Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
> * Carsten Ziegeler:
>
>> Some time ago the support for per sitemap classloaders has been
>> added to 2.2; this feature is currently disabled (for making the
>> implementation for blocks easier I guess).
>>
>> Now the question is, do we want to support this or i
* Carsten Ziegeler:
> Some time ago the support for per sitemap classloaders has been
> added to 2.2; this feature is currently disabled (for making the
> implementation for blocks easier I guess).
>
> Now the question is, do we want to support this or is this
> obsolete when we have the
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> IIUC the classloading as you describe it here isn't in place, right?
Yupp.
> Currently
> we have one global classloader for *all* blocks (see the BlocksManager). The
> build system (= Maven 2) takes care that only one version of each artifact is
> added to the global cla
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
One remaining question: currently we have several places where the
thread context classloader is used (for example to create new
instances). I guess that with the blocks-fw in place that the thread
context class loader is
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
>> One remaining question: currently we have several places where the
>> thread context classloader is used (for example to create new
>> instances). I guess that with the blocks-fw in place that the thread
>> context class loader is not the correc
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
What the blocks fw eventually will support depends on what you and
others want it to support and are prepared to implement ;)
Yes, that's the plan. Adding it to
org.apache.cocoon.blocks.servlet.BlocksManager (module:
cocoon-blocks-fw-servlet-impl) shouldn't be too di
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
And one additional question :) In 2.1.x you can configure extra
classpath in the web.xml; I think we should remove that feature for
blocks-fw as well, right?
yes, those hacks are not required with blocks any more
--
Reinhard Pötz Independent Consultant, Train
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
One remaining question: currently we have several places where the
thread context classloader is used (for example to create new
instances). I guess that with the blocks-fw in place that the thread
context class loader is not the correct one.
why do you think so? (just
Reinhard Poetz skrev:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
On 04.03.2006, at 01:54, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Some time ago the support for per sitemap classloaders has been
added to
2.2; this feature is currently disabled (for making the implementation
for blocks easier I guess).
I guess it is just disab
Carsten Ziegeler skrev:
Some time ago the support for per sitemap classloaders has been added to
2.2; this feature is currently disabled (for making the implementation
for blocks easier I guess).
Now the question is, do we want to support this or is this obsolete when
we have the blocks implemen
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> Some time ago the support for per sitemap classloaders has been added to
>> 2.2; this feature is currently disabled (for making the implementation
>> for blocks easier I guess).
>>
>> Now the question is, do we want to support this or is this obsol
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> Some time ago the support for per sitemap classloaders has been added to
>> 2.2; this feature is currently disabled (for making the implementation
>> for blocks easier I guess).
>>
>> Now the question is, do we want to support this or is this obsol
Torsten Curdt wrote:
On 04.03.2006, at 01:54, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Some time ago the support for per sitemap classloaders has been added to
2.2; this feature is currently disabled (for making the implementation
for blocks easier I guess).
I guess it is just disabled by default because i
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Some time ago the support for per sitemap classloaders has been added to
2.2; this feature is currently disabled (for making the implementation
for blocks easier I guess).
Now the question is, do we want to support this or is this obsolete when
we have the blocks implemen
On 04.03.2006, at 01:54, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Some time ago the support for per sitemap classloaders has been
added to
2.2; this feature is currently disabled (for making the implementation
for blocks easier I guess).
I guess it is just disabled by default because it is a new feature
No
Some time ago the support for per sitemap classloaders has been added to
2.2; this feature is currently disabled (for making the implementation
for blocks easier I guess).
Now the question is, do we want to support this or is this obsolete when
we have the blocks implementation soon? In this case
16 matches
Mail list logo
