On Aug 19, 2014, at 11:06 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2014, at 4:38 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
On 19-Aug-2014, at 10:17 pm, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
The fact that we basically have none, pushes me to argue
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Leo Simons lsim...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2014, at 11:06 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2014, at 4:38 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
On 19-Aug-2014, at 10:17 pm, Sebastien Goasguen
On Aug 22, 2014, at 6:04 AM, Leo Simons lsim...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2014, at 11:06 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2014, at 4:38 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
On 19-Aug-2014, at 10:17 pm, Sebastien Goasguen
are effective and properly
maintained.
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: ilya musayev [mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 August 2014 5:22 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.5 RM
David
Since CI has been mentioned several times, do you know where we
for past couple of years
with slow progress in this area i.e adding automated or unit tests with check
ins.
Thanks
/sudha
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 2:05 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: 4.5 RM
I see
IMHO we should not even release 4.5 until we have a agreed upon:
-what our issues are and why we released 4.4 and 4.3 late.
-taken action to resolve those issues
-guarantees that 4.5 will be on time
If we don't do that, I don't even know why we are putting ourselves through
the pain of a
+1 on what David said. Shared the same feelings as him, we really need to
focus on the high priority issue facing CloudStack. Gerrit/Github pull
request will definitely help in this regards.
Thanks
-min
On 8/19/14 10:15 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
IMHO we should not even release
about code review and CI?
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 10:16 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.5 RM
IMHO we should not even release 4.5 until we have a agreed upon:
-what our issues are and why we
Hey David!
Before you or anyone reads this, I want to say that I support what you’re
trying to do here.
I’ve few ideas and concerns so if anyone is skimming please go to the bottom
and read the list.
On 19-Aug-2014, at 7:15 pm, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
IMHO we should not even
+1 Agree that we need to have some form of CI to control basic quality
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 10:16 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.5 RM
IMHO we should not even release 4.5 until we have a agreed upon
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:15 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
IMHO we should not even release 4.5 until we have a agreed upon:
-what our issues are and why we released 4.4 and 4.3 late.
-taken action to resolve those issues
-guarantees that 4.5 will be on time
If we don't do
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.5 RM
IMHO we should not even release 4.5 until we have a agreed upon:
-what our issues are and why we released 4.4 and 4.3 late.
-taken action to resolve those issues
-guarantees that 4.5 will be on time
If we don't do that, I don't even know why
Hi Sebastien,
On 19-Aug-2014, at 10:17 pm, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
The fact that we basically have none, pushes me to argue for a change in git
workflow (see several other threads). because it will be way faster to start
gating commits using a new agreed upon workflow
I personally think that everyone has used Github and it would take
everyone less time to start using it
Plus one to using github. I found using review board for uploading .patch
files to be a horrible experience.
The fork and pull request nature of github in my view compliments git and a
neat
On Aug 19, 2014, at 4:38 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
On 19-Aug-2014, at 10:17 pm, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
The fact that we basically have none, pushes me to argue for a change in git
workflow (see several other threads). because it
David
Since CI has been mentioned several times, do you know where we stand
with donated hardware?
Thanks
ilya
On 8/19/14, 10:15 AM, David Nalley wrote:
IMHO we should not even release 4.5 until we have a agreed upon:
-what our issues are and why we released 4.4 and 4.3 late.
-taken action
Hi folks;
So we haven't had anyone step up to be release manager for 4.5 yet. So
you consider this either a threat or me volunteering depending on your
perspective. :)
If no one else steps up by midweek I'm happy to be the RM for 4.5. My
plan would be to likely hit feature freeze nearly
Hey David,
On 11-Aug-2014, at 3:24 pm, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Hi folks;
So we haven't had anyone step up to be release manager for 4.5 yet. So
you consider this either a threat or me volunteering depending on your
perspective. :)
Awesome, go for it!
If no one else steps up by
Hi Sebastien,
On 11-Aug-2014, at 5:35 pm, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 11, 2014, at 9:24 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Hi folks;
So we haven't had anyone step up to be release manager for 4.5 yet. So
you consider this either a threat or me volunteering
On Aug 11, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
On 11-Aug-2014, at 5:35 pm, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 11, 2014, at 9:24 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Hi folks;
So we haven't had anyone step up to be release
Thanks for being willing to take on this role, David!
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:24 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Hi folks;
So we haven't had anyone step up to be release manager for 4.5 yet. So
you consider this either a threat or me volunteering depending on your
perspective. :)
21 matches
Mail list logo
