Hi Sergey,
On 20 March 2012 22:09, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com wrote:
How does this Compendium cycle work ? Having CXF DOSGi RI 'endorced' as
TCK-compliant is a strong enough reason to try to cut an interim release in
the next few weeks, however, I'm wondering, when would be DOSGi
On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 10:18:27 AM Sven Bendel wrote:
I just found a bug in the current CXF release. Filed it under
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9772857/webserver-generates-badly-forma
ted-services-wsdl
and got the tip to share it with this mailing list. Can you confirm this
is
Well, the file we talk about is fetched from `
http://www.example.com:8081/TestWS/services?wsdl` which should return an
WSDL, shouldn't it? And there is a service deployed on the server. It runs
quite well and responds without any problems when called from Eclipse's Web
Service Explorer.
On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 04:11:32 PM Sven Bendel wrote:
Well, the file we talk about is fetched from `
http://www.example.com:8081/TestWS/services?wsdl` which should return an
WSDL, shouldn't it?
Maybe not. NORMALLY with cxf, all GET requests to
David,
On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 11:00:12 AM David Bosschaert wrote:
The TCK compliance work I did was part of the OSGi 4.3 Compendium
cycle and I expect that the RIs for that (of which CXF-DOSGi is part)
will be collected soon - within 2 weeks is my guess, but I can get a
more detailed
Hm, you're right, I get HTML. However, the error stacktrace leads to the
conclusion, that this file is being downloaded by the automatically
generated client (from the service's WSDL) or rather the ServiceImpl class
provided by CXF. Therefore either the client geneneration code has some bug
in it
Found the problem. I accidentally specified the WSDL endpoint as `
http://www.example.com:8081/TestWS/services` instead of `
http://www.example.com:8081/TestWS/services/MyTestWS`. So the automatically
generated client tried to fetch the WSDL from `
http://www.example.com:8081/TestWS/services?wsdl`
On 21 March 2012 15:34, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
If you are willing to do the release, then I think it's a good idea. I'd
rather have a release often type thing if it fixes a few issue that are
needed. Do you know if it needs a new CXF proper release or is 2.5.2 OK?
If it's just
On 21 March 2012 19:09, David Bosschaert david.bosscha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 March 2012 15:34, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
If you are willing to do the release, then I think it's a good idea. I'd
rather have a release often type thing if it fixes a few issue that are
needed. Do
David,
Add to your ~/.m2/settings.xml something like:
settings
servers
server
idapache.releases.https/id
usernamedkulp/username
passwordyourapachepassword/password
/server
/servers
/settings
to setup your credentials needed to deploy
Yes, this is what I did.
David, I think we also need to get your public gpg key added to
http://pgp.mit.edu/, here are some links I found useful.
http://irtfweb.ifa.hawaii.edu/~lockhart/gpg/gpg-cs.html
https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/How+To+Generate+PGP+Signatures+With+Maven
You
11 matches
Mail list logo
