I've only been partially following, and I hear and respect the desire for
"quality control", but IMO, people talk about Apache all of the time in other
events. For example, when Flex joined the incubator in January 2012, there was
a Flex user conference shortly after in April 2012. I spoke
And that's why I suggested required disclaimers. Big events have disclaimers.
That way, Apache is not endorsing their message as 100% accurate on behalf of
the foundation, just their attempt to get the message out. Sounds like Rich
will make sure there is some ASF-experienced people
From the peanut gallery: IMO, without a formal training/certification program,
what even an ASF Member understands about the Apache Way, not to mention
committers who are not members, is up for grabs. It is essentially the party
game "telephone" where one person says something to another
Hi Bertrand,
Your link took me to a post about splitting lists because some list is busy,
but AIUI, this proposal for iot@ is to communicate between related projects.
Does the ASF have an example of a cross-project list that failed?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 6/7/19, 4:34 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz"
code are already in NOTICE files.
Please educate me.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 4/19/19, 6:15 AM, "Sam Ruby" wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 8:03 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > On Apr 19, 2019, at 1:06 AM, Alex Harui mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
&
From the peanut gallery:
IMO, big corporations have enough money to get their names out there and
influence projects if they want to. So, it might be the best use of time to
find ways to limit the impact on the projects instead of trying to prevent them
from using their names. The ASF tends
On 3/22/19, 12:04 AM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
It would be very important to come up with a replacement that is
as effective as what we're trying to replace. Frankly, I don't know
a single candidate.
Does anyone?
Do-ocracy - I think we've used this word before to
before during or after to ensure the
success of httpd?
>
> Best Regards,
> Myrle
>
> On Sat 20. Oct 2018 at 00:28 Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> I would say that, in general, large code drops are more a *symptom* of a
problem, rather than a problem, in
IMO, the issue isn't about large code drops. Some will be ok.
The issue is about significant collaboration off-list about anything, not just
code.
My 2 cents,
-Alex
On 10/19/18, 1:32 PM, "James Dailey" wrote:
+1 on this civil discourse.
I would like to offer that sometimes
Hi ComDev,
Our new PMC chair was confused by reporter.a.o saying that our board report is
due on 6/20. I suppose technically it is, but maybe some language should be
added to say that reports should/must be filed a week earlier?
Thoughts?
-Alex
Just to throw a different opinion out there, I wouldn't mind reading and
deleting as many as a dozen marketing-type emails per year if it got the
ASF's name out in front of people that don't already know about us, or
made the ASF appear like a friendly, collegial, foundation.
We might require
On 4/20/17, 10:14 AM, "William Li" wrote:
>Thanks Ted. No worries on the commitment side. Either way I'd start
>learning and contributing.
>
>If there are ways to check contributions by companies, it could be a
>win-win for both the individuals and the companies
On 12/21/16, 12:10 PM, "William A Rowe Jr" <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 12/21/16, 11:05 AM, "Pierre Smits" <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
&
p://www.orrtiz.com>
>OFBiz based solutions & services
>
>OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
>http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>
>On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 12/21/16, 9:01 AM, "Rich Bowen" <
On 12/21/16, 9:01 AM, "Rich Bowen" wrote:
>
>
>On 12/21/2016 08:32 AM, A. Soroka wrote:
>> Not to say that this isn't a good first step, but that is definitely
>>not going to capture a lot of important engagement. At Apache Jena we
>>recently elected an excellent committer
On 12/20/16, 6:47 PM, "Matthew Sacks" wrote:
>Alex, what does this have anything to do with diversity?
I (and maybe others) want to eliminate the argument that the response rate
was too low to be used to draw conclusions. See [1].
Thinking about this more, we might
On 12/20/16, 8:11 AM, "Rich Bowen" wrote:
>
>
>On 12/19/2016 08:36 AM, Sharan F wrote:
>> Hello Everyone
>>
>> A big thank you to everyone that has helped or participated in getting
>> the Committer Diversity Survey out, and also to all the committers that
>> responded to
On 12/6/16, 3:36 AM, "Rich Bowen" wrote:
>On Dec 6, 2016 6:10 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz"
>wrote:
>
>I hope we agree on that and I think we do, I'm just slightly worried
>that your initiative might be interpreted in the wrong way.
>
>I am confident
IMO, rather than gathering statistics, it would be better to gather
stories, tips and advice. It doesn't seem to me that statistics would be
helpful, folks just need to know that it can have great benefits or great
cost and some ideas of the reasons why. Even if it hasn't been helpful in
the
On 11/15/16, 9:03 AM, "Patricia Shanahan" wrote:
>That should be "example of undesirable behavior". One could obviously
>write a rule that prohibits using words with more than three syllables
>in e-mails.
Personally, I don't think "rules", "standards" and "policies" are in play
On 8/17/16, 1:00 AM, "Sharan Foga" wrote:
>Hi
>
>It sounds like there are mixed feelings about allowing this so I will
>respond back to them saying that we'd prefer that they don't distribute
>any ASF material.
From the peanut gallery: HW seems to be a big sponsor of
On 5/23/16, 12:18 PM, "tamaonakah...@gmail.com"
wrote:
Snip...
> Members who receive a great deal of generosity during their growth are
>likely to pay it forward.
I found your entire email (most of which I snipped) to be very
informative. Thank you for taking the time
Also, not specific to software: http://leanin.org
HTH,
-Alex
On 5/23/16, 6:36 AM, "Patricia Shanahan" wrote:
>Systers, http://anitaborg.org/get-involved/systers/
>
>More generally, the Wikipedia article on "Women in Computing",
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_computing,
On 5/21/16, 4:29 PM, "Patricia Shanahan" wrote:
>Good points. Unfortunately, the projects in which I'm currently active
>are not very beginner-friendly.
>
>Could people suggest a few projects that would benefit from, and be able
>to use, relatively inexperienced programmers right
On 5/20/16, 5:26 AM, "Sharan Foga" wrote:
>>>Hi All
>>>
>>> I'm interested in finding out how we could encourage more women to
>>> participate on Apache projects. It's a discussion topic that came up
>>>last
>>> week while I was at Apachecon. My understanding is that we
Hi Rich,
I'm on the road with limited internet so I haven't looked, but when are
reviews due?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 2/17/16, 1:51 PM, "Rich Bowen" wrote:
>By now, you should have received email from the ApacheCon CFP system
>with your system credentials. Note that the email was
Hi Rich,
Are there going to be tracks and track chairs? I'm interested in seeing a
track on Client-side topics and am willing to help review talks relating
to that. If the reviewers need to be Apache-wide, I am probably not be
best person for that.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 2/13/16, 3:57 AM, "Rich
Hi,
What is the appropriate list for discussing possible tracks for ApacheCon?
Some Apache projects, like Flex and Cordova, are more oriented to clients,
applications and front-ends than server-side, backend code. For this
year's ApacheCon in Vancouver, Flex and Cordova want to propose a track
On 11/21/15, 7:06 PM, "William A Rowe Jr" wrote:
>That was my reaction. A dev-cn@community.apache. org could be a useful
>discussion vehicle to engage prospects and help with facilitating that
>engagement. It wouldn't look all that much different than the usual
>English
IMO, I believe history does repeat itself, and that there are pendulums
and cycles, but I think the dynamic here is more linear. Now I certainly
haven’t been involved with open source and Apache for very long, but
having met Roy and heard him describe why Apache was founded and how it
was
On 7/16/15, 7:24 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>OK. Thanks for the info.
>
>I might try subsetting the information to not grab the release info and
>run a job once a day to cache the latest for my project on some other
>server. I’ll reply ba
On 8/20/15, 5:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
It is generally AL code all the time. I don't know where you invented a
'kick-in' concept, but unless the committers are violating their
ICLA/CCLA,
nothing could be further from the truth.
Committers sometimes make mistakes.
On 8/20/15, 9:26 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
However, a quick search reveals that there are precisely zero
occurrences of the word 'release' in version 2.0 of the Apache
License.
So, I don't know what Jim meant by 'licenses kick in at release', but
my view is that
On 6/25/15, 7:18 AM, hedh...@gmail.com on behalf of Niclas Hedhman
hedh...@gmail.com on behalf of nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
If the format is published, and the reward of following it would be
that the reporter picks it up automatically, it could lead to swift
adoption ;-)
You might get push
This is a really cool service. I noticed it wants login creds. What data
would have to be stripped in order to allow general public access? What
would it take to get the JSON for the public info? I’ll write the client
side in Apache Flex.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 3/5/15, 1:39 AM, Daniel Gruno
to fit in he Apache
Way.
Best regards
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:24 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Consensus Approval works
If person A ‘can’t work’ with person B, in the nomination discussion, if
person A is a reasonable person and sees overwhelming support for person
B, person A should simply vote +0 and try to avoid person B. It isn’t
like you all work in the same physical office. Once a group of people
gets large
Consensus Approval works great until you have someone who others rightly
or wrongly perceive as an obstructionist. Then it just makes the whole
project the loser.
At least one project uses majority approval for new members, but a serious
attempt is made to make sure that the vote is unanimous
I think Bertrand’s document is coming along nicely.
This is half serious and half for fun, but while it will be great to have
a maturity model and top-level authoritative documents on the Apache Way,
to me, what would also help is a way to make important things memorizable.
I sure hope I don’t
On 1/15/15, 9:46 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Where are you seeing discouragement of pilot projects?
In the tone and content of the responses on this thread, including this
one where it feels to me you are again using the maintenance and training
costs to
On 1/15/15, 6:35 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
...*historically*, when this kind of thing has happened (project
implements,
thing becomes critical), gradually it becomes the responsibility of
Infra,
://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
I’m way outside my area of knowledge, but is there anything stopping the
OFBiz community from
My (more than) 2 cents on this topic. It's going to be really interesting to
see how the board decides on this sort of thing.
Your plan is completely logical. Plenty of business operate this way like
newspapers and car manufacturers. Everybody knows when the next release is.
Car
IMO, a more important question is: Does it fit within the Apache Way of
Community over Code to have a project release on a particular schedule?
Because it feels to me that if you have a release cadence then you are saying
Clock over Community.
I get that having a schedule helps many in the
it is worth blogging it. The draft of the report is captured
on the dev@flex.a.o archives so it is public and searchable.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
45 matches
Mail list logo