I started generating /doap/{tlp-id}/pmc.rdf
Please tell me what to add in these files
I don't understand what to write into /doap/foundation/tlps.rdf
And for /doap/{tlp-id}/{project-id}.rdf, the content can't be generated: there
is a lot of handwritten content we can't guess automatically
What w
Please delete me from this thread if you can.
Betty B. James
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Sergio Fernández
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY
> wrote:
> >
> > I think we could generate an authoritative DOAP url for TLPs from
> > committee-
> > info.txt
> > then
Hi,
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
>
> I think we could generate an authoritative DOAP url for TLPs from
> committee-
> info.txt
> then give instructions to projects to update their software DOAP files to
> point
> to these reference TLPs DOAP files
>
Exactly. I think a co
Le lundi 11 mai 2015 08:46:41 Sergio Fernández a écrit :
> Hi sebb,
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:08 PM, sebb wrote:
> > > What I can already say is that I do not understand what
> >
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/projects/
> > data_files>
> > > aim to repre
On 11 May 2015 at 13:21, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 1:13 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> There is some special-case XSL code which does this conversion.
>> If the rdf:resource URL does not end in ".rdf", then the the http://
>> and .apache.org/ header and trailer are stripped
Hi,
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 1:13 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> There is some special-case XSL code which does this conversion.
> If the rdf:resource URL does not end in ".rdf", then the the http://
> and .apache.org/ header and trailer are stripped off, leaving
> "commons"
> This is then assumed to be the
On 11 May 2015 at 07:46, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Hi sebb,
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:08 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> > What I can already say is that I do not understand what
>> >
>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/projects/data_files
>> > aim to represent.
>>
>> T
Hi sebb,
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:08 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> > What I can already say is that I do not understand what
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/projects/data_files
> > aim to represent.
>
> This is the default location for the PMC data [1] files which pro
On 5 May 2015 at 16:57, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:39 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> > One question, sebb, how the site development is organize? Do you use
>> jira or
>> > something as any other project does? Just to do the things properly
>> > according your guidelines.
>>
Hi,
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:39 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> > One question, sebb, how the site development is organize? Do you use
> jira or
> > something as any other project does? Just to do the things properly
> > according your guidelines.
>
> It's not a regular project.
> I don't know who "owns" the
On 5 May 2015 at 14:58, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:51 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> Checking for such simple typos could be done with almost any scripting
>> language.
>>
>> The RDF files are listed in
>>
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/proj
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:51 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> Checking for such simple typos could be done with almost any scripting
> language.
>
> The RDF files are listed in
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/projects/files.xml
> (DOAPs)
> and
>
> https://svn.apache.org/r
On 5 May 2015 at 07:06, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> Le mardi 5 mai 2015 01:05:31 sebb a écrit :
>> > OK, but that's because whoever code the XSLT decided to be defensive to
>> > such interpretation.
>>
>> If you read back in this thread you will see that I did this in order
>> to support both asfext:PM
Hi
Can anyone give any hint of implementing decision tree in pig?
Thanks
Neera
-Original Message-
From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:herve.bout...@free.fr]
Sent: 05 May 2015 11:37
To: sebb; Sergio Fernández
Cc: dev@community.apache.org; ASF Site-Dev
Subject: Re: DOAP format question
Le mardi
Le mardi 5 mai 2015 01:05:31 sebb a écrit :
> > OK, but that's because whoever code the XSLT decided to be defensive to
> > such interpretation.
>
> If you read back in this thread you will see that I did this in order
> to support both asfext:PMC and asfext:pmc.
>
> > But that does not mean is r
On 4 May 2015 at 20:50, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 9:04 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> > The term must be used exactly in the same way it is defined by the
>> > namespace/vocabulary/ontology, otherwise won't be processed as expected.
>>
>> Theoretically, but not in this case.
>>
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 9:04 PM, sebb wrote:
> > The term must be used exactly in the same way it is defined by the
> > namespace/vocabulary/ontology, otherwise won't be processed as expected.
>
> Theoretically, but not in this case.
>
> The processing is defined by XSL files that were manually cr
On 4 May 2015 at 19:37, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> RDF can be serialized as XML, but the XML tool chain is not well suitable to
> process RDF. That's what a meant when I early commented I was happy to
> contribute proper DOAP/RDF infrastructure to projects-new.a.o.
>
> Back to the current issues...
RDF can be serialized as XML, but the XML tool chain is not well suitable
to process RDF. That's what a meant when I early commented I was happy to
contribute proper DOAP/RDF infrastructure to projects-new.a.o.
Back to the current issues... see my comments inline.
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:51 PM,
On 4 May 2015 at 18:00, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> I'm not a RDF expert: if someone with more knowledge on this can join, it
> would be really useful
>
> But apart from seeing that most of the documentation was talking about pmc
> instead of PMC [1] (I just had to fix 1 place), I was convinced that th
I'm not a RDF expert: if someone with more knowledge on this can join, it
would be really useful
But apart from seeing that most of the documentation was talking about pmc
instead of PMC [1] (I just had to fix 1 place), I was convinced that the
correct case is lowercase when reading asfext defi
There are 7 projects currently that maintain their own PMC RDF files.
Alll of these use asfext:PMC (not pmc).
However it looks like all of the project DOAP files use asfext:pmc
rather than PMC.
So the path of least resistance is clearly to use lower-case.
On 4 May 2015 at 01:39, sebb wrote:
>
XPath nodes are case-sensitive; is not the same as .
The change from PMC to pmc has broken some of the reports - the PMC
name is missing from most of the entries listed in
http://projects.apache.org/indexes/pmc.html.
I don't know which case is correct, but there are currently RDF files
in projec
ok, it seems I can update the source, then I did it
I suppose this will be published in the next site content generation...
Regards,
Hervé
Le dimanche 12 avril 2015 04:41:22 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on http://projects-new.apache.org/ , which makes me dig into ASF
> DOAP co
24 matches
Mail list logo
