I just cloned and checked out some of the tags and branches from
cxf-test. I think it looks pretty good now.
Should we do an official vote about the switch or can we already
consider this discussion a consensus?
The other question is when to switch. I am in no hurry to do so. From my
side
On Jan 27, 2014, at 4:17 AM, Christian Schneider ch...@die-schneider.net
wrote:
I just cloned and checked out some of the tags and branches from cxf-test. I
think it looks pretty good now.
Should we do an official vote about the switch or can we already consider
this discussion a
The downside is for the files that have existed since 2.1, a git
blame and log and such will only go back to 2.1. Blame will list me
as the person for any lines that have existed since 2.1 (since I did
the release:prepare for 2.1 and all the commits prior to that are
squashed up into
On Jan 24, 2014, at 1:18 AM, Thorsten Höger li...@hoegernet.de wrote:
Some comments after playing around with the test repo:
- I can only see branches for 2.5.x, 2.6.x and 2.7.x. but 2.4 and before are
missing
Since we are not maintaining those versions anymore, there is no point in
On 23.01.2014 19:05, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Jan 22, 2014, at 9:30 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
The downside is for the files that have existed since 2.1, a “git
blame” and log and such will only go back to 2.1. Blame will list me
as the person for any lines that have existed since
Some comments after playing around with the test repo:
- I can only see branches for 2.5.x, 2.6.x and 2.7.x. but 2.4 and before are
missing
- there are no tags for released versions
- maybe trunk should be renamed to master (git-style)
Am 23.01.2014 19:05, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
On Jan 22,
On 22/01/14 09:20, Christian Schneider wrote:
Recently many apache projects switched from svn to git (like Camel and
Karaf).
As git has many advantages compared to svn (especially for back ports) I
think it makes sense to also do this switch for cxf.
Any opinions?
Comment from someone who has
+1
I'm using git-svn now, would love to have git direct.
- Dennis
On 01/22/2014 10:20 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Recently many apache projects switched from svn to git (like Camel and
Karaf).
As git has many advantages compared to svn (especially for back ports)
I think it makes sense
I would love to have CXF use git. I currently use the git copy and it would be
great if
this repo would be the truth.
Regards,
Thorsten
Am 22.01.2014 12:10, schrieb Dennis Sosnoski:
+1
I'm using git-svn now, would love to have git direct.
- Dennis
On 01/22/2014 10:20 PM, Christian
It’s not pleasure work to merge the patches between the branches in SVN behind
the GFW.
I’m +1 for swathing cxf to git.
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
Web: http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com(http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/)
(English)
+1
From: Willem Jiang [willem.ji...@gmail.com]
Sent: 22 January 2014 13:20
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Discuss: Switching cxf to git
It’s not pleasure work to merge the patches between the branches in SVN behind
the GFW.
I’m +1 for swathing cxf
On Jan 22, 2014, at 4:20 AM, Christian Schneider ch...@die-schneider.net
wrote:
Recently many apache projects switched from svn to git (like Camel and Karaf).
As git has many advantages compared to svn (especially for back ports) I
think it makes sense to also do this switch for cxf.
Any
On 22/01/14 15:30, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Jan 22, 2014, at 4:20 AM, Christian Schneider ch...@die-schneider.net
wrote:
Recently many apache projects switched from svn to git (like Camel and Karaf).
As git has many advantages compared to svn (especially for back ports) I think
it makes sense
On Jan 22, 2014, at 9:35 AM, Alessio Soldano asold...@redhat.com wrote:
On 22/01/14 15:30, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Few thoughts though:
1) Lets wait until after at least milestone2. We’re close and I don’t want
to screw any of that up.
2) I’d LIKE to rebuild the git repo and possibly
On Jan 22, 2014, at 12:01 PM, Christian Schneider ch...@die-schneider.net
wrote:
There is one thing that might be different.
I recently committed/pushed a change from a non committer to karaf. I
proposed to the developer to fork the karaf repo on github and commit and
push there. I then
On 22/01/14 17:18, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Jan 22, 2014, at 12:01 PM, Christian Schneider ch...@die-schneider.net
wrote:
There is one thing that might be different.
I recently committed/pushed a change from a non committer to karaf. I
proposed to the developer to fork the karaf repo on
16 matches
Mail list logo
