[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12981159#action_12981159
]
Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-973:
-
indeed. That's something I've introduce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12981090#action_12981090
]
Randall Leeds commented on COUCHDB-973:
---
Since the document may be recreated at any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12981068#action_12981068
]
Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-973:
---
I almost went to say +1 but after r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12981062#action_12981062
]
Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-973:
---
I'll re-read the relevant parts of RFC 2616
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benjamin Young updated COUCHDB-973:
---
Attachment: 410.patch
> Return 410 when GETing a previously deleted document (rather than 40
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benjamin Young updated COUCHDB-1026:
Attachment: encode_db_name_in_rewriter.patch
> Database names are not encoded in the rewr
Database names are not encoded in the rewriter
--
Key: COUCHDB-1026
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1026
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Bug
Components: HTTP Interface
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980944#action_12980944
]
Timothy Smith commented on COUCHDB-360:
---
I agree with Benoit; I have a use case that
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:38, Noah Slater wrote:
> On 12 Jan 2011, at 18:00, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> What is this now? The US Senate? I thought we were better than that.
>
> I'll filibuster us into November if you're not careful, Mister.
>
>
>
Noah for president.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Filipe David Manana
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>> Vote was stopped yesterday, in any serious businness, we would wait a little.
>
> Apache CouchDB is not a business, it's an open source and community project.
>
> Besides that
On 12 Jan 2011, at 18:00, Paul Davis wrote:
> What is this now? The US Senate? I thought we were better than that.
I'll filibuster us into November if you're not careful, Mister.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> On 12 Jan 2011, at 17:45, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Robert Newson
>> wrote:
>>> +1 trillion.
>>
>> Does that mean the motion passes? I could see nay-votes having a hard
>> time coming back from down 1 trillio
On 12 Jan 2011, at 17:45, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Robert Newson
> wrote:
>> +1 trillion.
>
> Does that mean the motion passes? I could see nay-votes having a hard
> time coming back from down 1 trillion.
Sorry to inform you, Paul...
But that the ASF constitution
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980830#action_12980830
]
Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1010:
--
np, let me know
> improve supervisi
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
> +1 trillion.
Does that mean the motion passes? I could see nay-votes having a hard
time coming back from down 1 trillion.
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Paul Davis
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote
+1 trillion.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
>> On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Robert Newson
>>> wrote:
1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues.
Paul,
I think a new release candidate from the tip of 1.0.x
(3674f2a2ef778bdf211426d9e804192e22cd26ad in github " ensure
write_streamed_attachment bails on negative LenLeft values"
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
>> O
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Robert Newson
>> wrote:
>>> 1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues. Unless there's another
>>> known one of sufficient severity I think we s
On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Robert Newson
> wrote:
>> 1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues. Unless there's another
>> known one of sufficient severity I think we should get 1.0.2 as soon
>> as we can. Can some other folks chime
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980815#action_12980815
]
Adam Kocoloski commented on COUCHDB-1010:
-
I'd like to take one last look first,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980801#action_12980801
]
Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-1010:
Looks good to me.
> improve sup
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Filipe David Manana
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Benoit Chesneau
>>> wrote:
>
> Did the multipart API GET issue cause
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Filipe David Manana
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
Did the multipart API GET issue caused a problem with the current
replicator???
As far as I know
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980751#action_12980751
]
Malte S. Stretz commented on COUCHDB-1025:
--
Doh. Sorry for the noise, next time
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Filipe David Manana
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>>
>>> Did the multipart API GET issue caused a problem with the current
>>> replicator???
>>> As far as I know, CouchDB doesn't internally use the GET multipart
>>> APIs. The n
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>
>> Did the multipart API GET issue caused a problem with the current
>> replicator???
>> As far as I know, CouchDB doesn't internally use the GET multipart
>> APIs. The new replicator uses it however, but it's not part of any
>> official
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Filipe David Manana
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>> Vote was stopped yesterday, in any serious businness, we would wait a little.
>
> Apache CouchDB is not a business, it's an open source and community project.
>
> Besides that
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Filipe David Manana
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>> Well vote is a formal way to test against final package. It take time
>> to prepare artefact and manage process.
>>
>> I guess you all have time to test in real condition last
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> Vote was stopped yesterday, in any serious businness, we would wait a little.
Apache CouchDB is not a business, it's an open source and community project.
Besides that we're talking a about a minor, maintenance release.
Nothing stops us t
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> Well vote is a formal way to test against final package. It take time
> to prepare artefact and manage process.
>
> I guess you all have time to test in real condition last patches, I
> didn't. I even guess you tested last 2 patches against
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> On 12 Jan 2011, at 14:06, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
>> Vote was stopped yesterday, in any serious businness, we would wait a little.
>
> If Paul works on the release today, you're going to have 4 days to find any
> problems with the current c
On 12 Jan 2011, at 14:06, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> Vote was stopped yesterday, in any serious businness, we would wait a little.
If Paul works on the release today, you're going to have 4 days to find any
problems with the current code. Should that be long enough? That's twice the 1
or 2 days
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> I guess you all have time to test in real condition last patches, I
> didn't.
>
s/have/had
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Volker Mische wrote:
> On 12.01.2011 14:51, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Robert Newson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues. Unless there's another
>>> known one of sufficient severity I think we should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Newson resolved COUCHDB-1025.
Resolution: Invalid
The Referer header is required when POST'ing to a document resource (
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Volker Mische wrote:
>>
>> I'm just asking for 1 or 2 days, that's not to much.
I make Volker's words my own.
--
Filipe David Manana,
fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to the
On 12.01.2011 14:51, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues. Unless there's another
known one of sufficient severity I think we should get 1.0.2 as soon
as we can. Can some other folks chime in with their take
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Sebastian Cohnen
wrote:
> unless someone discover another 968 (in terms of seriousness) I think 1.0.2
> should be released ASP. Many people are waiting for this release...
>
I'm waiting for it too. But I want to have time to test it seriously.
- benoît
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
> 1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues. Unless there's another
> known one of sufficient severity I think we should get 1.0.2 as soon
> as we can. Can some other folks chime in with their take please?
>
> B.
I'm just asking for 1 or 2
unless someone discover another 968 (in terms of seriousness) I think 1.0.2
should be released ASP. Many people are waiting for this release...
On 12.01.2011, at 14:34, Robert Newson wrote:
> 1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues. Unless there's another
> known one of sufficient severit
I agree that there are already more than enough serious and not so
serious issues fixed to justify a 1.0.2 release. If we keep waiting
and waiting, there are always issues being reported and discovered
every day/week, therefore always delaying a release.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Robert New
1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues. Unless there's another
known one of sufficient severity I think we should get 1.0.2 as soon
as we can. Can some other folks chime in with their take please?
B.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:27
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980704#action_12980704
]
Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1010:
--
If no one comment against, I will co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980701#action_12980701
]
Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1002:
--
so far no news since comment. Closin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980700#action_12980700
]
Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1001:
--
so far noone reviewed my patch. Test
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
> 1.0.x now has fixes for COUCHDB-1021, COUCHDB-1022 and additional
> protection against any other bugs that might cause
> write_streamed_attachment to go off the rails.
>
> I think we can restart this process and sorry, again, for having to
>
Misleading error "Referer header required." when POSTing without a body
---
Key: COUCHDB-1025
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1025
Project: CouchDB
Issue
1.0.x now has fixes for COUCHDB-1021, COUCHDB-1022 and additional
protection against any other bugs that might cause
write_streamed_attachment to go off the rails.
I think we can restart this process and sorry, again, for having to
veto the previous attempt.
B.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:21 PM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980661#action_12980661
]
Filipe Manana commented on COUCHDB-1022:
Robert, perfectly fine, simpler than exp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980655#action_12980655
]
Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-1022:
I added a guard clause to write_streamed
50 matches
Mail list logo
