I'm fine with that, how about other people think about the change ? and one
open question related to this in other mail thread.
http://markmail.org/message/2o3v7qka742kc2rv
Regards,
Amey
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>
> > On Sep 12, 2017, at 12:38
> On Sep 12, 2017, at 12:38 AM, Amey Jadiye wrote:
>
> Hello Rob,
I'm going to be away from my computer until Friday. I'll give it a look then if
that's alright with you.
Cheers,
-Rob
>
> I have submitted pull req. let me know if below action plan looks good.
>
> *
Hello Rob,
I have submitted pull req. let me know if below action plan looks good.
* RandomStringGenerator in commons-text
* new RandomStringUtils in commons-text with different package using
RandomStringGenerator
* Mark RandomStringUtils in commons-lang as deprecated
* release commons-text 1.2
What I really wanted to say was:
I'm for keeping RandomStringUtils undeprecated in lang.
Sorry,
Pascal
Am 06.09.2017 um 21:20 schrieb Gary Gregory:
On Sep 6, 2017 12:31, "Pascal Schumacher" wrote:
I'm for keeping RandomStringUtils in lang (at least in 3.x).
It
On Sep 6, 2017 12:31, "Pascal Schumacher" wrote:
I'm for keeping RandomStringUtils in lang (at least in 3.x).
It has to stay in 3.x no matter what to maintain BC.
Gary
Am 06.09.2017 um 12:55 schrieb Rob Tompkins:
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 3:34 AM, Amey Jadiye
I'm for keeping RandomStringUtils in lang (at least in 3.x).
Am 06.09.2017 um 12:55 schrieb Rob Tompkins:
On Sep 6, 2017, at 3:34 AM, Amey Jadiye wrote:
Hi Rob,
Looking at frequency I think more number of requests coming
for RandomStringUtils for its simplicity.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 6:02 AM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote:
> > > Using RandomStringGenerator from RandomStringUtils sounds good, but
> > > implies adding a dependency to commons-lang (commons-text).
> >
> > I haven't understood it that way; IIRC it was suggested that "Commons
>
> > Using RandomStringGenerator from RandomStringUtils sounds good, but
> > implies adding a dependency to commons-lang (commons-text).
>
> I haven't understood it that way; IIRC it was suggested that "Commons
> Text" would additionally provide the same easy-to-use API (alias
>
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/blob/master/pom.xml
[2]
https://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-optional-and-excludes-dependencies.html
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Amey Jadiye [mailto:ameyjad...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. September 2017 09:34
An: Com
-and-excludes-dependencies.html
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Amey Jadiye [mailto:ameyjad...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. September 2017 09:34
> An: Commons Developers List
> Betreff: Re: [LANG] Releasing 3.6.1
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> Looking at frequency I think mor
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 7:05 AM, Gilles wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 06:55:49 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>> On Sep 6, 2017, at 3:34 AM, Amey Jadiye wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> Looking at frequency I think more number of requests coming
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 06:55:49 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Sep 6, 2017, at 3:34 AM, Amey Jadiye
wrote:
Hi Rob,
Looking at frequency I think more number of requests coming
for RandomStringUtils for its simplicity.
RandomStringGenerator is strong , flexible but one can't
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 3:34 AM, Amey Jadiye wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> Looking at frequency I think more number of requests coming
> for RandomStringUtils for its simplicity.
>
> RandomStringGenerator is strong , flexible but one can't use it quickly.
> Also I think this tool
Hi Rob,
Looking at frequency I think more number of requests coming
for RandomStringUtils for its simplicity.
RandomStringGenerator is strong , flexible but one can't use it quickly.
Also I think this tool should belong in Commons text's arsenal. I'm not
only moving RandomStringUtils to text
+1
Am 5. September 2017 07:17:57 MESZ schrieb Benedikt Ritter :
>Hi,
>
>since we’re getting more and more requests about the deprecation of
>RandomStringUtils, I’m thinking about releasing the current state of
>the master branch as 3.6.1. I may have time to push an RC sometime
> On Sep 5, 2017, at 11:00 AM, Amey Jadiye wrote:
>
> Hello Benedikt,
>
> How about we keep that deprecated in lang and release Text-1.2 ?
[snip]
I’m on board with this if folks are complaining and the original intent was to
deprecate things in [lang]. Why not roll
Hello Benedikt,
How about we keep that deprecated in lang and release Text-1.2 ? I will
submit changes [1] related to this in fact i'm fixing couple of failing
test cases ATM. If you are planning to release 3.6.1 just to remove
deprecation and deprecate RandomStringUtils back in Lang - 3.7 I'm
Hi,
since we’re getting more and more requests about the deprecation of
RandomStringUtils, I’m thinking about releasing the current state of the master
branch as 3.6.1. I may have time to push an RC sometime this week. So if you
have some fixes you want to include, please do so now.
Regards,
18 matches
Mail list logo