Hi Tomasz
I've rerun the demo.
First of all, the changes you've made recently have definitely made it
look much better, thanks.
Unfortunately, I'm still hitting this GWT ApplicationException when
refreshing the endpoint :
Application Error
Class$jcb
2011-02-25T11:46:55.078Z
Can this message,
+1,
Willem
On 2/24/11 4:30 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We've resolved over 50 issues since 2.3.2. Thus, we really should get 2.3.3
out, especially since 2.3.2 contained an issue preventing it from being used as
a JAX-WS implementation for J2EE
containers.
List of issues:
That's great but what if your client isn't Java? Download a SOAP stack
and pray its compatible with CXF?
Simple HTTP calls are far superior, more lightweight, and easier to
code. Seriously, check out what we've done with the HornetQ REST
interface. Specifically the Javascript and Python
Bill, I'm all for plugging but if you could spend some time on fixing
the five (rather simple) RESTEasy bugs I reported (RESTEAST-494, 495,
496, 497, and 502) over a month ago, among the 109 you presently have
open and unresolved, that would also be good. As the Russian Czar
learned during WWI,
Hi Guys
Come on, this is not a RESTEasy or HornetQ mailing list.
More comments inline
2011/2/25 Glen Mazza gma...@talend.com:
Bill, I'm all for plugging but if you could spend some time on fixing
the five (rather simple) RESTEasy bugs I reported (RESTEAST-494, 495,
496, 497, and 502) over a
Nearly lost the message from Willem...
On 2/24/11 8:23 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
CXF JMS transport supports JMS URI which is part of JMS over SOAP spec
out of box. I think you can use it with JAXRS frontend without any
trouble
Yes indeed. On the server side it's easy. We can have say 3
Wow, you're funny. CXF has 255 unresolved bugs, does this mean they are
rotting at the core as well?
FYI, half your bugs weren't even bugs. The others were minor example
errors. I apologize your bug reports weren't given my immediate full
attention, no matter how minor (or nonexistent) they
Hi
Few more comments. I agree, the way Tasks and Endpoints are currently
shown is nice.
- Can you please consider having both ManageEndpoints and Filter links
located under the Tasks ? And have Endpoints shown first, with the
Tasks in the bottom of the pane ? Ultimately, the user just
Actually, Glen, looks like I've misread your comments as I always do,
sorry :-). But of course I'd still encourage us all to discuss
RestEasy issues on the RestEasy list where I'm a subscriber too :-)
Cheers, Sergey
2011/2/25 Bill Burke bbu...@redhat.com:
Wow, you're funny. CXF has 255
On 2/25/11 10:51 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
In your opinion, why would such (Java) users prefer an HTTP centric
interface for consuming messages backed up by JMS stores, when they
just can do plain Java JMS ?
What do you think ?
(Remember you asked what I think so)
I don't think
Well, I was hoping the glowing review I gave your book
(http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/entry/book_review_restful_java_with)
would result in additional sales and hence additional assistants for you
to close the bugs I reported (if not early retirement for yourself :);
if not, well, I appreciate you
Jeff, I do not want you to send me any more emails off list, under any
circumstances. If you have a problem with any email I send, send it
directly to the dev list. If others agree with you, I'll go along with
it, and apologize, as I did earlier today. If others disagree with you,
OK, then
12 matches
Mail list logo
