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 3, 2013, 2:33 p.m., Girish Shilamkar wrote: > >

RE: event bus details

I had logged a similar bug where the UUID of the user that was disabled and the UUID of the domain that was deleted is not included: CLOUDSTACK-1673 - AWS Regions - Events - User disable / Domain Delete event does not include the UUID of the user/domain that was disabled. -Thanks Sangeetha

RE: Console Proxy VM failed to start

You can free IPs from op_dc_ip_address_alloc table. update nic_id, reservation_id and taken as null for the entry that has timestamp marked as "taken" but is not being really allocated to any system Vm yet. -Thanks Sangeetha From: Maurice Lawler [mailto:maurice.law...@me.com] Sent: Thursday, J

RE: Regions in 4.1

There is no UI support for regions in 4.1. All API calls relating to regions feature is implemented. Note that cloudstack does not do data sync between regions. There are few open issues relating to Regions and Event notifications: CLOUDSTACK-1673 - AWS Regions - Events - User disable / Domain D

RE: Instructions to *consume* events in another region?

Management server can be configured to publish CloudStack events to RabbitMQ server. Documentation relating to Event Notification can found in - http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Admin_Guide/events.html#event-framework -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message

RE: Instructions to *consume* events in another region?

cloudstack -Thanks Sangeetha --Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 1:31 PM To: Subject: Re: Instructions to *consume* events in another region? On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote: > Managem

RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

I tried upgrade from 4.0 -> 4.1 using Rhel6.3 binaries and Xenhost in Advanced zone set up and upgrade succeeds. After upgrade , I was able to deploy Vms in new network without any issues. Deploying Vms in existing networks succeed. But Vms are not given any ip address. In router, I see that th

RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

s) as part of Upgrade procedure? -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:02 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Sangeetha Hariharan Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1 Ok, found

RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

ssues will arise? On Mar 28, 2013 11:38 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:51:16AM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote: > > Can we get a confirmation on the approach we want to take? > > > > 1. We are going to fix the router for the case - &qu

RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

ent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:18 PM To: Sangeetha Hariharan Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1 On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:28:33AM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote: > Then we can go with the option of reboot (start and stop) of all the system

RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

re to the fresh installed 4.1 DB. -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message----- From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:22 PM To: Chip Childers Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1 Cre

RE: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1844) Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - KVM host agent.properties is not restored as part of upgrading the binaries from 4.0 to 4.1.

sted 4.1 rpms and we copy the old agent.properties, everything started up fine. I'll take a look. More info on your test setup is appreciated. On Mar 28, 2013 7:43 PM, "Sangeetha Hariharan (JIRA)" wrote: > Sangeetha Harihar

RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules

Had the following questions after going over the spec - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-+Affinity-Anti-affinity+groups : 1.In the API changes section - For all the API calls listed can we include if the parameters are optional/Required? 2.Can new DB changes introduce

RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules

Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 7:51 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules Comments inline. Thanks, Prachi -Original Message- From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.h

RE: [ACS41] Another day, another bug list

* CLOUDSTACK-1874 * AWS Regions - Account table in cloud_usage DB has region_id. Kishan / Sangeetha - I'm not quite sure if this is actually critical. Frankly it doesn't sound like it is. Can we either resolve it or downgrade it? >>This was logged as Critical only because it is a DB schema cha

[DISCUSS] Upgrade from 4.0 -> 4.1 ( components.xml and db.propetries)

Wanted to discuss about how to deal with components.xml and db.properties when upgrading from 4.0 ->4.1. 1. If someone has made changes to your existing copy of the file components.xml in your previous-version CloudStack installation , after upgrade they will have to translate these change

RE: [DISCUSS] Upgrade from 4.0 -> 4.1 ( components.xml and db.propetries)

their existing config adding the lines you mention. On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Sangeetha Hariharan < sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com> wrote: > Wanted to discuss about how to deal with components.xml and > db.properties when upgrading from 4.0 ->4.1. > > > 1. If

RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules

Message- From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 11:08 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules Prachi , Thanks for your response. Had 1 follow up question

RE: [DISCUSS] Upgrade from 4.0 -> 4.1 ( components.xml and db.propetries)

4.0 -> 4.1: db.awsapi.username= db.awsapi.password= db.awsapi.host= db.awsapi.port= You have to add these entries to db.properties , if you want AWS query APIs to work. -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com] S

[ACS42][QA]Test Plan for "Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules"

Test cases for " Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules" is posted here - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Test+Paln+for+Affinity-Anti-affinity+Rules. Reference FS: - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-+Affinity-Anti-affinity+groups Please review and pr

RE: [ACS42][QA]Test Plan for "Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules"

riginal Message- From: srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of prasanna Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 6:24 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS42][QA]Test Plan for "Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules" On 4 April 2013 10:40, Sangeetha

RE: [ACS42][QA]Test Plan for "Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules"

tsav.prasa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of prasanna Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 6:24 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS42][QA]Test Plan for "Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules" On 4 April 2013 10:40, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote: > Test cases for " Affinity / Anti-affi

RE: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring

Min, Could you also include the details of the API changes (new parameters) that will be proposed as part of this feature? Also it would be helpful if you list the request and response parameters for the new API calls. For all the API calls that are being deprecated , is there any specific err

RE: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring

e to another. As you said, Vmware deployment needs these VMs(as Vmware can't directly download template into primary storage), and old NFS based secondary storage deployment model needs them(data copy when cross zone). > How does this change? > > On 4/8/13 6:34 PM, "

RE: CLOUDSTACK-1732

Thank you Marcus. Test with the latest build from master. When deploying a Vm on a IP6 network , we see the dnsmasq service running successfully in the router . Vms get deployed successfully and get an Ipv6 address. I have closed the bug. -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Sh

RE: The given command does not exist or it is not available for user

I have seen this issue happen intermittently when the management server has not yet loaded all the components but we are able to access the management server UI. At this point , when we log in , we are presented with " The given command does not exist or it is not available for user". But when

RE: How to set the default network when I specify IP use "iptonetworklist" parameter when deploy a vm?

When using iptonetworklist when deploying Vms ,first entry in the iptonetworklist ( iptonetworklist[0].networkid) becomes the default network. -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 9:32 AM To: dev

RE: How to set the default network when I specify IP use "iptonetworklist" parameter when deploy a vm?

#x27;t specify the default network by set it in iptonetworklist[0]. maybe a commit after 3.02 has solve this problem? 2013/4/16 Sangeetha Hariharan > When using iptonetworklist when deploying Vms ,first entry in the > iptonetworklist ( iptonetworklist[0].networkid) becomes t

RE: CLOUDSTACK-1747: fresh deploydb bug in 4.1 requires cherry-pick commits from master

I still see this issue on master build , where after executing cloudstack-setup-databases DB version is still pointing to 4.0.0. I have logged the following bug to track this issue: CLOUDSTACK-2052 - After executing cloudstack-setup-databases , DB version is still pointing to 4.0.0. -Thanks

RE: [ACS42][QA]Issues with latest Master Build (Xenserver)

I am not able to start user Vms successfully using the build from master. I am testing with Xenserver 6.0.2 hosts. User Vm starts successfully but it gets to stopped state after few seconds. deployVM reports success . But later on cluster sync sees this Vm in stopped state and sends a StopComma

RE: [ACS42][QA]Issues with latest Master Build (Xenserver)

n Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:33:40PM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote: > I am not able to start user Vms successfully using the build from master. I > am testing with Xenserver 6.0.2 hosts. > User Vm starts successfully but it gets to stopped state after few seconds. > > deployVM reports

RE: [QA][ACS42] Test Plan for Change Account Membership CS-1390

Parth, As part of verification after the change in ownership is done , can you include the following checks: 1. New owner is able to start the Vm successfully. 2. Original owner is not able to list this Vm. 3. Vm is not part of the original isolated network anymore and cannot be accessed from o

RE: [ACS42][QA]Issues with latest Master Build (Xenserver)

know why we are not able to deploy Vms with lesser RAM ? Is anybody else facing this issue? -Thanks Sangeetha ________ From: Sangeetha Hariharan Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 9:59 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ACS42][QA]Issues with latest Mas

RE: ssvm service name (vmware)

It would be cloudstack-agent. Thanks Sangeetha Sent from my Windows Phone From: Fang Wang Sent: ‎20-‎04-‎2013 02:28 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: ssvm service name (vmware) Hi, I'd like t

RE: ssvm service name (vmware)

Sorry ..It is cloud . It is cloudstack-agent only for KVM hosts. -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 4:07 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: ssvm service name (vmware) It

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1820 - Automation: Need to add automation for AWS Style region feature

--- Yes , master Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request: fix test scripts to conform with library changes relating to account object

, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request: fix regions related test script to conform with library changes relating to account object

/test_regions.py PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10941/diff/ Testing --- Able to execute test_regions.py . Earlier there were syntax errors. Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1820 - Automation: Need to add automation for AWS Style region feature

://reviews.apache.org/r/10936/diff/ Testing (updated) --- Executed the scripts against a CloudStack set up and made sure they executed successfully. Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

RE: Review request for Test Plan for Deploy virtual machine user data enhancements

Shweta, I have 1 suggestion after going over the test plans. As part of validations for your test cases could you also include the check to make sure that we are able to fetch the user data successfully from within the user Vms. Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Shweta Agarwal [

RE: IPv6 support

Hi, IPV6 feature is supported in 4.1 but it is experimental and UI is not available. Also you will need to use System Vm templates that have support for ipv6. Only Phase 1 from the FS - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/IPv6+support is supported. In 4.2 , there will be n

RE: listAffinityGroups API parameters

Hi, listAffinityGroups API should support for account and domainId parameters . All regular users (other than admin users) can list only affinity group that belongs to them. But Admin users should be able to list affinity groups that belong to other accounts passed in account and domain Id para

RE: [VOTE] Move forward with 4.1 without a Xen-specific fix for CLOUDSTACK-2492?

Templates for IPV6 feature in 4.1 is different from the 4.2 templates. They are hosted here - http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/ as 4.1.0-experimental-ipv6-* . Also support was extended only for KVM and Xenserver. -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:s

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sailaja Mada

Congratulations Sailaja!! -Original Message- From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 2:25 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sailaja Mada Woohooo, congrats Sailaja. On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Pranav Saxena

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Venkata Swamy

Congratulations Swamy. -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 2:33 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Venkata Swamy Venkata, congrats! On 5/23/13 2:21

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Nux, - I created an instance - I added a rule (ping) in the otherwise untouched default security group - I added a rule (ping) in the otherwise untouched default security group Result: I could not ping the instance >> In this case , is it possible that when you tried to ping the instance , the >>

Review Request 22705: Test cases relating to access checks for listVirtualMachine() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain admin and regular us

test_listVM_by_id_as_user_vmsfromotherdomain (integration.component.test_acl_listvm.TestVMList) ... === TestName: test_listVM_by_id_as_user_vmsfromotherdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 95 tests in 134.796s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request 22706: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listVolume() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain adm

) ... === TestName: test_listVolume_by_id_as_user_volumefromsamedomaindifferentaccount | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 95 tests in 139.480s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22706: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listVolume() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain

(integration.component.test_acl_listvolume.TestVolumeList) ... === TestName: test_listVolume_by_id_as_user_volumefromsamedomaindifferentaccount | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 95 tests in 139.480s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request 22707: Test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listSnapshot() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain admin

: test_listSnapshot_by_id_as_user_snapshotfromsamedomaindifferentaccount | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 95 tests in 197.637s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22707: Test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listSnapshot() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain ad

: test_listSnapshot_by_id_as_user_snapshotfromsamedomaindifferentaccount | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 95 tests in 197.637s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request 22709: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regular us

(integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_30_restartNetwork_user_foruserinotherdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 33 tests in 256.713s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request 22712: This Test suite has test cases relating to acess checks for deleteNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regular users

(integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork_delete.TestIsolatedNetworkDelete) ... === TestName: test_deleteNetwork_user_foruserinsamedomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 10 tests in 61.766s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request 22713: This Test suite has test cases for deploying Virtual Machine using impersonation (passing account and domainId parameters) for shared network

: test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_regularuser_scope_all_crossdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 51 tests in 197.482s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22709: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regula

n one single function and maintenance will be easy? I will define all the exception entities in codes.py and have a method verifyMsginException(exception,message) which will verify that the exception has the message. - sangeetha ---

Re: Review Request 22709: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regula

(integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_30_restartNetwork_user_foruserinotherdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 33 tests in 256.713s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22709: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regula

test_30_restartNetwork_user_foruserinotherdomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_30_restartNetwork_user_foruserinotherdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 33 tests in 256.713s OK Thanks, sangeetha

Re: Review Request 22709: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regula

he domain ... === TestName: test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_scope_domain_withsubdomainaccess_parentdomainuser | Status : SUCCESS === ok # Validate that an admin user in a subdomain is allowed to deploy VM in a shared network created with scope="domain" and with subdomain access for t

Re: Review Request 22709: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regula

k_scope_domain_withsubdomainaccess_parentdomainuser | Status : SUCCESS === ok # Validate that an admin user in a subdomain is allowed to deploy VM in a shared network created with scope="domain" and with subdomain access for the parent domain ... === TestName: test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_scope_domain_withsubdomainaccess_subdomainadminuser | Status : SUCCESS === ok # Validate that regular user in a subdomain is allowed to deploy VM in a shared network created with scope="domain" and with subdomain access for the parent domain ... === TestName: test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_scope_domain_withsubdomainaccess_subdomainuser | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 28 tests in 129.477s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 14469: CLOUDSTACK-4637: Fix failures in test_egress_fw_rules.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14469/#review27163 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 16, 2013, 2:27

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya

Congrats Sowmya! -Original Message- From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:43 AM To: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya Congrats Sowmya! On 23-Oct-2013, at 4:16 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > The Project Management

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Shilamkar, Girish

Congrats Girish!! -Original Message- From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:59 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Shilamkar, Girish Congratz, Girish -Original Message- From: Prasa

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara

Congrats Talluri!! -Original Message- From: Suresh Sadhu [mailto:suresh.sa...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:16 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara Congrats Talluri -Original Message- From: Sanjeev

RE: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu

Congratulations Sanjeev! -Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 7:31 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu Congratulations Sanjeev! Regards, Somesh -Original Mess

RE: Snapshot partial file creates are not cleaned up.

Hi, Following are couple of issues that have been logged to track this issue: CLOUDSTACK-5395 - When backup snapshot fails because of backup.snapshot.wait time exceeding , the vhd entries form the primary store is not getting cleared. This bug was reopened to address - "cleaning up of snapshot

Re: Review Request 22706: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listVolume() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain

-- Ran 95 tests in 139.480s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22706: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listVolume() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain

-- Ran 95 tests in 139.480s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22705: Test cases relating to access checks for listVirtualMachine() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain admin and regula

: test_listVM_by_id_as_user_vmsfromotherdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 95 tests in 134.796s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22705: Test cases relating to access checks for listVirtualMachine() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain admin and regula

134.796s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22712: This Test suite has test cases relating to acess checks for deleteNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regular users

samedomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork_delete.TestIsolatedNetworkDelete) ... === TestName: test_deleteNetwork_user_foruserinsamedomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 10 tests in 61.766s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22707: Test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listSnapshot() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain ad

TestName: test_listSnapshot_by_id_as_user_snapshotfromsamedomaindifferentaccount | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 95 tests in 197.637s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22707: Test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listSnapshot() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain ad

in 197.637s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22712: This Test suite has test cases relating to acess checks for deleteNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regular users

Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 10 tests in 61.766s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request 25518: CLOUDSTACK-7035-[Automation] - Automate ACL test cases relating to listNetworks() for isolated and shared networks.

ACK-6973 -I AM - listNetworks - When Domain Admin calls listNetwork with listall=false , isolated networks belonging to other users in the domain is also listed. CLOUDSTACK-6939 - IAM - DomainAdmin - Not able to listNetwork belonging to a subdomain by passing uuid. CLOUDSTACK-6937- IAM - ROOT admin - Not able to list network owned by accounts under any domain by passing uuid. Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 25518: CLOUDSTACK-7035-[Automation] - Automate ACL test cases relating to listNetworks() for isolated and shared networks.

nging to other users is listed. CLOUDSTACK-6973 -I AM - listNetworks - When Domain Admin calls listNetwork with listall=false , isolated networks belonging to other users in the domain is also listed. CLOUDSTACK-6939 - IAM - DomainAdmin - Not able to listNetwork belonging to a subdomain by passing uuid. CLOUDSTACK-6937- IAM - ROOT admin - Not able to list network owned by accounts under any domain by passing uuid. Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 25518: CLOUDSTACK-7035-[Automation] - Automate ACL test cases relating to listNetworks() for isolated and shared networks.

istall=false , isolated networks belonging to other users in the domain is also listed. CLOUDSTACK-6939 - IAM - DomainAdmin - Not able to listNetwork belonging to a subdomain by passing uuid. CLOUDSTACK-6937- IAM - ROOT admin - Not able to list network owned by accounts under any domain by passing uuid. Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 22713: This Test suite has test cases for deploying Virtual Machine using impersonation (passing account and domainId parameters) for shared network

rossdomain (integration.component.test_acl_sharednetwork_deployVM-impersonation.TestSharedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_as_regularuser_scope_all_crossdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 51 tests in 197.482s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request 25722: CLOUDSTACK-7567 - Automate ACL test cases relating to depoying VM in shared network with different scopes - All/Domain/Domain with subdomain/Account for Admin, domain admin and r

: SUCCESS === ok Validate that regular user in a subdomain is allowed to deploy VM in a shared network created with scope="domain" and with subdomain access for the parent domain ... === TestName: test_deployVM_in_sharedNetwork_scope_domain_withsubdomainaccess_subdomainuser | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 28 tests in 125.258s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 25749: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-7573: ISO Guest OS Change

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25749/#review53756 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Sept. 17, 2014, 7:28

Review Request 25796: CLOUDSTACK-7585 - Automation - Fix test_acl_sharednetwork.py and test_acl_sharednetwork_deployVM-impersonation.py to pick "Shared Network" network offering when creating networks

| 7 | | 422 | SharedNetwork-Account| 7 | | 423 | SharedNetwork-All-impersonation | 7 | | 424 | SharedNetwork-Domain-nosubdomain-impersonation | 7 | | 425 | SharedNetwork-Domain-withsubdomain-impersonation | 7 | | 426 | SharedNetwork-Account-impersonation | 7 | +-+--+-+ Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 25518: CLOUDSTACK-7035-[Automation] - Automate ACL test cases relating to listNetworks() for isolated and shared networks.

belonging to other users is listed. CLOUDSTACK-6973 -I AM - listNetworks - When Domain Admin calls listNetwork with listall=false , isolated networks belonging to other users in the domain is also listed. CLOUDSTACK-6939 - IAM - DomainAdmin - Not able to listNetwork belonging to a subdomain by passing uuid. CLOUDSTACK-6937- IAM - ROOT admin - Not able to list network owned by accounts under any domain by passing uuid. Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request 25841: CLOUDSTACK-7587 - Automation - Add simulator_only attribute to acl related test cases.

se" is used for the acl related test suites , not test case gets executed. Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request 26776: CLOUDSTACK-7732 - Automate test cases relating to enabling/disabling of zone/pod/cluster/host

=3) Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Review Request 27000: CLOUDSTACK-7762 -[Automation] - Fix test failure for test_02_revert_vm_snapshots in smoke/test_vm_snapshots.py

Tested with advanced zone set up with Xenserver hosts: Test to create VM snapshots ... === TestName: test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to revert VM snapshots ... === TestName: test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to delete vm snapshots ... === TestName: test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 3 tests in 795.005s OK Thanks, sangeetha hariharan

Re: Review Request 27049: CLOUDSTACK-7769 - Fixed test_ssvm.py script

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27049/#review57878 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 22, 2014, 7:19

Re: Review Request 27195: CLOUDSTACK-7788: Fixed the script "test_escalations_instances.py" - Regular Users should not use "expunge" parameter for destroying a VM

config parameters? - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 25, 2014, 2:59 p.m., Chandan Purushothama wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache

Re: Review Request 27193: CLOUDSTACK-7788: Fixed the script 'test_dynamic_compute_offering.py' to be run only on hardware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27193/#review58512 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 25, 2014, 2:38

Re: Review Request 27193: CLOUDSTACK-7788: Fixed the script 'test_dynamic_compute_offering.py' to be run only on hardware

> On Oct. 25, 2014, 4:16 p.m., sangeetha hariharan wrote: > > Ship It! In this case, simulator does not support for scale operation which is the reason for the failures. Please log a ticket to have simulator support for this operation. -

Re: Review Request 27192: CLOUDSTACK-7787: Fixed the script 'test_lb_secondary_ip.py' to be run only on hardware

VMs for validation has been marked for not being picked up by simulator runs. - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 25, 2014, 2:23 p.m., Chandan Purushothama wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit

Re: Review Request 27191: CLOUDSTACK-7786 : Fixed the script 'test_haproxy.py' to be run only on hardware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27191/#review58516 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 25, 2014, 2:12

Re: Review Request 27191: CLOUDSTACK-7786 : Fixed the script 'test_haproxy.py' to be run only on hardware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27191/#review58517 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 25, 2014, 2:12

Re: Review Request 27195: CLOUDSTACK-7788: Fixed the script "test_escalations_instances.py" - Regular Users should not use "expunge" parameter for destroying a VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27195/#review58525 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 25, 2014, 6:50

Re: Review Request 27305: CLOUDSTACK-7810 : Fixed the script "test_vpc_vm_life_cycle.py"

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27305/#review58926 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 28, 2014, 8:45

Re: Review Request 27307: CLOUDSTACK-7811 : Fixed the script "test_persistent_networks.py"

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27307/#review58929 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 28, 2014, 8:50

Re: Review Request 27308: CLOUDSTACK-7812 : Fixed the script "maint/test_redundant_router_network_rules.py"

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27308/#review58931 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Oct. 28, 2014, 8:55

Re: Review Request 27845: CLOUDSTACK-7876 - Fixed the script 'test_vpc_vm_life_cycle.py' - Prevent Destruction of VM before it can be recovered

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27845/#review60818 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Nov. 10, 2014, 11:47

  1   2   >