On 30/04/2009, dwo...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Added: commons/sandbox/validator2/trunk/LICENSE.txt
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/validator2/trunk/LICENSE.txt?rev=770203&view=auto
>
> ==
> --- com
I wrote some code based on the org.json implementation mainly if you map a
class property in your json with your java class fqn or a key that
corresponds to some java class fqn you can map the object back and forth
from java to json and vice versa, nothing too fancy but saved me the effort
of mapp
--- On Thu, 4/30/09, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> From: Christian Grobmeier
> Subject: Re: New Sandbox Component Proposal: Commons JSON
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Thursday, April 30, 2009, 2:25 PM
> Matt,
>
> > I don't know about folks you (or I) know face-to-face,
> but I know
Matt,
> I don't know about folks you (or I) know face-to-face, but I know that
> several ASF committers and members have popped up around the ANTLR lists over
> the years, including, off the top of my head, myself, Torsten, O.Ziegermann,
> H.L. Ship, and probably others. I personally am quite
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabr...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:59 AM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: New Sandbox Component Proposal: Commons JSON
>
>
>
>
> --- On Thu, 4/30/09, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
> > From: Christian Gro
--- On Thu, 4/30/09, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> From: Christian Grobmeier
> Subject: Re: New Sandbox Component Proposal: Commons JSON
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Thursday, April 30, 2009, 9:55 AM
> > Why do you consider a dependency
> on Antlr a negative (the runtime is 148k),
> Why do you consider a dependency on Antlr a negative (the runtime is 148k),
> JSON is a formally defined language after all.
I don't know a person face to face who actually can handle antlr. Its
a cool tool, but if you need to create a patch for your json lib, it
can be hell. Plain java is unde
Hello,
I am glad we are looking at JSON.
Why do you consider a dependency on Antlr a negative (the runtime is 148k),
JSON is a formally defined language after all.
I always scratch my head when I hear "there are dependencies!" when any
application I create or use always has dependencies. I wo
Hi Jörg,
thanks for asking!
>> I would like to add:
>> - no dependencies!
>> - Creates JSON Strings of Objects and vice versa
>
> ... and a bit more on the mapping this mechanism.
Basically you have a JSONValue which can be JSONString, JSONNumber
etc. If you call toJSON at this object, you'll ge
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Christian Grobmeier wrote at Donnerstag, 30. April 2009 13:10:
>> - Streaming API (StAX/pull-parser like) for both easy and efficient
>> parsing
>
> Shall this solution actually act as StAX XMLReader/XMLWriter or do you use
> this API simply
Hi Christian,
Christian Grobmeier wrote at Donnerstag, 30. April 2009 13:10:
> Dear Commons-Folks,
>
> Yonik Seeley and I propose the creation of a new Sandbox component
> within Apache Commons. We would like to name it Commons JSON since it
> should deal with everything around JSON.
>
> Yonik
Thanks.
-Donald
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Donald,
Donald Woods wrote:
Any questions?
I'm already implementing the API over in Geronimo -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERON
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-ojb has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
Dear Commons-Folks,
Yonik Seeley and I propose the creation of a new Sandbox component
within Apache Commons. We would like to name it Commons JSON since it
should deal with everything around JSON.
Yonik did already implement a JSON-Parser in Apache Labs name Noggit:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/a
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
I don't know if this is your problem, but Maven 1.0.2 cannot follow
redirects. It still points to the maven central that used to be at
ibiblio which redirects to repo1.maven.org now. Do the instructions
tell you how to specify the repository?
Ralph
On Apr 29, 2009, at 10:30 PM, Dan Fabulic
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> My concern with Sanselan is that it gets us into the trademark game. I
> like that "Apache Commons Logging" is all about the Apache trademark.
That concern is valid, but it should be sufficient to change the name
Sanselan whenever factual t
17 matches
Mail list logo
