Does only proper components need a doapfile?
If yes, then proper-trunk, except if a proper component can go dormant.
Then doap_files in SVN.
Christian
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 5:11 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 23/05/2008, sebb wrote:
>> At present the doap files are in each project trunk, and therefore
Hi,
test works on OSX - but we cannot really test on *nix boxes if the
name-normalizing works on windows too. "if system == windows" wouldn't
give back "windows" at the gump servers. So we don't have a continues
integration test for exactly that problem.
Question is, if we should refactor more to
Hi,
I think restrict visibility whereever possible would be a good idea
too. You can loosen later if one wants to.
I just checked out CPIO, AR and JAR. The latter two contain so less
code, everything looks good. But CPIO needs some work...
However, I guess you want to:
CpioArchiveInputStream
-
On 2009-03-18, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> I'd like to remove some fields, make them private or final and maybe
> move some methods around before our first release. In particular:
I just saw sebb's patch attached to SANDBOX-294 and he seems to agree
with most of my points. In addition the patch ma
Hi,
some of the classes inherited from Ant contain protected fields that
are only there for backwards compatibility reasons.
For example ZipOutputStream in Ant used to extend
java.util.zip.DeflaterOutputStream in Ant 1.4 which exposes the
Deflater as a non-final protected field - when we changes
On 18/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2009-03-17, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>
> > Hmmm. Actually it is possible if the Gump descriptor could be used to map a
> > specific artifact to a different one, e.g. commons-lang:commons-lang:* to
> > org.apache.commons:commons-lang-backcomp:3.x.
>
>
> Ye
On 2009-03-17, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hmmm. Actually it is possible if the Gump descriptor could be used to map a
> specific artifact to a different one, e.g. commons-lang:commons-lang:* to
> org.apache.commons:commons-lang-backcomp:3.x.
Yes, that could work, but it still would require a 1:1 map
On 23/05/2008, sebb wrote:
> At present the doap files are in each project trunk, and therefore
> presumably get copied to tags (and branches), where they don't really
> make sense.
>
> Perhaps it might be worth moving them all to a common location, e.g.
> trunks- ?
>
> Just a thought.
P
Hi, all.
I am developing a framework called as Robust-Task.
Robust-Task is a framework which helps you write READABLE code when you need
to express complex or long business flow.
(Recently, 0.1 concept version was released.)
I would like to see that the idea of Robust-Task is valuable through the
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2009-03-17, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>> I always assumed that Gump does not take care about the Maven deps,
>> since it uses its own descriptors.
>
> That's the theory and it works for build tools that support this
> use-case (read: Ant).
>
> AFAIK there is
On 2009-03-17, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> I always assumed that Gump does not take care about the Maven deps,
> since it uses its own descriptors.
That's the theory and it works for build tools that support this
use-case (read: Ant).
AFAIK there is no way to make mvn supply more jars to javac than
Guys,
I am not sure about my change here. It was simply not compilable in Eclipse,
but that might also have been due to stricter compiler settings. Actually
both HttpFileObject and WebdavFileObject contain a setupMethod method. In
both classes it was declared package private, therefore it was n
+1, source tarball can be used to build package will all my different
compilers, all tests pass.
- Jörg
Dan Fabulich wrote:
>
> My third attempt at releasing a commons project; please test rigorously!
>
> RC3 includes an API change to QueryRunner to guarantee thread-safety.
> (DBUTILS-52)
>
>
On 17/03/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 17/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> > Actually, the tests are (correctly) run many times. VFS uses an interesting
> > mechanism to run the tests once for each provider type. It took me quite a
> > while to figure out what it was doing. Some providers, such as webd
Reasoning purely by symmetry, doesn't it seem that where you are headed here
is toward an extended rational polynomial class that handles rational
polynomials of a base variable and simple functions of a base variable (such
as trig functions, log and exp)?
If so, then having some kind of unified c
Hi,
I used already the classes of the analysis package:
http://commons.apache.org/math/userguide/analysis.html
There is already a fine class for Polynomial Functions which can calculate
the derivation:
PolynomialFunction.derivative()
I would like to suggest a class called "RationalFunction" wh
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Bodewig wrote at Dienstag, 17. März 2009 16:16:
> On 2009-03-17, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>> Stefan Bodewig wrote at Dienstag, 17. März 2009 06:00:
>
>>> This works great for Ant built projects but doesn't work at all for
>>> Maven built ones since those additional jars would n
On 2009-03-17, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Stefan Bodewig wrote at Dienstag, 17. März 2009 06:00:
>> This works great for Ant built projects but doesn't work at all for
>> Maven built ones since those additional jars would never be used by
>> Maven unless they are listed in the POM.
> We can either
On 2009-03-17, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi
I could not test it with a general working testcase, since this is a
platform problem and i have only OSX.
>> I have written some rudimentary tests that pass on Windows.
> can those test run successfully on *NIX too? (Gump is running t
Siegfried Goeschl wrote at Dienstag, 17. März 2009 13:07:
> Hi Jörg,
>
> thanks a lot - I will update the commons-exec test matrix
I should have mentioned that they have been executed in a Linux x86
environment (Gentoo).
- Jörg
-
Stefan Bodewig wrote at Dienstag, 17. März 2009 06:00:
[snip]
> This works great for Ant built projects but doesn't work at all for
> Maven built ones since those additional jars would never be used by
> Maven unless they are listed in the POM.
We can either setup a submodule or build those as a
Hi
>>> I could not test it with a general working testcase, since this is a
>>> platform problem and i have only OSX.
>
> I have written some rudimentary tests that pass on Windows.
can those test run successfully on *NIX too? (Gump is running those on
a unix platform too). I can test the test
On 17/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Actually, the tests are (correctly) run many times. VFS uses an interesting
> mechanism to run the tests once for each provider type. It took me quite a
> while to figure out what it was doing. Some providers, such as webdav, http
> and ftp have to be run manual
I'd suggest marking it volatile or making it an immutable property. the
overhead incurred from enforcing thread safety i think is a bit much for the
specific purpose of the QueryRunner -- in all the instances that you
mentioned -- it's the datasource that should be dispatched to threads not
the qu
Actually, the tests are (correctly) run many times. VFS uses an
interesting mechanism to run the tests once for each provider type. It
took me quite a while to figure out what it was doing. Some providers,
such as webdav, http and ftp have to be run manually. I've put
instructions in the do
On 2009-03-17, sebb wrote:
> On 17/03/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> just made a quick fix for SANDBOX-284:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-284
>> I could not test it with a general working testcase, since this is a
>> platform problem and i have only OSX.
On 17/03/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 17/03/2009, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> > Hi Ralph,
> >
> > +) I'm unable to run "mvn test" on commons-vfs (see below) SVN trunk
> > +) you can deploy a SNAPSHOT using "mvn -Pci deploy"
>
>
> Surely you just have to run
>
> mvn install
>
> to deploy it to yo
On 17/03/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just made a quick fix for SANDBOX-284:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-284
>
> I could not test it with a general working testcase, since this is a
> platform problem and i have only OSX.
> However, GUMP will not run on w
On 17/03/2009, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
>
> +) I'm unable to run "mvn test" on commons-vfs (see below) SVN trunk
> +) you can deploy a SNAPSHOT using "mvn -Pci deploy"
Surely you just have to run
mvn install
to deploy it to your local repo?
> Cheers,
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
>
On 17/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2009-03-16, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> > Personally I think failing is good and we'll learn lots from it. I'd
> > like to keep trunk until the consumer community indicate it's a pain
> > point.
>
>
> Right now it doesn't look as if any of the projects wi
Hi Jörg,
thanks a lot - I will update the commons-exec test matrix
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>
>> Siegfried:
>>
>> If you've gone through the pains of running builds through your JDK 'zoo',
>> you might want to list what you've tested here for the
Hi Ralph,
+) I'm unable to run "mvn test" on commons-vfs (see below) SVN trunk
+) you can deploy a SNAPSHOT using "mvn -Pci deploy"
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
=== START ===
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository//org/apache/commons/commons-vfs/2.0-SNAPSHOT/commons-vfs
On 17/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2009, at 5:32 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>
> > On 16/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi Ralph,
> > > >
> > > > Ralph Goers wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I ha
On 2009-03-17, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> it looks like all the world is meeting at the conference except myself :-)
A pity.
> However, I think developing at the hackathon is a quick development,
Since I won't attend the hackathon (no time for a full week off), I
don't expect there will be m
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
Hi,
it looks like all the world is meeting at the conference except myself :-)
However, I think developing at the hackathon is a quick development,
and I would like to kindly ask you to take make some edits at the wiki
and let me know which tasks has been done. It would be frustrating to
think on
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by ChristianGrobmeier:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CompressRoadmap
The comment on the change is:
marked 284 as patch available
-
Hi all,
just made a quick fix for SANDBOX-284:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-284
I could not test it with a general working testcase, since this is a
platform problem and i have only OSX.
However, GUMP will not run on windows too, i guess. I think here is
some refactoring necessar
38 matches
Mail list logo
