I'm cautiously optimistic. Disappointed this is documented on Google's site
and not Android's site. That piece of minutiae matters.
On Oct 31, 2013 12:14 PM, Carlos Santana csantan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm going to the store to buy a Bag of KitKat to celebrate Happy
Halloween !
On Thu, Oct
.
Joe
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm cautiously optimistic. Disappointed this is documented on Google's
site
and not Android's site. That piece of minutiae matters.
On Oct 31, 2013 12:14 PM, Carlos Santana csantan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm going
+9001
Seriously, those docs suck and should go away! We should definitely do this.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Since Cordova just uses the underlying webview's WebSQL / Localstorage /
IDB, I think it's confusing to have such elaborate docs for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14908/#review27476
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joe Bowser
On Oct. 24, 2013, 3:40 p.m
I shipped the Honeycomb device down to SF. I wouldn't worry about it
because we don't support Honeycomb.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Thanks Simon,
I fixed a bug today that caused openDatabase to fail when the DB name
changed
There are some 3.0.0 bugs that don't exist in 2.9.0.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Josh Soref jso...@blackberry.com wrote:
On 10/21/13 7:38 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote:
Having a tonne of fun putting the bunny back in the box.
Here is a list of plugin defects [1] that have been
Yeah. I suspect that there's a WebView problem here that we can't do
anything about because Samsung has its own modified version of the WebView.
On Oct 21, 2013 8:28 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Cool. One thing I would look at is whether Angular is using
history.pushState /
+1 for More Magic/Less Magic
On Oct 21, 2013 8:34 AM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote:
Less Magic (bin/create, Plugman) and More Magic (CLI).[1]
Mike Billau's suggestions look decent to me. How about classic instead of
legacy? Removes the it sucks and will die someday
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
Typically YYZ (Toronto Pearson International Airport), 1 hour drive from
Google Waterloo office down the freeway.
I'm flying into YYZ.
There is a closer, smaller airport in Waterloo Region (YKF?) but it has
very few
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Anis KADRI anis.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
Sweet. So I think we all agree (expect Joe perhaps?) that both
approaches should be supported :-)
I don't care. I'll keep using the source and plugman and making sure
that works, and I'll just ignore the complaints and
I meant that we'll be using my laptop here in Vancouver at the Regus
space. Who is hosting the hangout?
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
So, can I get an invite to the hangout? I'll be hosting it from the
Regus space in Vancouver.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9
4, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Joe Bowser
bows...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm unavailable until after the 15th. I'll be at Big
Android
BBQ.
Hey
I'm going through the plugins right now to see what needs to be
backported, and I find myself not remembering what the state of
CordovaResourceAPI was during 2.9.x and whether these fixes should go
into 2.9.x. I'm thinking that they shouldn't, since I can't find the
related commits on the
Hey
Other than the ResourceURI fixes, I think that we're pretty much done
the backporting for 2.9.x on Android. That being said, I notice that
we break apart Notification into Notification and Vibration for 3.0.x
because of the W3C. I'm thinking that we don't want to move things
like API
Hey
Often there will be errors in the docs that will go back three or more
releases? How far should we go back in supporting docs? So far when I
do a docs update, I'll edit the latest releast, the last major release
and the 2.9.x branch, leaving the older releases with bad docs.
Should we edit
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
Anis: Totally agrees, but its important to highlight that both directions
for that arguments hold. We've done our best to support bin/ scripts post
3.0, yet blanket statements like CLI should not be used with IDE, or CLI
Hey
I just noticed Andrew's work on CB-3747, and while I'm cool with this
being added, because we're Apache, we need to make sure that we point
to media that's compatible with Apache's licences that we can
guarantee will still exist. Part of why I didn't fix this issue
myself is because the
on Apache's servers, don't think it will be a problem to
put a short video on there.
I suppose we could use http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOH4aGows40 if it is
allowed (not sure the license)
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
I just noticed Andrew's work on CB
I say this because Shaz and I own the copyright to that video, BTW. :P
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess we could use the old PhoneGap video. I think we should use this
video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XI-fLgWOA4U
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10
It might be worthwhile for me to take a look at the source and see
whether this makes sense as a plugin, or as something derived from the
existing code that installs like a plugin. Of course, this goes into
the CordovaWebView design and what we expose, so there'll be a lot
more information here.
/watch?v=MBBpBgfa_Lo
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Joe Bowser
bows...@gmail.comjavascript:;
javascript:;
wrote:
I say this because Shaz and I own the copyright to that video, BTW.
:P
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Joe Bowser
bows
at all, so as
far as
user knows it should all work OK as per the API guide.
Yeah - this is what worries me the most. Couldn't the docs be
updated
pretty quickly to let folks know about issues?
On 10/8/13 4:05 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
What
I think we need to just have everyone go through their work over the
past month and see if they missed backports. I didn't actually have
very much missed, and I just backported the File plugin in the 2.9.1
branch. Of course, with backporting, we need more people to look at
what was in 3.1.0 and
I'm unavailable until after the 15th. I'll be at Big Android BBQ.
Hey
I'm very unclear as to why it would be similar to cordova-android,
since it sounds like FireOS already has support for a lot of what
Cordova does. What does the current FireOS WebApp API look like, and
how does it compare to Cordova? I thought they were already very
similar.
Also, would the
OK, where did my commits go?
I'm cool with me acutally screwing up and being called on it, but this
looks like you're trying to make me look bad for your own ends.
Seriously, if you have a problem with me being on this project, put it
on the list. Your passive aggressive nonsense is harming the
.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, where did my commits go?
I'm cool with me acutally screwing up and being called on it, but this
looks like you're trying to make me look bad for your own ends.
Seriously, if you have a problem with me being on this project
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
It's a problem when you chose to interpret everything in the absolute worst
version of possible explanations, without warrant.
Oh really? Who wins with this retag? Why is it acceptable to throw me
under the bus once
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Ian Clelland iclell...@chromium.org wrote:
1. Being on your local head does not mean that it's on the head of 3.1.x on
the remote repo.
The thing is that it was yesterday when I checked the commit log.
4. Nobody's doing anything out of spite. If it means that
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Sorry, was away from my computer for a while there.
Joe, sounds like what happened was that you pushed the tag without pushing
the branch. That has happened a few times in the past by others (including
myself). No
Just tagged Android. There's some weird inconsistencies across
devices, but overall the platform itself still seems solid. There's
nothing here that would prevent a release.
We should really start that API audit though. These inconsistencies
don't make me super confident in the plugins. :(
On
Hey
Are we doing a release? I don't see any reason why not from an Android
standpoint, since only one issue was merged in from RC1.
Joe
are
overdue)
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
Are we doing a release? I don't see any reason why not from an Android
standpoint, since only one issue was merged in from RC1.
Joe
that is not in RC1 (but in the 3.1.x branch) related to
the Keyboard preferences in iOS 7 (visual bug). This is why I've already
made the prefs into a plugin. Technically they can at a later date use
this
plugin as well (plugin not released yet).
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@chromium.org wrote:
We should be supporting 2.9 -- I'm pretty sure we've committed to at least
fixing bugs as they come up.
We've committed to it, but to be honest, I stopped doing the backports
when I heard there wasn't going to be a
Do it!
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote:
The Android platform scripts use shelljs.exec's synchronous mode. This is a
terrible hack that leaks filehandles by the hundred, wastes lots of CPU
cycles, and can cause EMFILE on OSX because it runs out of
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote:
I am strongly opposed to splitting into one file per platform. We want to
support platform tags in config.xml, which will allow platform-specific
content within the single config.xml.
Agreed. I'm not sure if
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Lindsey Simon els...@gmail.com wrote:
When you say www are you referring to project/www or
project/platform/android/assets/www?
That's the kicker, isn't it? If you're using the CLI, we're talking
project/www, but not everyone uses the CLI, or should use the
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Carlos Santana csantan...@gmail.com wrote:
Branden,
On Android, it's really easy to load XML files from res/xml/foo.xml,
so that's where we put it.
Easy for who?
Easy for anyone who has to actually maintain this. We have to do this
on startup, and adding
Hey
What did we agree to for supporting the old 2.9.x branch? I'm just
wondering, since we're still getting tons of bugs filed against that.
While most of them are valid in 3.0.x, we probably should be
backporting to 2.9.
Have people been doing this. I've been doing this a bit, but I have
to
Because only Blackberry implements it this way.
On iOS, it lives in the root of the iOS project, and on Android it
lives in res/xml, because it's an XML file on Android. I'm fine with
the CLI abstracting out reality as long as we're clear that's what's
being done, and indicate that this is for
Hey
Right now, I'm working on a weird file issue that requires me to
update mobile-spec, but I'm wondering where the tests should live.
Should it all keep living in mobile-spec, or is it with the plugins.
And if it's with the plugins, will there be scripts to assemble
mobile-spec all Voltron
Hey
I found these icons from Noun Project which are public domain. I'm
wanting to replace are existing non-icon weirdness with these. I
would have liked to use other icons to make it look more consistent,
but I'm worried about licensing.
For Arrows:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote:
We debated internally at Google how much to talk about this. In the end we
decided that since the external APIs were not changing, this could be
claimed as an internal refactoring. I'm not sure whether that was the
Source Technology Center*
France, Montpellier
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
I found these icons from Noun Project which are public domain. I'm
wanting to replace are existing non-icon weirdness with these. I
would have liked to use other
So, what are the plugins being versioned at? 3.x? 1.x?
I'm asking because the plugins are tagged with the 3.0.0 release, so
it makes sense for them to start there.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote:
I don't think we want the Cordova version (3.1.0)
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Plugins are not tagged nor branched along with platforms. They are releases
completely independently.
Commit to the dev branch always.
AND FOREVER!11!!eleventyone!!!
Seriously, can't we have a stable branch
, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, We've been ignoring this for quite a while, but it's not going
away:
There's still people who want to use WebSQL, and WebSQL is still
totally broken. Part of the reason it's broken is the fact that
Android prevents
:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, here's a crazy concept that I'm going to throw out there.
How about we audit and recommend a third-party plugin and not do any
more work on this issue.
+1
I don't think there's enough consensus about whether WebSQL even
...@chromium.org
wrote:
+1
Also, if you are a component owner, it's pretty simple in JIRA to add a
dashboard widget that shows you all unassigned bugs in your component.
Ian
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
:12 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Tried out my email code, and despite my confidence, it doesn't work :P.
So... Joe - like your plan.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
yup.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Michael Sierra msie...@adobe.com wrote:
I'm doing a bunch of cleanup work on the doc about config.xml
preferences, and have accumulated a faceful of queries I could use
some help with. I'm also folding in some parallel PhoneGap Build doc
where appropriate, but
After I let Andrew do the tagging of RC1, I noticed something that
looks broken by the fact that I can't reproduce this result without
using coho, and I can't find in the source where coho messes with the
build labels.
Now, as well all know, the JS is generated by Grunt. Assuming that
we're
at the previous tag?
Coho's not involved in any of that. The code is in
cordova-js/build/packager.js
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
After I let Andrew do the tagging of RC1, I noticed something that
looks broken by the fact that I can't reproduce
I'm currently trying to figure out CB-4858, which got assigned to
David, but I'm finding that I'm getting stuck at this part:
private String updateUrl(String url) {
Uri newUrl = Uri.parse(url);
if (newUrl.isRelative()) {
//url = this.webView.getUrl().substring(0,
Ok, We've been ignoring this for quite a while, but it's not going away:
There's still people who want to use WebSQL, and WebSQL is still
totally broken. Part of the reason it's broken is the fact that
Android prevents us from using the official WebSQL API on file URIs,
and that we have a nasty
+1
It's been a while, but I think it's time to spell things out.
I feel that it's next to impossible to contribute to this project in
any real meaningful way, and that this project has gone off the
tracks. This is due to certain people posting huge essays that change
the architecture of the
needs extra testing. I actually
didn't mean to change the name from RELEASENOTES, so I'll add the file
update the instructions to use this name.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
You set the version on the 3.1.x branch to 3.2.x-dev.
I tried following
My responses are also inline:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding unilateral decision making, I can't find examples of this. I'm
looking back at all the essay sized proposals
Hey
It's come to my attention that InAppBrowser is terrible
1. We keep getting UI Thread errors
2. The UI is awful (on Android)
3. We can now move drawables in plugins
So, I propose that we do a re-write of InAppBrowser and add the
ability to move drawable resources to plugman. Even though I
That plugin specifically is getting a lot effort put into it from Max right
now, so if there are any limitations just bring them up.
-Michal
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
It's come to my attention that InAppBrowser is terrible
1. We keep getting UI
Hey
Where's the issue that was opened about making Cordova a library
project? Or was that just on the list?
Joe
to share :)
On Sep 17, 2013 5:14 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Max, should I redirect all InAppBrowser issues to you if you're already on
it?
Here's some thoughts:
* I think that it needs to be broken out into multiple classes. The
InAppWebView is becoming non-trivial, and probably
made its way into ADT / Ant? Or
are you thinking of moving to Gradle?
I think any IAB improvements are welcome.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
I just pushed up some minor changes that make a pretty big difference:
1. I made the background
iOS: Shaz
Windows: Jesse
OSX: Shaz
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we move this so it happens on Mondays instead of Fridays.
Releasing on a Friday is never a good idea, especially since we're
going to be MIA for those two Fridays with internal
Based on what I know about The Apache Way, direct hosting on GitHub
will never happen. BTW, Whenever there is something that I don't
like about the way we have to do things, I blame the Apache Way for
it.
I would love if there was better mirroring for pull requests from
GitHub. That being said,
volunteered for release master, so I'll do so for this
one.
First up is creating the release bug and branching JS / Spec. I'll get
on
it and report back! :)
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
So, what's happening with this release?
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013
11, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
This is in response to CB-4620:
This bug only happens if you are switching between pages faster than
the app can draw the URI. I don't even know how this could happen,
since I didn't think the WebView worked without being attached
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
That's good feedback. I was flip floppy about actually removing the files
from core, but sounds like there's good reason to leave them for now. I'll
put them back and deprecate them. Also unsure about whether it merits a
Any reason why? I'm wondering if this was done to help people who
don't use node or something.
It's in bin/node_modules. I understand the need for this for build
scripts, but shouldn't we tell people to npm update?
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Braden Shepherdson
bra...@chromium.org wrote:
Where is this? That sounds odd.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Joe Bowser bows
This is in response to CB-4620:
This bug only happens if you are switching between pages faster than
the app can draw the URI. I don't even know how this could happen,
since I didn't think the WebView worked without being attached to a
view, but it does.
So, what I'm proposing is that we add an
What does this have to do with Cordova? It looks like you're building
your own bridge on Android.
Make sure that your Java version that you're building with supports
annotations. If not, you won't be able to add the Javascript
Interface.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:52 PM, dev at watch2web.com
Hey
So, I'm trying to catch up on all the changes that have been done, and
I'm finding that EVERYTHING IS BROKEN! While a bunch of changes were
done on master, they break what's on master in the plugins because we
do plugin dev in the dev branch. Also, I don't see any documented way
of switching
+1 for #2
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Anis KADRI anis.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for number 2
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:16 AM, David Kemp drk...@google.com wrote:
+1 for #2 as well
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Braden Shepherdson
bra...@chromium.orgwrote:
+1 for #2.
On Tue,
Hey
I just pulled the latest Cordova JS and I noticed that urlutil has
failing tests. What is urlutil for, and why are the tests failing?
Should I care about this beyond the fact that I dislike failing tests?
Joe
Hey
The last week, I've been doing some preliminary work on Android
accessibility, and after fiddling with Cordova, I've come to some
pretty bad realizations:
1. Android Accessibility in a WebView is achieved the same way we do
PhoneGap, except that their JS is injected from a static server.
Subject: Re: Android a11y, Whitelists and Offline Story
(I thought Android a11y was going to be Ally Ogilvie :) )
Some thoughts inline:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
The last week, I've been doing some preliminary work on Android
accessibility
I'd use this if i had one of those ASUS Transformer devices. Those
things are awesome!
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Anis KADRI anis.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks pretty cool. However, not sure if I would use something like
this as I am completely hopeless when it comes to typing on
Hey
I found a pretty serious bug on master with the Camera and I'm
wondering if there's been additional changes to the core APIs that
would cause this to not work, namely any fixes in the
CordovaResourceAPI? It seems that for some reason the Camera isn't
finding the photo right away because of
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Ian Clelland iclell...@chromium.org wrote:
After thinking about this for a couple of days, and discussing with Andrew
and Michal here, it seem that there are definitely (at least) two different
issues here.
First is that there is no way to use a custom
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4029
This seems easy enough, does anyone know what the code is?
://www.w3.org/TR/file-writer-api/#errors-and-exceptions
On 8/22/13 1:55 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4029
This seems easy enough, does anyone know what the code is?
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
Potentially cordova itself would make use of this feature. For one quick
practical example, in order to implement local notifications on iOS you
have to modify the AppDelegate, which is created as part of the app
too.
Joe Bowser wrote:
After reading the mailing list, it looks like this will NOT be added to
InAppBrowser, since there is very little reason to add it for a corp VPN
setup. (If your network is so secure, why do you need broken SSL?)
Corporate networks or VPNs are secure that's why we
Hey
If you look at the Minor bugs, many of them are Good First Bug
status and could be tackled. Feel free to work on those if you can.
Also, if you have a phone that I can't get, you can work on those bugs
too. Let us know if you've adopted a bug by writing a comment on it,
and when you're
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Ian Clelland iclell...@chromium.org wrote:
For Mobile Chrome Apps, we have a need to subclass the CordovaChromeClient
class used by our applications. There's not currently a way to do that in
the CLI world
Also, in [this thread][1], there has been some
I can't make this meeting. I'm out of the office until the 16th.
On Aug 7, 2013 8:06 AM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 7, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote:
Attendees: If you plan to attend, could you add your name to this list
(inline so that the
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Smith, Peter
pet...@fast.au.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hi,
There seems conflicting information about the Android API levels
supported/required and it is causing us some confusion. Please see
questions inline below.
You seem to be very easily confused.
(Ref 1)
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Joe - please stop saying I told you so. It really is counter-productive
and it takes away from having a feeling of shared responsibility for the
project.
I completely disagree. I explicitly disagreed with this because
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
That said, I'm still don't think that our mistake was anything other than
poor messaging / docs. 3.0 implies that breaking changes will happen.
I disagree. We should have kept the shim in so that people could
Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
Normally being very averse to changing pubic API's, I'm with Andrew and
Ian on this. If we are going to be making breaking changes, especially if
they are small, do them all at once.
On Jul 9, 2013, at 11:06 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
So far, we've
Android and iOS at a minimum (the plugin ecosystem for the other
platforms is much smaller).
Any takers?
- tommy
On 30/07/2013, at 11:57 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
So, yeah, remember how I fought this, and then suddenly we came to
consensus because it's better to break everything
: 2bdc849c2ba505d944f2b81fc02245fba9fbf204
Parents: 7cbe8f5
Author: Joe Bowser bows...@apache.org
Authored: Tue Jul 30 15:03:25 2013 -0700
Committer: Joe Bowser bows...@apache.org
Committed: Tue Jul 30 15:03:25 2013 -0700
/commit/5c38101a
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova-android/tree/5c38101a
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova-android/diff/5c38101a
Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: 5c38101a9eda2a18b65dfcabf0452bd727009598
Parents: b4236b9
Author: Joe Bowser bows...@apache.org
Hey
Apparently Cordova 2.9.x doesn't build with Android 4.3. This is
because of an issue with setPluginsEnabled being deprecated in
InAppBrowser. Since we agreed to support this release, should we
release a Cordova 2.9.1 soon to incorporate the fix, or just tell
people to replace InAppBrowser
/ install work here? If so, I think that would be
preferred way.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
Apparently Cordova 2.9.x doesn't build with Android 4.3. This is
because of an issue with setPluginsEnabled being deprecated in
InAppBrowser. Since we
I did the update on the Nexus 10 and will be testing on it today. I don't
expect any major surprises.
On Jul 29, 2013 8:25 AM, Mike Billau mike.bil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, we were wondering if anybody has been performing testing on Android
4.3? and if so, how it has it been looking? I can
Yes, we do.
On Jul 29, 2013 7:38 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Fil alluded to this last week I think, but wanted to confirm. Should we be
creating a cordova-medic repo?
901 - 1000 of 1563 matches
Mail list logo
