Is there any way we can tell whether or not it uses CouchDB?
Obviously, if not, we should remove it.
Otherwise, I'd be tempted to say leave it.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:59, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:11:22PM -0500, Patrick Aljord wrote:
gpirate is a
On 23/01/2009, at 6:12 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
If you want to use CouchDB to build your porn empire, all power to
you -- but
I think that expecting a link from our wiki is a little too much to
ask.
Why? It's a page about apps using CouchDB, not a moral statement by a
group of developers.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Antony Blakey antony.bla...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/01/2009, at 6:12 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
If you want to use CouchDB to build your porn empire, all power to you --
but
I think that expecting a link from our wiki is a little too much to ask.
Why? It's a
Antony,
Thanks for your explanation, and for highlighting the problems associated with
moral arbitration. I can see what you're trying to say. However, I think you
slightly misunderstood my email, I wrote:
I can think of the following problematic areas:
I was not suggesting that all of the
Personally, I'd like to see some porn site links on that page. Porn sites
have particular operation/traffic requirements, and if I saw that CouchDB
was suitable for that, I'd be more comfortable about building a media server
on CouchDB.
Ha. You know what they say about the porn industry
hi,
interesting discussion with two entirely different angles of view. i did ISP
work and know about the pain filtering/censoring/how-ever-you-call-it causes
if you have to treat a large amount of customers and can not afford to be
liable for your actions (or missing actions). from that point of
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 09:30:58AM +1030, Antony Blakey wrote:
On 23/01/2009, at 9:15 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
I think that the links and content on our website should aim to be
family
friendly and work safe, as vague as that may be. I wasn't proposing a
set of
hard and fast rules for
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Michael McDaniel couc...@autosys.us wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 09:30:58AM +1030, Antony Blakey wrote:
On 23/01/2009, at 9:15 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
I think that the links and content on our website should aim to be
family
friendly and work safe, as vague
On 23/01/2009, at 9:40 AM, lenz wrote:
the situation here is different, it is a product page and it is
actively
edited by the community. after all it is a public wiki. if someone
thinks
that it is not right, change it, cut out the link part and just
leave the
wording, make a note, delete
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
My concerns do not apply to Google because they frame their website and
purpose
differently. When you visit Google you're not prompted or reminded about
opportunities for copyright infringement.
Well, gipirate is a
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:16:31AM +1030, Antony Blakey wrote:
Before long you have to ban some people from editing, and that is the
equivalent of making a moral judgement. The system I proposed
acknowledges that judgement is required, but shifts the domain from
morals to a technical
On 23/01/2009, at 12:31 PM, Dean Landolt wrote:
The issue with gipirate starts with the name. The name says
'theft'. If it
was called gitorrents or gitorrensearch, then maybe your argument
could be
taken seriously. You wouldn't quibble over a site called giporn
being about
porn, even if
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 08:37:15PM -0500, Patrick Aljord wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
My concerns do not apply to Google because they frame their website and
purpose
differently. When you visit Google you're not prompted or reminded about
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
GPirate frames itself as a website for copyright infringement. It
conceptually,
and literally, invites you to infringe copyright. Several of the links on
the
home page are direct links to copyright infringing trackers.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 09:53:41PM -0500, Patrick Aljord wrote:
Err no, those are links that link to other bittorrent search engine, try a
search. Again, just like a google search. Anyway, this thread is totally OT
so let's leave it at that.
I chose a random featured link from the front page:
On 23/01/2009, at 1:16 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
I like relativism, but I try to avoid the nihilistic or laissez-fair
tendencies
of naïve relativism.
I'm a moral absolutist. But I don't regard that many things as moral
questions worthy of judgement, at least not compared to the universe
On 23/01/2009, at 1:34 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
Imagine a disgruntled DBA who decides that he's going to setup
CouchDB Sucks and
from that site he's doing to create one new website per day, each
one using a
subdomain and listing a new reason why CouchDB does, in fact, suck.
Because he's
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
http://gpirate.com/s?src=featuredq=Lost%20S05E01%20%0D
What is this if not directing me to copyright infringement?
I said I'd leave it at that but anyway... this is a link to an html page,
please give me any link to an
18 matches
Mail list logo
