On 2009-01-12, Ralph Goers wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2009, at 7:49 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> I haven't figured out which artifact it is that breaks configuration's
>> tests - but must admit that I didn't try too hard since nobody seemed
>> to be interested anyway.
> Well, I'm interested.
Great.
If you look at the bottom of
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/ivy/ivy-tests/index.html you see
links to all the test reports, this is achieved by the
element in the Gump descriptor.
I have just now added such an element to the descriptor of
commons-configuration-test
and hope that I've
Hi all,
to be honest I'm not familiar enough with mvn to really know how to
debug things, but I'll explain how Gump and mvn play together and toss
out some ideas. Maybe at the end of the thread we will know how to
really debug things. If you can come up with a better idea, I'll be
grateful.
Par
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
Stefan Bodewig wrote at Dienstag, 13. Januar 2009 11:08:
> I've just removed all dependencies from commons-configuration to show
> that the tests pass and plan to add Xerces and Xalan back in to see
> whether it really is the XML part that is causing the problems.
>
> Stefan
CC uses by default x
I've just removed all dependencies from commons-configuration to show
that the tests pass and plan to add Xerces and Xalan back in to see
whether it really is the XML part that is causing the problems.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-
Hi.
> The first step would be to rearrange slightly the analysis package. We
> could have the main interfaces in the analysis package
> (UnivariateRealFunction, DifferentiableUnivariateRealFunction ...) and
> spread the other interfaces and classes in several subpackages:
> - analysis.solving
>
> From: Siegfried Goeschl [mailto:siegfried.goes...@it20one.at]
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> just a quick note - since I started the processes without "su" they did
> not start tomcat. Okay, that is expectet but the process were still
> running in the background - so this could be an issue
Hmm. That do
Folks,
DBCP seems to have been fairly quiet for a while. In recent days I have hit
/ seen others hit various issues including:
- DBCP doesn't build on a 1.6 JVM
- Tomcat 5/6 can't build on a 1.6 JVM because it depends on building DBCP
- Tomcat trunk (the basis for 7) requires building on a 1.6 JVM
Folks,
The nightly builds [1] all seem rather old. Any idea why? Should I be
looking somewhere else for these?
Cheers,
Mark
[1] http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/nightly/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commo
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Folks,
>
> DBCP seems to have been fairly quiet for a while. In recent days I have hit
> / seen others hit various issues including:
> - DBCP doesn't build on a 1.6 JVM
> - Tomcat 5/6 can't build on a 1.6 JVM because it depends on building DBCP
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The nightly builds [1] all seem rather old. Any idea why? Should I be
> looking somewhere else for these?
>
Commons group in continuum on vmbuild [1] should have current builds.
The link to nightlies may need to be updated to stop
> -Original Message-
> From: Rahul Akolkar [mailto:rahul.akol...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 13 January 2009 15:41
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: Nightly builds
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > The nightly builds [1] all seem rather old. Any
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rahul Akolkar [mailto:rahul.akol...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 13 January 2009 15:41
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: Nightly builds
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> > Fo
On 13/01/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Folks,
>
> DBCP seems to have been fairly quiet for a while. In recent days I have hit
> / seen others hit various issues including:
> - DBCP doesn't build on a 1.6 JVM
> - Tomcat 5/6 can't build on a 1.6 JVM because it depends on building DBCP
> - Tomcat t
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>
> Looks like some of the changes to the JDBC API mean that it is not
> possible to create a single version of DBCP which is compatible with
> both Java 1.4 and 1.6.
>
> Will that mean moving DBCP to a minimum of Java 1.6?
> Or can it be made compatible wit
Siegfried Goeschl schrieb:
Hi Russel,
see my comments below
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Russel Winder wrote:
Last year there was a lot of effort trying to get Commons CLI into a fit
state for a 1.2 release -- much credit to Emmanuel Bourg.
However, having got the Subversion 1.x branch of Comm
Just tried building trunk and got the following error on WinXP - looks
like the file redirect.bat is missing?
---
Test set: org.apache.commons.exec.DefaultExecutorTest
--
Mark Thomas wrote:
Folks,
DBCP seems to have been fairly quiet for a while. In recent days I have hit
/ seen others hit various issues including:
- DBCP doesn't build on a 1.6 JVM
- Tomcat 5/6 can't build on a 1.6 JVM because it depends on building DBCP
- Tomcat trunk (the basis for 7) requires
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> DBCP seems to have been fairly quiet for a while. In recent days I have
>> hit
>> / seen others hit various issues including:
>> - DBCP doesn't build on a 1.6 JVM
>> - Tomcat 5/6 can't build on a 1.6 JVM be
"Mark Thomas" wrote in message
news:016501c9757d$d3c848d0$7b58da...@org...
>> From: Siegfried Goeschl [mailto:siegfried.goes...@it20one.at]
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> just a quick note - since I started the processes without "su" they did
>> not start tomcat. Okay, that is expectet but the process wer
On 2009-01-13, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> I've just removed all dependencies from commons-configuration to show
> that the tests pass
this part worked, the build passed.
> and plan to add Xerces and Xalan back in to see whether it really is
> the XML part that is causing the problems.
The next Gu
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Russel Winder
wrote:
> Last year there was a lot of effort trying to get Commons CLI into a fit
> state for a 1.2 release -- much credit to Emmanuel Bourg.
>
> However, having got the Subversion 1.x branch of Commons CLI into a fit
> state for a 1.2 release, nothin
23 matches
Mail list logo
