Re: [Fwd: whirlycache]

2004-08-12 Thread Mats Norén
Yes, it would be interesting to see what could come out of that: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=108634103626603w=2 /Mats Hunsberger, Peter wrote: Don't recall if I ever pointed out this one: http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/people/dmodha/arcfast.pdf The basic

RE: StaticBucketMap

2004-08-12 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Hi, yes, this is the case; The event package still uses the StaticBucketMap; but the event package is not used by the ECM. However, the event package is used by Cocoon in the continuations manager. So, if you experience problems there, it might be related to the use of the StaticBucketMap. HTH

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30356] - CIncludeTransformer + event aware caching

2004-08-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30356. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30356] - CIncludeTransformer + event aware caching

2004-08-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30356. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30356] - CIncludeTransformer + event aware caching

2004-08-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30356. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30356] - CIncludeTransformer + event aware caching

2004-08-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30356. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[Help]How can I use non-ascii file name?

2004-08-12 Thread roy huang
Hi,all: Use reader to display jpg or gif is quite simple,like: map:match pattern=*.jpg map:read mime-type=image/jpg src=jpg/{1}.jpg / /map:match But if the file name is not ASCII but utf-8 or other encoding like .jpg (simplified Chinese),the resolver didn't resolve the name

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30356] - CIncludeTransformer + event aware caching

2004-08-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30356. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30356] - CIncludeTransformer + event aware caching

2004-08-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30356. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30356] - CIncludeTransformer + event aware caching

2004-08-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30356. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30356] - CIncludeTransformer + event aware caching

2004-08-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30356. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30356] - CIncludeTransformer + event aware caching

2004-08-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30356. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30356] - CIncludeTransformer + event aware caching

2004-08-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30356. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Request for a small change in CustomJXPathBinding

2004-08-12 Thread Bart Molenkamp
Hi all, Three days ago, I posted an email [1] with a small change request in custom binding. There is IMO a small problem when trying to bind a value on a bean that is null (ie. the value is null before saving it in a binding). The following line in CustomJXPathBinding.java:68 throws an

Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Unico Hommes
My experience with subversion since we switched is that the cocoon repository is painfully slow at least using subclipse. I haven't much previous experience with subversion but I was under the impression that it should be more performant then CVS? So, I am wondering whether this is a problem

RE: [Fwd: whirlycache]

2004-08-12 Thread Hunsberger, Peter
Mats Norén [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, it would be interesting to see what could come out of that: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=108634103626603w=2 /Mats Heck, your note is probably the place I found the reference in the first place, thanks. snipredundant

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27957] - JSP content type overrides serializer

2004-08-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27957. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30356] - CIncludeTransformer + event aware caching

2004-08-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30356. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Yepp, similar problems here. It doesn't matter if I use subclipse or CLI. My machine simply hangs for 10 minutes or more and all other applications are blocked. So, in fact this is currently a major pita: I'm waiting a quarter of my time for svn to do something :( and I'm even not able to read

RE: Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Carsten Ziegeler dijo: Yepp, similar problems here. It doesn't matter if I use subclipse or CLI. My machine simply hangs for 10 minutes or more and all other applications are blocked. So, in fact this is currently a major pita: I'm waiting a quarter of my time for svn to do something :( and

Re: Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Unico Hommes
Well at least my applications don't freeze up and I can do other things in the meantime. But to give an impression to others of how serious this is on Windows platform, the first mail I sent was just after I started 'synchronize' in subclipse: it is still running .. I know this is probably in

Re: Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Unico Hommes wrote: Well at least my applications don't freeze up and I can do other things in the meantime. But to give an impression to others of how serious this is on Windows platform, the first mail I sent was just after I started 'synchronize' in subclipse: it is

Re: Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Bruno Dumon
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 16:50, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Unico Hommes wrote: Well at least my applications don't freeze up and I can do other things in the meantime. But to give an impression to others of how serious this is on Windows platform, the first mail I sent was

Re: Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Adam R. B. Jack wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Unico Hommes wrote: Well at least my applications don't freeze up and I can do other things in the meantime. But to give an impression to others of how serious this is on Windows platform, the first mail I sent was just after I started 'synchronize'

Re: Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Ugo Cei
Il giorno 12/ago/04, alle 15:42, Unico Hommes ha scritto: My experience with subversion since we switched is that the cocoon repository is painfully slow at least using subclipse. I haven't much previous experience with subversion but I was under the impression that it should be more performant

Re: [RT] Concerns surrounding CocoonNG

2004-08-12 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Leo Sutic wrote: Niclas, the problem I have with Merlin/Metro is this: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=avalon-devm=108965397729686w=2 Do you have ANY idea just how incredibly hard it has been to develop for Merlin? I've been trying to get a whole platform out the door here at

Re: Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
I have couple of suggestions to Carsten and Unico: http://blog.reverycodes.com/archives/28.html Anything else I forgot? :) For me, when Eclipse (the new stuff) was trying to 'decorate' all files with the SVN status, it killed my machine. I've found Eclipse 3.x fat as all heck without extra

Re: Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Unico Hommes
Adam R. B. Jack wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Unico Hommes wrote: Well at least my applications don't freeze up and I can do other things in the meantime. But to give an impression to others of how serious this is on Windows platform, the first mail I sent was just after I started 'synchronize'

Re: Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Ugo Cei wrote: On OS X Panther: $ time svn update At revision 36287. real1m6.448s user0m2.010s sys 0m4.010s On Windows XP, HDD 7200 RPM, last access timestamp disabled: cocoon-2.2.X $ time svn up At revision 36287. real0m29.125s user0m1.632s sys 0m2.663s Most of the time

Re: Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Unico Hommes
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Adam R. B. Jack wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Unico Hommes wrote: Well at least my applications don't freeze up and I can do other things in the meantime. But to give an impression to others of how serious this is on Windows platform, the first mail I sent was just after I

Re: Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Unico Hommes
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Ugo Cei wrote: On OS X Panther: $ time svn update At revision 36287. real1m6.448s user0m2.010s sys 0m4.010s On Windows XP, HDD 7200 RPM, last access timestamp disabled: cocoon-2.2.X $ time svn up At revision 36287. real0m29.125s user0m1.632s sys

Re: Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Leszek Gawron
Unico Hommes wrote: My experience with subversion since we switched is that the cocoon repository is painfully slow at least using subclipse. I haven't much previous experience with subversion but I was under the impression that it should be more performant then CVS? So, I am wondering whether

Re: Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Ugo Cei
Il giorno 12/ago/04, alle 17:33, Vadim Gritsenko ha scritto: IMHO, Most of the time is disk IO. Might be. I haven't got a HD LED on my laptop. I've just run it on my desktop Linux box and the disk is spinning like mad indeed. Times are a little lower, even though the box is not a speed demon.

Re: Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Unico Hommes
Unico Hommes wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Ugo Cei wrote: On OS X Panther: $ time svn update At revision 36287. real1m6.448s user0m2.010s sys 0m4.010s On Windows XP, HDD 7200 RPM, last access timestamp disabled: cocoon-2.2.X $ time svn up At revision 36287. real0m29.125s user

Re: Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Unico Hommes
Leszek Gawron wrote: Unico Hommes wrote: My experience with subversion since we switched is that the cocoon repository is painfully slow at least using subclipse. I haven't much previous experience with subversion but I was under the impression that it should be more performant then CVS? So, I

Re: Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Leszek Gawron
Unico Hommes wrote: Leszek Gawron wrote: Unico Hommes wrote: My experience with subversion since we switched is that the cocoon repository is painfully slow at least using subclipse. I haven't much previous experience with subversion but I was under the impression that it should be more

Re: Bring the new I18NMatcher in line with LocaleAction [Bug 30046]

2004-08-12 Thread Upayavira
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Upayavira wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: What I would like to do is to come up with approach which will unify these two together, by making I18nMatcher closer to LocaleAction, or, if you have suggestion, by enhancing LocaleAction. It would be good to see them unified, but

Re: Subversion really slow

2004-08-12 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Ugo Cei dijo: Il giorno 12/ago/04, alle 15:42, Unico Hommes ha scritto: My experience with subversion since we switched is that the cocoon repository is painfully slow at least using subclipse. I haven't much previous experience with subversion but I was under the impression that it should

Re: Request for a small change in CustomJXPathBinding

2004-08-12 Thread Ralph Goers
I'd suggest you write a patch and then submit it via bugzilla. Ralph At 8/12/2004 06:21 AM, you wrote: Hi all, Three days ago, I posted an email [1] with a small change request in custom binding. There is IMO a small problem when trying to bind a value on a bean that is null (ie. the value is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30372] - The daylight time cause error when timezone is CST

2004-08-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30372. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.