eems to work as you said... :-)
>
> Le mer. 31 janv. 2024 à 15:51, Bengt Rodehav a écrit :
> >
> > I tried to use the new (1.13.0) versions in combination with the 1.12.1
> > version of the above mentioned bundle. It seems to work (using openjdk
> 17)
> > but I'm very
; 8, this surprises me. Am I missing something?
/Bengt
Den tis 30 jan. 2024 kl 17:29 skrev Bengt Rodehav :
> I am trying to use the new iPojo version that was released a couple of
> months ago (for which I'm very thankful) but I seem to miss an artifact. I
> have had the following line in my K
I am trying to use the new iPojo version that was released a couple of
months ago (for which I'm very thankful) but I seem to miss an artifact. I
have had the following line in my Karaf feature descriptor:
mvn:org.apache.felix/org.apache.felix.ipojo/1.12.1
But when I now try to switch to iPojo
:
> There is already an issue for this problem
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-7769
>
> пт, 8 дек. 2023 г. в 23:16, Bengt Rodehav :
>
> > I have a strange problem concerning the iPojo plugin to the webconsole.
> For
> > some reason it only works if I use
I have a strange problem concerning the iPojo plugin to the webconsole. For
some reason it only works if I use http port 8182. The webconsole itself
works fine on other ports but not the iPojo plugin. It's as if port 8182 is
hard coded.
I did find this configuration in the feature descriptor
should check
> javax dependencies and change them to jakarta package. That's a common
> problem for jaxb for example when migrating from java 8 to java 11+
>
> ср, 6 дек. 2023 г. в 21:54, Bengt Rodehav :
>
> > I have a problem with iPojo not finding the JspPropertyG
I have a problem with iPojo not finding the JspPropertyGroupDescriptor
class. I have discussed this in the ops4j mailing list:
https://groups.google.com/g/ops4j/c/qMSZT4RNRqc
But, I'm not sure if this is a Pax-Web problem or an iPojo problem.
I am using Karaf 4.4.4 with Pax-Web 8.0.22.
I get
Ok - sounds great.
/Bengt
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, 19:32 Александр Шаклеин, wrote:
> Everything works fine
> You doun't need to build full felix project for ipojo to work.
> It enough to build only maven-ipojo-plugin project.
>
> ср, 29 нояб. 2023 г. в 03:25, Bengt Rodehav :
>
&
17:44 skrev Bengt Rodehav :
> OK - I used OpenJDK 21 which was probably not such a good idea. I'll
> revert to Java 8.
>
> /Bengt
>
> Den tis 28 nov. 2023 kl 17:42 skrev Guillaume Nodet :
>
>> I'm using the following:
>>
>> ➜ manipulator git:(migra
, arch: "aarch64", family: "mac"
>
>
>
> Le mar. 28 nov. 2023 à 17:38, Bengt Rodehav a écrit :
> >
> > I had problems building. What java version should I use when I build?
> >
> > /Bengt
> >
> > Den tis 28 nov. 2023 kl 16:16 skr
I had problems building. What java version should I use when I build?
/Bengt
Den tis 28 nov. 2023 kl 16:16 skrev Guillaume Nodet :
> @Bengt Rodehav, @Александр Шаклеин
> I've pushed a few updates. Could you check the branch and test it in
> your environment ?
> If that's ok, I'll
to release a fixed version of
> > ipojo.
> > If you provide a PR that makes the project buildable and fixes the ASM
> > problem, I'm willing to start an official release...
> >
> > Le lun. 27 nov. 2023 à 09:12, Bengt Rodehav a écrit
> :
> > >
&g
Does it matter what java version I use when I build iPojo?
/Bengt
Den mån 27 nov. 2023 kl 09:11 skrev Bengt Rodehav :
> Ok - I'll see if I can figure out how to do that as well.
>
> /Bengt
>
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2023, 20:30 Александр Шаклеин,
> wrote:
>
>> I'm u
Ok - I'll see if I can figure out how to do that as well.
/Bengt
On Fri, 24 Nov 2023, 20:30 Александр Шаклеин, wrote:
> I'm using my own release version.
>
> пт, 24 нояб. 2023 г., 19:40 Bengt Rodehav :
>
> > I managed to build this branch but I had to comment away the in
or do you
simply use a snapshot version?
/Bengt
Den fre 24 nov. 2023 kl 12:44 skrev Bengt Rodehav :
> OK - thanks!
>
> /Bengt
>
> Den fre 24 nov. 2023 kl 11:57 skrev Александр Шаклеин <
> cheester...@gmail.com>:
>
>> No. This one
>> https://github.com/apac
OK - thanks!
/Bengt
Den fre 24 nov. 2023 kl 11:57 skrev Александр Шаклеин :
> No. This one
> https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/129
>
> пт, 24 нояб. 2023 г. в 19:55, Bengt Rodehav :
>
> > Is this the commit I should be using?
> >
> >
> >
>
Is this the commit I should be using?
https://github.com/kwin/felix-dev/commit/93b773b29d41e625bdca52f200f8171824ad9ae9
/Bengt
Den tors 23 nov. 2023 kl 21:08 skrev Bengt Rodehav :
> That sounds great!
>
> Is there a release that I can download? I would really like to try it.
&
That sounds great!
Is there a release that I can download? I would really like to try it.
/Bengt
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023, 18:37 Александр Шаклеин, wrote:
> I have tested it with changes in suggested PR with jdk21. It works well.
>
> чт, 23 нояб. 2023 г., 19:08 Bengt Rodehav :
&
I am revisiting this issue. Looking to start using iPojo in Karaf 4.4.4
which supports JDK20. Did anyone create (and release) a new version of
iPojo that works with JDK20? As I understood it, it was mainly about using
new version of ASM.
/Bengt
Den tis 22 mars 2022 kl 17:31 skrev Bengt Rodehav
> JB
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 10:32 AM Bengt Rodehav wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Alexander Shaklein has made some improvements of iPojo to make it
> > possible to use more recent Java versions. We have discussed it on
> > this thread:
> >
>
appreciate if his changes could be included in a new release of
iPojo. Who can create a new release?
/Bengt Rodehav
Not sure how or by whom a new release of iPojo could be created. Does
anyone know?
/Bengt
Den tis 15 mars 2022 kl 17:25 skrev Bengt Rodehav (Jira) :
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17507040#comment-17507040
]
Bengt Rodehav commented on FELIX-6502:
--
I have done some testing regarding this fix and after
f nothing will change there in future, then asm version upgrade will be
> enough i think.
>
> пт, 11 мар. 2022 г., 19:03 Bengt Rodehav :
>
> > That was quick!
> >
> > I tried it and it works. I guess asm 9.2.0 supports up to and including
> JDK
> > 18 - right? So in th
:
> I have updated PR branch - increased asm - version for manipulator.
> I have tested build on OpenJDK 17 - it was successful.
> Have a try to test it.
>
> Regards, Alexander
>
> сб, 12 мар. 2022 г. в 00:35, Bengt Rodehav :
>
> > OK - thanks. Please let me know when yo
lem later.
>
> сб, 12 мар. 2022 г. в 00:16, Bengt Rodehav :
>
> > OK - I managed to build the important parts. However, using OpenJDK 17, I
> > get the following build error:
> >
> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > org.apache.felix:maven-ipojo-plugin:1.12.2-
ade in the
manipulator only - but I cannot remember anymore.
/Bengt
Den fre 11 mars 2022 kl 13:10 skrev Bengt Rodehav :
> Thanks Alexander - I'll try that.
>
> It turned out that my initial problem was that I was using OpenJDK 17 for
> the build. When I changed to JDK 8 that error dis
; install*
> Project successfully builds using jdk8 and jdk11.
> (Btw, even if you build it using jdk8 it will properly work on jdk11+)
>
> Regards,
>
> Alexander
>
>
> пт, 11 мар. 2022 г. в 19:30, Bengt Rodehav :
>
> > I am on Windows - hope it is possible to build i
I am on Windows - hope it is possible to build iPojo on Windows.
/Bengt
Den fre 11 mars 2022 kl 10:19 skrev Bengt Rodehav :
> I downloaded the entire Felix code base for this commit. I then attempted
> to build iPojo with "mvn clean install" and got the following error:
&g
built it the wrong way. Can anyone advise me how to build Felix
(or just iPojo)?
/Bengt
Den ons 9 mars 2022 kl 15:55 skrev Bengt Rodehav :
> I haven't done this before. I was hoping someone had newly built iPojo
> jar's I could test.
>
> /Bengt
>
> Den ons 9 mars 2022 kl 15:41 s
ubproject.
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 3:27 PM Bengt Rodehav wrote:
> >
> > I can try. Not familiar with how to create a working JAR from the
> > information in the JIRA though. Alexander, could you build the necessary
> > jar's fo
yet to review the path.
>
> Could you have a look and see if it is working for you?
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 10:14 AM Bengt Rodehav wrote:
> >
> > This is really interesting. We are very dependent on iPojo but we need to
> > move
Sorry, I meant we use OpenJDK 17...
/Bengt
Den fre 4 mars 2022 kl 10:13 skrev Bengt Rodehav :
> This is really interesting. We are very dependent on iPojo but we need to
> move on to newer Java. We use OpenJDK 18 now. Even if iPojo won't be
> maintained as in new features, it woul
This is really interesting. We are very dependent on iPojo but we need to
move on to newer Java. We use OpenJDK 18 now. Even if iPojo won't be
maintained as in new features, it would be very valuable to have the
existing functionality work in newer Java versions.
/Bengt Rodehav
Den fre 4 mars
ut service
dependencies - not configuration properties. Do you think the Condition
service could still be used for depending on a configuration property?
/Bengt
Den ons 8 sep. 2021 kl 10:42 skrev Bengt Rodehav :
> David,
>
> Yes controlling by adding and removing configuration
ndidate of Felix SCR 2.2.0-RC1 will be available shortly that
> implements
> > the latest OSGi R8 release candidate APIs. The final release of OSGi R8
> > compendium will hopefully be released by October. All of that means that
> > it is not available in Karaf at this time.
ed by October. All of that means that
> it is not available in Karaf at this time.
>
> Tom
>
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 6:14 AM Bengt Rodehav wrote:
>
> > Thanks Karl for your tip.
> >
> > Do you know which version of DS/SCR is required for using the new
> condition
> &
on.html#service.condition
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 10:39 AM Bengt Rodehav wrote:
> >
> > I have noticed that iPojo is not supported any more. That is unfortunate
> > for us since we have built a lot of our functionality on iPojo. It's
> > actually the best compo
I have noticed that iPojo is not supported any more. That is unfortunate
for us since we have built a lot of our functionality on iPojo. It's
actually the best component model I have seen so far.
We need to move on to something else then. What would you suggest? What
alternative is closest to
Bengt Rodehav created FELIX-4432:
Summary: DefaultServiceRankingInterceptor holds duplicate
dependencies
Key: FELIX-4432
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4432
Project: Felix
I looked at maven central to see if the 1.11.1 version was uploaded - which
it is. I was just curious about the date. On maven central the update
date is Jan 20, 2014. This seems strange since the vote was just closed
(Jan 29). How come?
/Bengt
2014-01-29 Clement Escoffier
OK - that explains it
/Bengt
2014-01-30 Clement Escoffier clement.escoff...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On 30 janv. 2014, at 14:54, Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com wrote:
I looked at maven central to see if the 1.11.1 version was uploaded -
which
it is. I was just curious about the date
I did find FileInstall 3.2.8 on maven central now so I assume it is
released.
/Bengt
2013/12/20 Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com
What happened with this release? Seems like the vote fell asleep a bit...
/Bengt
2013/12/10 Felix Meschberger fmesc...@adobe.com
+1
Regards
Felix
What happened with this release? Seems like the vote fell asleep a bit...
/Bengt
2013/12/10 Felix Meschberger fmesc...@adobe.com
+1
Regards
Felix
—
Felix Meschberger | Principal Scientist | Adobe
Am 09.12.2013 um 09:48 schrieb Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org:
I'd like to
Bengt Rodehav created FELIX-4351:
Summary: @Updated does not pass the current configuration
Key: FELIX-4351
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4351
Project: Felix
Issue Type
Bengt Rodehav created FELIX-4338:
Summary: Incorrect overwriting of properties that have not been
changed
Key: FELIX-4338
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4338
Project: Felix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bengt Rodehav updated FELIX-4338:
-
Attachment: ConfigInstaller.java.patch
Changes the setConfig() method to parse the configuration
Bengt Rodehav created FELIX-4332:
Summary: Incorrect evalution of variables
Key: FELIX-4332
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4332
Project: Felix
Issue Type: Bug
a bundle but make it available via the system
bundle (i.e., use a version that you have outside and delegate it down).
regards,
Karl
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com wrote:
Hello Charles,
I recently had a similar problem that I brought up on the Karaf user
that in felix and you have to do that yourself. In any case, the spec is
mum on the issue.
regards,
Karl
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. One question though:
The problem I had (log4j classes were present in jar:s
Hello Charles,
I recently had a similar problem that I brought up on the Karaf user list:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/karaf-user/201211.mbox/%3CCAJ0TPG%2BERzf6Q709cndh-YqfP_HQq%3DVk6iA4ZQfEtZE7tJPWUw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Although my problem was that the application classloader had
Perfect - thanks!
/Bengt
2012/11/6 Clement Escoffier clement.escoff...@gmail.com
Hi,
It's time to close the vote. The vote is successful.
I will upload the artifacts right now.
Thanks and regards,
Clement
On 28 oct. 2012, at 17:30, Clement Escoffier clement.escoff...@gmail.com
What happened to this vote? I'm looking forward to this release since I
have problems using the current version.
/Bengt
2012/10/30 Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com
+1
regards,
Karl
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org
wrote:
+1
Carsten
-3487
Project: Felix
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: File Install
Affects Versions: fileinstall-3.2.2
Environment: Karaf 2.2.5
Reporter: Bengt Rodehav
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Priority: Minor
Again thanks a lot,
/Bengt
2012/6/11 Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com
I need to see if there are other issues to work on before cutting a
release, but I'll add that on my todo list for sure.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com wrote:
Thanks a lot for fixing
Bengt Rodehav created FELIX-3487:
Summary: Variables are not preserved during write-back if they are
defined as framework properties
Key: FELIX-3487
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3487
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bengt Rodehav updated FELIX-3487:
-
Attachment: ConfigInstaller.patch
Properties.patch
Note that the utils project
Bengt Rodehav created FELIX-3488:
Summary: Improve documentation for the
felix.fileinstall.enableConfigSave property
Key: FELIX-3488
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3488
Project
Bengt Rodehav created FELIX-3489:
Summary: Make it possible to specify the
felix.fileinstall.enableConfigSave per directory
Key: FELIX-3489
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3489
Components: iPOJO
Affects Versions: iPOJO-1.6.0
Reporter: Bengt Rodehav
Priority: Minor
I use iPOJO and configuration admin. When certain configuration properties
change, I want to restart my iPOJO instance. I e I want the instance to
become invalid and then valid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12934446#action_12934446
]
Bengt Rodehav commented on FELIX-2694:
--
Sounds really good. Thanks Clement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12933344#action_12933344
]
Bengt Rodehav commented on FELIX-2694:
--
Works perfectly Clement - excellent job!
Now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12932884#action_12932884
]
Bengt Rodehav commented on FELIX-2694:
--
Unfortunately there seems to still be some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12932660#action_12932660
]
Bengt Rodehav commented on FELIX-2694:
--
I've tested against trunk again. Turns out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12919186#action_12919186
]
Bengt Rodehav commented on FELIX-2636:
--
I've tried the latest trunk now. Seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12919249#action_12919249
]
Bengt Rodehav commented on FELIX-2636:
--
Thanks a lot Clement.
Yes, you'r right
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12919058#action_12919058
]
Bengt Rodehav commented on FELIX-2636:
--
Great Clement!
I'll try the latest trunk
Issue Type: Bug
Components: iPOJO
Affects Versions: iPOJO-1.4.0
Reporter: Bengt Rodehav
Controlling the validity of an iPOJO instance as follows doesn't work:
@Controller
@Property(name = connect.enabled, mandatory = true)
private boolean mValid = false;
When
I had the same problem a while back. I was informed that since Karaf also
supports Java 1.5 (which doesnt have these packages), they should not by
default be imported by Karaf.
See the following:
http://old.nabble.com/Karaf-1.4.0-and-ActiveMQ-5.3.1-td28191404.html
/Bengt
2010/6/14
Versions: karaf 1.6.0
Reporter: Bengt Rodehav
I'm using camel-ftp for secure ftps connections. This requires encryption and
thus access to extensions. Karaf.bat sets the following system property on the
java command line:
-Djava.ext.dirs=%JAVA_HOME%\lib\ext;%KARAF_HOME%\lib\ext
: Karaf
Affects Versions: karaf 1.6.0
Reporter: Bengt Rodehav
Changes related to Karaf startup has been done in Karaf 1.6.0 but those changes
have not been reflected in the configuration of the Wrapper service. I had to
do the following changes in karaf-wrapper.conf to get Karaf
Versions: karaf 1.6.0
Reporter: Bengt Rodehav
features-maven-plugin does not take the classifier into account when resolving
the artifact. This is due to an incorrect usage of the ArtifactFactory in the
class AddFeaturesToRepoMojo. The call:
artifact = this.factory.createArtifact
and i've fixed that as part of
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2307
Basically, just add '\' before the '{' and '}' and it should work:
file://inbox?move=backup/$\{date:now:yyyMMdd\}/$\{file:name\}
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 23:22, Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com wrote:
Hello
Issue Type: Bug
Components: File Install
Affects Versions: fileinstall-3.0.0
Reporter: Bengt Rodehav
To avoid property substitution, an escape character was introduced in version
3.0.0 of File Install. The idea is that if I want to send the configuration
value
${propkey
for that ?
As a workaround, you can try:
file://inbox?move=backup/$\{date:now:yyyMMdd\}/$\{file:name\}${#}
It will force a substitution, and thus will remove the escape chars.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:11, Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com wrote:
Hello Guillaume,
Thanks for your reply. However, if I
Yeah, that makes more sense.
2010/5/28 Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com
I think the loop is correct, even though very weird.
I guess it should read as:
if (stopDelim = 0)
{
while (true)
{
...
}
}
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:01, Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com wrote
around this? Any clues?
/Bengt
2010/5/26 Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com
I'm using the File Install component and cannot find a way to set values
like ${abc} (without the quotes). File install insists on performing
property substitution which I do not want in this case. I noticed that this
seems
I'm using the File Install component and cannot find a way to set values
like ${abc} (without the quotes). File install insists on performing
property substitution which I do not want in this case. I noticed that this
seems to have been addressed in version 3.0.0 but I cannot get it to work.
My
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868556#action_12868556
]
Bengt Rodehav commented on FELIX-2329:
--
Perfect - will test as soon as possible
I was kind of hoping to get FELIX-2329 into Karaf 1.6.0.
/Bengt
2010/5/14 Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com
Guillaume,
I have to outstanding patches: FELIX-2327 FELIX-2330.
Thanks,
Jarek
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com
wrote:
All the snapshots
Project: Felix
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Karaf
Affects Versions: karaf-1.4.0
Reporter: Bengt Rodehav
Presently the fatures-maven-plugin cannot handle URL's starting with anything
else than mvn: and wrap:. As long as mvn: exists later on in the URL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12865049#action_12865049
]
Bengt Rodehav commented on FELIX-2329:
--
Attached to this issue is a modified version
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bengt Rodehav updated FELIX-2329:
-
Attachment: AddFeaturesToRepoMojo.java
Improve the URL handling in features-maven-plugin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bengt Rodehav updated FELIX-2329:
-
Attachment: AddFeaturesToRepoMojo.diff
Diff file containing the changes made
84 matches
Mail list logo
