Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-12 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le lundi 11 mai 2015 08:46:41 Sergio Fernández a écrit : Hi sebb, On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:08 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: What I can already say is that I do not understand what https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/projects/ data_files aim to

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-12 Thread Sergio Fernández
Hi, On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: I think we could generate an authoritative DOAP url for TLPs from committee- info.txt then give instructions to projects to update their software DOAP files to point to these reference TLPs DOAP files

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-12 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I started generating /doap/{tlp-id}/pmc.rdf Please tell me what to add in these files I don't understand what to write into /doap/foundation/tlps.rdf And for /doap/{tlp-id}/{project-id}.rdf, the content can't be generated: there is a lot of handwritten content we can't guess automatically What

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-11 Thread Sergio Fernández
Hi sebb, On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:08 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: What I can already say is that I do not understand what https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/projects/data_files aim to represent. This is the default location for the PMC data [1] files

Re: DOAP validation code (was DOAP format question)

2015-05-11 Thread Sergio Fernández
As a said, that was a quick approximation of the problem. So the next step should be a implement such validator, ok, I'll do it in the following days. On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:36 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 May 2015 at 11:51, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 5 May 2015 at 16:57,

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-11 Thread sebb
On 11 May 2015 at 07:46, Sergio Fernández wik...@apache.org wrote: Hi sebb, On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:08 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: What I can already say is that I do not understand what https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/projects/data_files aim to

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-11 Thread Sergio Fernández
Hi, On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 1:13 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: There is some special-case XSL code which does this conversion. If the rdf:resource URL does not end in .rdf, then the the http:// and .apache.org/ header and trailer are stripped off, leaving commons This is then assumed to

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-11 Thread sebb
On 11 May 2015 at 13:21, Sergio Fernández sergio.fernan...@redlink.co wrote: Hi, On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 1:13 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: There is some special-case XSL code which does this conversion. If the rdf:resource URL does not end in .rdf, then the the http:// and .apache.org/

DOAP validation code (was DOAP format question)

2015-05-08 Thread sebb
On 5 May 2015 at 16:57, Sergio Fernández wik...@apache.org wrote: Hi, snip/ I didn't have much time today, but what I already did was implementing the basics of how the DOAP processing could look like. For the moment is at https://github.com/wikier/asf-doap until I'll get something more

Re: DOAP validation code (was DOAP format question)

2015-05-08 Thread sebb
On 8 May 2015 at 11:51, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 5 May 2015 at 16:57, Sergio Fernández wik...@apache.org wrote: Hi, snip/ I didn't have much time today, but what I already did was implementing the basics of how the DOAP processing could look like. For the moment is at

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-05 Thread Sergio Fernández
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:51 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: Checking for such simple typos could be done with almost any scripting language. The RDF files are listed in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/projects/files.xml (DOAPs) and

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-05 Thread sebb
On 5 May 2015 at 14:58, Sergio Fernández sergio.fernan...@redlink.co wrote: On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:51 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: Checking for such simple typos could be done with almost any scripting language. The RDF files are listed in

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-05 Thread sebb
On 5 May 2015 at 16:57, Sergio Fernández wik...@apache.org wrote: Hi, On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:39 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: One question, sebb, how the site development is organize? Do you use jira or something as any other project does? Just to do the things properly according

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-05 Thread Sergio Fernández
Hi, On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:39 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: One question, sebb, how the site development is organize? Do you use jira or something as any other project does? Just to do the things properly according your guidelines. It's not a regular project. I don't know who owns

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-05 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le mardi 5 mai 2015 01:05:31 sebb a écrit : OK, but that's because whoever code the XSLT decided to be defensive to such interpretation. If you read back in this thread you will see that I did this in order to support both asfext:PMC and asfext:pmc. But that does not mean is right.

RE: DOAP format question

2015-05-05 Thread neera.x.singh
Hi Can anyone give any hint of implementing decision tree in pig? Thanks Neera -Original Message- From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:herve.bout...@free.fr] Sent: 05 May 2015 11:37 To: sebb; Sergio Fernández Cc: dev@community.apache.org; ASF Site-Dev Subject: Re: DOAP format question Le mardi

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-05 Thread sebb
On 5 May 2015 at 07:06, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: Le mardi 5 mai 2015 01:05:31 sebb a écrit : OK, but that's because whoever code the XSLT decided to be defensive to such interpretation. If you read back in this thread you will see that I did this in order to support both

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-04 Thread sebb
There are 7 projects currently that maintain their own PMC RDF files. Alll of these use asfext:PMC (not pmc). However it looks like all of the project DOAP files use asfext:pmc rather than PMC. So the path of least resistance is clearly to use lower-case. On 4 May 2015 at 01:39, sebb

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-04 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I'm not a RDF expert: if someone with more knowledge on this can join, it would be really useful But apart from seeing that most of the documentation was talking about pmc instead of PMC [1] (I just had to fix 1 place), I was convinced that the correct case is lowercase when reading asfext

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-04 Thread sebb
On 4 May 2015 at 18:00, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: I'm not a RDF expert: if someone with more knowledge on this can join, it would be really useful But apart from seeing that most of the documentation was talking about pmc instead of PMC [1] (I just had to fix 1 place), I was

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-04 Thread Sergio Fernández
RDF can be serialized as XML, but the XML tool chain is not well suitable to process RDF. That's what a meant when I early commented I was happy to contribute proper DOAP/RDF infrastructure to projects-new.a.o. Back to the current issues... see my comments inline. On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:51 PM,

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-03 Thread sebb
XPath nodes are case-sensitive; asfext:PMC is not the same as asfext:pmc. The change from PMC to pmc has broken some of the reports - the PMC name is missing from most of the entries listed in http://projects.apache.org/indexes/pmc.html. I don't know which case is correct, but there are

Re: DOAP format question

2015-04-13 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
ok, it seems I can update the source, then I did it I suppose this will be published in the next site content generation... Regards, Hervé Le dimanche 12 avril 2015 04:41:22 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : Hi, I'm working on http://projects-new.apache.org/ , which makes me dig into ASF DOAP

DOAP format question

2015-04-11 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Hi, I'm working on http://projects-new.apache.org/ , which makes me dig into ASF DOAP conventions And I found something that I think is a bug: on http://projects.apache.org/docs/pmc.html , half of the page explains about asfext:PMC in uppercase, while the other half is about asfext:pmc in