On Nov 24, 2003, at 4:57 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I'll do it then.
Yep, saw that. Thanks!
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Orixo Member
Read my weblog athttp://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
stev
On 23 Nov 2003, at 22:31, Steven Noels wrote:
On Nov 21, 2003, at 9:12 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
But I would suggest to ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this before we
include any example/code/tutorial/anything that is covered by that.
I agree that the license seems harmless enough. But I also ag
On Nov 21, 2003, at 9:12 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
But I would suggest to ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this before we
include any example/code/tutorial/anything that is covered by that.
I agree that the license seems harmless enough. But I also agree with
Antonio that this smells funny to me:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 17 Nov 2003, at 20:15, Steven Noels wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
We need "scan the license" very carefully before take decision.
I read it briefly and it basically boils down to "don't mess with us,
and we won't mess with you". They do expect you to do a "compati
On 17 Nov 2003, at 20:15, Steven Noels wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
We need "scan the license" very carefully before take decision.
I read it briefly and it basically boils down to "don't mess with us,
and we won't mess with you". They do expect you to do a "compatible
application" though, so
Tony Collen wrote:
Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
Hi All!
I just read on slashdot, that M$ published the XML Schema for their
new Office 2003 Suite (mostly Word related) including documentation:
http://isb.oio.dk/info/news/wordml+published.htm
According to
http://rep.oio.dk/Microsoft.com/officesch
Hi!
Pleas don't panic!
If you read my mail carefully all I did was letting you all know, that
there are XML Schemas available and also noted, that I don't know if
that is relevant for us (meaning: I don't know, if we really have to
cope with the XML schema at all).
What I meant with "adding t
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
We need "scan the license" very carefully before take decision.
I read it briefly and it basically boils down to "don't mess with us,
and we won't mess with you". They do expect you to do a "compatible
application" though, so you can't use the grammar for something
diffe
Antonio Gallardo dijo:
> Michael Hartle dijo:
>> Hmm, basically, this sounds interesting, but according to the legal
>> notice
>>
>>> There is a separate patent license available to parties interested in
>>> implementing software programs that can read and write files that
>>> conform to the Specif
Gianugo Rabellino dijo:
> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>> Michael Hartle dijo:
>>
>>>Hmm, basically, this sounds interesting, but according to the legal
>>> notice
>>>
>>>
There is a separate patent license available to parties interested in
implementing software programs that can read and write
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Michael Hartle dijo:
Hmm, basically, this sounds interesting, but according to the legal notice
There is a separate patent license available to parties interested in
implementing software programs that can read and write files that
conform to the Specification. This paten
Michael Hartle dijo:
> Hmm, basically, this sounds interesting, but according to the legal notice
>
>> There is a separate patent license available to parties interested in
>> implementing software programs that can read and write files that
>> conform to the Specification. This patent license is a
Tony Collen dijo:
> Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
>> Hi All!
>>
>> I just read on slashdot, that M$ published the XML Schema for their new
>> Office 2003 Suite (mostly Word related) including documentation:
>> http://isb.oio.dk/info/news/wordml+published.htm
>>
>> According to
>> http://rep.oio.dk/Micr
Hmm, basically, this sounds interesting, but according to the legal notice
There is a separate patent license available to parties interested in
implementing software programs that can read and write files that
conform to the Specification. This patent license is available at this
location: htt
Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
Hi All!
I just read on slashdot, that M$ published the XML Schema for their new
Office 2003 Suite (mostly Word related) including documentation:
http://isb.oio.dk/info/news/wordml+published.htm
According to
http://rep.oio.dk/Microsoft.com/officeschemas/LegalNotice.htm
Hi All!
I just read on slashdot, that M$ published the XML Schema for their new
Office 2003 Suite (mostly Word related) including documentation:
http://isb.oio.dk/info/news/wordml+published.htm
According to
http://rep.oio.dk/Microsoft.com/officeschemas/LegalNotice.htm they are
even redistribut
16 matches
Mail list logo
