Henri Yandell wrote
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Niall Pemberton
Perhaps if its going to be a
while before 3.3 release gets out, then we could just release
Collections 3.2.1 which is just 3.2 re-packaged ready for OSGi. I
could do that if 3.3 is going to be delayed.
Might be worth it.
I noticed that MapConfiguration was almost identical to
BaseConfiguration. So I removed duplicate code and reimplemented it
based on BaseConfiguration in the experimental branch.
This change could also be ported to trunk.
Oliver
Emmanuel Bourg schrieb:
Oliver Heger a écrit :
Would XMLConfiguration also go into this package?
XMLConfiguration and XMLPropertiesConfiguration remain in the main
package.
Why?
Oliver
In this regard the package name o.a.c.c.sax would make more sense.
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-primitives has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue a
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affect
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jux has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:47 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, does anyone object to me putting this code into the sandbox? I've
> got working versions of expressions and builders (with test cases of
> course) for:
>
> MVEL
> OGNL
> BeanUtils
> JXPath
>
If you're interested,
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affe
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-compress has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue aff
On 10/04/2008, Bindul Bhowmik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Siegfried,
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > commons-exec (see http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/) is about
> running
> > external processes from wi
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Excuse the top post, but there isn't much context to
> what I want to say.
>
> Beyond what I've already said wrt Morph, its Language
> concept does allow for setting and getting from
> expressions, as do those various libr
Well, I figured out a way to have proxy determine the type of a method
when doing invocation recording. It took me a while, but I got it.
The code is checked into the proxy 2.0 branch. Now, I've got my
builders working for commons-expression, too! :)
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Michael Heue
Hello Siegfried,
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> commons-exec (see http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/) is about running
> external processes from within a JVM - and there are a lot of OS and JVM
> versions out there (plus a lot of
Oliver Heger a écrit :
Would XMLConfiguration also go into this package?
XMLConfiguration and XMLPropertiesConfiguration remain in the main
package. In this regard the package name o.a.c.c.sax would make more sense.
Emmanuel Bourg
---
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> 2008/4/9, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Does anyone have code that can take care of this situation:
> >
> > List strings = new ArrayList();
> >
> > Class returnType = getReturnType(strings.getClass(), "get", int.class);
> >
> > I want the "r
That pretty much sums it up. Niall? :)
-Matt
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [
--- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have code that can take care of this
> situation:
>
> List strings = new ArrayList();
>
> Class returnType = getReturnType(strings.getClass(),
> "get", int.class);
>
> I want the "returnType" to be java.lang.String.
> Does anyone have
2008/4/9, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Does anyone have code that can take care of this situation:
>
> List strings = new ArrayList();
>
> Class returnType = getReturnType(strings.getClass(), "get", int.class);
>
> I want the "returnType" to be java.lang.String. Does anyone have code
>
Does anyone have code that can take care of this situation:
List strings = new ArrayList();
Class returnType = getReturnType(strings.getClass(), "get", int.class);
I want the "returnType" to be java.lang.String. Does anyone have code
that would return that? Is it possible?
---
Emmanuel Bourg schrieb:
Oliver Heger a écrit :
I would like to keep main package pretty small, so that it only
contains the basic interfaces and abstract base classes.
Sub packages would group classes with similar functionality. The plist
and web packages are good examples for that, but I am
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To address the other part of your proposal, James, the
> record/playback mechanism: wouldn't the resulting
> object be a functor a la [functor]? A get would be a
> function, a set a procedure.
>
Yes, they would, and I
Excuse the top post, but there isn't much context to
what I want to say.
Beyond what I've already said wrt Morph, its Language
concept does allow for setting and getting from
expressions, as do those various libraries to which
James plans to interface. But Morph also contains a
Reflector abstract
Hi Simone,
thanks a lot for your effort - considering the fact that I nearly killed
Niall's box yesterday I'm happy that it runs smoothly on your box(es)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Simone Gianni wrote:
Hi Siegfried,
run on :
- Linux Gentoo (2.6.22-mactel-r2 #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Nov 15 23:26:36
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just curious, what's the current state? In Apache Sling we would need an
> > OSGi enabled release in two weeks :) Now, don't get me wrong, I
Hi Siegfried,
run on :
- Linux Gentoo (2.6.22-mactel-r2 #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Nov 15 23:26:36 CET
2007 i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7600 @ 2.33GHz GenuineIntel
GNU/Linux)
... JVM Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
1.5.0_12-b04) - Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.5.0_12
Hi
I feel really bad about not giving commons-exec the love it needs.
Nice to see some additional testing going on with the code. Have you
found any bugs that need fixing?
Could we include these tests as part of the exec project? I would be
happy to help out with the integration if needed. In add
On 09/04/2008, Siegfried Goeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> commons-exec (see http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
> is about running external processes from within a JVM - and there are a lot
> of OS and JVM versions out there (plus a lot of code in commons-exec to
> handle th
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just curious, what's the current state? In Apache Sling we would need an
> OSGi enabled release in two weeks :) Now, don't get me wrong, I don't want
> to push or force you to do a release (especially as I'm not able to h
Hi folks,
commons-exec (see http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/) is about
running external processes from within a JVM - and there are a lot of OS
and JVM versions out there (plus a lot of code in commons-exec to handle
this).
So if you feel adventurous and have some time to spare ...
+
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not convinced that, once you remove the constraint
> of a String representation, that what you are talking
> about is necessarily an "expression". Also given the
> concern I brought up about recording, explicitly
>
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Commons rule is (or at least was) that Commons components should have
> "boring functional names", so Commons Expression would fit, but Commons
> Expresso would not. (Yes, there are some components that do not confor
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:18 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Antonio Petrelli
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > There is already a regular-expression tool called Expresso:
> > http://www.ultrapico.com/Expresso.htm
> > Come on, James, express your
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not convinced that, once you remove the constraint
> of a String representation, that what you are talking
> about is necessarily an "expression". Also given the
> concern I brought up about recording, explicitly
>
2008/4/9, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 09/04/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Antonio Petrelli
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > There is already a regular-expression tool called Expresso:
> > > http://www.ultrapico.com/Expresso.h
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, to clarify, Morph isn't "mine." Matt
> Sgarlata is the primary developer; I just came in
> midway and started helping out (at least I like to
> think my input has been helpful)... then, I wasn't
> necessarily
--- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Antonio Petrelli
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > There is already a regular-expression tool called
> Expresso:
> > http://www.ultrapico.com/Expresso.htm
> > Come on, James, express yourself better :-D
>
> Than
On 09/04/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Antonio Petrelli
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > There is already a regular-expression tool called Expresso:
> > http://www.ultrapico.com/Expresso.htm
> > Come on, James, express yourself better :
--- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wanted to start up a discussion about maybe
> starting a new sandbox
> project for expression abstraction. It could be
> named
> commons-expresso. I realize that there's a J2EE
> framework out there
> called "Expresso", but its site hasn't been up
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Antonio Petrelli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is already a regular-expression tool called Expresso:
> http://www.ultrapico.com/Expresso.htm
> Come on, James, express yourself better :-D
Thanks, Antonio. :) Ok, I googled only shortly to look for somethi
2008/4/9, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I realize that there's a J2EE framework out there
> called "Expresso", but its site hasn't been updated since 2005, so I
> don't know how active it is or if this would even be a conflict
> anyway.
There is already a regular-expression tool called E
I wanted to start up a discussion about maybe starting a new sandbox
project for expression abstraction. It could be named
commons-expresso. I realize that there's a J2EE framework out there
called "Expresso", but its site hasn't been updated since 2005, so I
don't know how active it is or if thi
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still hoping to bring Morph on board soon, and its
> current codebase contains several facets including a
> Language abstraction. I really think there's some
> overlap there with [el], but another piece of Morph is
>
Just curious, what's the current state? In Apache Sling we would need an
OSGi enabled release in two weeks :) Now, don't get me wrong, I don't
want to push or force you to do a release (especially as I'm not able to
help with the open issues). I would just like to know, if it might be
possible
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The descriptor said which is Maven1, I changed it to
> (Gump speak for Maven2) so I hope it will work better on the next run.
Thanks Stefan
Niall
> Stefan
---
The descriptor said which is Maven1, I changed it to
(Gump speak for Maven2) so I hope it will work better on the next run.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oliver Heger a écrit :
I would like to keep main package pretty small, so that it only contains
the basic interfaces and abstract base classes.
Sub packages would group classes with similar functionality. The plist
and web packages are good examples for that, but I am not sure how to
handle
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affe
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=74988&projectId=538
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 9 Apr 2008 00:56:12 -0700
Finished at: Wed 9 Apr 2008 00:56:50 -0700
Total time: 37s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Number:
48 matches
Mail list logo
