Mike can you try by adding kvmclock.disable=true in your
agent.properties and test if it then works (this is a workaround).
On Friday 06 February 2015 01:31 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
Hi everyone,
So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS 4.5
(due to this kvmclock
@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Thanks for the feedback, Andrei.
I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still
is,
so it's great to have your comments.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM
Thanks, Marcus
I responded to Rohit's e-mail and then later read yours. :)
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
No, it won't help. It won't remove the kvmclock xml, just generate xml
that explicitly disables kvmclock. See my email above.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at
No, it won't help. It won't remove the kvmclock xml, just generate xml
that explicitly disables kvmclock. See my email above.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Sure, Rohit, I can try that. I'm pretty sure I did put that property in
already, but
Sure, Rohit, I can try that. I'm pretty sure I did put that property in
already, but let me try that again in case I spelled something wrong or
made some other data-entry error in the file that led to it not working for
me.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
with kvmclock.disable=false?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 06:45:14
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
I
:22:15
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
CentOS *6* users, that is...
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
If a vm is pv enabled, it gets the kvmclock timer xml attribute,
regardless. Setting kvmclock.disable makes that timer xml explicitly
disable
with kvmclock.disable=false?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 06:45:14
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
I
...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 06:45:14
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other
things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt
packages (as I'm temped to believe
- Original Message -
From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 16:22:15
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
CentOS *6* users, that is...
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
If a vm
as
Ubuntu 14.04 and 12.04.
Andrei
- Original Message -
From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Thanks for the feedback, Andrei.
I personally don't
Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Thanks for the feedback, Andrei.
I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still
is,
so it's great
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Cc: Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com,
dev@cloudstack.apache.org, int-toolkit
int-tool...@schubergphilis.com, int-cloud
int-cl...@schubergphilis.com
Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Hi everyone
...@schubergphilis.com,
dev@cloudstack.apache.org, int-toolkit
int-tool...@schubergphilis.com, int-cloud
int-cl...@schubergphilis.com
Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Hi everyone,
So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work
and 12.04.
Andrei
- Original Message -
From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Thanks for the feedback, Andrei.
I personally don't have a good
Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Thanks for the feedback, Andrei.
I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still
is,
so it's great to have your
FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on Ubuntu
12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same issue would
be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Hi Wilder,
The
Hi there,
We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have Ubuntu
12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04.
Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to fix? Not
being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool.
Just to add to the confusion, RHEL 6.3+ has had support for kvmclock,
even though it's version number is older, due to how they backport
things. It's a big mess. Ubuntu 12.04 is still behind on it though.
I'm remembering now that kvmclock was first merged for 4.1, then
backed out because of the
Looking at the code, it looks like this IS new for 4.5, I forget that
feature merge for this release was LAST SPRING!
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Thanks, Marcus
Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see how
If it helps, I've actually just set this Ubuntu system up recently. It has
never been used with CloudStack before (and I haven't quite got it working
due to that exception when I try to run a VM).
Basically I was setting up a new KVM env so I could test this code:
I just happen to be using 12.04.1, but I'm personally fine with upgrading.
I know that upgrading is sometimes easier said than done in production
environments, though, so it would be interesting to get feedback from users
on this.
On Sunday, February 1, 2015, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Rohit
As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04
(which is what I'm running).
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Hi Mike,
I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to
work for me. I’ve
Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was
able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case).
As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a
supported platform for CS 4.5.
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce
~Rajani
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski
I should point out that I'm on master.
On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Hi everyone,
Any news on this?
I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or
without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
I'm on
@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, 31 January, 2015 13:57:33
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
I was about to test 4.4 to 4.5 upgrade, but I'd rather have this kvmclock
thing fixed.
When will the next RC be cut?
Lucian
I've already cut RC2 that should include the kvmclock fixes.
--David
Actually, there are two sections in that doc that specify different Libvirt
versions (depending on what you need to do):
* 0.9.4
* 0.9.11 (maybe this version has to be compiled from source?)
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
It looks like our
Thanks, Marcus
Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see how
they resolved the issue, though.
This is what I see version wise (on Ubuntu 12.04.1):
cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo kvm --version
QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0),
I am able to manually create a VM on KVM using an ISO. I just can't create
a VM via CloudStack due to that exception.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the
following:
The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's a
thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to
target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were
changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and
Ubuntu
Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the
following:
2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see
the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0:
http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html
On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of libvirt).
I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it
says I'm at the latest.
What am I missing there? :)
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
That's a different error.
Hi everyone,
Any news on this?
I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or
without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
Thanks!
Mike
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Okay,
kvmclock has been fixed, some changes were made to
LibvirtComputingResource in 4.5 and master. it doesn't apply to 4.4.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Tomasz Zięba t.a.zi...@gmail.com wrote:
-1
quite simple issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8176
Hi Marcus,
On 23-Jan-2015, at 3:17 pm, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
kvmclock has been fixed, some changes were made to
LibvirtComputingResource in 4.5 and master. it doesn't apply to 4.4.
Just saw your changes on commit@, thanks for fixing it. I’ll test it and see if
it works in my
Hi Rohit,
Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it.
Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :)
Cheers,
Wilder
On 22 Jan 2015,
Hi Wilder,
Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5
branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks.
Regards.
On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry for the delay on the
Hi Wilder,
If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC.
At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83.
Thanks.
On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
Hi Rohit,
Tests were based on
Hi all,
Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has
been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work.
Remarks:
* I will test Basic Zone later today
* For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests
results. :)
There
-1
quite simple issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8176
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8175
2015-01-13 0:16 GMT+01:00 David Nalley da...@gnsa.us:
Hi folks,
I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
up for a vote:
Git
Hi Marcus,
Thanks for replying. I checked the code, we read the config value from
agent.properties to see if kvmclock.disabled param is true or false.
Based on that only we general suitable xml. I think codewise it looks
alright, what other improvements do you think we can do?
The libvirt
Hi,
On Monday 19 January 2015 06:00 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc.
mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk)
Yes please let'd do that.
Since yesterday, I've scanned over 400 issues on JIRA and
-1 (binding), just to be formal. As said, Rohit found a regression in
comparison to 4.4!
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 19 January 2015 06:00 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc.
I'd suggest in LibvirtComputingResource we wrap the call to
clock.setTimer for kvmclock in a libvirt version check and change the
parameters passed based on that (see variable
_hypervisorLibvirtVersion). I haven't tracked down exactly which
version shipped it, but it seems like someone was
So we likely will cancel this, but there's good discussion and problem
solving going on in this, I don't want people to ignore this because I
cancelled it.
--David
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
-1 (binding), just to be formal. As said, Rohit found
...or I guess we can just disable extra attributes altogether for
kvmclock, if we can confirm that it never should have had extra
options
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd suggest in LibvirtComputingResource we wrap the call to
clock.setTimer for kvmclock in
by any chance, I wanted to test VPC load-balancing without netscaler. on
4.3.x I have a dropdown list for Algorithm on the Load-Balancing features
of a Public IP. in 4.5.0 I don't see the list and it fail to create LB.
Thanks,
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Daan Hoogland
CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
(+ users)
Hi everyone,
David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test
this candidate.
In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository
built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740:
DEB: http
Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc.
mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk)
Op 15 jan. 2015 15:42 schreef Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com:
Hi,
Tested using KVM: While it was working for most cases it failed for me
(after
Rohit, the kvmclock error might be that we are trying to use a feature
of kvmclock that is missing in your particular version of qemu or
libvirt. We probably don't want to require kvmclock to be disabled
(though it is an option), so we can perhaps wrap the offending tick
code xml generation in a
Hi,
Tested using KVM: While it was working for most cases it failed for me
(after upgrades from 4.3.2) for few minor issues.
Due to this, I've to vote -1.
Browsing cluster level settings produced NPE. This issue has already
been fixed in 4.4 but somehow did not make in to 4.5/master. I've
packages as well will you?
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 13 January 2015 07:37
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
(+ users)
Hi everyone,
David has started
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 15 January 2015 09:33
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Hi Adrian,
I'll be creating CentOS7 packages soon, for that I need to procure and setup
a RHEL
+1 (binding)
Brought up a basic zone using devcloud4(Centos 6and XenServer
6.2.0-70446c), everything worked without issue system vms came up and
their agent connected.
Added Nux's macchinina distribution as a template.
Added Ubuntu as a template. (Loved the HVM checkbox addition to the UI).
Rohit,
I don’t suppose you will be creating the el7 packages as well will you?
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 13 January 2015 07:37
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack
Daan:
I am running it for at least 72 hours, though practice tells me the
vote period will be longer.
--David
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
David,
Can you be lenient with the 72 hour schedule on this one? I don't
think I personally can get to
David,
Can you be lenient with the 72 hour schedule on this one? I don't
think I personally can get to test this soon and we have two other
votes going on as well.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
+1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of
+1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of vm,
vpc, and several storage types.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
(+ users)
Hi everyone,
David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test
this
: Monday, 12 January, 2015 23:16:55
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Hi folks,
I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5
Hi folks,
I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
Source
Message -
From: David Nalley da...@gnsa.us
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 12 January, 2015 23:16:55
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Hi folks,
I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https
(+ users)
Hi everyone,
David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test this
candidate.
In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository
built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740:
DEB:
65 matches
Mail list logo
