Hi Clayton, Uwe,
Could we have an update on this issue, do we have to translate the
string or not ?
Thanks in advance
Kind regards
Sophie
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
On 15.12.2008, at 13:24, Olivier Hallot wrote:
image id=img_id3152980 src=res/commandimagelist/
sc_framedialog.png width=0.566cm
Uwe Fischer wrote:
Hi,
Jean-Francois Nifenecker wrote:
Uwe Fischer a écrit :
In my opinion, there is only one prominent place to add a link to
*all* the existing places that offer templates and samples and macros
and more - that is the OOo user interface itself.
For example, the Templates
Hi Frank,
Frank Peters wrote:
[...]
I don't see a reason for not having both.
Yes, you're right :-)
Kind regards
Sophie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Ger,
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 21:00 +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote:
Hi Ger,
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 08:21 -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
Please see http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Feature_-_Templates
interesting concept
Hi Ger,
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
Forwarded Message
From: G. Roderick Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Contest_info [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [contest-info] Some help needed for winners announce page
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 07:35:13 -0500
Can
Hi Alex, Andre,
Alex Thurgood wrote:
Andre Schnabel wrote:
We cannot get to a consensus as long as we do not know, what we talk
about. Just to say we address legal issues is much to genereal to
get any consensus.
Maybe we should mention to users the potential impact of using
copyrighted
Hi Laurent, all,
Laurent Godard wrote:
Hi sophie
+1 From several discussions and threads that I remind, this was not
the topic. But adding new articles was the concern.
adding to something non-free ? no
write new ones, yes
The last discussion I remember (it was between Rene and Juergen)
Hi Ger,
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 19:43 +0200, Sophie Gautier wrote:
Hi all,
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
[...]
And sorry also about the neglect of the announcements on the NLC list,
but without feedback, it's difficult to know if somebody is interested
Hi Andre,
Andre Schnabel wrote:
[...]
What do you think about it ?
Well, the key point here might be to convince Pavel. See comments at
issue 59391
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59391
Ha, why making it simple when it could be complicated ;-) I was not
aware of that.
Well
Hi all,
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
[...]
Also, don't forget that translating some doc into another language implies
providing screenshots in the same language. This means that the translation
effort is quite similar to writing a doc from scratch. Having done that once
for the OOo
Hi Alex,
Alex Thurgood wrote:
Laurent Godard wrote:
Salut Laurent,
all of this to be translated, working with NLC
Not sure that the working with is enough ;-)
I actually translated several pages of the old (1.1.x) dev guide into
French about 18 months ago, but then got side-tracked
Hi Laurent, all,
Laurent Godard wrote:
Hi Gerry
What I said to Andrew. We need to look at what exists and decide what it
is we can do. I have little to no programming skill at this level having
never dived in so can only offer high level support.
as said previously bye someone else,i think
Hi all,
Uwe Fischer wrote:
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
Members of the project should be aware that Uwe Fischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is recruiting on other lists such as
dev@openoffice.org, OOoAuthors and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please track
down these messages if you want to get involved.
Thank you,
Hi all,
I'm answering between your lines :
Uwe Fischer wrote:
[...]
Currently, at the end of many Help pages you find Additional
information or See also ... sections. These links stay within the
installed Help system, or they link to portal pages like
documentation.openoffice.org which will
Hi Scott,
Scott Carr wrote:
[...]
Sophie,
Can you post the current steps you use to this list so we can look them
over?
Thanks
Sorry for the delay.
I'm not sure what you want me to describe, but here is our process, for
information :
We have open two directories on DocFiles part of our
Hi all,
Jim Harris wrote:
I agree that OOo Documentation and its dev project and support tools
could be improved.
I also agree a Wiki _may_ be a good solution.
However, I have seen no evidence that it is clearly the best
solution, or even that it is what should be done next.
And even if it
Hi Jean,
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
[...]
Can people upload files there without using SSH/CVS, like they can
upload files to issues? If so, that is a good idea, and I was not aware
of that possibility. Thank you!
Yes, no need of SSH/CVS.
If you're not a member of the project
Rich wrote:
i managed to delete the original message, so this is a new thread. sorry.
anybody knows of such lists for 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 ?
I've done some but can't find them other than in French. You'll find all
the releases not here :
Hi all,
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
It's not an objection to the LGPL per se: it's just that a cursory
reading of it clearly establishes that it is not relevant to
documentation.
The authors of the GPL agree with you:
The GPL was designed for programs; it contains lots
Hi Daniel and Jean,
Jean, I'll answer to your mail here also because I'm short in time now.
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Sophie Gautier wrote:
We have never accepted documentation under GPL or LGPL licence.
I wasn't saying you did. I was just answering to Peter's email with my
analysis of several
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Scott Carr wrote:
If you can not prove where every piece of the document comes from, and
who worked on it, then you are basically giving up the document.
I don't think that's right. None of the open source licenses have a
requirement to track changes, and
Hi,
In the FR release, since 2.0.1, the main menu entries have changed:
nouns have been replaced by verbs (ie : Edition is now Editer for the
Edit menu).
This has not been reflected in the OLH. Will it be changed for the 2.0.3
release or do I have to fill an issue for this ?
Thanks in
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 15:52 +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote:
Hi,
I'm finishing to update the FR install guide and some of our users ask
for more informations about msi database and parameters. So I ask about
them on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Ingo kindly answered.
I
Hi Ger,
I've uploaded on the issue our final revision of the FR setup guide. The
only part I'm not sure is the Mac install.
Kind regards
Sophie
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.3/106 - Release Date: 19/09/2005
Hi Marko,
I'm jumping at the end of your mail.
Marko Moeller wrote:
[...]
Note: The official source for OOoDocuments is:
http://documentation.openoffice.org/
The Site of the francophone project (with a lot of good documents in
french is:
http://fr.openoffice.org/
the doc-List
is:
Hi Ger,
I've attached a version to the issue with some comments (from FR
community) and proposed corrections (based on my English spell checker ;)
I don't think we will have language packs for the final, the first beta
was localised and I think the next one will be too.
Kind regards
Sophie
Jonathon Blake wrote:
JC Hellry wrote:
The mail that started it all today was not productive. If that's the real OOo
way then no wonder you're getting forked.
It is the real OOo way.
If you're not happy with the way we lead our projects, you can either
ask the CC to replace us, or
Hi all,
You'll find here :
http://fr.openoffice.org/files/documents/67/2685/debian_install_us.sxw
an how-to install OOo 1.9.mxx versions under Debian translated in english.
Wording need to be reviewed, and I'm sure you'll do that better than the
FR team ;)
Kind regards
Sophie
--
No virus found
Hi Roderick,
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
[...]
Thanks very much. The information in the document is quite similar to
what is already in the SETUP_GUIDE at
http://documentation.openoffice.org/setup_guide2/2.x/en/SETUP_GUIDE_draft.pdf. The only difference between what is there and yours is the
Hi Diane,
Diane Mackay wrote:
[...]
Mac users are at 1.1.2, I think.
No, the X11 version is at 1.1.4
And they keep up with the developer snapshots as well. They just
finished a build of m83
Ok, I guess I'm not keeping up there as well. The information I have
based my
understanding upon is
Hi Christian,
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
[...]
In fact it depends on the language, for example for French NLC, we have
1.1.3 available, but German NLC has 1.1.4.
Yes, IIRC correctly the reason for the german-Mac-builder/porter to only
provide a german version is that he has a 10.3 system and thus
Hi Scott,
Thanks for your answer,
Scott Carr wrote:
[...]
- is the english one still the master to follow for changes ?
Yes, that is the direction that is being planned.
So is there something worked on currently in english ?
I'm going to inform the other NLC members concerned.
Kind regards
Sophie
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
Sophie wrote:
Scott Carr wrote:
- is the english one still the master to follow for changes ?
Yes, that is the direction that is being planned.
So is there something worked on currently in english ?
I'm going to inform the other NLC members concerned.
Linda Worthington
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Sophie Gautier wrote:
Thanks for the information, but the Install Guide should contain Windows
/Linux/Mac installation.
Yes. An official install guide should include all official platforms. Even
if, for example, Linux and Solaris users know how to do it.
If you
Jean, Daniel,
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
[...]
I think this is a great idea. We can always combine the different guides
into one, later, if we wanted to.
The guide is delivered with the binaries, so you won't be able to mix it
after the build process. This is why we have to hurry writing it too.
35 matches
Mail list logo
