Will there be a 3.1.12 early jun? Since last was early April. ..
Hi,
I wanted to be able to turn MTOM on and off based on the content of the
operation in question. I wanted this to work as a CXF feature available on
either the client or server. What I have come up with is available here:
http://cxf.apache.org/cxf-313-release-notes.html
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Sobkowiak Krzysztof <
krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> For the 3.0.x and 2.x releases you have always provided a release notes
> page like this https://cxf.apache.org/cxf-306-release-notes.html. I would
+1 (non binding)
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh cohei...@apache.org
wrote:
+1.
Colm.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Alessio Soldano asold...@redhat.com
wrote:
+1
Thanks
Alessio
On 28/07/15 20:13, Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release 3.0.6
+1 (non binding)
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Aki Yoshida elak...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
aki
2015-07-27 21:26 GMT+02:00 Alessio Soldano asold...@redhat.com:
This is a vote to release 2.7.17. It’s been over 2 months since the last
release and we’ve fixed more than 18 issues.
Hi,
As part of starting up my application I want to know when all services have
started. Unfortunately in the case of cxf, the Endpoints have all been
created by the time I get the ApplicationListenerContextRefreshedEvent
but the servers may actually still be starting.
It would be useful to
after further interrogation of the code the start should have been called
before spring finished loading
My issue is the ServerRegistry does not contain all the jaxws:endpoints
when the spring application listener fires.
Anyone got any thoughts as to why?
On 18/06/2015 9:30 AM, Jason Pell ja
Ok I feel stupid.
seems another developer on my team added another spring context loader
which generated the premature event
Please ignore my last 2 emails :-(
On 18/06/2015 10:29 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
after further interrogation of the code the start should have been called
+1 (non binding)
On 08/06/2015 2:16 AM, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Cheers, Sergey
On 05/06/15 21:49, Daniel Kulp wrote:
3.1.1 fixes a bunch of issues in 3.1.0 that would prevent it from working
properly in several normal use cases, particularly in OSGi.
Staging area:
Hi,
If MTOM is enabled, its enabled for all operations, even those which have
no need for it. Is this part of the standard, or would it be possible to
be smarter about when to enable it?
Ideally only operations that accept / return attachments should have MTOM
enabled (at least if this
Can you try this on 2.7.15 or 3.0.4?
I don't know why your issue is occurring but a more up to date cxf might
have already fixed it.
Would be good to know
On 25/03/2015 6:17 AM, Balana, Vishal vishal.bal...@fmr.com.invalid
wrote:
I am giving example below about how I have added wsse header to
sometime
later this year, that means to have only a few more releases on 2.7.x.
Maybe we can already mention in the 2.7.15 release note that there
will be only a few more releases planned (2~3).
2015-02-15 23:15 GMT+01:00 Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com:
Java 8 support I think is paramount
the end of life in two months. I agree things are
changing at a much slower rate in the productions. But starting planning
for a Java 8 trunk is better be done earlier than later :-)
Sergey
On 13/02/15 22:32, Jason Pell wrote:
By customers I don't mean my companies customers, I mean users
By customers I don't mean my companies customers, I mean users of cxf 2.7
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
From a purely selfish point of view, I hope that 2.7 end of life is
announced well in advance, as a lot of customers will have to migrate to
3.x
From a purely selfish point of view, I hope that 2.7 end of life is
announced well in advance, as a lot of customers will have to migrate to
3.x.
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 4:20 AM, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
We've had a brief chat with Dan earlier about the possibility
+1 non binding.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Aki Yoshida elak...@gmail.com wrote:
But this org.apache.aries.blueprint.reflect is available from
org.apache.aries.blueprint.core.compatibility, so it isn't a problem
of CXF, no?
karaf@root() exports | grep org.apache.aries.blueprint.reflect
awesome thanks
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Aki Yoshida elak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jason,
yes. We had this issue that was caused by some inconsistency with
jetty8 and jetty9 wiring and it was fixed yesterday.
regards, aki
2015-02-06 23:05 GMT+01:00 Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com
JAXRSClientServerWebSocketSpringWebAppTestJAXRSClientServerWebSocketTest.testStreamRegisterAndUnregister:372
» NullPointer
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
Is this expected at the moment:
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.WebSocketFactory$Acceptor
Is this expected at the moment:
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.WebSocketFactory$Acceptor
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:366)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355)
at
Hi Dan,
Any thoughts on timeline for next patch release?
if this
is the right choice.
So we should discuss this here.
Christian
On 05.12.2014 07:33, Jason Pell wrote:
Hi Christian,
I have added a test case to my github branch which demonstrates the
session
issue and fails as a result.The session in the session holder is the
same
it works. So we should be sure it makes
sense.
Christian
On 05.12.2014 11:29, Jason Pell wrote:
I would like the option of enabling roll backs for runtime exceptions in
cxf 3 when I eventually upgrade. Does cxf 3 at least cater for a error in
middle of process where by the reply is never
to
sessionTransacted.
Can you have a quick look and make sure my comments are accurate
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
OK I am going to revert my changes, add a config property to
JMSConfiguration to optionally disable exception propagation.
The existing
+1 (non binding)
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh cohei...@apache.org
wrote:
+1.
Colm.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.7.14 and 3.0.3. These versions fix a
bunch of bugs users have encountered.
Hi,
I would like to change the existing behavior of JMS destination to NOT
rollback the transaction if a checked exception is encountered.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6136
Christian suggested I post an email to this list to give everyone an
opportunity to agree or disagree with my
Not at the moment :-)
On 05/12/2014 6:09 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
On Dec 4, 2014, at 12:09 PM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to change the existing behavior of JMS destination to NOT
rollback the transaction if a checked exception is encountered
18:09, Jason Pell wrote:
Hi,
I would like to change the existing behavior of JMS destination to NOT
rollback the transaction if a checked exception is encountered.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6136
Christian suggested I post an email to this list to give everyone an
opportunity
, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
Very annoyed with myself that I did not check the transaction support for
request response till now. Was on my list of todos. Now I am going to have
to depend on 2.7.15 snapahot.
I need guaranteed delivery even for request response
-transport-jm the trans test is false because the sessions
match.
I know I must be missing something, and I will continue to debug it to see
if I can figure it out, but perhaps someone might have some insight to
assist me
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
Hi
, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
Ok - in my local tests with both websphere mq and active mq, the trans
test appears to be doing the right thing, but I am unsure why. I don't
understand why the sessions are not the same.
However when I am debugging
Would be interested in your feedback regarding the change.
https://github.com/pellcorp/apache-cxf/compare/apache:2.7.x-fixes...cxf6136_jms_ex_rollback?expand=1
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
Never mind, think I figured it out.
Another question I have
exactly why the resource holder having the session
means trans = false
Thanks
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
Would be interested in your feedback regarding the change.
https://github.com/pellcorp/apache-cxf/compare/apache:2.7.x-fixes
.
Can you please retry with the latest Java 7 patch ?
Thanks, Sergey
On 01/12/14 03:11, Jason Pell wrote:
With both Java 6 (patch 37) and Java 7 (patch 60)
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
I get the following exception in 3.0.x fixes when running
Done I will apply the final 6118 to 3.0 and trunk today
On 29/11/2014 9:21 PM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
Took me a while but I finally got where you are coming from. Thanks for
the detailed and informative replies.
On 29/11/2014 8:46 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote
Took me a while but I finally got where you are coming from. Thanks for the
detailed and informative replies.
On 29/11/2014 8:46 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
On Nov 29, 2014, at 1:44 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
If the same SEI is used for both service endpoint
Branch: refs/heads/2.7.x-fixes
Commit: 27ce514bb97a7693fd78d1ca16685665bca64553
Parents: e172a3e
Author: Jason Pell jp...@apache.org
Authored: Thu Nov 27 16:54:01 2014 +1100
Committer: Jason Pell jp...@apache.org
Committed: Fri Nov 28 15:52:36 2014 +1100
this weekend.
On 29/11/2014 2:11 PM, Jason Pell jp...@apache.org wrote:
Its only reversing what's coming from the model. If you define IN in the
jaxws properties on the client it will continue to validate IN on the
client as before.
If I have IN defined for a operation using an annotation the old code
28, 2014, at 10:11 PM, Jason Pell jp...@apache.org wrote:
Its only reversing what's coming from the model. If you define IN in the
jaxws properties on the client it will continue to validate IN on the
client as before.
If I have IN defined for a operation using an annotation the old
not really too
much of an issue.
On 29/11/2014 3:18 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
On Nov 28, 2014, at 10:11 PM, Jason Pell jp...@apache.org wrote:
Its only reversing what's coming from the model. If you define IN in the
jaxws properties on the client it will continue to validate
Hi All
Was wondering if anyone knows why in AbstractOutDatabindingInterceptor,
isRequestorRole has a definition of:
protected boolean isRequestor(Message message) {
return
Boolean.TRUE.equals(message.containsKey(Message.REQUESTOR_ROLE));
}
Whereas in AbstractInDatabindingInterceptor
remove these other methods from the
master version. For the released tracks, we probably need to keep them
as @deprecated with delegating to MessageUtils impl.
2014-11-27 12:49 GMT+01:00 Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com:
Oh and then we have another method in the AbstractPhaseInterceptor which
All I get now is the X500Principal of the https token.
My policy is below. I am relying on the RequireClientCertificate to have
the saml token signed and thus I would have expected it to be present in
the security context. I am at a loss as to why something like this could
change between point
this behaviour.
Colm.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
All I get now is the X500Principal of the https token.
My policy is below. I am relying on the RequireClientCertificate to have
the saml token signed and thus I would have expected it to be present
I don't think I can easily override the wss4j interceptor as I am using WS
policy so the interceptors are added for me.
Am eager to understand the security issues with client certs. When will
these be publicized
On 17/10/2014 12:56 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
I would be interested
I will create jira and a patch to support the property.
On 17/10/2014 12:58 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
I don't think I can easily override the wss4j interceptor as I am using WS
policy so the interceptors are added for me.
Am eager to understand the security issues with client
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6054
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
I will create jira and a patch to support the property.
On 17/10/2014 12:58 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
I don't think I can easily override the wss4j interceptor
I have merged a fix for 2.7 3.0 and master
On 17/10/2014 7:46 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6054
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
I will create jira and a patch to support the property.
On 17/10/2014
I refined the hack and just use the endpoint info getProperty directly. No
need to map to a client.
Though I would add a getEndpointInfo method to HttpConduit so I can get rid
of reflection after 2.7.14
On 10/10/2014 12:58 PM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
I came up with a really dodgy
Tried that, the interceptor chain has not been initiated when the
alternative selector is called.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
On Oct 9, 2014, at 8:01 PM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
I can't upgrade to 3.x as yet. So I need to figure out
doIntercept on the PhaseInterceptorChain is called after the select
alternative.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
Tried that, the interceptor chain has not been initiated when the
alternative selector is called.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Daniel
For instance I want to force choosing username password token for one
method call and then a saml bearer token for all others.
I don't have enough info in the assertor http conduit
I can't upgrade to 3.x as yet. So I need to figure out a way to do this in
2.7.
On 10/10/2014 4:18 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
On Oct 9, 2014, at 5:41 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
For instance I want to force choosing username password token for one
method call
for now
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
I can't upgrade to 3.x as yet. So I need to figure out a way to do this in
2.7.
On 10/10/2014 4:18 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
On Oct 9, 2014, at 5:41 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote
+1 (non binding)
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Dennis Sosnoski d...@sosnoski.com wrote:
+1
- Dennis
On 10/09/2014 06:37 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
+1
Jeff
On Oct 8, 2014, at 11:30 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.7.13 and 3.0.2.There
Would it be acceptable to change cxf to set the saml version on the Saml
callback before calling the callback.
I want to be able to create a bearer token inside a local callback and I
want to handle saml 1 and 2 automatically based on the wsdl WS policy. At
the moment I can't do that. If I could
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-516
On 08/10/2014 10:19 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
Would it be acceptable to change cxf to set the saml version on the Saml
callback before calling the callback.
I want to be able to create a bearer token inside a local callback and I
Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
On Aug 10, 2014, at 10:47 PM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
I cant seem to find code that controls mtom based on what a client can
handle. My understanding is the Accept header should be used. If I have a
Accept header which is either a wild card
parts of the mtom
spec and see what you were referring to.
On Aug 13, 2014 12:45 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
Does that not seem strange. What if one particular lient cant suppport
mtom but the rest can. It seems bad form to return attachments to a client
that will barf on them
, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
In the mean time I created an interceptor to override the mtom-enabled
property based on the Accept property. I would prefer to use something
build into cxf, but this seems to work for my use case.
https://github.com/pellcorp/cxf/blob/master/JavaFirst/src
I cant seem to find code that controls mtom based on what a client can
handle. My understanding is the Accept header should be used. If I have a
Accept header which is either a wild card or includes application/xop+xml
use mtom if con figured on endpoint otherwise fall back to inlined base 64.
I
/interceptor/MtomOutInterceptor.java
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
I cant seem to find code that controls mtom based on what a client can
handle. My understanding is the Accept header should be used. If I have a
Accept header which is either a wild card
+1 (non binding)
On 16/07/2014 8:02 AM, Christian Schneider ch...@die-schneider.net
wrote:
+1
Christian
Am 15.07.2014 21:57, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
This is a vote to release the latest patch releases on all three branches.
There are over 80 fixes for 3.0.1 with most back ported to 2.7.12
That definitely sounds good. I am so sick of system properties for
configuration.
On 10/07/2014 10:30 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
Alessio,
Two thoughts:
1) There is a java.xml.stream.util.StreamReaderDelegate class available
from StAX apis, is there really a need for another
HI,
The commit:
commit 22e6b39db88ab99c175ba59bbcf623830614d1d1
Author: Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org
Date: Thu Jun 12 12:37:26 2014 -0400
Optimization to only load the first extension found when only one is
asked for.
Broke some code our project uses. We are overriding the
Hi,
Just noticed this thread. I have managed to be able to configure the
conduit using properties, but its not exactly standard. And it won't work
with OSGI. Its documented here
Hi,
I can't find reference to being able to authenticate to the cxf git repo
using ssh. I am not very comfortable having my password in .netrc file.
I sent an email off to the infrastructure team, but figured I would ask the
question here as well. What are others doing on linux (OSX as
, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
Hi,
I can't find reference to being able to authenticate to the cxf git repo
using ssh. I am not very comfortable having my password in .netrc file.
I sent an email off to the infrastructure team, but figured I would ask
the question here as well. What
Even better, integration with gnome key ring
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13385690/how-to-use-git-with-gnome-keyring-integration
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
Answered my own question, sort of
git config --global credential.helper 'cache
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.308 sec
FAILURE! - in org.apache.cxf.transport.jms.uri.URIConfiguredConduitTest
testSendReceive(org.apache.cxf.transport.jms.uri.URIConfiguredConduitTest)
Time elapsed: 0.02 sec ERROR!
java.lang.RuntimeException: peer
out my repo and try again.
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.308 sec
FAILURE! - in org.apache.cxf.transport.jms.uri.URIConfiguredConduitTest
testSendReceive
Deleted all org/apache/wss4j out of m2 repository and build continues
Weird
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
Downgrading to maven 3.0.3 got me past that one, but then I hit another
issue.
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven
I would think getting users to modify a pom to exclude jaxb core is
acceptable for 3.0.1. I certainly would not have a problem especially if it
were in the release notes and clearly highlighted.
We use our own version of jaxb jaxb facets. But it will be sometime before
we upgrade to 3.x anyway.
The policy is applied but not embedded from memory. When you define the
ref to the policy in the @WebService its embedded, both uri and also spring
bean refs.
Since the policy annotations in web services suited me i did not pursue why
it was not being embedded very far.
On 19/11/2013 7:07 AM,
with WS policy username
password with with java first
Sent from my Android phone
On 24/09/2013 2:49 PM, Jason Pell jp...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded our environment to use 2.7.7 and immediately upon deployment I
started getting the following error:
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; systemId
, but not for blueprint so we're
using the relative paths that then work with blueprint.
Dan
On Sep 24, 2013, at 2:50 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
I think this issue is causing hanging of startup of my application. I
am
reverting to 2.7.6.
I will debug and try to figure out what
Silly me Dan provided the reason in original reply.
I will chase up in our code
Thanks
Jason
Sent from my Android phone
On 25/09/2013 6:55 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
No internet is better than a corporate proxy situation that causes
internet requests to take a longgg
Hi,
I upgraded our environment to use 2.7.7 and immediately upon deployment I
started getting the following error:
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; systemId:
http://www.w3.org/2007/02/ws-policy.xsd; lineNumber: 30; columnNumber: 69;
schema_reference.4: Failed to read schema document
+1 (non binding)
On 14/09/2013 10:37 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to
2.6.10.
This also includes an update release of our build-utils to get the PMD
stuff needed to work with the latest Eclipse.
List of
Sent from my Android phone
On 10/09/2013 2:13 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
If you tell m2eclipse to import the projects with the m2eclipse profile
enabled, then it switched to a different PMD ruleset that doesn't have the
custom rule.
That said, I do have to wonder if we really
Please be sure to post back saying how you solved it...
On 02/09/2013 6:45 PM, Jana Weschenfelder
jana.weschenfel...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Hello,
many thanks for the reply. I got a hint from an expert an hour ago.
I would like to try this first. I agree that my undertaking is not
Just wondering where the code to turn off out schema validation is going to
land? Its gone from message mode out interceptor but the diff does not seem
to add it in anywhere.
I am without a computer so I can't check the code out to look but wanted to
make sure it was not lost-
On Aug 14, 2013
Can you see if there is a mix of spring versions on the classpath.
On Jul 27, 2013 1:58 AM, Iyappan Raman iyappan.ra...@grantsolutions.gov
wrote:
I am getting below error when i changed from 2.5.1 to 2.7.5, please let me
know if i need to add any dependencies.
Thank You
Iyappan
Caused by:
http://cxf.apache.org/cxf-276-release-notes.html
Is the correct 2.7.6 link
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.comwrote:
The release notes link is incorrect, it points to the wrong version.
Gary
On Jul 23, 2013, at 4:10, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
executing the soap request
stuff.
Seems like a big change but is probably reasonably clean approach.
Or alternative is to execute gzip out interceptor logic in wsdl get
interceptor.
On Jul 23, 2013 8:12 PM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
I checked the code and WSDLGetInterceptor aborts
I have created a jira and I will play around with refactoring WSDL Get
Interceptor to support GZIP encoding and see what I come up with.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
So next question.
What would make most sense?
Modify wsdlgetinterceptor
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5151
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
I have created a jira and I will play around with refactoring WSDL Get
Interceptor to support GZIP encoding and see what I come up with.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:59 PM
in pom yet there but changed
the code to use reflection to pick up the right method). I can
integrate the corresponding changes into 2.7.x and add them to the
ticket. Please take a look.
Thanks.
regards, aki
2013/7/12 Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com:
Hi,
I did not get to this this week
.
2013/7/7 Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com:
I might have time end of next week so leave with me for the moment.
On Jul 7, 2013 6:54 AM, Aki Yoshida elak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jason,
I wanted to have a patched snapshot sometime next week. But I am not
around in the beginning of the next
on it in the next few days :-). But if you can't find time next
week, I can look at it next week then.
regards, aki
2013/7/5 Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com
It depends when you need it done :-)
Its been on my list of todos for a long time and i am flat out on my day
job with other stuff
needs to be instead called?
If that's the case, we should put the code to handle both cases in
all
code lines.
thanks.
aki
2013/7/4 Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com
Sorry guys i never got back to this one. Would be easier i should
think
to fix this for 3.0
, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
Sorry guys i never got back to this one. Would be easier i should think
to
fix this for 3.0 and no longer support the old version at all thus no
reflection magic.
Well, I'd LIKE to still be able to run 2.7/2.6 with the newer versions
Sorry guys i never got back to this one. Would be easier i should think to
fix this for 3.0 and no longer support the old version at all thus no
reflection magic.
On Jul 4, 2013 7:04 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
Aki,
This was on my todo list to look at, just never have managed to
Hi,
Not sure how it would work but codehaus projects or at least (
https://jira.codehaus.org) use donay to allow jira reporters and watchers
to up the priority of issues with cold hard cash.
https://donay.com/
I added an incentive for an issue i have on the appassembler project.
Wondering
I accidentally pasted the wrong jira url. Here is the jira i raised which
has the donay section bottom right
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAPPASM-200
On Jul 2, 2013 6:18 AM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
Hi,
Not sure how it would work but codehaus projects or at least (
https
For my day job we use OpenDJ (previously OpenDS) to start an embedded ldap
server. Works very well.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Oliver Wulff owu...@talend.com wrote:
Spring also supports starting an embedded LDAP server. See here:
+1 (non binding)
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
We've resolved over 40 issues since 2.7.4. Not a lot, but it includes an
OSGi fix that is blocking a Camel issues which may also be causing issues
with the ServiceMix release. This also affects CXF
+1 (non binding)
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Christian Schneider ch...@die-schneider.net
wrote:
+1
... forgot the important part :-)
Christian
On 06.05.2013 10:07, Christian Schneider wrote:
Tested on Karaf 2.3.1 and Karaf 3.0.0.RC1 with JAX-WS and JAX-RS services.
No problems
Hi,
The xjc-utils are released separately. I think you will be able to make
use of the patch if you use
2.6.2-SNAPSHOT of xjc-utils.
Cheers
Jason
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Bickerton, Alec
alec.bicker...@sunrise.netwrote:
Hi,
I submitted a patch back in March (
+1 (non binding) good to resolve wood stox issue
On May 3, 2013 4:45 AM, Aki Yoshida elak...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for 2.7.5 release
thanks.
aki
2013/5/2 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org
It looks like we have the WS-Discovery stuff nailed down (and I'd like to
blog about it a bit but
Topics of interest.
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/re-CXF-with-Sprint-Integration-td5501007.html
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/CXF-embedded-within-a-SpringIntegration-Context-td5158465.html
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Jason Pell ja...@pellcorp.com wrote:
Is there any plans to add
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
